scholarly journals 828. Evaluation of Home Time as a Patient-Centered Metric for Pneumonia Hospitalizations: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Medicare Fee-For-Service Beneficiaries

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S455-S456
Author(s):  
Rajeshwari Nair ◽  
Yubo Gao ◽  
Mary Vaughan-Sarrazin ◽  
Eli N Perencevich ◽  
Saket Girotra ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) uses hospital readmission to incentivize hospital care delivery for acute conditions including pneumonia. However, current CMS performance metrics do not account for the competing risk of mortality in the post-discharge period or during the hospital stay. Our objective was to assess home time within 30 days after discharge among pneumonia hospitalizations, as a patient-centered metric. Methods A retrospective observational study was conducted in a cohort of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries admitted between 01/01/2015 and 11/30/2017. Home time was the number of days spent alive, out of an acute care setting, skilled nursing facility, or a rehabilitation facility within 30 days of discharge. If a patient spends any part of a day in a care facility or died after discharge, then that day was not included in the calculation for home time. Hospital-level rates of risk-adjusted home time were calculated using multilevel regression models. We compared hospital performance on 30-day risk-standardized home time with its performance on 30-day risk standardized readmission rate (RSRR) and mortality rate (RSMR). Characteristics of hospitals with high and low risk-adjusted home-time were compared. Results Among 1.7 million pneumonia admissions admitted to 3,116 hospitals, the median 30-day risk-standardized home time was 20.5 days (interquartile range: 18.9-21.9 days). Hospital-level characteristics such as case volume, bed size, for-profit ownership, rural location of hospital, teaching status, and participation in the bundle payment program were significantly associated with home-time. RSRR (rho: -0.233, p< 0.0001) and RSMR (rho: -0.223, p< 0.0001) had weak, inverse correlations with home time. Using the home time metric, 35.5% of hospitals were reclassified as high performers compared with their average or poor performance on the RSRR or RSMR metric. Conclusion Home time is a novel, patient-centered, hospital-level metric that can be easily calculated using claims data, accounts for differences in post-discharge mortality and can be intuitively interpreted. Utilization of this metric could potentially have policy implications in assessing hospital performance on delivery of healthcare to pneumonia patients. Disclosures Rajeshwari Nair, PhD, Merck and Company, Inc. (Research Grant or Support)

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-15
Author(s):  
Kenneth Gaines ◽  
Patricia Commiskey

Purpose Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability in the USA and worldwide. While stroke care has evolved dramatically, many new acute approaches to therapy focus only on the first 3-12 hours. Significant treatment opportunities beyond the first 12 hours can play a major role in improving outcomes for stroke patients. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the issues that affect stroke care delivery for patients and caregivers and describe an integrated care model that can improve care across the continuum. Design/methodology/approach This paper details evidence-based research that documents current stroke care and efforts to improve care delivery. Further, an innovative integrated care model is described, and its novel application to stroke care is highlighted. Findings Stroke patients and caregivers face fragmented and poorly coordinated care systems as they move through specific stroke nodes of care, from acute emergency and in-hospital stay through recovery post-discharge at a care facility or at home, and can be addressed by applying a comprehensive, technology-enabled Integrated Stroke Practice Unit (ISPU) Model of Care. Originality/value This paper documents specific issues that impact stroke care and the utilization of integrated care delivery models to address them. Evidence-based research results document difficulties of current care delivery methods for stroke and the impact of that care delivery on patients and caregivers across each node of care. It offers an innovative ISPU model and highlights specific tenets of that model for readers.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 106-106
Author(s):  
Kristen K. McNiff ◽  
Yichen Zhang ◽  
Belen Fraile ◽  
Michael J. Hassett

106 Background: Addressing utilization near the end of life (EOL) for cancer patients is critical to enhance the value of cancer care. Cancer EOL utilization measures have been widely endorsed, including by the National Quality Forum (chemotherapy in the last 14 days; ICU in the last 30 days; not admitted to hospice; admitted to hospice for < 3 days). However, efforts to use these measures to assess hospital quality and value have been constrained, in part because currently endorsed specifications do not provide a claims-based approach to cohort identification, and do not include a hospital attribution methodology. Methods: Using Medicare fee-for-service claims for adults ≥65 years, and through an iterative process informed by an expert panel, we developed extensible claims-based algorithms to a) identify patients who were deceased from cancer; b) attribute each patient to a responsible hospital; and c) derive hospital-level performance measures. We sought to ensure that these algorithms had strong face validity and were consistent with standard practices for claims-based analyses. Results: We identified 347,452 cancer decedents as those who had a cancer diagnosis associated with ≥2 hospital inpatient (IP), hospital outpatient (OP), or hospice claims, and died between 2011-2014. A decedent’s care was attributed to a hospital if there were ≥2 claims from that institution during the 6 months before death (N = 221,102). If this identified multiple hospitals, one was selected using the following sequence: total majority of all claims; most OP claims; most IP claims; last IP claim before death. Measure performance reflected national published data: 6% received chemotherapy in the last 14 days; 28% admitted to ICU in the last 30 days; and 34% not admitted to hospice. There was significant variation in hospital performance for all measures. Conclusions: Claims-based EOL measures do not define ‘ideal’ performance, but they do provide hospitals with broad utilization data that can help inform value-based cancer care delivery. These methods addressed gaps hindering the application of endorsed cancer EOL measures to hospitals. Companion quality measures to assess goal-concordant care are also needed.


