scholarly journals PL3.5 Efficacy and safety of selinexor in recurrent glioblastoma

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii3-iii4 ◽  
Author(s):  
A B Lassman ◽  
P Y Wen ◽  
M van den Bent ◽  
S R Plotkin ◽  
A Walenkamp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Partial Responder

Abstract BACKGROUND New treatment modalities are needed for recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM). Selinexor is a novel, oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export which forces nuclear retention of tumor suppressor proteins including p53 and p27, leading to apoptosis. We previously reported interim results showing tolerability, preliminary efficacy, and blood-brain barrier penetration in a surgical cohort (N=8). We now report updated results following completion of accrual to non-surgical cohorts (N=68). MATERIALS AND METHODS This is an open-label, multicenter, phase 2 study of selinexor monotherapy. Patients (pts) not undergoing surgery for measurable rGBM per response assessment neuro-oncology criteria (RANO) were enrolled in one of 3 arms encompassing different dosing schedules of selinexor (50 mg/m2 [~ 85 mg] BIW, 60 mg BIW, and 80 mg QW). Treatment was continuous, although cycles were defined as 28 days and response was assessed every other cycle by MRI. Prior treatment with radiotherapy and temozolomide was required and prior bevacizumab was exclusionary. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression free survival (6mPFS) rate, calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS 76 pts were enrolled; 24, 14 and 30 pts on doses of ~85 mg BIW, 60 mg BIW, and 80 mg QW, respectively. Median age was 56 years (range 21–78). Median number of prior treatments was 2 (range 1–7) At the end of the 6 cycles, 30.2% pts on 80 mg QW were free from progression. The 6mPFS rate on 80 mg QW was 18.9%. Best RANO-defined responses (assessed locally) among 26 evaluable pts on 80 mg QW included 1 complete response, 2 partial responses, 7 stable disease, and 16 with progressive disease. Complete and partial responses were durable: the complete and a partial responder remain on selinexor for 393 and 1093 days respectively, as of the cut-off date. Median duration of response was 10.8 months. The most common related adverse events (all grades) in pts on ~85 mg BIW/60 mg BIW/80 mg QW were nausea (42%/64%/63%), leukopenia (38%/7%/43%), fatigue (71%/71%/47%), neutropenia (29%/14%/33%), decreased appetite (46%/71%/27%), and thrombocytopenia (67%/29%/23%). CONCLUSION Selinexor demonstrated efficacy, with durable responses and disease stabilization in rGBM. Based on the favorable efficacy and safety profile, selinexor at a dose of 80 mg QW is recommended for further development in rGBM.

Efficacy and safety of selinexor in recurrent glioblastoma.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2005-2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew B. Lassman ◽  
Patrick Y. Wen ◽  
Martin J. Van Den Bent ◽  
Scott Randall Plotkin ◽  
Anna Maria Elisabeth Walenkamp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Nuclear Retention ◽  
Disease Stabilization

2005 Background: New treatment modalities are needed for recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM). Selinexor (SEL) is a novel, oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export which forces nuclear retention of tumor suppressor proteins including p53 and p27, leading to apoptosis. We previously reported interim results showing tolerability, preliminary efficacy, and blood-brain barrier penetration in a surgical cohort (N = 8). We now report updated results following completion of accrual to non-surgical cohorts (N = 68). Methods: This is an open-label, multicenter, phase 2 study of SEL monotherapy. Patients (pts) not undergoing surgery for measurable rGBM (per RANO) were enrolled in one of 3 arms encompassing different dosing schedules. Treatment was continuous, although cycles were defined as 28 days and response was assessed every other cycle by MRI. Prior treatment with radiotherapy and temozolomide was required and prior bevacizumab was exclusionary. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression free survival (6mPFS) rate, calculated by the Kaplan Meier method. Results: A total of 76 pts were enrolled. Median age was 56 years (range 21-78). Median number of prior treatments was 2 (range 1-7). At the end of the 6 cycles, 30.2% patients on 80 mg QW were free from progression. The 6mPFS rate on 80 mg QW was 15.1%. Best RANO-defined responses (assessed locally) among 26 evaluable pts on 80 mg QW included 1 complete response, 2 partial responses, 7 stable disease, and 16 with progressive disease. Median duration of response was 10.8 months. The most common related adverse events in pts on ~85 mg BIW/60 mg BIW/80 mg QW were nausea (42%/64%/60%), leukopenia (38%/7%/43%), fatigue (71%/71%/43%), neutropenia (29%/14%/33%), decreased appetite (46%/71%/27%), and thrombocytopenia (67%/29%/23%). Conclusions: SEL demonstrated efficacy, with durable responses and disease stabilization in rGBM. Based on the favorable efficacy and safety profile, SEL at a dose of 80 mg QW is recommended for further development in rGBM. Clinical trial information: NCT01986348. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals CTNI-18. FINAL RESULTS OF A PHASE 2 STUDY OF EFFICACY, SAFETY AND INTRATUMORAL PHARMACOKINETICS (PK) OF SELINEXOR MONOTHERAPY IN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA (rGBM)

