scholarly journals 223. Difference in Carbapenem Use by ASP Intervention in Japanese Healthcare Facilities

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S112-S113
Author(s):  
Mio Endo ◽  
Shinya Tsuzuki ◽  
Yusuke Asai ◽  
Taichi Tajima ◽  
Nobuaki Matsunaga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Average Hospital ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Prospective Audit And Feedback

Abstract Background Antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) interventions have been reported to reduce unnecessary antimicrobial use (AMU). In this study, we investigated the difference in the use of carbapenems by ASP intervention in Japanese healthcare facilities. Methods Data on two components of AMU and ASP registered in Japan Surveillance for Infection Prevention and Healthcare Epidemiology (J-SIPHE) from January to December 2019, were used. Facilities with an infection control team in addition to an antimicrobial stewardship team responsible for the proper use of antimicrobial agents were included in the study. AMU data (such as DOT [Days of Therapy / 100 patient days]) are entered semi-automatically from medical fee statement (receipt) file at each facility. ASP intervention is divided into four categories 1) pre-authorization, 2) prospective audit and feedback (PAF), 3) PAF and required notification (RN), 4) RN. The Kruskal-Wallis test is performed to see overall difference and the Dunn test with the Bonferroni correction is done for each pair of categories. Results A total of 114 hospitals were included in the analysis. The median number of beds at participating facilities were 430 [IQR: 281–602], the median average hospital stay was 13.0 days [IQR: 11.4–15.2] and total number of inpatients per month was 10087 [6247–14536]. PAF and RN were the most common ASP interventions for carbapenems (62.5%), followed by RN (33.6%). The median DOT [IQR] of participating facilities were 2.1 [1.2–3.1] and 1) 0.7 [0.2–1.1], 2) 2.7 [2.1–3.4], 3) 2.1 [1.4–3.1] and 4) 2.0 [1.2–3.5] by ASP categories. There are significant differences between 1) and 2), 1) and 3), and 1) and 4) (p=0.014, p< 0.01 and p< 0.01, respectively) while the differences between 2) and 3), 2) and 4), and 3) and 4) are not significant (p=1.00). Table 1. Summary statistics of healthcare facilities by ASP Interventions Figure 1. DOT by ASP Interventions Conclusion Only 3.5% of ASP interventions belong to 1) pre-authorization category and this might be due to the complexity of registration process. This category was found to have the lowest DOT among all ASP interventions in Japanese healthcare facilities. The variances of DOT were especially large in categories 3) and 4), and more detailed analyses would be necessary to evaluate their efficacies accurately. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals 105. Fluoroquinolone Stewardship at a Community Health-System: A Decade in Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S167-S167
Author(s):  
Matthew Song ◽  
Ashley Wilde ◽  
Ashley Wilde ◽  
Sarah E Moore ◽  
Brian C Bohn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Provider Education ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Adult Inpatient ◽  
Prospective Audit And Feedback ◽  
Adult Hospital

Abstract Background Fluoroquinolone stewardship is a common target for antimicrobial stewardship programs seeking to maintain or improve fluoroquinolone susceptibility rates. Additional benefits include reducing C. difficile infection rates, drug toxicities, and resistance to other antimicrobials as fluoroquinolones can co-select for resistance. The Norton Healthcare antimicrobial stewardship program was founded in 2011 and provides services at 4 adult hospitals with ~1600 beds. Main fluoroquinolone stewardship activities have included provider education, prospective audit and feedback, and guideline and order-set development. The purpose of this study was to describe the resistance and usage rates of fluoroquinolones over time. Methods This was a descriptive study examining individual adult hospital antibiograms from 2010 to 2020. Levofloxacin susceptibility rates to E. coli and P. aeruginosa were collated from annual antibiograms between 2010 and 2020 for outpatients and each adult hospital. Adult hospital resistance rates were aggregated and weighted accordingly to number of isolates per hospital per year. Additionally, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin inpatient days of therapy (DOT) was collected since 2016 when DOT was first readily retrievable and was normalized per 1000 patient days to compare between different time points. Results Outpatient levofloxacin likelihood of activity against P. aeruginosa improved from 81% to 91%. Outpatient levofloxacin likelihood of activity against E. coli remained stable between 84 – 86% (Figure 1). Adult inpatient fluoroquinolone usage decreased by approximately 75% from 83.5 to 21.37 DOT/1000 patient days since 2016 (Figure 2). Adult inpatient levofloxacin likelihood of activity against P. aeruginosa improved from 53% to 83%. Adult inpatient levofloxacin likelihood of activity against E. coli improved from 65% to 75% (Figure 3). Conclusion The Norton Healthcare antimicrobial stewardship program has been effective in reducing unnecessary fluoroquinolone usage and improving inpatient fluoroquinolone susceptibility rates. Future studies should examine opportunities to translate successes to the outpatient phase of care. Disclosures Ashley Wilde, PharmD, BCPS-AQ ID, Nothing to disclose Paul S. Schulz, MD, Gilead (Consultant, Speaker’s Bureau)Merck (Consultant, Speaker’s Bureau)

