scholarly journals 295. SARS-CoV-2 Infection in a Referral Cancer Center in Mexico City During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S255-S255
Author(s):  
Diana Vilar-Compte ◽  
Daniel De La Rosa Martinez ◽  
Alexandra Martín-Onraet ◽  
Carolina Pérez-Jiménez ◽  
Beda Islas-Muñoz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Strong Predictor ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Solid Cancer ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background Literature on SARS-CoV-2 infection in cancer patients is scarce in Latin America. This population seems to have a higher risk for adverse outcomes. This study aims to correlate clinical characteristics with outcomes in patients with cancer in a referral center in Mexico. Methods We included patients with cancer and confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, from April, 19 to December 30, 2020, at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico. Clinical information was obtained from medical and epidemiological records. We conducted a descriptive analysis. For the association between variables with hospitalization, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and mortality; univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed; odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Results Four hundred thirty-three patients were included; 268 (62%) were female, the median age was 55 years. One hundred thirty-five (31%), 130 (30%), and 93 (21%) patients had obesity, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus (DM), respectively. Three hundred forty-one (79%) had solid cancer; 82 (19%) hematological malignancy (HM), and 10 (2%) were under evaluation for cancer diagnosis. One hundred seventy (39%) had advanced or metastatic cancer. One hundred ninety-eight (46%) patients were hospitalized. Risk factors were: age (p= 0.001); woman (p=0.019); HM (p=0.050) and advanced or metastatic cancer (p= 0.041). Fourty-five (10%) patients required IMV. Age (p=0.018); DM (p=0.041); C-Reactive Protein (p= 0.002), and LDH (p= 0.033) were associated with invasive mechanical ventilation. Mortality within 30-days after diagnosis was 19% (82 cases). Associated characteristics were: age (p=0.041); lymphocytes (p=0.049); creatinine (p=0.005) and albumin (p=0.001). Conclusion In this study, patients with cancer showed higher mortality, need of hospitalization, and invasive mechanical ventilation compared with groups of patients without cancer. We did not find an increased risk in mortality for hematological malignancies. Although our cohort was younger than others previously reported, age was a strong predictor of adverse outcomes. Variables associated with IMV and death were similar to those previously described in cancer patients with COVID-19. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Impact of cancer on emergency department outcomes.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18618-e18618
Author(s):  
Alexander S. Qian ◽  
Edmund M. Qiao ◽  
Vinit Nalawade ◽  
Rohith S. Voora ◽  
Nikhil V. Kotha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Inpatient Admission ◽  
Cancer Site ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk

e18618 Background: Cancer patients frequently utilize the Emergency Department (ED) for a variety of diagnoses, both related and unrelated to their cancer. Patients with cancer have unique risks related to their cancer and treatment which could influence ED-related outcomes. A better understanding of these risks could help improve risk-stratification for these patients and help inform future interventions. This study sought to define the increased risks cancer patients face for inpatient admission and hospital mortality among cancer patients presenting to the ED. Methods: From the National Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) we identified patients with and without a diagnosis of cancer presenting to the ED between 2016 and 2018. We used International Classification of Diseases, version 10 (ICD10-CM) codes to identify patients with cancer, and to identify patient’s presenting diagnosis. Multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression models assessed the influence of cancer diagnoses on two endpoints: hospital admission from the ED, and inpatient hospital mortality. Results: There were 340 million weighted ED visits, of which 8.3 million (2.3%) occurred in patients with a cancer diagnosis. Compared to non-cancer patients, patients with cancer had an increased risk of inpatient admission (64.7% vs. 14.8%; p < 0.0001) and hospital mortality (4.6% vs. 0.5%; p < 0.0001). Factors associated with both an increased risk of hospitalization and death included older age, male gender, lower income level, discharge quarter, and receipt of care in a teaching hospital. We identified the top 15 most common presenting diagnoses among cancer patients, and among each of these diagnoses, cancer patients had increased risks of hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] range 2.0-13.2; all p < 0.05) and death (OR range 2.1-14.4; all p < 0.05) compared to non-cancer patients with the same diagnosis. Within the cancer patient cohort, cancer site was the most robust individual predictor associated with risk of hospitalization or death, with highest risk among patients with metastatic cancer, liver and lung cancers compared to the reference group of prostate cancer patients. Conclusions: Cancer patients presenting to the ED have high risks for hospital admission and death when compared to patients without cancer. Cancer patients represent a distinct population and may benefit from cancer-specific risk stratification or focused interventions tailored to improve outcomes in the ED setting.

