scholarly journals MET-11 Recent advances in targeted therapies and immunotherapy for metastatic brain tumors

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi26-vi26
Author(s):  
Yuichi Ando

Abstract This presentation outlines CQ2 of Chapter 2 from the forthcoming updated version of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Brain Tumors, edited by the Society. These guidelines discuss chemotherapy and other drug therapies for metastatic brain tumors in adult patients. First, there is no noteworthy change in the principle of prioritizing local treatment of symptomatic metastatic brain tumors or those that require local treatment in the near future. However, with recent advances in molecular-targeted drugs and/or immune checkpoint inhibitors, many physicians now consider starting systemic treatment prior to local treatment of brain metastases, even in patients with solid tumors that were once considered insensitive to chemotherapy, given that their symptoms are well-controlled and do not require urgent treatment. In the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the molecular subtypes of metastatic brain tumors with EGFR mutations and ALK fusion genes have yielded favorable responses to molecular-targeted drugs. Because small molecule drugs are well delivered to the central nervous system, systemic drug therapy with such targeted drugs is commonly selected for patients with untreated metastatic brain tumors. A recent phase II trial has shown the effectiveness of anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab monotherapy for metastatic brain tumors from NSCLC. Because untreated metastatic brain tumors from renal cell carcinoma are prone to bleeding, local treatment of brain metastases should be prioritized before systemic treatment, even if the patient is asymptomatic. Regardless of BRAF mutation status, immune checkpoint inhibitors alone or in combination (nivolumab and ipilimumab) are effective against malignant melanoma with brain metastases; moreover, a combined treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors is effective against BRAF mutation-positive malignant melanoma with brain metastases. A novel HER2 inhibitor, tucatinib (unapproved), is expected to be effective against metastatic brain tumors from HER2-positive breast cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii105-ii105
Author(s):  
Alexander Hulsbergen ◽  
Asad Lak ◽  
Yu Tung Lo ◽  
Nayan Lamba ◽  
Steven Nagtegaal ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTION In several cancers treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), a remarkable association between the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and superior oncological outcomes has been reported. This effect has hitherto not been reported in the brain. This study aimed to investigate the relation between irAEs and outcomes in brain metastases (BM) patients treated with both local treatment to the brain (LT; i.e. surgery and/or radiation) and ICIs. METHODS This study is a retrospective cohort analysis of patients treated for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) BMs in a tertiary institution in Boston, MA. Outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and intracranial progression-free survival (IC-PFS), measured from the time of LT. Sensitivity analyses were performed to account for immortal time bias (i.e., patients who live longer receive more cycles of ICIs and thus have more opportunity to develop an irAE). RESULTS A total of 184 patients were included; 62 (33.7%) were treated with neurosurgical resection and 122 (66.3%) with upfront brain radiation. irAEs occurred in 62 patients (33.7%). After adjusting for lung-Graded Prognostic Assessment, type of LT, type of ICI, newly diagnosed vs. recurrent BM, BM size and number, targetable mutations, and smoking status, irAEs were strongly associated with better OS (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.19 – 0.58, p < 0.0001) and IC-PFS (HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.26 – 0.65; p = 0.0001). Landmark analysis including only patients who received more than 3 cycles of ICI (n = 133) demonstrated similar results for OS and IC-PFS, as did sensitivity analysis adjusting for the number of cycles administered (HR range 0.36 – 0.51, all p-values < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS After adjusting for known prognostic factors, irAEs strongly predict superior outcomes after LT in NSCLC BM patients. Sensitivity analysis suggests that this is unlikely due to immortal time bias.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
Motonobu Nakamura

Treatment of malignant melanoma has made great strides in the last decade. On the one hand, immune checkpoint inhibitors and molecular targeted drugs improved the prognosis of patients. On the other hand, it is very important to be aware of the causes of malignant melanoma based on the latest knowledge. In this review, I will briefly review the carcinogenic mechanism of malignant melanoma from the aspects of ultraviolet rays, mechanical stress, trauma and so on.


Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 3707
Author(s):  
Marcus Skribek ◽  
Konstantinos Rounis ◽  
Dimitrios Makrakis ◽  
Sofia Agelaki ◽  
Dimitris Mavroudis ◽  
...  