Author(s):  
Joia S. Mukherjee

People value health. Yet impoverished patients face many barriers in seeking and receiving care. This chapter challenges the hypothesis that low service utilization of services is due to lack of patient knowledge. Rather, the chapter posits that low utilization is due to barriers to care (Quality of care, another factor in low utilization, will be addressed in Chapter 10). The chapter highlights offers the approaches caregiving and accompaniment to help providers and managers understand the geographical distance, harrowing transportation, and financial challenges that patients face. This understanding should support the design of more empathic and patient-centered programs that reduce barriers to care. To that end, this chapter introduces a tool called the care delivery value chain which is a helpful framework to design a system that optimizes access and services across the continuum of care.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 42-43
Author(s):  
Emmanuelle Belanger ◽  
Richard Jones ◽  
Gary Epstein-Lubow ◽  
Kate Lapane

Abstract Physical and psychological suffering are interrelated and should be assessed together as part of palliative care delivery. We aimed to describe the overlap of pain and depressive symptoms among long-stay nursing home (NH) residents with advanced Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia (ADRD), and to determine the incidence of pain and depressive symptoms. We conducted a retrospective study of a US national sample of fee-for-Service Medicare beneficiaries who became long-stay NH residents in 2014-2015, had two consecutive quarterly Minimum Dataset assessments (90 and 180 days +/- 30 days), and had a diagnosis of ADRD in the Chronic Condition Warehouse and moderate to severe cognitive impairment (N= 92,682). We used descriptive statistics and Poisson regression models to examine the incidence of each symptom controlling for age, sex, and concurrent hospice care. Sub-groups with self-reported and observer-rated symptoms (pain/PHQ-9) were modelled separately, as were those switching between the two. The prevalence of depressive symptoms was low (5.7%), while pain was more common (18.2%). Across various subgroups, 2% to 4% had both pain and depression, but between 20% and 25% were treated with both antidepressants and scheduled analgesia. Depressed residents at baseline had an incidence rate ratio (IRR) of pain of 1.2 at the second assessment, while the residents with pain at baseline had an IRR of depressive symptoms of 1.3 at the second assessment. Our results support the expected relationship between pain and depressive symptoms in a national sample of long-stay NH residents with advanced ADRD, suggesting the need for simultaneous clinical management.


Author(s):  
Kari White ◽  
Subasri Narasimhan ◽  
Sophie A. Hartwig ◽  
Erin Carroll ◽  
Alexandra McBrayer ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Thirty-seven states require minors seeking abortion to involve a parent, either through notification or consent. Little research has examined how implementation of these laws affect service delivery and quality of care for those who involve a parent. Methods Between May 2018 and September 2019, in-depth interviews were conducted with 34 staff members involved in scheduling, counseling, and administration at abortion facilities in three Southeastern states. Interviews explored procedures for documenting parental involvement, minors’ and parents’ reactions to requirements, and challenges with implementation and compliance. Both inductive and deductive codes, informed by the Institute of Medicine’s healthcare quality framework, were used in the thematic analysis. Results Parental involvement laws adversely affected four quality care domains: efficiency, patient-centeredness, timeliness, and equity. Administrative inefficiencies stemmed from the extensive documentation needed to prove an adult’s relationship to a minor, increasing the time and effort needed to comply with state reporting requirements. If parents were not supportive of their minor’s decision, participants felt they had a duty to intervene to ensure the minor’s decision and needs remained centered. Staff further noted that delays to timely care accumulated as minors navigated parental involvement and other state mandates, pushing some beyond gestational age limits. Lower income families and those with complex familial arrangements had greater difficulty meeting state requirements. Conclusions Parental involvement mandates undermine health service delivery and quality for minors seeking abortion services in the Southeast. Policy Implications Removing parental involvement requirements would protect minors’ reproductive autonomy and support the provision of equitable, patient-centered healthcare.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 216495612110226
Author(s):  
Kavitha P Reddy ◽  
Tamara M Schult ◽  
Alison M Whitehead ◽  
Barbara G Bokhour