scholarly journals Invasive mechanical ventilation at 36 weeks post-menstrual age, adverse outcomes with a comparison of recent definitions of bronchopulmonary dysplasia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milenka Cuevas Guaman ◽  
Nikou Pishevar ◽  
Steven H. Abman ◽  
Martin Keszler ◽  
William E. Truog ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Inhospital Mortality ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Using Data

Abstract Objectives To determine whether the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (iMV) at 36 weeks PMA in patients with severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (sBPD) identifies those patients at highest risk for tracheostomy or gastrostomy, and to compare sBPD with recent definitions of BPD. Study design Observational study from Jan 2015 to Sept 2019 using data from the BPD Collaborative Registry. Results Five hundred and sixty-four patients with sBPD of whom 24% were on iMV at 36 weeks PMA. Those on iMV had significantly (p < 0.0001) increased risk for tracheostomy or gastrostomy. The overall mortality rate was 3% and the risk for mortality was substantially greater in those on iMV than in those on noninvasive support at 36 weeks PMA (RR 13.8, 95% CI 4.3–44.5, p < 0.0001). When applying the NICHD definition (2016) 44% had Grade III BPD. When applying the NRN definition, 6% had Grade 1 BPD, 70% had Grade 2 BPD, and 24% had Grade 3 BPD. Conclusions Patients with sBPD who were on iMV at 36 weeks had a significantly greater risk of inhospital mortality and survivors had a significantly greater risk of undergoing tracheostomy and/or gastrostomy. The use of type 2 sBPD or Grade 3 BPD would enhance the ability to target future studies to those infants with sBPD at the highest risk of adverse long-term outcomes.

scholarly journals Clinical factors and outcomes of subsegmental pulmonary embolism in cancer patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 1050-1058
Author(s):  
Melissa Yan ◽  
Ryan Kieser ◽  
Carol C. Wu ◽  
Wei Qiao ◽  
Cristhiam M. Rojas-Hernandez
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Pulmonary Arteries ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract In the cancer population, patients diagnosed with venous thromboembolism (VTE) are considered to have a threefold increased risk of mortality compared with those without VTE. With the advent of modern computed tomography (CT), the rate of diagnosis of subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SSPE) has increased, likely as a result of improved visualization of the peripheral pulmonary arteries. The clinical significance of SSPE remains unclear because of the lack of randomized controlled clinical trials. The aim of this study was to identify the incidence and risk factors of recurrent proximal PE within 12 months of diagnosis of SSPE in cancer. We performed a retrospective analysis of 206 adult cancer patients who were diagnosed with SSPE from 2014 to 2016 at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. At the time of SSPE diagnosis, the majority had metastatic cancer, 108 patients (53.2%) were undergoing chemotherapy, and 23 patients (11.2%) had a history of VTE. Most patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2. Sixty-seven percent of SSPE was discovered incidentally on restaging CT scans, with the majority being a single and isolated event (70.9%). Within 12 months of SSPE diagnosis, 18 patients (8.7%) were found to have a recurrent PE. The patients treated with anticoagulation had a lower rate of PE recurrence (8% vs 13% in those not treated with anticoagulation). Treatment with anticoagulation did not appear to have a significant impact on overall survival (P = .48) when adjusted for ECOG performance status and cancer stage.

scholarly journals COVID-19 and cancer registries: learning from the first peak of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvin J. X. Lee ◽  
Karin Purshouse
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Cancer Registries ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
International Studies ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk

AbstractThe SARS-Cov-2 pandemic in 2020 has caused oncology teams around the world to adapt their practice in the aim of protecting patients. Early evidence from China indicated that patients with cancer, and particularly those who had recently received chemotherapy or surgery, were at increased risk of adverse outcomes following SARS-Cov-2 infection. Many registries of cancer patients infected with SARS-Cov-2 emerged during the first wave. We collate the evidence from these national and international studies and focus on the risk factors for patients with solid cancers and the contribution of systemic anti-cancer treatments (SACT—chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted and hormone therapy) to outcomes following SARS-Cov-2 infection. Patients with cancer infected with SARS-Cov-2 have a higher probability of death compared with patients without cancer. Common risk factors for mortality following COVID-19 include age, male sex, smoking history, number of comorbidities and poor performance status. Oncological features that may predict for worse outcomes include tumour stage, disease trajectory and lung cancer. Most studies did not identify an association between SACT and adverse outcomes. Recent data suggest that the timing of receipt of SACT may be associated with risk of mortality. Ongoing recruitment to these registries will enable us to provide evidence-based care.