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii46-ii46
Author(s):  
Andrew Lassman ◽  
Patrick Wen ◽  
Martin van den Bent ◽  
Scott Plotkin ◽  
Annemiek Walenkamp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Nuclear Retention ◽  
Phase 2 Trial ◽  
Human Gbm

Abstract BACKGROUND Selinexor is an FDA-approved first-in-class, oral selective nuclear export inhibitor which forces nuclear retention of many tumor suppressor proteins. METHODS We conducted a phase 2 trial of selinexor monotherapy for adults with recurrent GBM including a surgical arm to explore intratumoral PK and 3 medical arms to optimize dosing. Prior treatment with radiotherapy and temozolomide was required; prior bevacizumab was exclusionary. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (6mPFS) rate. RESULTS Selinexor administered ~2 hours pre-operatively yieleded average intratumoral concentration (136 nM, n=6) comparable to the in vitro IC50 (130 nM) from 7 primary human GBM cell lines. Among all 68 patients accrued to 3 medical arms (~85 mg BIW, n=24; 60 mg BIW, n=14; 80 mg QW, n=30), median age was 56 years (21–78). Median number of prior lines of therapies was 2 (1–7). At 80 mg QW, 28% patients were progression-free at the end of cycle 6; the 6mPFS was 17%; disese control rate by RANO was 37% (1 CR, 2 PRs, 7 SD) among 27 evaluable patients; responses were durable (median 11.1 months), and treatment lasted for 442, 547 and 1282 days in 3 responders, as of data lock, with one responder remaining on treatment off study; median overall survival was 10.2 months with 95% CI (7.0, 15.4). The ~85 mg BIW-schedule was abandoned due to poor tolerability. The related adverse events (all grades) in patients on ~85 mg BIW/60 mg BIW/80 mg QW were nausea (41.7%/64.3%/66.7%), fatigue (70.8%/71.4%/50.0%), neutropenia (29.2%/14.3%/33.3%), decreased appetite (45.8%/71.4%/26.7%), thrombocytopenia (66.7%/28.6%/23.3%) and weight loss (16.7%,/42.9%/6.7%). CONCLUSION Selinexor monotherapy demonstrated encouraging intratumoral penetration and efficacy, with durable disease control in rGBM. Monotherapy dose at 80 mg QW is recommended for further development in rGBM. A phase 1/2 study of combination therapy for newly diagnosed or rGBM has been initiated (NCT04421378).

