scholarly journals 57. Evaluation of the 2019 European Heart Rhythm Association International Consensus Document in Patients with Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices Who Develop Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S40-S40
Author(s):  
Supavit Chesdachai ◽  
Larry M Baddour ◽  
Muhammad R Sohail ◽  
Raj Palraj ◽  
Malini Madhavan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Electronic Device ◽  
Heart Rhythm ◽  
Consensus Document ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia ◽  
Device Infection ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Device Extraction ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation has markedly increased over the past two decades. Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) occurs in patients with CIED and determination of device infection among patients without clinical findings of pocket site infection is often difficult. Our study examines the characteristics, management, and outcomes of SAB in patients living with CIED using 2019 international criteria to define CIED infection. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of patients with CIED who were hospitalized at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, with SAB from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2019. Patients who met CIED infection criteria following SAB based on the 2019 European Heart Rhythm Association International Concensus Document were identified. A time-to-event analysis was used to determine the impact, if any, of complete device extraction on outcomes. Results Overall, 110 patients with CIED developed SAB and 92 (83.6%) of them underwent transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE). Eighty-eight (80%) had CIED infection with 57 (51.8%) and 31 (28.2%) patients meeeting criteria for definite and possible CIED infections, respectively. Forty-three (75.4%) patients with definite CIED infection underwent complete device extraction. For possible and rejected CIED infection, the rates of complete device extraction were 35.5% and 27.3%, respectively (p< .001 for each). The primary endpoint of a composite of one-year mortality and SAB relapse had a rate that was significantly lower in patients with CIED infection who underwent complete device extraction as compared to that of patients who did not undergo device extraction (25.9% vs. 76.5%, p< .001). No significant difference in outcomes was seen in the rejected CIED infection group (33.3% vs. 62.5%, p =.27). Conclusion The rate of CIED infections following SAB was higher than that reported previously. Increased use of TEE and a novel case definition with broader diagnostic criteria were likely operative, in part, in accounting for the the higher rate of CIED infections complicating SAB. Complete device removal is critical in patients with either definite or possible CIED infection as defined by the 2019 consensus document to improve one-year mortality and SAB relapse rates. Disclosures Larry M. Baddour, MD, Boston Scientific (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Botanix Pharmaceuticals (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Roivant Sciences (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant Muhammad R. Sohail, MD, Medtronic (Consultant)Philips (Consultant)

scholarly journals 732Predictors of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection in Patients with Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S206-S207
Author(s):  
Hassan Elmalik ◽  
Madhu Reddy ◽  
Michael Brimacombe ◽  
Kassem Hammoud ◽  
Raghuveer Dendi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Electronic Device ◽  
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia ◽  
Device Infection

scholarly journals Impact of Reduced Vancomycin MIC on Clinical Outcomes of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

2013 ◽  
Vol 57 (11) ◽  
pp. 5536-5542 ◽  
Author(s):  
So-Youn Park ◽  
In-Hwan Oh ◽  
Hee-Joo Lee ◽  
Chun-Gyoo Ihm ◽  
Jun Seong Son ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Primary Source ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

ABSTRACTVancomycin has been a key antibiotic agent for the treatment of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) infections. However, little is known about the relationship between vancomycin MIC values at the higher end of the susceptibility range and clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of MRSA bacteremia on clinical outcomes in patients with a vancomycin MIC near the upper limit of the susceptible range. Patients with MRSA bacteremia were divided into a high-vancomycin-MIC group (2 μg/ml) and a low-vancomycin-MIC group (≤1.0 μg/ml). We examined the relationship between MIC, genotype, primary source of bacteremia, and mortality. Ninety-four patients with MRSA bacteremia, including 31 with a high vancomycin MIC and 63 with a low MIC were analyzed. There was no significant difference between the presence ofagrdysfunction and SCCmectype between the two groups. A higher vancomycin MIC was not found to be associated with mortality. In contrast, high-risk bloodstream infection sources (hazard ratio [HR], 4.63; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.24 to 17.33) and bacterial eradication after treatment (HR, 0.06; 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.17), irrespective of vancomycin MIC, were predictors of all-cause 30-day mortality. Our study suggests that a high-risk source of bacteremia is likely to be associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes, but a high vancomycin MIC in a susceptible range, as well as genotype characteristics, are not associated with mortality.

