158. Impact of Fluoroquinolone Cascade Reporting of Urine Samples on Antibiotic Prescribing Rates in a Network of Urgent Care Clinics

Abstract Background Cascade reporting is a type of selective reporting in which susceptibility results of certain antibiotics (either with broader spectrum or cost) are only reported if an organism is resistant to other prespecified agents. This strategy has been successfully deployed in inpatient settings but its impact in outpatient settings is less well characterized. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the impact of cascade reporting of the antimicrobial susceptibility of fluoroquinolones on prescribing rates of select antibiotics in a network of urban Urgent Care clinics. Methods On July 2019, the susceptibility reporting policies for urine cultures growing Enterobacterales were changed to routinely reporting a limited antibiotic panel including first and second generation cephalosporins, nitrofurantoin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), and fluroquinolone (FQ) reporting was changed to a release only in case of resistance to all agents in the limited panel. Third and fourth generation cephalosporins and carbapenems were reported only in case of resistance to all narrower spectrum agents and FQs. We then compared monthly antibiotic use in prescriptions per 1000 patient-encounters for the pre-intervention (June 2018-June 2019) and post-intervention (August 2019-December 2020) periods using an interrupted times series analysis. Results Immediately following the change to cascade reporting, FQ prescribing decreased by 38% (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-0.77 p< 0.0001) and no change in trend was subsequently seen (IRR 1.01, 95% CI 0.98-1.04; p=0.59) (Figure 1).Cephalexin prescribing did not immediately change following the intervention (IRR 1.20, 95% CI 1.00-1.33; p=0.05) but subsequently showed a trend towards increase use (IRR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.06; p< 0.0001) (Figure 1). No immediate or trend changes in the prescribing rates of TMP-SMX or nitrofurantoin were identified (Figure 1). Conclusion In a network of Urgent Care clinics, cascade reporting of FQ susceptibility in urine cultures growing Enterobacterales resulted in a sustained decrease in FQ prescribing without major shifts towards prescribing of other agents. Cascade reporting should be considered as a feasible antimicrobial stewardship strategy in this outpatient setting. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Download Full-text

229. Hospitalists Antimicrobial Scorecard Improves Antibiotic Prescribing at a Community Teaching Hospital

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.273 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S116-S116

Author(s):

Julia Sessa ◽

Helen Jacoby ◽

Bruce Blain ◽

Lisa Avery

Keyword(s):

Patient Care ◽

Teaching Hospital ◽

Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽

Rank Order ◽

Antibiotic Use ◽

Outpatient Setting ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Full Time ◽

Days Of Therapy ◽

The Impact

Abstract Background Measuring antimicrobial consumption data is a foundation of antimicrobial stewardship programs. There is data to support antimicrobial scorecard utilization to improve antibiotic use in the outpatient setting. There is a lack of data on the impact of an antimicrobial scorecard for hospitalists. Our objective was to improve antibiotic prescribing amongst the hospitalist service through the development of an antimicrobial scorecard. Methods Conducted in a 451-bed teaching hospital amongst 22 full time hospitalists. The antimicrobial scorecard for 2019 was distributed in two phases. In October 2019, baseline antibiotic prescribing data (January – September 2019) was distributed. In January 2020, a second scorecard was distributed (October – December 2019) to assess the impact of the scorecard. The scorecard distributed via e-mail to physicians included: Antibiotic days of therapy/1,000 patient care days (corrected for attending census), route of antibiotic prescribing (% intravenous (IV) vs % oral (PO)) and percentage of patients prescribed piperacillin-tazobactam (PT) for greater than 3 days. Hospitalists received their data in rank order amongst their peers. Along with the antimicrobial scorecard, recommendations from the antimicrobial stewardship team were included for hospitalists to improve their antibiotic prescribing for these initiatives. Hospitalists demographics (years of practice and gender) were collected. Descriptive statistics were utilized to analyze pre and post data. Results Sixteen (16) out of 22 (73%) hospitalists improved their antibiotic prescribing from pre- to post-scorecard (χ 2(1)=3.68, p = 0.055). The median antibiotic days of therapy/1,000 patient care days decreased from 661 pre-scorecard to 618 post-scorecard (p = 0.043). The median PT use greater than 3 days also decreased significantly, from 18% pre-scorecard to 11% post-scorecard (p = 0.0025). There was no change in % of IV antibiotic prescribing and no correlation between years of experience or gender to antibiotic prescribing. Conclusion Providing antimicrobial scorecards to our hospitalist service resulted in a significant decrease in antibiotic days of therapy/1,000 patient care days and PT prescribing beyond 3 days. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Download Full-text