Obinutuzumab short-duration infusion (SDI) in previously untreated advanced follicular lymphoma: Results from the end of induction analysis of the phase IV GAZELLE study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7545-7545
Author(s):  
Miguel Angel A. Canales Albendea ◽  
Thomas A. Buchholz ◽  
Koji Izutsu ◽  
Takayuki Ishikawa ◽  
Laura Maria Fogliatto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Phase Iv

7545 Background: Obinutuzumab (G)-chemotherapy (chemo) has demonstrated improved progression-free survival compared with rituximab (R)-chemo in previously untreated advanced follicular lymphoma (FL). G is currently administered by IV infusion over ̃3–4 hours. A shorter duration of infusion in Cycle (C) 2 and subsequent cycles, as is standard practice with R, could improve convenience for patients (pts) and efficiency for infusion facilities. We report the primary analysis of the prospective, open-label, multicenter, single-arm, Phase IV, GAZELLE study (NCT03817853), which evaluated the safety of G administered as a 90-minute (min) SDI from C2 onwards in pts with FL. Methods: Pts with previously untreated FL received G (1000mg) intravenously on Day (D) 1, 8, and 15 of C1, and on D1 thereafter, plus chemo (bendamustine, CHOP, or CVP) for 6–8 cycles. In C1, pts received G at the standard infusion rate. Pts without a Grade (Gr) ≥3 infusion-related reaction (IRR) in C1 were eligible to receive G as a 90-min SDI from C2. Pts with a Gr 3 IRR in C1 received the standard G infusion in C2, and were eligible for G SDI in subsequent cycles if no Gr ≥3 IRRs occurred. Pts with a second Gr 3/4 IRR discontinued G. At the end of induction (EOI), responding pts received maintenance G (1000mg) as SDI for 2 years or until disease progression (PD). The primary endpoint was incidence of Gr ≥3 IRRs during C2. IRRs were defined as any event occurring ≤24 hours from infusion judged to be related to treatment. Secondary endpoints included adverse events (AEs) and investigator-assessed overall response rate at EOI. Results: As of December 3, 2020, 113 pts had received study treatment. Median age was 62.0 years, 50.4% were male, 61.9% had stage IV FL, and 45.1% were classified as high-risk FLIPI. Of the 110 pts who were eligible for G SDI from C2, no pt experienced a Gr ≥3 IRR with SDI in C2 (Table). One pt experienced a Gr 3 IRR with SDI in C5, presenting hypertension. All other IRRs with SDI were Gr 1/2. No Gr 4/5 IRRs were reported. Other AEs were similar to those observed in previous studies. At the clinical cut-off date, 104 pts had a CT imaging-based response assessment at EOI and 9 pts had no response assessment; 76/113 (67.3%) had a complete response, 22 (19.5%) had a partial response, and six (5.8%) had PD. Conclusions: In GAZELLE, G SDI in C2 and beyond appeared to be safe. No Gr 3 IRRs were observed in C2 and only one Gr 3 IRR was reported in subsequent cycles. The safety profile of G SDI was comparable with the established profile of G in advanced FL. Clinical trial information: NCT03817853. [Table: see text]

NIMG-54. RADIOMIC FEATURES FROM LESION HABITAT PREDICT RESPONSE TO COMBINATION OF NIVOLUMAB AND BEVACIZUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA: A FEASIBILITY STUDY

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi141-vi141
Author(s):  
Ruchika Verma ◽  
Yasmeen Rauf ◽  
Ipsa Yadav ◽  
Volodymyr Statsevych ◽  
Jonathan Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Poor Response ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Proportional Hazard ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazard ◽  
Expert Radiologist ◽  
Mri Scans