scholarly journals 1141. Implementation of a Pediatric Handshake Antimicrobial Stewardship Program to Improve Antimicrobial Utilization

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S406-S406
Author(s):  
Amanda P Hughes ◽  
Maya Beganovic ◽  
Ronda Oram ◽  
Sarah Wieczorkiewicz ◽  
Anthony Chiang
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Antimicrobial Utilization ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Acceptance Rates ◽  
Prospective Audit And Feedback ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs emerged in response to rising rates of resistance and adverse effects associated with inappropriate antimicrobial utilization. Optimal metrics and strategies (e.g., preauthorization, prospective audit and feedback) for AMS remain to be elucidated. This study evaluated the impact of a multidisciplinary, rounding-based AMS strategy (i.e., Handshake Stewardship) on antimicrobial utilization and prescribing practices at a pediatric hospital. Methods This was a single-center, retrospective quality improvement study at a community, teaching children’s hospital. All pediatric and neonatal inpatients with active antimicrobial orders between July 2018 and March 2019 were included in the study, and endpoints were compared with data from July 2017- March 2018. Antimicrobial courses were prospectively audited by a multidisciplinary AMS team, and feedback was provided to the primary teams during Handshake Stewardship rounds. The primary endpoint was a number of interventions made and the corresponding acceptance rates. The secondary endpoint was days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient-days. Descriptive statistics were performed on all continuous and categorical data as appropriate. Results Of 2238 antimicrobial courses reviewed, 710 (32%) required intervention, and 86% of the interventions made were accepted. The top 3 indications evaluated were respiratory (n = 522, 23%), sepsis/bacteremia (n = 351, 16%), and surgical prophylaxis (n = 266, 12%). Of the respiratory courses reviewed, there were 228 opportunities for antimicrobial optimization. The most common interventions were: bug-drug optimization (n = 208, 29%), discontinuation of anti-infective (n = 136, 19%), and dose optimization (n = 120, 17%). No significant difference was observed for overall, ceftriaxone, meropenem, and vancomycin DOT pre- and post-implementation of Handshake Stewardship. However, a statistically significant reduction in DOTs was observed for piperacillin–tazobactam (15.2 vs. 7.4, P = 0.004) and a nonsignificant reduction in meropenem (9.5 vs. 6.2). Conclusion Rounding-based, Handshake AMS was associated with overall high intervention acceptance rates and a reduction in commonly utilized broad-spectrum antimicrobials. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Acceptability and effectiveness of antimicrobial stewardship implementation strategies on fluoroquinolone prescribing

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Katie J. Suda ◽  
Gosia S. Clore ◽  
Charlesnika T. Evans ◽  
Heather Schacht Reisinger ◽  
Ibuola Kale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Clinical Pathways ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Prior Approval ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Prospective Audit And Feedback ◽  
Advanced Generation

Abstract Objective: To assess the effectiveness and acceptability of antimicrobial stewardship-focused implementation strategies on inpatient fluoroquinolones. Methods: Stewardship champions at 15 hospitals were surveyed regarding the use and acceptability of strategies to improve fluoroquinolone prescribing. Antibiotic days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 days present (DP) for sites with and without prospective audit and feedback (PAF) and/or prior approval were compared. Results: Among all of the sites, 60% had PAF or prior approval implemented for fluoroquinolones. Compared to sites using neither strategy (64.2 ± 34.4 DOT/DP), fluoroquinolone prescribing rates were lower for sites that employed PAF and/or prior approval (35.5 ± 9.8; P = .03) and decreased from 2017 to 2018 (P < .001). This decrease occurred without an increase in advanced-generation cephalosporins. Total antibiotic rates were 13% lower for sites with PAF and/or prior approval, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = .20). Sites reporting that PAF and/or prior approval were “completely” accepted had lower fluoroquinolone rates than sites where it was “moderately” accepted (34.2 ± 5.7 vs 48.7 ± 4.5; P < .01). Sites reported that clinical pathways and/or local guidelines (93%), prior approval (93%), and order forms (80%) “would” or “may” be effective in improving fluoroquinolone use. Although most sites (73%) indicated that requiring infectious disease consults would or may be effective in improving fluoroquinolones, 87% perceived implementation to be difficult. Conclusions: PAF and prior approval implementation strategies focused on fluoroquinolones were associated with significantly lower fluoroquinolone prescribing rates and nonsignificant decreases in total antibiotic use, suggesting limited evidence for class substitution. The association of acceptability of strategies with lower rates highlights the importance of culture. These results may indicate increased acceptability of implementation strategies and/or sensitivity to FDA warnings.