Abstract 20081: Predicting Risk of Endovascular Device Infection in Patients with Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Sohail ◽  
Bharath Raj Palraj ◽  
Sana Khalid ◽  
Daniel Uslan ◽  
Farah Al-Saffar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Device ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Infection Model ◽  
Multivariable Model ◽  
Operating Characteristics ◽  
Clinical Predictors ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Device Infection ◽  
Device Extraction

Objectives: Clinicians need to identify which patients presenting with S. aureus bacteremia (SAB) have underlying cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infection and therefore need device extraction. The goal of this study was to identify clinical predictors of CIED infection in patients presenting with SAB. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all cases of SAB in CIED recipients at Mayo Clinic from Jan 2001 to Dec 2011. CIED infection was defined using clinical, microbiologic and echocardiographic criteria. Patients who presented with clinical signs of CIED pocket infection were excluded. A multivariable model was developed to identify independent predictors of CIED infection. Model discrimination was summarized using the area under a receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). Results: Among the 131 patients with SAB and CIED, 45 (34%) had underlying CIED infection. Permanent pacemaker (PPM) devices (OR 3.90, 95% CI 1.65-9.23, p=0.002), >1 device-related procedure (OR 3.30, 95% CI 1.23-8.86, p=0.018), and duration of SAB ≥4 days (OR 5.54, 95% CI 3.32-13.23, p <0.001) were independently associated with an increased risk of CIED infection. The AUC for this multivariable model was 0.79 indicating good discriminatory capacity to separate SAB patients with and without CIED infection. Various combinations of these three features and the corresponding predicted probabilities of CIED infection are summarized in Table. Conclusions: An individual patient’s risk of underlying CIED infection can be calculated based on the type of device, number of device-related procedures, and duration of SAB. Patients without any of these high-risk features have very low risk of underlying CIED infection and may be monitored closely without immediate device extraction.

scholarly journals The impact of prior urethral sling on artificial urinary sphincter outcomes

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Ziegelmann ◽  
Brian J. Linder ◽  
Marcelino E. Rivera ◽  
Boyd R. Viers ◽  
Daniel S. Elliott
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Artificial Urinary Sphincter ◽  
Device Failure ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Urinary Sphincter ◽  
Device Infection ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: We sought to evaluate device outcomes in men who underwent primary artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement after failed male urethral sling (MUS).Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of 990 men who underwent an AUS procedure between 2003 and 2014. Of these, 540 were primary AUS placements, including 30 (5.5%) with a history of MUS. AUS revisions and explantations were compared between men stratified by the presence of prior sling. Hazard ratios (HR) adjusting for competing risks were used to determine the association with prior sling and AUS outcomes (infection/ erosion, urethral atrophy, and mechanical malfunction), while overall device failure was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and Coxregression analysis.Results: There was no significant difference in age, body mass index, prior prostatectomy, or pelvic radiation when stratified by history of MUS. However, patients with a history of MUS were more likely to have undergone prior collagen injection (p=0.01). On univariate and multivariate analysis, prior MUS was not associated with device failure (HR 1.54; p=0.27). Three-year overall device survival did not significantly differ between those with and without prior MUS (70% vs. 85%; p=0.21). Also, there were no significant differences in the incidence of device infection/erosion, mechanical malfunction, and urethral atrophy.Conclusions: AUS remains a viable treatment option for men with persistent or recurrent stress urinary incontinence after MUS. However, while not statistically significant, we identified a trend towards lower three-year device outcomes in patients with prior urethral sling. These findings indicate the need for longer-term studies to determine if slings pose an increased hazard.

scholarly journals Composition of raw milk from conventional and organic dairy farming

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denis Kucevic ◽  
Snezana Trivunovic ◽  
Vladan Bogdanovic ◽  
Ksenija Cobanovic ◽  
Dobrila Jankovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Raw Milk ◽  
Farming System ◽  
Dairy Farming ◽  
Milk Samples ◽  
High Statistical Significance ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Organic Dairy ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Impact