Abstract PURPOSE The use of immunotherapy in glioblastoma management is under active investigation. Glioblastomas are “cold” tumors, meaning that they have inactivated or fewer tumor infiltrative lymphocytes in addition to substantial tumor necrosis, attributing to their poor response to immunotherapy. A significant challenge is the apriori identification of Glioblastoma patients who will respond favorably to immunotherapy. In this work, we evaluated the ability of computerized MRI-based quantitative features (radiomics) extracted from the lesion habitat (including enhancing lesion, necrosis, and peritumoral hyperintensities) to predict response and progression-free survival (PFS) in recurrent GBM patients treated with combination of Nivolumab and Bevacizumab. METHODS Immunotherapy response assessment in neuro-oncology (iRANO) criteria along with PFS were used to analyze n=50 patients enrolled in a randomized clinical trial where patients received Nivolumab with either standard or low dose Bevacizumab. These patients were assessed to see if they had complete response, partial response, stable disease (i.e. responders, n=31), or disease progression (i.e. non-responders, n=19). Lesion habitat constituting necrotic core, enhancing tumor, and edema were delineated by expert radiologist on Gd-T1w, T2w and FLAIR MRI scans. COLIAGE radiomic features from each of the delineated regions were selected using minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) via cross-validation, to segregate non-responder patients from responders. A multivariable cox proportional hazard model was used to predict survival (PFS). RESULTS CoLlAGe correlation, sum average, and sum variance features (capture local heterogeneity) from the lesion habitat, were found to segregate non-responder patients from responders with an accuracy of 86%, followed by 80% using features from peritumoral hyperintensities and 78% from enhancing tumor. In our survival analysis, C-index of 0.688 was obtained using features from the entire lesion habitat, followed by peritumoral hyperintensities (0.675) and enhancing tumor (0.656). CONCLUSION Radiomic features from the lesion habitat may predict response to combination of Nivolumab and Bevacizumab in recurrent Glioblastomas.

DREAMM-9: Phase III study of belantamab mafodotin plus VRd versus VRd alone in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (TI NDMM).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS8556-TPS8556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saad Zafar Usmani ◽  
Evangelos Terpos ◽  
Wojt Janowski ◽  
Hang Quach ◽  
Sarah West ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label

TPS8556 Background: Bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) is the standard of care for transplant-eligible and TI NDMM, but relapse is usually inevitable. The median progression-free survival (PFS) is ~3 years for patients with TI NDMM, and with each relapse, the duration of response (DoR) diminishes, highlighting the need for novel, effective, targeted agents. Single-agent belantamab mafodotin is a first-in-class B-cell maturation antigen–binding, humanized, afucosylated, monoclonal immunoconjugate, showing deep and durable responses in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma ( Lancet Oncol2020). Preclinical work suggests belantamab mafodotin plus bortezomib or lenalidomide enhances anti-myeloma activity. Therefore, studying clinical activity of belantamab mafodotin in combination with these agents is warranted. Methods: DREAMM-9 (NCT04091126) is a two-part, open-label study to determine efficacy and safety of single-agent belantamab mafodotin with VRd vs. VRd alone in patients with TI NDMM. Patients aged ≥18 years with ECOG status 0–2 and adequate organ system functions will be eligible. Part 1 (dose selection) will evaluate safety/tolerability of belantamab mafodotin with VRd administered by single (Day 1) or split dosing (Days 1 and 8) in ≤5 cohorts (n = 12/cohort): 1.9 mg/kg, 2.5 mg/kg split and single, and 3.4 mg/kg split and single. Six more patients may be added to cohort(s) most likely to be selected as recommended Phase III dose (RP3D). Dose-limiting toxicities and adverse events (AEs) will be assessed, and belantamab mafodotin RP3D determined through modified toxicity probability interval criteria. Part 2 (randomized Phase III) will determine efficacy and safety of belantamab mafodotin at RP3D with VRd vs. VRd alone (n = 750) in two arms randomized 1:1. Dual primary endpoints will be rate of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity and PFS. Secondary endpoints will be response rates (overall response, complete response, very good partial response or better, sustained MRD negativity), DoR, time to progression, and overall survival. Safety assessment will include AEs, serious AEs and ocular findings. In both parts, belantamab mafodotin will be given with VRd for eight induction cycles and then with Rd for maintenance until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Funding: GlaxoSmithKline (209664). Drug linker technology licensed from Seattle Genetics; monoclonal antibody produced using POTELLIGENT Technology licensed from BioWa. Clinical trial information: NCT04091126 .