scholarly journals 157. A Multidisciplinary Approach to Carbapenem Stewardship at a Large Community Hospital in Brooklyn, New York

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S88-S88
Author(s):  
Samuel Simon ◽  
Rosanna Li ◽  
Yu Shia Lin ◽  
Suri Mayer ◽  
Edward Chapnick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Klebsiella Pneumoniae ◽  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Prospective Audit And Feedback

Abstract Background Carbapenem-resistant gram-negative organisms are a continuously mounting threat, underscoring the need for effective antimicrobial stewardship interventions to improve the use of carbapenems. We sought to implement several multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship interventions beginning in January 2019 in an effort to reduce unnecessary meropenem use and the incidence of carbapenem-resistant gram-negatives. Methods Prospective audit and feedback was utilized daily in combination with weekly stewardship rounds between an Infectious Diseases pharmacist and physician in the Intensive Care Units. A second Infectious Diseases physician attended weekly interdisciplinary rounds on meropenem high-use units. Meropenem Days of Therapy (DOT) per 1,000 patient days and the incidence of meropenem resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae were compared by the chi-square test of proportions. Results Between 2018 and 2019 the institution’s meropenem DOT per 1,000 patient days decreased 33%, from 57 to 38 days per 1,000 patient days (difference, 19 days per 1,000 patient days; p&lt; 0.001). In the hospital antibiogram, the meropenem susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa over the same time period increased from 71% to 77% of isolates (difference, 6%; p = 0.009). A non-significant decrease in the susceptibility of meropenem to Klebsiella pneumoniae was also observed from 92 to 90% (difference, 2%: p = 0.1658). Conclusion These data support the need for antimicrobial stewardship efforts targeting broad-spectrum antimicrobials such as meropenem. In the setting of a sustained decrease in meropenem use over 12 months, we observed a significant improvement in the percent susceptibility rate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to meropenem for the first time in five years. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals 1059. Impact of a Syndrome-Based Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention on Anti-Pseudomonal β-Lactam Use, C. difficile Rates and Cost in an Urban Community Hospital

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S374-S375
Author(s):  
Alfredo J Mena Lora ◽  
Martin Cortez ◽  
Ella Li ◽  
Lawrence Sanchez ◽  
Rochelle Bello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Community Hospital ◽  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Urban Community ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Prospective Audit And Feedback ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The use of anti-Pseudomonal β-lactam (APBL) agents has significantly increased in the past decade, carrying higher costs and contributing to antimicrobial pressure. Antimicrobial stewardship (ASP) can promote evidence-based antimicrobial selection and mitigate excess APBL use. We implemented a comprehensive ASP with syndrome-based prospective audit and feedback (PAF) at an urban community hospital. The goal of this study is to assess the impact of syndrome-based PAF on APBL use, C. difficile rates and cost. Methods ASP with all CDC core elements was implemented at a 151-bed community hospital in October 2017. Syndrome-based guidelines and PAF was established and overseen via direct communication with an ID physician. Days of therapy (DOT), cost and C. difficile rates were assessed 12 months before and after ASP. DOT for APBL and non-APBL utilization was tabulated by unit and paired t-test performed. Results Most cases reviewed by PAF (51%) were represented in our syndrome-based treatment guidelines (Figure 1). Soft tissue (33%) and intra-abdominal (24%) infections were the most common syndromes. Change to guideline was the most common PAF intervention (62%) followed by de-escalation (30%). At 12 months, total DOT/1,000 increased (392.5 vs. 404) while the proportion of parenteral antimicrobials used decreased (71% vs. 65%). Antibiotic expenditures decreased by 23%, with a reduction in APBL of 20% and non-APBL of 10% (Table 1). Statistically significant reductions APBL use in non-ICU settings (P = 0.0139) and statistically significant increases in non-APBL in ICU settings occurred (P = 0.0001) (Figure 2 and 3). C difficile rates decreased from 21% (3.27 vs. 2.56). Conclusion Syndrome-based PAF was successfully implemented. A reduction in APBL use was seen in non-ICU settings, where evidence-based de-escalation may be more feasible. APBL use remained high in the ICU but was guideline consistent. A rise in non-APBL use also occurred. Certain critical illness syndromes warrant APBLs, but PAF may promote culture-directed and syndrome-specific treatments. ASP increased guideline-based therapy and contributed to decreased broad-spectrum antimicrobial use, antimicrobial expenditures and C difficile rates. Syndrome based PAF can be successfully implemented in community settings. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Profile of Antimicrobial Use in the Pediatric Population of a University Hospital Centre, 2015/16 to 2018/19