The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is implementing a Whole Health System (WHS) of care that empowers and equips Veterans to take charge of their health and well-being and live their lives to the fullest, and increasingly leaders recognize the need and value in implementing a similar approach to support the health and well-being of employees. The purpose of this paper is to do the following: 1) provide an overview of the WHS of care in VHA and applicability in addressing employee resiliency; 2) provide a brief history of employee well-being efforts in VHA to date; 3) share new priorities from VHA leadership as they relate to Employee Whole Health strategy and implementation; and 4) provide a summary of the impacts of WHS of care delivery on employees. The WHS of care utilizes all therapeutic, evidence-based approaches to support self-care goals and personal health planning. Extending these approaches to employees builds upon 10 years of foundational work supporting employee health and well-being in VHA. In 2017, one facility in each of the 18 Veterans Integrated Service Networks (VISNs) in VHA was selected to participate in piloting the WHS of care with subsequent evaluation by VA’s Center for Evaluating Patient-Centered Care (EPCC). Early outcomes, from an employee perspective, suggest involvement in the delivery of the WHS of care and personal use of the whole health approach have a meaningful impact on the well-being of employees and how they experience the workplace. During the COVID-19 pandemic, VHA has continued to support employees through virtual resources to support well-being and resiliency. VHA's shift to this patient-centered model is supporting not only Veteran care but also employee health and well-being at a time when increased support is needed.


2021 ◽  
pp. 155982762110066
Author(s):  
Amy R. Mechley

Primary care has been shown to significantly decrease the overall cost of a population’s health care while improving the quality of each person’s well-being. Lifestyle medicine (LM) is ideally positioned to be delivered via primary care and has been shown to improve short- and long-term health outcomes of patients and populations. Direct primary care (DPC) represents a viable alternative to the fee-for-service reimbursement model. It has been shown to be economically and financially sustainable. Furthermore, it has the potential to fulfill the Quadruple Aim of health care in the United States. LM practiced in a DPC model has the potential to transform health care delivery. This article will discuss the need for health care systems change, provide an overview of the DPC model, demonstrate a basic understanding of the benefits, and review the steps needed to de-risk the investment of time, money, and resources for our future DPC providers.


2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 975-980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aanand D Naik ◽  
Molly J Horstman ◽  
Linda T Li ◽  
Michael K Paasche-Orlow ◽  
Bryan Campbell ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives: Readmission following colorectal surgery, typically due to surgery-related complications, is common. Patient-centered discharge warnings may guide recognition of early complication signs after colorectal surgery. Materials and Methods: User-centered design of a discharge warnings tool consisted of iterative health literacy review and a heuristic evaluation with human factors and clinical experts as well as patient end users to establish content validity and usability. Results: Literacy evaluation of the prototype suggested &gt;12th-grade reading level. Subsequent revisions reduced reading level to 8th grade or below. Contents were formatted during heuristic evaluation into 3 action-oriented zones (green, yellow, and red) with relevant warning lexicons. Usability testing demonstrated comprehension of this 3-level lexicon and recognition of appropriate patient actions to take for each level. Discussion: We developed a discharge warnings tool for colorectal surgery using staged user-centered design. The lexicon of surgical discharge warnings could structure communication among patients, caregivers, and clinicians to improve post-discharge care.


2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 262-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary S. Koithan ◽  
Mary Jo Kreitzer ◽  
Jean Watson

The principles of integrative nursing and caring science align with the unitary paradigm in a way that can inform and shape nursing knowledge, patient care delivery across populations and settings, and new healthcare policy. The proposed policies may transform the healthcare system in a way that supports nursing praxis and honors the discipline’s unitary paradigm. This call to action provides a distinct and hopeful vision of a healthcare system that is accessible, equitable, safe, patient-centered, and affordable. In these challenging times, it is the unitary paradigm and nursing wisdom that offer a clear path forward.


2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Swickard ◽  
Wendy Swickard ◽  
Andrew Reimer ◽  
Deborah Lindell ◽  
Chris Winkelman

Today’s health care delivery system relies heavily on interhospital transfer of patients who require higher levels of care. Although numerous tools and algorithms have been used for the prehospital determination of mode of transport, no tool for the transfer of patients between hospitals has been widely accepted. Typically, the interfacility transport decision is left to the discretion of the referring provider, who may or may not be aware of the level of care provided or the means of transport available. A need exists to determine the appropriate level of care required to meet the needs of patients during transport. The American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN) Synergy Model for Patient Care is a patient-centered model that focuses on optimizing patient care by matching the characteristics of the patient with the competencies of the nurse. This model shows significant promise in providing the theoretical backing to guide the decision on the level of care necessary to complete interfacility transfers safely and effectively. This article describes a new tool inspired by the AACN Synergy Model for Patient Care to determine the appropriate level of care required for interfacility transport.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document