Development of an Electronic Algorithm to Identify Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescribing for Pediatric Pharyngitis

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology ◽

10.1017/ice.2020.728 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 41 (S1) ◽

pp. s188-s189

Author(s):

Jeffrey Gerber ◽

Robert Grundmeier ◽

Keith Hamilton ◽

Lauri Hicks ◽

Melinda Neuhauser ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Predictive Value ◽

Gold Standard ◽

Antibiotic Stewardship ◽

Chart Review ◽

Antibiotic Use ◽

Audit And Feedback ◽

Urgent Care ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Tract Infections ◽

The Impact

Background: Antibiotic overuse contributes to antibiotic resistance and unnecessary adverse drug effects. Antibiotic stewardship interventions have primarily focused on acute-care settings. Most antibiotic use, however, occurs in outpatients with acute respiratory tract infections such as pharyngitis. The electronic health record (EHR) might provide an effective and efficient tool for outpatient antibiotic stewardship. We aimed to develop and validate an electronic algorithm to identify inappropriate antibiotic use for pediatric outpatients with pharyngitis. Methods: This study was conducted within the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) Care Network, including 31 pediatric primary care practices and 3 urgent care centers with a shared EHR serving >250,000 children. We used International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes to identify encounters for pharyngitis at any CHOP practice from March 15, 2017, to March 14, 2018, excluding those with concurrent infections (eg, otitis media, sinusitis), immunocompromising conditions, or other comorbidities that might influence the need for antibiotics. We randomly selected 450 features for detailed chart abstraction assessing patient demographics as well as practice and prescriber characteristics. Appropriateness of antibiotic use based on chart review served as the gold standard for evaluating the electronic algorithm. Criteria for appropriate use included streptococcal testing, use of penicillin or amoxicillin (absent β-lactam allergy), and a 10-day duration of therapy. Results: In 450 patients, the median age was 8.4 years (IQR, 5.5–9.0) and 54% were women. On chart review, 149 patients (33%) received an antibiotic, of whom 126 had a positive rapid strep result. Thus, based on chart review, 23 subjects (5%) diagnosed with pharyngitis received antibiotics inappropriately. Amoxicillin or penicillin was prescribed for 100 of the 126 children (79%) with a positive rapid strep test. Of the 126 children with a positive test, 114 (90%) received the correct antibiotic: amoxicillin, penicillin, or an appropriate alternative antibiotic due to b-lactam allergy. Duration of treatment was correct for all 126 children. Using the electronic algorithm, the proportion of inappropriate prescribing was 28 of 450 (6%). The test characteristics of the electronic algorithm (compared to gold standard chart review) for identification of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing were sensitivity (99%, 422 of 427); specificity (100%, 23 of 23); positive predictive value (82%, 23 of 28); and negative predictive value (100%, 422 of 422). Conclusions: For children with pharyngitis, an electronic algorithm for identification of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing is highly accurate. Future work should validate this approach in other settings and develop and evaluate the impact of an audit and feedback intervention based on this tool.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Download Full-text

142. Implementing an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in the Outpatient Setting

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.187 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S82-S82

Author(s):