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lydia R Rahem ◽  
Bénédicte Franck ◽  
Hélène Roy ◽  
Denis Lebel ◽  
Philippe Ovetchkine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Pediatric Population ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Defined Daily Dose ◽  
Centre Hospitalier ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire ◽  
Days Of Therapy

Background: Antimicrobial stewardship is a standard practice in health facilities to reduce both the misuse of antimicrobials and the risk of resistance. Objective: To determine the profile of antimicrobial use in the pediatric population of a university hospital centre from 2015/16 to 2018/19. Methods: In this retrospective, descriptive, cross-sectional study, the pharmacy information system was used to determine the number of days of therapy (DOTs) and the defined daily dose (DDD) per 1000 patient-days (PDs) for each antimicrobial and for specified care units in each year of the study period. For each measure, the ratio of 2018/19 to 2015/16 values was also calculated (and expressed as a proportion); where the value of this proportion was ≤ 0.8 or ≥ 1.2 (indicating a substantial change over the study period), an explanatory rating was assigned by consensus. Results: Over the study period, 94 antimicrobial agents were available at the study hospital: 70 antibiotics (including antiparasitics and antituberculosis drugs), 14 antivirals, and 10 antifungals. The total number of DOTs per 1000 PDs declined from 904 in 2015/16 to 867 in 2018/19. The 5 most commonly used antimicrobials over the years, expressed as minimum/maximum DOTs per 1000 PDs, were piperacillin-tazobactam (78/105), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (74/84), ampicillin (51/69), vancomycin (53/68), and cefotaxime (55/58). In the same period, the care units with the most antimicrobial use (expressed as minimum/ maximum DOTs per 1000 PDs) were hematology-oncology (2529/2723), pediatrics (1006/1408), and pediatric intensive care (1328/1717). Conclusions: This study showed generally stable consumption of antimicrobials from 2015/16 to 2018/19 in a Canadian mother-and-child university hospital centre. Although consumption was also stable within drug groups (antibiotics, antivirals, and antifungals), there were important changes over time for some individual drugs. Several factors may explain these variations, including disruptions in supply, changes in practice, and changes in the prevalence of infections. Surveillance of antimicrobial use is an essential component of an antimicrobial stewardship program. RÉSUMÉ Contexte : La gestion des antimicrobiens est une pratique courante dans les centres hospitaliers afin de réduire l’utilisation inappropriée des antimicrobiens et le risque de résistance. Objectif : Décrire l’évolution de l’utilisation des antimicrobiens dans un centre hospitalier universitaire de 2015-16 à 2018-19. Méthodes : Dans cette étude rétrospective, descriptive et transversale, les dossiers pharmacologiques ont servi à déterminer le nombre de jours de traitement (NJT) et la dose définie journalière (DDD) par 1000 jours-présence (JP) pour chaque antimicrobien et pour chaque unité de soins par année de l’étude. Pour chaque mesure, on a également comparé le ratio de 2018-19 à celui de 2015-16, qui est exprimé en proportion; lorsque la valeur de cette proportion était ≤ 0,8 ou ≥ 1,2, ce qui indiquait un changement important durant la période de l’étude, une note explicative a été attribuée par consensus. Résultats : Durant la période à l’étude, 94 antimicrobiens ont été disponibles dans notre centre : 70 antibiotiques (dont les antiparasitaires et les antituberculeux), 14 antiviraux et 10 antifongiques. Le nombre total de NJT par 1000 JP a diminué de 904 en 2015-16 à 867 en 2018-19. Les cinq antimicrobiens utilisés le plus fréquemment et présentés en minimum / maximum de NJT par 1000 JP étaient les suivants : piperacilline-tazobactam (78/105), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (74/84), ampicilline (51/69), vancomycine (53/68) et cefotaxime (55/58). Pendant la même période, les unités de soins qui faisaient la plus grande utilisation d’antimirobiens (exprimée en minimum / maximum de NJT par 1000 JP) étaient hématologie-oncologie (2529/2723), pédiatrie (1006/1408) et soins intensifs pédiatriques (1328/1717). Conclusions : Cette étude démontre une consommation stable d’antimicrobiens entre 2015-16 et 2018-19 dans un centre hospitalier universitaire mère-enfant canadien. Malgré le fait que la consommation entre les groupes d’antimicrobiens (antibiotiques, antiviraux, antifongiques) était stable, on a constaté d’importantes variations concernant certains médicaments individuels. Plusieurs facteurs peuvent expliquer cette variation, notamment des ruptures d’approvisionnement, des changements de pratique et des changements dans la prévalence d’infections. La surveillance de la consommation des antimicrobiens est une partie essentielle de tout programme d’antibiogouvernance.