Selinexor, daratumumab, and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8510-8510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Gasparetto ◽  
Suzanne Lentzsch ◽  
Gary J. Schiller ◽  
Natalie Scott Callander ◽  
Sascha Tuchman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Open Label Phase

8510 Background: Selinexor is a first-in-class oral Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) compound that binds and inactivates exportin 1 (XPO1). Selinexor in combination with low dose dexamethasone (Sel-dex) was approved by the FDA, based on data from the STORM study, wherein Sel-dex induced an overall response rate (ORR) of 26.2% in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM). Single agent daratumumab has demonstrated an ORR of 29% in MM reftactory to proteasome inhibitors (PIs)/immunomodulatory drug (IMiDs). We evaluated the safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of the combination of Sel-dex and daratumumab (SDd) in pts with MM refractory to PIs/IMiDs. Methods: This is a multicenter, open-label, phase 1b/2 dose escalation and expansion study. Pts were eligible if they had received ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy, including a PI and an IMiD, or whose MM was refractory to a PI and an IMiD. In the expansion phase, pts were required to be anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody-naïve. One dose level was tested at each schedule: selinexor once-weekly (QW at 100 mg) or twice-weekly (BIW at 60 mg) with dexamethasone 40 mg. Daratumumab 16 mg/kg IV was administered per label. Primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), and assess safety, tolerability and efficacy of SDd in pts with RRMM. Results: A total of 34 pts were enrolled; 3 in the 60 mg BIW and 31 in the 100 mg QW cohorts. Median age was 69 and median number of prior treatment regimens was 3 (range, 1–10). Out of 34 pts, 62% and 65% were refractory to bortezomib and lenalidomide respectively. Common treatment related adverse events (all grades, grades 3/4) included: thrombocytopenia (71%, 47%), fatigue (62%, 18%), nausea (71%, 9%), anemia (62%, 32%) and neutropenia (50%, 26%). Two dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were reported in the 60 mg BIW cohort: Grade 3 thrombocytopenia and Grade 2 fatigue requiring dose reduction in selinexor to 100 mg QW. In the 100 mg QW escalation cohort (n = 6), no DLTs occured. 32 patients were evaluable for efficacy. The ORR was 73% (11 VGPR, 11 PR) for 30 daratumumab-naïve pts. Median progression-free survival was 12.5 months in both groups. Conclusions: Based on tolerability and efficacy, the RP2D of SDd is selinexor 100 mg, daratumumab 16 mg/kg and dexamethasone 40 mg, administered QW. In pts with PI and IMiD refractory MM, weekly SDd demonstrated promising activity with an ORR of 73% in daratumumab-naïve pts and a median PFS of 12.5 months. This supports further development of a novel non-PI, non-IMiD backbone in earlier lines of therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02343042 .

scholarly journals Bintrafusp alfa (M7824) a bifunctional fusion protein targeting TGF-β and PD-L1: results from a phase 1 expansion cohort in patients with recurrent glioblastoma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Khasraw ◽  
Michael Weller ◽  
David Lorente ◽  
Kathryn Kolibaba ◽  
Chee Khoon Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fusion Protein ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Bifunctional Fusion Protein ◽  
Expansion Cohort

Abstract Background For patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM), there are few options following treatment failure with radiotherapy plus temozolomide. Bintrafusp alfa is a first-in-class bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of the TGF-βRII receptor (a TGF-β “trap”) fused to a human IgG1 antibody blocking PD-L1. Methods In this phase 1, open-label expansion cohort, (NCT02517398), patients with rGBM that progressed after radiotherapy plus temozolomide received bintrafusp alfa 1200 mg Q2W until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or trial withdrawal. Response was assessed per RANO criteria. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR); secondary endpoints included safety. Results As of August 24, 2018, 35 patients received bintrafusp alfa for a median of 1.8 (range, 0.5-20.7) months. Eight patients (22.9%) experienced disease control as assessed by an independent review committee: 2 had a partial response, 4 had stable disease, and 2 had non–complete response /non–progressive disease. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.4 (95% CI, 1.2-1.6) months; 6- and 12-month PFS rates were 15.1% and 11.3%, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 5.3 (95% CI, 2.6-9.4) months; 6- and 12-month OS rates were 44.5% and 30.8%, respectively. The DCR (95% CI) was 66.7% (22.3-95.7%) for patients with IDH-mutant GBM (n=6) and 13.8% (3.9-31.7%) for patients with IDH–wild-type GBM (n=29). Disease control was seen regardless of PD-L1 expression. Twenty-five patients (71.4%) experienced treatment-related adverse events (grade ≥3; 17.1% [n=6]). Conclusions The percentage of patients achieving disease control and the manageable safety profile may warrant further investigation of bintrafusp alfa in GBM.