There is lack of data addressing the intracranial (IC) efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) on brain metastases (BM) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This patient category is underrepresented in randomized clinical trials. We retrospectively collected clinical data on patients with non-oncogenic driven NSCLC with BM who were treated with ICIs at two medical oncology institutes in Sweden and Greece from 2016 to 2019. IC efficacy was assessed in patients who had not received local treatment for BM less than three months prior to the initiation of ICIs and had adequate radiological evaluation. We screened 280 patients, of which 51 had BM. BM was an independent predictor for inferior PFS (HR = 2.27; 95% CI, 1.53–3.36) but not OS (HR = 1.58; 95% CI, 0.97–2.60) for the whole patient population. IC response assessment was done on 33 patients. IC objective response rate (ORR) was 24.2%. The presence of neurological symptoms related to BM did not affect IC ORR (p = 0.48). High PD-L1 levels from extracranial biopsies were not a predictive factor for IC ORR (p = 0.13). ICIs are active in NSCLC patients with BM regardless of the presence of neurological symptoms and can achieve durable IC disease stabilization in a subgroup of patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. 396-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hayato NOMURA ◽  
Osamu YAMASAKI ◽  
Tatsuya KAJI ◽  
Hiroshi WAKABAYASHI ◽  
Yoshia MIYAWAKI ◽  
...  

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 501
Author(s):  
Tadahiro Shoji ◽  
Chie Sato ◽  
Hidetoshi Tomabechi ◽  
Eriko Takatori ◽  
Yoshitaka Kaido ◽  
...  

The incidence of ovarian cancer, which has had a poor prognosis, is increasing annually. Currently, the prognosis is expected to improve with the use of molecular-targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors as maintenance therapies after the first-line chemotherapy. The GOG218 and ICON7 studies reported the usefulness of bevacizumab and the SOLO-1 and PRIMA (A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study of Niraparib Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer Following Response on Front-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy) studies have reported the usefulness of olaparib and niraparib, respectively. The ATHENA study investigating the usefulness of rucaparib is currently ongoing. Although clinical studies of immune checkpoint inhibitors are lagging in the field of gynecology, many clinical studies using programmed death cell-1 (PD-1) and PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibodies are currently ongoing. Some biomarkers have been identified for molecular-targeted drugs, but none have been identified for immune checkpoint inhibitors, which is a challenge that should be addressed in the future.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (13) ◽  
pp. 7201
Author(s):  
In-Ho Kim ◽  
Hyo-Jin Lee

Radical cystectomy is the primary treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer; however, approximately 50% of patients develop metastatic disease within 2 years of diagnosis, which results in dismal prognosis. Therefore, systemic treatment is important to improve the prognosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Currently, several guidelines recommend cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical cystectomy, and adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended in patients who have not received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have recently become the standard treatment option for metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Owing to their clinical benefits, several immune checkpoint inhibitors, with or without other agents (including other immunotherapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and emerging agents such as antibody drug conjugates), are being extensively investigated in perioperative settings. Several studies for perioperative immunotherapy have shown that immune checkpoint inhibitors have promising efficacy with relatively low toxicity, and have explored the predictive molecular biomarkers. Herein, we review the current evidence and discuss the future perspectives of perioperative systemic treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.


2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 368-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keisuke Imafuku ◽  
Koji Yoshino ◽  
Kei Yamaguchi ◽  
Satoshi Tsuboi ◽  
Kuniaki Ohara ◽  
...  

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have drastically changed in the treatment of many kinds of malignancies, especially malignant melanoma. The focus of the recent experiments has not only been on their efficacy but also immune-related adverse events (irAEs). We report a case of fulminant hepatitis due to nivolumab. In this case, the patient had undergone long-term nivolumab therapy. He did not complain of any symptoms but his liver enzyme levels were extremely elevated (grade 4). We promptly decided to start oral corticosteroids in the patient. His liver function rapidly improved. The dose of corticosteroids was gradually reduced. Our case demonstrates that sudden onset fulminant hepatitis can occur despite the safe use of long-term nivolumab therapy. The irAE can improve rapidly with proper corticosteroid treatment. This report will be useful for the physicians who always use immune checkpoint inhibitors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document