Travis B Nielsen ◽

Maressa Santarossa ◽

Beatrice D Probst ◽

Laurie Labuszewski ◽

Jenna Lopez ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Primary Care ◽

Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽

Inappropriate Prescribing ◽

The United States ◽

Outpatient Setting ◽

Urgent Care ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽

Post Intervention ◽

Stewardship Program

Abstract Background Antimicrobial-resistant infections lead to increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Among the most facile modifiable risk factors for developing resistance is inappropriate prescribing. The CDC estimates that 47 million (or ≥30% of) outpatient antibiotic prescriptions in the United States are unnecessary. This has provided impetus for expanding our antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) into the outpatient setting. Initial goals included the following: continuous evaluation and reporting of antibiotic prescribing compliance; minimize underuse of antibiotics from delayed diagnoses and misdiagnoses; ensure proper drug, dose, and duration; improve the percentage of appropriate prescriptions. Methods To achieve these goals, we first sent a baseline survey to outpatient prescribers, assessing their understanding of stewardship and antimicrobial resistance. Questions were modeled from the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Precious Drugs & Scary Bugs Campaign. The survey was sent to prescribers at 19 primary care and three immediate/urgent care clinics. Compliance rates for prescribing habits were subsequently tracked via electronic health records and reported to prescribers in accordance with IRB approval. Results Prescribers were highly knowledgeable about what constitutes appropriate prescribing, with verified compliance rates highly concordant with self-reported rates. However, 74% of respondents reported intense pressure from patients to inappropriately prescribe antimicrobials. Compliance rates have been tracked since December 2018 and comparing pre- with post-intervention rates shows improvement in primary care since reporting rates to prescribers in August 2019. Conclusion Reporting compliance rates has been helpful in avoiding inappropriate antimicrobial therapy. However, the survey data reinforce the importance of behavioral interventions to bolster ASP efficacy in the outpatient setting. Going forward, posters modeled off of the IDPH template will be conspicuously exhibited in exam rooms, indicating institutional commitment to the enumerated ASP guidelines. Future studies will allow for comparison of pre- and post-intervention knowledge and prescriber compliance. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Download Full-text

Pharmacy-Based Intervention to Reduce Antibiotic Use for Acute Bronchitis

Annals of Pharmacotherapy ◽

10.1177/106002800303700204 ◽

2003 ◽

Vol 37 (2) ◽

pp. 187-191 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

David E Hickman ◽

Marilyn R Stebbins ◽

John R Hanak ◽

B Joseph Guglielmo

Keyword(s):

Intervention Program ◽

Acute Bronchitis ◽

Antibiotic Use ◽

Urgent Care ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Group Model ◽

Community Based ◽

Health Maintenance ◽

Physician Group ◽

The Impact

BACKGROUND: Intervention programs can reduce inappropriate antibiotic use for the treatment of acute bronchitis in a closed health maintenance organization model. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a pharmacy-based intervention program intended to reduce antibiotic use in the treatment of acute bronchitis in a community-based physician group model. SUBJECTS: Adult and pediatric patients with an office or urgent care visit for acute bronchitis during the baseline and study periods were included in the study. The clinicians were primary care physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants in a suburban community-based physician group setting. METHODS: All patients treated for acute bronchitis from January 1 through June 30, 1998, were evaluated for initial receipt of antibiotics and use of clinic resources (office visits, additional antibiotics). From September through December of 1998, physicians were provided literature from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), cough and cold package inserts, and newsletters intended to educate the providers regarding the inappropriateness of antibiotics in the treatment of acute bronchitis. Patient-directed literature from the CDC was placed in the examination rooms and clinic waiting areas beginning September 1998. From January 1 through June 30, 1999, all patients treated for acute bronchitis were assessed for receipt of antibiotics and use of clinic resources. A separate geographic clinic site served as a control during both study periods. RESULTS: During 1998, 888 of 1840 patients (48.3%) received antibiotics for treatment of acute bronchitis; this total decreased to 924 of 2392 (38.6%; p ≤ 0.001) in 1999, a reduction of 20%. The rate of antibiotic prescribing in control patients was unchanged during the concomitant time periods (142/446, 31.8% vs. 102/321, 31.8%). The rate of subsequent physician visits was similar (8% vs. 9%) between patients receiving antibiotics and those who did not. However, significantly more patients initially receiving antibiotics required a subsequent antibiotic prescription (45/1812, 2.5% vs. 24/2420, 1.0%; p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A pharmacy-based intervention program reduces the incidence of inappropriate antibiotic use in the treatment of acute bronchitis. Reduced antibiotic prescribing does not increase consumption of healthcare resources; patients who receive antibiotics for acute bronchitis are more likely to subsequently require additional antibiotic prescriptions. While a significant decrease in antibiotic use was realized, other interventions are required to further reduce the prevalence of antibiotic use in acute bronchitis.