scholarly journals Retrospective Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Anlotinib Combined With Dose-Dense Temozolomide in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei She ◽  
Lin Su ◽  
Liangfang Shen ◽  
Chao Liu
Keyword(s):  
Survival Curve ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
Rano Criteria ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Dose Dense

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze the safety and clinical efficacy of anlotinib combined with dose-dense temozolomide (TMZ) as the first-line therapy in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM).Patients and MethodsWe collected the clinical data of 20 patients with rGBM. All patients received anlotinib (12 mg daily, orally for 2 weeks, discontinued for 1 week, repeated every 3 weeks) combined with dose-dense TMZ (100 mg/m2, 7 days on with 7 days off) until the disease progressed (PD) or adverse effects (AEs) above grade 4 appeared. Grade 3 AEs need to be restored to grade 2 before continuing treatment, and the daily dose of anlotinib is reduced to 10 mg. The patients were reexamined by head magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) every 1 to 3 months. The therapeutic effect was evaluated according to Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria. The survival rate was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis. The baseline of all survival index statistics was the start of anlotinib combined with dose-dense of TMZ. National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Events version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE 4.0) was used to evaluate AEs.ResultsTwenty cases of rGBM were evaluated according to the RANO criteria after treatment with anlotinib and dose-dense TMZ, including five cases of stable disease (SD), thirteen cases of partial response (PR), one case of complete response (CR), and one case of PD. The median follow-up time was 13.4 (95% CI, 10.5–16.3) months. The 1-year overall survival (OS) rate was 47.7%. The 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 55%. In the IDH wild type group, the median PFS and median OS were 6.1 and 11.9 months, respectively. We observed that AEs associated with treatment were tolerable. One patient stopped taking the drug because of cerebral infarction. There were no treatment-related deaths.ConclusionAnlotinib combined with dose-dense TMZ for the first-line therapy showed good efficacy in OS, PFS, ORR, and DCR in the treatment of rGBM, and the AEs were tolerant. Randomized controlled clinical trials investigating the treatment of rGBM with anlotinib are necessary.

Selinexor containing regimens in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) previously treated with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (αCD38 mAbs).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20020-e20020
Author(s):  
Cristina Gasparetto ◽  
Brea Lipe ◽  
Sascha Tuchman ◽  
Nizar J. Bahlis ◽  
Heather J. Sutherland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Functional Inactivation ◽  
Dose Modifications

