scholarly journals Viral Failure Among Persons Living with HIV Initiating Dolutegravir-Based vs. Other Recommended Regimens in Real-World Clinical Care Settings

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S39-S39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Nance ◽  
Vani Vannappagari ◽  
Kimberly Smith ◽  
Catherine Johannes ◽  
Brian Calingaert ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Much of the prior research on viral failure (VF) with integrase inhibitor (INSTI) therapy is based on results from trials rather than clinical care settings and little is known about recently approved medications such as dolutegravir (DTG). We compared VF in persons living with HIV (PLWH) who initiated DTG-based vs. other guideline recommended regimens in clinical care across the United States. Methods PLWH from eight CFAR Network of Integrated Clinical Systems (CNICS) sites who started a recommended regimen between August 2013 and August 2016 were included. We compared DTG vs. other INSTI, and vs. darunavir-based (DRV) regimens included in current guidelines for initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART). VF was defined as a viral load of >400 copies/ml >6 months after initiation. We used Cox models adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, tuberculosis, HIV risk factor, CD4 count, days since last HIV viral load, and site. PLWH were censored at death, regimen change or loss to follow-up (LTFU) with sensitivity analyses varying LTFU definitions from 0 to 12 months after last activity and including/excluding inverse probability censoring weights based on variables in the main models. Results Among 6636 PLWH who initiated a recommended regimen, a lower proportion on DTG-based regimens experienced VF during follow-up (Figure). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for VF for DTG vs. DRV-based regimens was 0.56 (95% confidence interval 0.37–0.86). In sensitivity models, the HR for VF for DTG vs. other INSTI regimens ranged from 0.73 to 1.07 depending on LTFU definitions. The HR for DTG vs. DRV-based regimens ranged from 0.38 to 0.63 depending on LTFU definitions. In sensitivity analyses among the 1,229 PLWH known to be ART-naive at initiation, a similar pattern was found with a lower HR of VF among those who initiated DTG vs. DRV-based regimens (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.11–0.56). Conclusion The observed rate of VF during follow-up was lower among PLWH initiating DTG-based vs. DRV-based regimens in routine clinical care at sites across the US. Results also demonstrated that different definitions of LTFU can have a large impact on the results and highlight the importance of sensitivity analyses in informing study definitions to minimize bias. Disclosures V. Vannappagari, ViiV Healthcare: Employee and Shareholder, Salary and Stocks; K. Smith, ViiV Healthcare: Employee, Salary; C. Johannes, VIIV: Research Contractor, Research support; B. Calingaert, VIIV: Research Contractor, Research support; C. Saltus, VIIV: Research Contractor, Research grant; J. Eron, VIIV: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee; M. S. Saag, VIIV: Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Grant recipient; BMS: Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee and Grant recipient; Gilead: Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee and Research support; Merck: Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee and Grant recipient; H. M. Crane, VIIV: Scientific Advisor, Nothing to date but I have been asked to be an advisor so there may be a relationship in the future.

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Mesic ◽  
Alexander Spina ◽  
Htay Thet Mar ◽  
Phone Thit ◽  
Tom Decroo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Progress toward the global target for 95% virological suppression among those on antiretroviral treatment (ART) is still suboptimal. We describe the viral load (VL) cascade, the incidence of virological failure and associated risk factors among people living with HIV receiving first-line ART in an HIV cohort in Myanmar treated by the Médecins Sans Frontières in collaboration with the Ministry of Health and Sports Myanmar. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study, including adult patients with at least one HIV viral load test result and having received of at least 6 months’ standard first-line ART. The incidence rate of virological failure (HIV viral load ≥ 1000 copies/mL) was calculated. Multivariable Cox’s regression was performed to identify risk factors for virological failure. Results We included 25,260 patients with a median age of 33.1 years (interquartile range, IQR 28.0–39.1) and a median observation time of 5.4 years (IQR 3.7–7.9). Virological failure was documented in 3,579 (14.2%) participants, resulting in an overall incidence rate for failure of 2.5 per 100 person-years of follow-up. Among those who had a follow-up viral load result, 1,258 (57.1%) had confirmed virological failure, of which 836 (66.5%) were switched to second-line treatment. An increased hazard for failure was associated with age ≤ 19 years (adjusted hazard ratio, aHR 1.51; 95% confidence intervals, CI 1.20–1.89; p < 0.001), baseline tuberculosis (aHR 1.39; 95% CI 1.14–1.49; p < 0.001), a history of low-level viremia (aHR 1.60; 95% CI 1.42–1.81; p < 0.001), or a history of loss-to-follow-up (aHR 1.24; 95% CI 1.41–1.52; p = 0.041) and being on the same regimen (aHR 1.37; 95% CI 1.07–1.76; p < 0.001). Cumulative appointment delay was not significantly associated with failure after controlling for covariates. Conclusions VL monitoring is an important tool to improve programme outcomes, however limited coverage of VL testing and acting on test results hampers its full potential. In our cohort children and adolescents, PLHIV with history of loss-to-follow-up or those with low-viremia are at the highest risk of virological failure and might require more frequent virological monitoring than is currently recommended.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S36-S36
Author(s):  
Lauren F Collins ◽  
Anandi N Sheth ◽  
C Christina Mehta ◽  
Elizabeth T Golub ◽  
Phyllis C Tien ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Age-related non-AIDS comorbidities (NACM) increasingly account for morbidity and mortality in persons living with HIV. The burden of NACM and its association with HIV is poorly described in women. Methods We analyzed data from HIV+ and at-risk HIV− participants who were followed in the Women’s Interagency HIV Study (WIHS) after 2009 (when >80% of participants used antiretroviral therapy). The prevalence of each NACM (defined by a combination of self-report, clinical measurements, and laboratory data) and the number of NACM were summarized at a most recent follow-up visit and were compared by age and HIV serostatus using unadjusted linear regression models. Results There were 3232 women (2309 HIV+, 923 HIV–) with a median follow-up of 15.3 years. The median age was 50 years, 65% were black, 38% currently smoked, 71% had ever used illicit drugs, 50% had annual income < $12,000, and median body mass index was 30 kg/m2. HIV+ women had a median CD4 count of 618 cells/mm3 and 66% had HIV viral suppression. Among 10 NACM evaluated, the following were more prevalent in HIV+ vs. HIV– women (all P < 0.01): psychiatric illness (57%/48%), liver disease (45%/26%), hyperlipidemia (40%/35%), bone disease (40%/33%), chronic kidney disease (15%/7%), and non-AIDS cancer (11%/7%). There was little difference in the prevalence of hypertension (66%/64%), lung disease (41%/43%), diabetes (22%/24%), and cardiovascular disease (19%/19%). Mean number of NACM was higher in HIV+ vs. HIV– women (3.6 vs. 3.0, P < 0.0001). Regardless of HIV serostatus, NACM burden significantly increased with age (P < 0.0001). Compared with women aged <40 of the same HIV serostatus, the estimated mean difference in NACM (HIV+/HIV–) for those 40–49, 50–59, ≥60 years was 1.1/0.7, 2.3/2.3, and 3.6/3.2, respectively (P < 0.0001 for all). Within-age-group comparisons revealed significantly greater NACM burden in HIV+ vs. HIV− women aged 40–49 years (P < 0.0001) and ≥60 years (P = 0.003), but not in those aged <40 or 50–59 years (HIV*age interaction P = 0.02) (figure). Conclusion NACM burden was high in both HIV+ and at-risk HIV– women, but higher in HIV+ women overall and in certain age groups. Accumulation of NACM has complex implications for clinical care, medication management, and healthcare screening that must be further examined in this population. Disclosures Anandi N. Sheth, MD, MS, Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Research Grant.