51: INCREASED RISK OF MENTAL DISORDERS ASSOCIATED WITH CHILDHOOD INVASIVE MECHANICAL VENTILATION

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-26
Author(s):  
Andrew Geneslaw ◽  
Yewei Lu ◽  
May Hua ◽  
Caleb Miles ◽  
Jeffrey Edwards ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Increased Risk

scholarly journals Recanalisation theraphy for acute ischemic stroke in cancer patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Merlino ◽  
Carmelo Smeralda ◽  
Gian Luigi Gigli ◽  
Simone Lorenzut ◽  
Sara Pez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Bridging Therapy ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Active Cancer

AbstractTo date, very few studies focused their attention on efficacy and safety of recanalisation therapy in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with cancer, reporting conflicting results. We retrospectively analysed data from our database of consecutive patients admitted to the Udine University Hospital with AIS that were treated with recanalisation therapy, i.e. intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), mechanical thrombectomy (MT), and bridging therapy, from January 2015 to December 2019. We compared 3-month dependency, 3-month mortality, and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (SICH) occurrence of patients with active cancer (AC) and remote cancer (RC) with that of patients without cancer (WC) undergoing recanalisation therapy for AIS. Patients were followed up for 3 months. Among the 613 AIS patients included in the study, 79 patients (12.9%) had either AC (n = 46; 7.5%) or RC (n = 33; 5.4%). Although AC patients, when treated with IVT, had a significantly increased risk of 3-month mortality [odds ratio (OR) 6.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.42–20.07, p = 0.001] than WC patients, stroke-related deaths did not differ between AC and WC patients (30% vs. 28.8%, p = 0.939). There were no significant differences between AC and WC patients, when treated with MT ± IVT, regarding 3-month dependency, 3-month mortality and SICH. Functional independence, mortality, and SICH were similar between RC and WC patients. In conclusion, recanalisation therapy might be used in AIS patients with nonmetastatic AC and with RC. Further studies are needed to explore the outcome of AIS patients with metastatic cancer undergoing recanalisation therapy.

Tobacco use, knowledge of harms, and cessation support among patients with non-tobacco related cancers.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24029-e24029
Author(s):  
Laura Vater ◽  
Anup Trikannad Ashwini Kumar ◽  
Neha Sehgal ◽  
Maria Khan ◽  
Kelsey Bullens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Safety Net ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Prescribe Medication ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Quit Smoking ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Quit Attempts

e24029 Background: Continued cigarette smoking among patients with cancer leads to numerous adverse health outcomes, even among patients with non-tobacco-related cancers such as breast, colon, and prostate cancer. Continued smoking is associated with poorer response to cancer treatment, increased risk for treatment-related toxicities, and shorter overall survival. While some patients with a smoking-related cancer make efforts to quit smoking at the time of diagnosis, patients with other forms of cancer might not understand the negative effects of continued smoking. In this study, we assessed patient knowledge of the harms of continued smoking, previous cessation attempts, and cessation support. Methods: We surveyed 102 adults with breast, colon, and prostate cancer at three locations: an NCI-designated cancer center, an urban safety-net medical center, and a rural cancer center. Patients were asked about current smoking behaviors, beliefs about the harms of continued smoking, quit attempts and resources used, and cessation support. We also surveyed seven oncologists to assess beliefs about harms of continued smoking, cessation support provided to patients, training and confidence in cessation counseling, and barriers to providing cessation support. Results: Most patients (82%) agreed or strongly agreed that continued smoking may shorten life expectancy, and 70% agreed or strongly agreed that continued smoking increased the risk of getting a different type of cancer. Only 41% of patients agreed or strongly agreed that continued smoking may cause more side effects from cancer treatment, and only 40% agreed or strongly agreed that ongoing smoking may affect treatment response. The majority of patients (86%) had tried to quit smoking for good, with an average 4.1 quit attempts per patient. Patients reported that physicians advised them to quit the majority of the time (92%), prescribed medication 33% of the time, and followed up on cessation attempts 43% of the time. Overall, oncologists had higher knowledge of the harms of continued smoking on treatment outcomes and survival. Those in practice for 20 years or more had higher confidence in cessation counseling than those in practice less than 4 years. Oncologists described lack of time and lack of confidence in cessation counseling as barriers to providing more cessation support. Conclusions: Among 102 patients with breast, colon, and prostate cancer who currently smoke, there was incomplete knowledge of the harms of continued smoking. Oncologists believe that tobacco cessation is important and frequently advise patients to quit, however they less frequently prescribe medication or follow up on cessation efforts. Interventions are needed to educate patients with cancer about the harms of continued smoking and to provide further cessation support.