e20020 Background: Exportin 1 (XPO1) mediates the nuclear export and functional inactivation of tumor suppressor proteins, is required for MM growth, is associated with poor prognosis in MM and mediates resistance to standard MM therapies. Selinexor (SEL) is a first-in-class, oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compound approved in combination with dexamethasone (dex) ± bortezomib for patients (pts) with previously treated MM. Once MM becomes refractory to αCD38 mAb, pts have limited effective treatment options and poor prognosis. Overall response rate (ORR) to the first regimen after refractoriness to an αCD38 mAb is 31%, median progression-free survival (mPFS) is 3.4 months (m), and median overall survival (mOS) is 8.6 m. The doublet SEL-dex (Xd) has shown ORR ̃26% in triple-class (IMID, PI, αCD38 mAb) refractory MM; SEL-based triplets could be more effective in this population. Methods: STOMP (Selinexor and Backbone Treatments of Multiple Myeloma Patients) is a multi-arm, open-label, Phase 1b/2 study evaluating SEL in various triplet combinations. Here, we retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of SEL-containing triplets in pts previously treated with αCD38 mAbs. Pts received SEL-dex (Xd) plus pomalidomide (XPd, n = 19), bortezomib (XVd, n = 4), lenalidomide (XRd, n = 4), daratumumab (XDd, n = 2) or carfilzomib (XKd, n = 18). ORR, mOS, mPFS and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed. Results: Among the 47 pts, median age 64 yrs, female 53%, median time from diagnosis 5.1 yrs, median number of prior regimens 5 (range, 2–11). Prior daratumumab (96%), isatuximab (4%); 96% had MM refractory to aCD38 mAb, 81% had triple-class refractory MM, 74% and 47% were quad- and penta-exposed, 43% and 15% had quad- and penta-refractory MM. αCD38 mAb was included in the immediate prior regimen of 57% of pts and median duration from end of most recent aCD38 mAb therapy to first dose of study treatment was 6.9 weeks (range, 2.6-114.9). ORR was 51% among the 45 evaluable pts, 59% in the XPd arm (n = 17; 2 pts were not efficacy evaluable) and 67% in the XKd arm. ORR was 47% (9/19) among pts with quad-refractory MM and evaluable efficacy. Among all evaluable pts mPFS was 8.8 m (95% CI: 4.9, NE) and mOS was 20.4 m (95% CI: 9.6, NE). Among the 25 pts with αCD38 mAb in their immediate prior regimen, efficacy was similar to that regimen: ORR 52% vs. 45%, mPFS 8.8 vs. 9.3 m. The most common treatment emergent AEs were nausea (72%), anemia (64%), thrombocytopenia (60%), fatigue (57%), which were managed with standard supportive care and dose modifications. Conclusions: SEL-containing triplets in pts with MM previously treated with αCD38 mAbs, most of whom had triple-class refractory MM, exhibit tolerability and comparable effectiveness to their most recent αCD38 mAb-containing regimens. Compared to historical control, mOS was much higher among these patients. Further investigation is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT02343042.

Sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132) in patients with previously treated metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC): Results from a phase I/II study.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 354-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott T. Tagawa ◽  
Bishoy Morris Faltas ◽  
Elaine Tat Lam ◽  
Philip James Saylor ◽  
Aditya Bardia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer

354 Background: Patients (pts) with mUC who progress after platinum (PLT)-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy have poor outcomes and limited treatment options. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a novel antibody-drug conjugate. It consists of a monoclonal antibody targeting Trop-2, an epithelial cell surface antigen overexpressed in UC, conjugated to the active metabolite of irinotecan (SN38). Methods: We performed a phase I/II basket study in pts with advanced solid tumors receiving intravenous SG administered on day 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles, until progression or unacceptable toxicity. CT/MRI scans were obtained at 8-week intervals for response assessment. We evaluated pts with mUC who progressed after ≥1 prior systemic therapy and were treated with SG at the 10 mg/kg dose level. Endpoints included safety, objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1, clinical benefit rate (CBR; complete response [CR], partial response [PR], or else SD ≥6-mo), and Kaplan-Meier estimated duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: 45 pts (41M/4F; median age 67, range 49-90; ECOG 0/1: 31%/69%) received a median of 2 (range: 1-6) prior treatment lines, including PLT-based chemotherapy (95%) and CPI (38%). 33 had visceral metastases involving liver (n=15), lung (n=27), and other organs (n=5). The ORR was 31% (14/45), with 2 CR and 12 PR. In pts with visceral involvement, the ORR was 27% (9/33). The ORR in CPI-treated pts was 23% (4/17). The median DOR was 12.6 mo (2 pts continuing >2 y), and the CBR was 47% (21/45). Median PFS and OS were 7.3 mo and 18.9 mo, respectively. The AE profile was consistent with prior reports. Grade ≥3 AEs in ≥5% of pts were neutropenia/neutrophil count decreased (38%), anemia (11%), hypophosphatemia (11%), diarrhea (9%), fatigue (9%), and febrile neutropenia (7%). Conclusions: SG demonstrated clinical activity in pts with relapsed/refractory mUC, including CPI-treated pts and pts with visceral disease. A single-arm, open-label, global phase 2 trial is underway to evaluate antitumor activity and safety of SG in advanced UC.(TROPHY-U-01; NCT03547973). Clinical trial information: NCT03547973.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document