Possible differences between composition of raw milk due to dairy farming system (organic vs conventional) as well as seasonal variations were investigated. The samples were analysed during one year. A total of 6.782 samples of raw milk were collected (4.496 from organic farming). Dairy farms were located in the northern part of Republic of Serbia (Province of Vojvodina). The principle of analysis of raw milk samples was in accordance with the methodology by midinfrared spectrometry and flow cytometry. The fixed effect of system of farming and season (winter, spring, summer and fall) have shown a high statistical significance (P < 0.01) on all examined milk parameters except fat, total solids and somatic cell count, where the impact was slightly lower (P < 0.05). Significant difference wasn't found in number of bacterial colonies (P > 0.05). Composition of milk is also affected by a number of other factors, therefore it is recommended to involve factors such as nutrition of dairy cows, breed and farm management.

scholarly journals 301. Penicillin Versus Cefazolin or Anti-staphylococcal Penicillins for Penicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S149-S149
Author(s):  
Mohammed Aldhaeefi ◽  
Jeffrey Pearson ◽  
Sanjat Kanjilal ◽  
Brandon Dionne
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
Positive Blood Culture ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Similar Distribution ◽  
Clinical Failure ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia ◽  
Definitive Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia is a significant cause of mortality. Penicillin (PCN) may have a role in the treatment of penicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (PSSA) bacteremia as it has a narrower spectrum of activity than cefazolin and is better tolerated than antistaphylococcal penicillins (ASPs). The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of PCN versus cefazolin or ASPs in the treatment of PSSA bacteremia. Methods This is a single-center, retrospective study at a tertiary academic medical center. All patients with a PSSA blood culture from January 1, 2012 to September 1, 2019 were screened. Patients were excluded if they were treated with a definitive antibiotic (defined as antimicrobial therapy received 72 hours after positive blood culture) other than the study comparators, or if they received combination antibiotic therapy &gt;72 hours from the initial positive blood culture result. The primary outcome was 60-day clinical failure, which was a composite endpoint of change in antibiotic after 72 hours of definitive therapy, recurrence of PSSA bacteremia, infection-related readmission, or all-cause mortality. Results Of 277 patients with PSSA bacteremia, 101 patients were included in the study; 62 (61%) were male and 11 (11%) had a β-lactam allergy. At baseline, 40 patients (40%) had hardware, 25 (25%) had an intravenous line, 6 (6%) were on dialysis, and 4 (4%) had active IV drug use, with similar distribution across antibiotic groups. Penicillin was the most common antibiotic used (Table 1). There was a significant difference among groups with respect to the 60-day clinical failure (log-rank p=0.019). In terms of unadjusted 60-day clinical failure, penicillin had similar outcomes to cefazolin (95% CI -0.29 to 0.104, p=0.376), however, it had statistically significant better outcomes in comparison to the ASPs, nafcillin or oxacillin (95% CI 0.023 to 0.482, p=0.031) (Table 1). Table 1. 60-day outcomes of PSSA bacteremia Conclusion Penicillin is effective and safe in the treatment of PSSA bacteremia and may be preferable to antistaphylococcal penicillins Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) international consensus document on how to prevent, diagnose, and treat cardiac implantable electronic device infections—endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS), International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID) and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)

EP Europace ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 515-549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carina Blomström-Lundqvist ◽  
Vassil Traykov ◽  
Paola Anna Erba ◽  
Haran Burri ◽  
Jens Cosedis Nielsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Electronic Device ◽  
Heart Rhythm ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device ◽  
International Consensus ◽  
Consensus Document ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices

Abstract Pacemakers, implantable cardiac defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices are potentially life-saving treatments for a number of cardiac conditions, but are not without risk. Most concerning is the risk of a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection, which is associated with significant morbidity, increased hospitalizations, reduced survival, and increased healthcare costs. Recommended preventive strategies such as administration of intravenous antibiotics before implantation are well recognized. Uncertainties have remained about the role of various preventive, diagnostic, and treatment measures such as skin antiseptics, pocket antibiotic solutions, anti-bacterial envelopes, prolonged antibiotics post-implantation, and others. Guidance on whether to use novel device alternatives expected to be less prone to infections and novel oral anticoagulants is also limited, as are definitions on minimum quality requirements for centres and operators and volumes. Moreover, an international consensus document on management of CIED infections is lacking. The recognition of these issues, the dissemination of results from important randomized trials focusing on prevention of CIED infections, and observed divergences in managing device-related infections as found in an European Heart Rhythm Association worldwide survey, provided a strong incentive for a 2019 International State-of-the-art Consensus document on risk assessment, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of CIED infections.

P2754Streptococcal infective endocarditis: distribution of species and their prognosis

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Chamat ◽  
A Dahl ◽  
C Hassager ◽  
M Arpi ◽  
L Oestergaard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infective Endocarditis ◽  
Electronic Device ◽  
Species Level ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Heart Valve Disease ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Streptococcal Species ◽  
Species Groups ◽  
One Year ◽  
The One

Abstract Background Infective endocarditis (IE) is frequently caused by streptococcal species. However, there is limited knowledge about the relationship between different streptococcal species and IE, and their associated outcomes. Purpose To examine the prevalence of streptococci at species level in IE, and to relate these different species to outcomes. Methods From 2002–2012 we prospectively collected consecutive patients with IE admitted to two tertiary heart centres covering a catchment area of 2.4 million people. The registry comprises 915 IE patients, 366 (40%) with streptococcal IE. Based on phylogenetic relationship, streptococcal species were classified into seven main groups: Mitis, Bovis, Mutans, Anginosus, Salivarius, Pyogenic and Nutritionally Variant Streptococcus (NVS). Classification at species level was not possible in 51 patients, who were excluded. Complications and prognosis of streptococcal IE were compared between the subgroups, and at species level. Results We included 315 patients with streptococcal IE. Mean age was 63 (IQR 52–76) years, and most were men (67%). A total of 115 patients (37%) had a previous heart valve disease, 58 (18%) had a prosthetic valve, 22 (7%) had previously had IE and 29 (9%) had a cardiac electronic device. With 148 episodes (47%) the Mitis group was the most common cause of IE. Other frequent groups were the Pyogenic group and the Bovis group, accounting for 66 (21%) and 51 (16%) of the cases, respectively. Surgery was carried out in 55% (n=173) of all cases. Patients infected with S. pneumoniae or S. agalactiae had a significantly higher rate of surgery, 72.2% (n=13) and 71.9% (n=23) respectively, whereas the Bovis group had a significantly lower rate, 35.5% (n=18) (p=0.048). The aortic valve was infected in 137 patients (43.5%), mitral valve in 105 patients (33.3%) and both valves were infected in 53 patients (16.8%). Twenty patients (6.3%) had right-sided IE, including pacemaker lead IE. There was no significant difference between the species subgroups regarding type of infected valve. Embolization and osteitis were observed in 76 (24.1%) and 30 (9.5%) patients, respectively. There was no significant difference between the species groups, as was the case with mortality: 23 patients (7.3%) died in-hospital and the one-year mortality was 16% (n=50). Distribution of streptococcal IE Conclusion Species of the Mitis group were the most frequent Streptococci causing IE. Patients infected with S. pneumonia or S. agalactiae had significantly higher rate of surgery, and patients infected with S. bovis group had lower rate of surgery. There was no significant difference in rate of complications such as abscesses, embolization, osteitis or mortality between the streptococcal species. Acknowledgement/Funding Supported by grants from Herlev-Gentofte University Hospital Research Foundation

Improved Outcome After Reduced Intensity Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (RI-HCT) for Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Using Tacrolimus/Sirolimus-Based Gvhd Prophylaxis.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2771-2771 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryotaro Nakamura ◽  
Joycelynne Palmer ◽  
Pablo Parker ◽  
Anthony Stein ◽  
Tracey Stiller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Bone Marrow Blasts ◽  
Improved Outcome