scholarly journals Prevention of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: current approaches and opportunities for improvement

2011 ◽  
pp. 191-204
Author(s):  
Alpesh N. Amin ◽  
Steven B. Deitelzweig
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Assessment Model ◽  
Major Surgery ◽  
Medical Illness ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
National Quality ◽  
American Society

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), a common complication in patients with cancer, is associated with increased risk of morbidity, mortality, and recurrent VTE. Risk factors for VTE in cancer patients include the type and stage of cancer, comorbidities, age, major surgery, and active chemotherapy. Evidence-based guidelines for thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients have been published: the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American Society for Clinical Oncology guidelines recommend thromboprophylaxis for hospitalized cancer patients, while the American College of Chest Physician guidelines recommend thromboprophylaxis for surgical patients with cancer and bedridden cancer patients with an acute medical illness. Guidelines do not generally recommend routine thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory patients during chemotherapy, but there is evidence that some of these patients are at risk of VTE; some may be at higher risk while on active chemotherapy. Approaches are needed to identify those patients most likely to benefit from thromboprophylaxis, and, to this end, a risk assessment model has been developed and validated. Despite the benefits, many at-risk patients do not receive any thromboprophylaxis, or receive prophylaxis that is not compliant with guideline recommendations. Quality improvement initiatives have been developed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, National Quality Forum, and Joint Commission to encourage closure of the gap between guideline recommendations and clinical practice for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of VTE in hospitalized patients. Health-care institutions and providers need to take seriously the burden of VTE, improve prophylaxis rates in patients with cancer, and address the need for prophylaxis across the patient continuum.

scholarly journals COVID-IRS: A novel predictive score for risk of invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with COVID-19

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. e0248357
Author(s):  
José Antonio Garcia-Gordillo ◽  
Antonio Camiro-Zúñiga ◽  
Mercedes Aguilar-Soto ◽  
Dalia Cuenca ◽  
Arturo Cadena-Fernández ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Systemic Disease ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Lactic Dehydrogenase ◽  
Total Sample ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Predictive Score ◽  
Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Predictive Variables

Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a systemic disease that can rapidly progress into acute respiratory failure and death. Timely identification of these patients is crucial for a proper administration of health-care resources. Objective To develop a predictive score that estimates the risk of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) among patients with COVID-19. Study design Retrospective cohort study of 401 COVID-19 patients diagnosed from March 12, to August 10, 2020. The score development cohort comprised 211 patients (52.62% of total sample) whereas the validation cohort included 190 patients (47.38% of total sample). We divided participants according to the need of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and looked for potential predictive variables. Results We developed two predictive scores, one based on Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and the other one on the Neutrophil/Lymphocyte ratio (NLR), using the following variables: respiratory rate, SpO2/FiO2 ratio and lactic dehydrogenase (LDH). The area under the curve (AUC) in the development cohort was 0.877 (0.823–0.931) using the NLR based score and 0.891 (0.843–0.939) using the IL-6 based score. When compared with other similar scores developed for the prediction of adverse outcomes in COVID-19, the COVID-IRS scores proved to be superior in the prediction of IMV. Conclusion The COVID-IRS scores accurately predict the need for mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients using readily available variables taken upon admission. More studies testing the applicability of COVID-IRS in other centers and populations, as well as its performance as a triage tool for COVID-19 patients are needed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document