Point Prevalence Survey of Antimicrobial Prescription Patterns in a Pediatric Tertiary-Care Unit in Thailand 2019

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (9) ◽  
pp. 1476-1482
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Point Prevalence ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Prospective Audit ◽  
Prevalence Survey ◽  
Prescription Patterns ◽  
Point Prevalence Survey ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Prospective Audit And Feedback

Background: Surveillance data is an essential part of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP). Objective: To describe and compare prescription patterns of antibiotics after a 3-years implementation of an ASP using prospective audit and feedback. Materials and Methods: The authors conducted a point prevalence survey (PPS) of antibiotic prescriptions at a 200-bed pediatric unit at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. A standardized study protocol from the Global Antimicrobial Resistance, Prescribing, and the Efficacy in Neonates and Children (GARPEC) project was used. The authors reviewed medical charts of hospitalized children of less than 18 years of age, using a point prevalence method on the 15 of February, May, August, and November 2019. Endpoints measures included rate of antimicrobial prescriptions and type of antimicrobial use, stratified by neonatal and pediatric ward types. Rate of antimicrobial prescriptions will be compared with historical data form PPS in the same institute collected in 2016. Results: In 2019, the medical records of 269 neonates and 409 children hospitalized were reviewed. The proportion of children receiving antibiotics in neonatal units overall was 18.6% (95% CI 14.1 to 23.8), of which ampicillin or gentamicin (52.0%) was the most common regimen. Rate of antibiotic prescriptions in general pediatric wards was 46.5%, with third generation cephalosporins being the most used antibiotics. Prescription rate in the oncology ward was 52.9% with antipseudomonal agents or meropenem being the most prescribed antibiotics. Prescription rates in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) was 88.9%, with meropenem being the most used antibiotic. Compared to a previous PPS study in 2016, prevalence of antimicrobial use was higher in general pediatric wards at 46.5% versus 37.2% (p=0.02) and PICU at 88.9% versus 67.7% (p=0.007). Conclusion: The prevalence rates of antimicrobial use in pediatric wards increased despite implementation of a prospective audit and feedback antibiotic stewardship program. Other measures are needed to reduce the unnecessary prescriptions. Keywords: Antimicrobial; Antimicrobial stewardship program; Pediatric; Point prevalence survey

scholarly journals When Antimicrobial Stewardship Isn′t Watching: The Educational Impact of Critical Care Prospective Audit and Feedback

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitra Fleming ◽  
Karim F. Ali ◽  
John Matelski ◽  
Ryan D'Sa ◽  
Jeff Powis
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Prospective Audit ◽  
Educational Impact ◽  
Antimicrobial Prescribing ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Prospective Audit And Feedback

Abstract Prospective audit and feedback (PAF) is an effective strategy to optimize antimicrobial use in the critical care setting, yet whether skills gained during PAF influence future antimicrobial prescribing is uncertain. This multisite study demonstrates that knowledge learned during PAF is translated and incorporated into the practice of critical care physicians even when not supported by an antimicrobial stewardship program.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document