Abstract Abstract 2771 Poster Board II-747 We previously reported an encouraging result with RI-HCT for MDS (Bone Marrow Transplant 2007; 40:843-50) using flugarabine/melphalan conditioning and cyclosporine (CSA)/mycophenolate (MMF) as GVHD prophylaxis. In order to further improve upon the outcome in the RI-HCT setting, we initiated a series of clinical trials at City of Hope National Medical Center designed to evaluate the impact of tacrolimus (FK)/sirolimus (SIRO)-based GVHD prophylaxis. Here we report the combined, updated results from a consecutive case-series of 89 patients with MDS (including AML progressed from MDS) who underwent RI-HCT from 2000 to 2008 and received either CSA/MMF (n =44) or FK/SIRO (n=45)-based GVHD prophylaxis. All patients received fludarabine 125 mg/m2 plus melphalan 140 mg/m2 followed by an allogeneic HCT (peripheral blood: n=83, bone marrow: n=6) from an HLA-identical sibling (SIB: n=35) or unrelated donor (MUD: n=54). Additional ATG was given to 12 patients. For MUD transplants a short course of methotrexate was added to CSA/MMF or FK/SIRO. The median age was 59 years (range: 20-71) and 31 (35%) patients were female, 58 (65%) were male. Diagnoses at transplant were RA (n=21), RARS (n=1), RAEB/RAEBT (n=36), and AML from prior MDS (n=31). Cytogenetic risk was low in 15 (17%), intermediate in 37 (41.5%), high in 37 (41.5%) patients. By IPSS criteria (for MDS only), 2 patients had low, 24 had int-1, 20 had int-2, and 12 had high-risk MDS. Twenty-seven patients had therapy-related MDS including 14 with prior autologous HCT. The median follow-up time for surviving patients was 39 months (range: 24-68) for the CSA/MMF group and 17 months (range: 4-39) for the FK/SIRO group. All but two patients (1 in CSA/MMF, 1 in FK/SIRO) engrafted with the median neutrophil recovery at 15 days (range: 11-55). The baseline patient, disease and transplant characteristics were similar between CSA/MMF and FK/SIRO, except for an increased percentage of therap-related MDS in the CSA/MMF group (43% vs. 18%, p<0.01). The median donor chimerism by STR at day 30 post-transplant was 100% in both groups (p=0.6). FK/SIRO was associated with a significantly reduced one-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) (11.4%) compared with CSA/MMF (36.2%, p=0.01). This improvement in NRM translated into a trend for improved overall survival (81.4% vs. 52.3%, p=0.1) and disease-free survival (72.2% vs. 52.3%, p=0.08) at one year. While we observed no significant difference in acute GVHD grade II-IV between CSA/MMF and FK/SIRO, FK/SIRO was associated with a significant reduction in grade IV GVHD (0% versus 26%, p<0.01) and a trend for III-IV GVHD (31% vs. 55%, p=0.1). There was no significant difference in chronic GVHD between FK/SIRO (60%) and CSA/MMF (56%, p=0.8). In multivariate analysis, the use of FK/SIRO was independently associated with improved NRM after adjusted for donor type, therapy-related MDS, %bone marrow blasts, and HLA match status (Table). In conclusion, FK/SIRO-based GVHD prophylaxis was associated with an improved outcome after RI-HCT for MDS attributable to the reduced risk for severe acute GVHD.Variables for NRMHazard Ratio (95% CI)p-valueDe novo (n=62) Therapy-related (n=27)baseline 0.75 (0.31–1.89)0.55Sibling donor (n=35) Unrelated donor (n=54)baseline 2.17 (0.70–6.74)0.18Bone marrow blasts < or =10% (n=67) Bone marrow blasts >10% (n=22)baseline 2.13 (0.92–4.96)0.08HLA match (sibling donor or 10/10 MUD, n=72)HLA < mismatch MUD (<10/10 match, n=17)baseline 6.26 (2.11–18.55)0.001FK/SIRO (n=45) CSA/MMF (n=44)baseline 6.58 (2.15–20.14)0.001 Disclosures: Off Label Use: cyclosporine, cellcept, tacrolimus, sirolimus, and methotrexate for GVHD prophylaxis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document