Download Full-text

Scope of Antibiotic Stewardship Programs in Pediatrics

Clinical Pediatrics ◽

10.1177/0009922819852985 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 58 (11-12) ◽

pp. 1291-1301 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Leslie Grammatico-Guillon ◽

Lukman Abdurrahim ◽

Kimberley Shea ◽

Pascal Astagneau ◽

Stephen Pelton

Keyword(s):

Antimicrobial Resistance ◽

Antibiotic Stewardship ◽

Antibiotic Use ◽

Antibiotic Consumption ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Large Variability ◽

Search Terms ◽

Inpatient Settings ◽

Meta Analyses ◽

The Impact

This review of pediatric antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs) summarized the antibiotic prescribing interventions and their impact on antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance. We reviewed studies of pediatric ASP, including the search terms “antimicrobial stewardship,” “antibiotic stewardship,” “children,” and “pediatric.” The articles’ selection and review were performed independently by 2 investigators, according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Twenty-one studies were included, from the past 15 years, increasing after the 2007 IDSA (Infectious Diseases Society of America) guidelines for ASP with a large variability of the programs, and the virtual exclusive focus on inpatient settings (90%): 16 formalized ASP and 5 non-ASP actions. A reduction in antibiotic prescribing in ASP has been demonstrated in the studies reporting pediatric ASP, but only one ASP showed a significant impact on antimicrobial resistance. However, the impact on antibiotic consumption in pediatrics demonstrated the important contribution of these strategies to improve antibiotic use in children, without complications or negative issues.

Download Full-text

The inconvincible patient: how clinicians perceive demand for antibiotics in the outpatient setting

Family Practice ◽

10.1093/fampra/cmz066 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Mike R Kohut ◽

Sara C Keller ◽

Jeffrey A Linder ◽

Pranita D Tamma ◽

Sara E Cosgrove ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Antibiotic Prescription ◽

Antibiotic Use ◽

Outpatient Setting ◽

Urgent Care ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Structured Interviews ◽

Related Factors ◽

Directed Content Analysis ◽

The Face ◽

Outpatient Settings

Abstract Background Perceived patient demand for antibiotics drives unnecessary antibiotic prescribing in outpatient settings, but little is known about how clinicians experience this demand or how this perceived demand shapes their decision-making. Objective To identify how clinicians perceive patient demand for antibiotics and the way these perceptions stimulate unnecessary prescribing. Methods Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with clinicians in outpatient settings who prescribe antibiotics. Interviews were analyzed using conventional and directed content analysis. Results Interviews were conducted with 25 clinicians from nine practices across three states. Patient demand was the most common reason respondents provided for why they prescribed non-indicated antibiotics. Three related factors motivated clinically unnecessary antibiotic use in the face of perceived patient demand: (i) clinicians want their patients to regard clinical visits as valuable and believe that an antibiotic prescription demonstrates value; (ii) clinicians want to avoid negative repercussions of denying antibiotics, including reduced income, damage to their reputation, emotional exhaustion, and degraded relationships with patients; (iii) clinicians believed that certain patients are impossible to satisfy without an antibiotic prescription and felt that efforts to refuse antibiotics to such patients wastes time and invites the aforementioned negative repercussions. Clinicians in urgent care settings were especially likely to describe being motivated by these factors. Conclusion Interventions to improve antibiotic use in the outpatient setting must address clinicians’ concerns about providing value for their patients, fear of negative repercussions from denying antibiotics, and the approach to inconvincible patients.

Download Full-text

Description of the methods for describing and assessing the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing and adherence to published treatment guidelines in an academic medical clinic

INNOVATIONS in pharmacy ◽

10.24926/iip.v7i1.412 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 7 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Michael E Klepser ◽

Ashley Altom ◽

Colleen MacCallum ◽

Eric Nordquist ◽

Donald G Klepser

Keyword(s):

Treatment Guidelines ◽

Antibiotic Use ◽

Electronic Medical Record System ◽

Outpatient Setting ◽

Therapeutic Regimen ◽

Original Research ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Dose Frequency ◽

Record System ◽

The Impact

Overuse and inappropriate use of antibiotics have been associated with increased rates of antimicrobial resistance and increased healthcare expenditures. Tracking inpatient antimicrobial use has helped quantify the value of stewardship programs aimed at improving the rational use of antibiotics among hospitalized patients. Unfortunately, similar methods for tracking and assessing antibiotic use in the outpatient setting have not been well described. We developed a novel method to capture trends and assess appropriateness of antibiotic usage. This strategy is based on identification of antimicrobial prescriptions in an electronic medical record system, linking prescribing to patient data, and capturing information regarding dosing and indications for use. Using information on dose, frequency, and duration of the antibiotic prescribed, a parameter to quantify antibiotic exposure (Prescribed Therapeutic Regimen, PTR) is calculated. This parameter is compared to a database of information on agents recommended in published guidelines (Recommended Therapeutic Regimen, RTR). By linking an ICD-9 code and the prescribed antibiotic we determine the appropriateness of the PTR by comparing it to the RTR for a given indication. Data are used to establish a baseline pattern of antibiotic use in the clinic to gauge the impact of future stewardship activities. Additionally, individual clinics and prescribers are given a snapshot of their antibiotic use compared to other clinics and prescribers. This is a novel means of describing antibiotic use in the outpatient setting that could serve as a standardized model for various adult and pediatric outpatient practices. Type: Original Research

