scholarly journals Use of Oral Fluid in a Rapid Syphilis Test Assay

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S107-S108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chelsea Shannon ◽  
Claire Bristow ◽  
Sasha Herbst De Cortina ◽  
Jennifer Chang ◽  
Jeffrey Klausner

Abstract Background From 2014 to 2015, the syphilis rate in the United States increased by 19%, reaching its highest rate since 1994. Currently, point-of-care syphilis assays use fingerstick or venipuncture whole blood to identify Treponema pallidum (TP) antibodies by qualitative immunoassay. However, patients and providers prefer oral fluid testing to whole blood testing. In this study, we aimed to determine whether a rapid syphilis test intended for use on whole blood could be used to detect TP antibodies in oral fluid. Methods Oral fluid was collected from 72 participants using the Super•SAL™ Oral Fluid Collection Device (Oasis Diagnostics®, Vancouver, WA). The device uses an absorbent cylindrical pad to collect and filter ~1 mlml of oral fluid. Oral fluid filtrate was tested using the SD Bioline Syphilis 3.0 rapid test (Alere Diagnostics, MA) following manufacturer directions for whole blood. TP particle agglutination (TPPA) and rapid plasma reagin (RPR) results derived from participants’ medical records were used as reference values. We used three different definitions as comparators: 1: TPPA reactive; 2: TPPA and RPR reactive and 3: TPPA reactive and RPR titer >1:4. Those with non-reactive TPPA and RPR results were considered seronegative. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity for definition 1 and sensitivity for definitions 2 and 3. We used the exact binomial method to determine 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results With definitions 1, 2, and 3, respectively, sensitivity was 83.3% (CI: 67.2, 93.6), 86.4% (CI: 65.1, 97.1), and 100% (CI: 71.5, 100). Specificity was 47.2% (CI: 36.5, 75.5). Conclusion The high sensitivity of the SD Bioline Syphilis 3.0 test using oral fluid suggests a strong potential for the development of accurate rapid oral syphilis tests. Sensitivity increased with higher RPR titer. False positive results may be due to the presence of non-venereal treponemal antibodies in oral fluid. Further research and development are needed to optimize specificity. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

2003 ◽  
Vol 332 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 51-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Soon Ahn ◽  
Sunga Choi ◽  
Sang Ho Jang ◽  
Hyuk Jae Chang ◽  
Jae Hoon Kim ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Paul C. Adamson ◽  
Jeffrey D. Klausner

Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae are two of the most often reported bacterial infections in the United States. The rectum and oropharynx are important anatomic sites of infection and can contribute to ongoing transmission. Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) are the mainstays for the detection of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae infections owing to their high sensitivity and specificity. Several NAATs have been evaluated for testing in rectal and pharyngeal infections. A few assays recently received clearance by the Food and Drug Administration, including one point-of-care test. Those assays can be used for testing in symptomatic individuals, as well as for asymptomatic screening in certain patient populations. Routine screening for C. trachomatis in pharyngeal specimens is not recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, though is often performed due to the use of multiplex assays. While expanding the types of settings for screening and using self-collected rectal and pharyngeal specimens can help to increase access and uptake of testing, additional research is needed to determine the potential benefits and costs associated with increased screening for rectal and pharyngeal C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae infections on a population level.