2015 ◽  
Vol 156 ◽  
pp. e47
Author(s):  
Robert Cook ◽  
Zhi Zhou ◽  
Chukwuemeka Okafor ◽  
Christa Cook ◽  
Larry Burrell ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (38) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathieu Castry ◽  
Anthony Cousien ◽  
Jonathan Bellet ◽  
Karen Champenois ◽  
Gilles Pialoux ◽  
...  

Background Despite the availability of highly effective direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) and the expected treatment as prevention (TasP) effect, transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) persists in men who have sex with men (MSM) who engage in high-risk sexual behaviours. Aim We aimed to estimate the incidence of primary HCV infection among MSM living with HIV in France when DAA was readily available. Methods We used data from a large French hospital cohort of persons living with HIV (ANRS CO4-FHDH) prospectively collected between 2014 and 2017. HCV incidence rates were calculated using person-time methods for HCV-negative MSM at inclusion who had serological follow-up from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2017. Sensitivity analyses were performed by varying the main assumptions to assess their impact on the results. Results Of 14,273 MSM living with HIV who were initially HCV-seronegative, 330 acquired HCV during follow-up over 45,866 person-years (py), resulting in an overall estimated incidence rate of 0.72/100 py (95% CI: 0.65–0.80). HCV incidence significantly decreased from 0.98/100 py (95% CI: 0.81–1.19) in 2014 to 0.45/100 py (95% CI: 0.35–0.59) in 2017 (54% decrease; 95% CI: 36–67). This trend was confirmed by most of the sensitivity analyses. Conclusion The primary incidence of HCV was halved for MSM living with HIV between 2014 and 2017. This decrease may be related to unrestricted DAA availability in France for individuals living with HIV. Further interventions, including risk reduction, are needed to reach HCV micro-elimination in MSM living with HIV.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristie C. Waterfield ◽  
Gulzar H. Shah ◽  
Gina D. Etheredge ◽  
Osaremhen Ikhile

Abstract Background With the indiscriminate spread of COVID-19 globally, many populations are experiencing negative consequences such as job loss, food insecurity, and inability to manage existing medical conditions and maintain preventive measures such as social distancing and personal preventative equipment. Some of the most disadvantaged in the COVID-19 era are people living with HIV/AIDS and other autoimmune diseases. Discussion As the number of new HIV infections decrease globally, many subpopulations remain at high risk of infection due to lack of or limited access to prevention services, as well as clinical care and treatment. For persons living with HIV or at higher risk of contracting HIV, including persons who inject drugs or men that have sex with men, the risk of COVID-19 infection increases if they have certain comorbidities, are older than 60 years of age, and are homeless, orphaned, or vulnerable children. The risk of COVID-19 is also more significant for those that live in Low- and Middle-Income Countries, rural, and/or poverty-stricken areas. An additional concern for those living the HIV is the double stigma that may arise if they also test positive for COVID-19. As public health and health care workers try to tackle the needs of the populations that they serve, they are beginning to realize the need for a change in the infrastructure that will include more efficient partnerships between public health, health care, and HIV programs. Conclusion Persons living with HIV that also have other underlying comorbidities are a great disadvantage from the negative consequences of COVID-19. For those that may test positive for both HIV and COVID-19, the increased psychosocial burdens stemming from stress and isolation, as well as, experiencing additional barriers that inhibit access to care, may cause them to become more disenfranchised. Thus, it becomes very important during the current pandemic for these challenges and barriers to be addressed so that these persons living with HIV can maintain continuity of care, as well as, their social and mental support systems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document