Download Full-text

141. Implementation of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions for Asymptomatic Bacteriuria and Acute Respiratory Infections, a Stepped Wedge Randomized Study

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.186 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S81-S82

Author(s):

Grace Mortrude ◽

Mary Rehs ◽

Katherine Sherman ◽

Nathan Gundacker ◽

Claire Dysart

Keyword(s):

Patient Satisfaction ◽

Primary Outcome ◽

Respiratory Infections ◽

Asymptomatic Bacteriuria ◽

Educational Interventions ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Acute Respiratory Infections ◽

Stepped Wedge ◽

Post Intervention ◽

The Impact

Abstract Background Outpatient antimicrobial prescribing is an important target for antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions to decrease antimicrobial resistance in the United States. The objective of this study was to design, implement and evaluate the impact of AMS interventions focused on asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) and acute respiratory infections (ARIs) in the outpatient setting. Methods This randomized, stepped-wedge trial evaluated the impact of educational interventions to providers on adult patients presenting to primary care (PC) clinics for ARIs and ASB from 10/1/19 to 1/31/20. Data was collected by retrospective chart review. An antibiotic prescribing report card was provided to PC providers, then an educational session was delivered at each PC clinic. Patient education materials were distributed to PC clinics. Interventions were made in a step-wise (figure 1) fashion. The primary outcome was percentage of overall antibiotic prescriptions as a composite of prescriptions for ASB, acute bronchitis, upper-respiratory infection otherwise unspecified, uncomplicated sinusitis, and uncomplicated pharyngitis. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary outcome, a composite safety endpoint of related hospital, emergency department or primary care visit within 4 weeks, antibiotic appropriateness, and patient satisfaction surveys. Figure 1 Results There were 887 patients included for analysis (405 pre-intervention, 482 post-intervention). Baseline characteristics are summarized in table 1. After controlling for type 1 error using a Bonferroni correction the primary outcome was not significantly different between groups (56% vs 49%). There was a statistically significant decrease in prescriptions for bronchitis (20.99% vs 12.66%; p=0.0003). Appropriateness of prescriptions for sinusitis (OR 4.96; CI 1.79–13.75; p=0.0021) and pharyngitis (OR 5.36; CI 1.93 – 14.90; p=0.0013) was improved in the post-intervention group. The composite safety outcome and patient satisfaction survey ratings did not differ between groups. Table 1 Conclusion Multifaceted educational interventions targeting providers can improve antibiotic prescribing for indications rarely requiring antimicrobials without increasing re-visit or patient satisfaction surveys. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Download Full-text

154. Development of an Electronic Algorithm to Target Outpatient Antimicrobial Stewardship Efforts for Adults with Acute Pharyngitis

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.199 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S87-S87

Author(s):

Ebbing Lautenbach ◽

Keith W Hamilton ◽

Robert Grundmeier ◽

Melinda M Neuhauser ◽

Lauri Hicks ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chart Review ◽

Inappropriate Prescribing ◽

Antibiotic Use ◽

University Of Pennsylvania ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Acute Pharyngitis ◽