Author(s):  
Debnath Maji ◽  
Aman Opneja ◽  
Michael A. Suster ◽  
Kara L. Bane ◽  
Brigid M. Wilson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background There are acute settings where assessing the anticoagulant effect of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) can be useful. Due to variability among routine coagulation tests, there is an unmet need for an assay that detects DOAC effects within minutes in the laboratory or at the point of care. Methods We developed a novel dielectric microsensor, termed ClotChip, and previously showed that the time to reach peak permittivity (T peak) is a sensitive parameter of coagulation function. We conducted a prospective, single-center, pilot study to determine its clinical utility at detecting DOAC anticoagulant effects in whole blood. Results We accrued 154 individuals: 50 healthy volunteers, 49 rivaroxaban patients, 47 apixaban, and 8 dabigatran patients. Blood samples underwent ClotChip measurements and plasma coagulation tests. Control mean T peak was 428 seconds (95% confidence interval [CI]: 401–455 seconds). For rivaroxaban, mean T peak was 592 seconds (95% CI: 550–634 seconds). A receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the area under the curve (AUC) predicting rivaroxaban using T peak was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.75–0.91, p < 0.01). For apixaban, mean T peak was 594 seconds (95% CI: 548–639 seconds); AUC was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.73–0.91, p < 0.01). For dabigatran, mean T peak was 894 seconds (95% CI: 701–1,086 seconds); AUC was 1 (p < 0.01). Specificity for all DOACs was 88%; sensitivity ranged from 72 to 100%. Conclusion This diagnostic study using samples from “real-world” DOAC patients supports that ClotChip exhibits high sensitivity at detecting DOAC anticoagulant effects in a disposable portable platform, using a miniscule amount of whole blood (<10 µL).


2002 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 269-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piia Tarkkinen ◽  
Tom Palenius ◽  
Timo Lövgren

Abstract Background: Recently, measurement of very low concentrations of C-reactive protein (CRP) has gained popularity as a potential new means for predicting the risk of future cardiac complications. In this study, we demonstrate the feasibility of a kinetic, one-step microparticle assay for quantitative determination of extremely low and high CRP concentrations in the limited timeframe typical for point-of-care testing. Methods: A noncompetitive, kinetic CRP immunoassay was developed that uses individual, porous microparticles as the solid phase. The microparticles were covalently coated with a monoclonal capture antibody, and the monoclonal detection antibody was labeled with europium. The one-step binding reaction was stopped by washing after 2 min of incubation, and the fluorescence signal of individual particles was measured. Results: The analytical detection limit (mean of zero calibrator + 3 SD) was 0.00016 mg/L CRP. Clinical samples were diluted 400-fold before assay to cover the CRP concentration range of 0.064–1200 mg/L. The assay correlated well with the Dade Behring N High Sensitivity CRP assay (for 0–10 mg/L, r = 0.969, Sy|x = 0.68, n = 54; for 0–350 mg/L, r = 0.969, Sy|x = 11.7, n = 100). The within- and between-run CVs based on calculated concentrations were, respectively, 9–16% and 14% at 0.11 mg/L, 4.5–12% and 8.2% at 4.2 mg/L, and 3.5–6.3% and 4.4% at 105 mg/L, with a CV &lt;15% at 0.2 mg/L and above. Conclusions: Use of the kinetic microparticle approach combined with time-resolved fluorometry allows ultrasensitive quantification of CRP in whole blood in 2 min with a linear assay range spanning more than four orders of magnitude.


2010 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. S271 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.R. Lee ◽  
K. Kardos ◽  
G. Yearwood ◽  
L. Kurtz ◽  
M. Roehler ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie A. MacMullan ◽  
Prithvi Chellamuthu ◽  
Aubree Mades ◽  
Sudipta Das ◽  
Fred Turner ◽  
...  

AbstractCurrent commercially available methods for reliably detecting antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 remain expensive and inaccessible due to the need for whole blood collection by highly trained phlebotomists using personal protective equipment (PPE). We evaluated an antibody detection approach utilizing the OraSure® Technologies’ Oral Antibody Collection Device (OACD) and their proprietary SARS-CoV-2 total antibody detection enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). We found that the OraSure® test for total antibody detection in oral fluid had comparable sensitivity and specificity to serum-based ELISAs while presenting a more affordable and accessible system with the potential for self-collection.


2006 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 614-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Quintela ◽  
D. J. Crouch ◽  
D. M. Andrenyak

2007 ◽  
Vol 170 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 117-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Speedy ◽  
D. Baldwin ◽  
G. Jowett ◽  
M. Gallina ◽  
A. Jehanli

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document