Test Characteristics ◽

Appropriate Prescribing ◽

Concurrent Infections ◽

The Impact

Abstract Background Although most antibiotic use occurs in outpatients, antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs) have primarily focused on inpatients. A major challenge for outpatient ASPs is lack of accurate and accessible electronic data to target interventions. We developed and validated an electronic algorithm to identify inappropriate antibiotic use for adult outpatients with acute pharyngitis. Methods In the University of Pennsylvania Health System, we used ICD-10 diagnostic codes to identify patient encounters for acute pharyngitis at outpatient practices between 3/15/17 – 3/14/18. Exclusion criteria included immunocompromising conditions, comorbidities, and concurrent infections that might require antibiotic use. We randomly selected 300 eligible subjects. Inappropriate antibiotic use based on chart review served as the basis for assessment of the electronic algorithm which was constructed using only data in the electronic health record (EHR). Criteria for appropriate prescribing, choice of antibiotic, and duration included positive streptococcal testing, use of penicillin/amoxicillin (absent b-lactam allergy), and 10 days maximum duration of therapy. Results Of 300 subjects, median age was 42, 75% were female, 64% were seen by internal medicine (vs. family medicine), and 69% were seen by a physician (vs. advanced practice provider). On chart review, 127 (42%) subjects received an antibiotic, of which 29 had a positive streptococcal test and 4 had another appropriate indication. Thus, 74% (94/127) of patients received antibiotics inappropriately. Of the 29 patients who received appropriate prescribing, 27 (93%) received an appropriate antibiotic. Finally, of the 29 patients who were appropriately treated, 29 (100%) received the correct duration. Test characteristics of the EHR algorithm (compared to chart review) are noted in the Table. Conclusion Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for acute pharyngitis is common. An electronic algorithm for identifying inappropriate prescribing, antibiotic choice, and duration is highly accurate. This algorithm could be used to efficiently assess prescribing among practices and individual clinicians. The impact of interventions based on this algorithm should be tested in future work. Test Characteristics of Electronic Algorithm for Inappropriate Prescribing, Agent, and Duration Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Download Full-text

Development of an Electronic Algorithm to Target Outpatient Antimicrobial Stewardship Efforts for Acute Bronchitis

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology ◽

10.1017/ice.2020.510 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 41 (S1) ◽

pp. s32-s32

Author(s):

Ebbing Lautenbach ◽

Keith Hamilton ◽

Robert Grundmeier ◽

Melinda Neuhauser ◽

Lauri Hicks ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽

Predictive Value ◽

Gold Standard ◽

Chart Review ◽

Acute Bronchitis ◽

Antibiotic Use ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Diagnostic Codes ◽

Icd 10 ◽

The Impact

Background: Antibiotic resistance has increased at alarming rates, driven predominantly by antibiotic overuse. Although most antibiotic use occurs in outpatients, antimicrobial stewardship programs have primarily focused on inpatient settings. A major challenge for outpatient stewardship is the lack of accurate and accessible electronic data to target interventions. We sought to develop and validate an electronic algorithm to identify inappropriate antibiotic use for outpatients with acute bronchitis. Methods: This study was conducted within the University of Pennsylvania Health System (UPHS). We used ICD-10 diagnostic codes to identify encounters for acute bronchitis at any outpatient UPHS practice between March 15, 2017, and March 14, 2018. Exclusion criteria included underlying immunocompromising condition, other comorbidity influencing the need for antibiotics (eg, emphysema), or ICD-10 code at the same visit for a concurrent infection (eg, sinusitis). We randomly selected 300 (150 from academic practices and 150 from nonacademic practices) eligible subjects for detailed chart abstraction that assessed patient demographics and practice and prescriber characteristics. Appropriateness of antibiotic use based on chart review served as the gold standard for assessment of the electronic algorithm. Because antibiotic use is not indicated for this study population, appropriateness was assessed based upon whether an antibiotic was prescribed or not. Results: Of 300 subjects, median age was 61 years (interquartile range, 50–68), 62% were women, 74% were seen in internal medicine (vs family medicine) practices, and 75% were seen by a physician (vs an advanced practice provider). On chart review, 167 (56%) subjects received an antibiotic. Of these subjects, 1 had documented concern for pertussis and 4 had excluding conditions for which there were no ICD-10 codes. One received an antibiotic prescription for a planned dental procedure. Thus, based on chart review, 161 (54%) subjects received antibiotics inappropriately. Using the electronic algorithm based on diagnostic codes, underlying and concurrent conditions, and prescribing data, the number of subjects with inappropriate prescribing was 170 (56%) because 3 subjects had antibiotic prescribing not noted based on chart review. The test characteristics of the electronic algorithm (compared to gold standard chart review) for identification of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing were the following: sensitivity, 100% (161 of 161); specificity, 94% (130 of 139); positive predictive value, 95% (161 of 170); and negative predictive value, 100% (130 of 130). Conclusions: For outpatients with acute bronchitis, an electronic algorithm for identification of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing is highly accurate. This algorithm could be used to efficiently assess prescribing among practices and individual clinicians. The impact of interventions based on this algorithm should be tested in future studies.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Download Full-text