scholarly journals 2437. First-line Fidaxomicin Use in High-risk Inpatients Reduces Recurrence Rates

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S842-S842
Author(s):  
Rose Kohinke ◽  
Lauren McDaniel ◽  
Angela Perhac ◽  
Nathan Everson

Abstract Background Fidaxomicin is recommended by the 2018 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines as a first-line treatment in adult patients with uncomplicated Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Carilion Roanoke Memorial Hospital (CRMH) implemented a clinical decision order set directing providers to initiate fidaxomicin for CDI in patients at high risk of recurrence. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of fidaxomicin on patient outcomes. Methods This quasi-experimental study included adults with a first episode or first recurrence of CDI before and after order set implementation. Patients receiving laxatives within 24 hours of testing and those with fulminant CDI were excluded. Pre-implementation was defined as May 2017 to November 2017 and post-implementation as May 2018 to November 2018. The primary endpoint was recurrence (diarrhea and a positive GDH with toxin or PCR within 30 days post-treatment). Secondary endpoints were clinical cure (resolution of symptoms within 2 days of completing therapy), global cure (cure with no recurrence at 3 months), mortality, and readmissions. Partial courses of fidaxomicin (i.e., patients discharged on another agent) were also evaluated. Results A total of 282 patients were included. In the pre-group, 59.1% received metronidazole, 39.6% oral vancomycin, and 1.3% fidaxomicin. In the post-group, fidaxomicin use increased to 52.3% and oral vancomycin was 44.5%. There was a significant improvement in recurrence (30.2% vs 17.1%, P = 0.019). Global cure and CDI upon readmission also improved in the post-group (Table 1). In patients receiving partial courses of fidaxomicin, recurrence (9.3% vs 25%, P = 0.19), global cure (86% vs 75%, P = 0.44), and infection on readmission (28.6% vs 37.5%, P = 0.67) were similar. Conclusion Fidaxomicin as a first-line agent in high-risk CDI patients decreased recurrence and increased global cure. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S833-S833
Author(s):  
Steven W Johnson ◽  
David H Priest ◽  
Shannon V Brown

Abstract Background Studies suggest oral vancomycin prophylaxis may be effective in preventing Clostridioides difficile infection. These studies are limited by their retrospective design, reliance on local clinical practice patterns, lack of intervention standardization, and limited risk stratification. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of oral vancomycin for the prevention of healthcare facility-onset CDI (HCFO-CDI) in high-risk patients. Methods We conducted a randomized, prospective, open-label study at Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center in Winston-Salem, North Carolina between October 2018 and April 2019. Admitted high-risk patients (defined as: ≥ 60 years of age, hospitalized ≤ 30 days prior to the index hospitalization and received systemic antibiotics during that prior hospitalization and currently receiving systemic antibiotics) were randomized 1:1 to either oral vancomycin (dosed at 125 mg once daily while receiving systemic antibiotics and continued for 5 days post completion of systemic antibiotics [OVP]), or no prophylaxis. The primary endpoint was incidence of HCFO-CDI. Secondary endpoints included incidence of community-onset healthcare facility-associated CDI (CO-HCFA-CDI), development of VRE colonization after receiving OVP, and adverse effects and cost of OVP. Results A total of 100 patients were evaluated, 50 patients in each group. Baseline and hospitalization characteristics were similar in each group. No incidents of HCFO-CDI were diagnosed in the OVP group compared with 6 (12%) in the no prophylaxis group (P = 0.03). CO-HCFA-CDI was not observed in either group. No patients developed new VRE colonization with only 1 patient reporting mild gastrointestinal side-effects to OVP. A total of 600 doses of OVP were given during the study, with each patient receiving an average of 12 doses. Total acquisition cost of OVP was $728.25, $60.69 per patient. Conclusion OVP was highly effective in preventing HCFO-CDI. OVP was well tolerated with no apparent risk for VRE colonization. Further prospective investigation is warranted to determine the impact and cost-effectiveness of routine use of OVP in high-risk patients. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S175-S175
Author(s):  
Cory Hussain ◽  
Deborah Aragon ◽  
Bryan C Knepper ◽  
Timothy C Jenkins ◽  
Katherine C Shihadeh ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Over diagnosis of hospital-onset Clostridioides difficile infection (HO-CDI) is directly tied to inappropriate C. difficile testing which does not distinguish between infected or colonized individuals. This can lead to inappropriate therapy. Multiple studies have utilized Computerized Clinical Decision Support (CCDS) tools to reduce inappropriate C. difficile testing. Our study looks at the impact of a Self-Assessment CCDS tools on C. difficile testing for HO-CDI and oral vancomycin utilization as a balancing metric. Methods Our institution utilizes a two-step test to diagnose HO-CDI that consists of toxin A/B enzyme immunoassay followed by a confirmatory PCR. We applied a self-assessment driven CCDS approach to reduce testing for HO-CDI. Our intervention was deployed in the 3rd quarter of 2018. It asked 3 questions about stool frequency, laxative use and previous C. difficile testing in the order itself. Inappropriate indications for testing included any of the following: < 3 bowel movements within 24 hours, receipt of a laxative within the past 48 hours, or a previous C. difficile test within the previous 7 days. Ordering providers would self-answer these questions. A ‘yes’ response to any of the three questions prevented further test ordering; though respondents had the freedom to change the answer and still proceed with the test order. We evaluated 3 metrics that were all calculated per 1000 inpatient census days: oral vancomycin usage, HO-CDI rates and C. difficile testing rates. Results Compared to baseline, our intervention resulted in a significant reduction of C. difficile testing and HO-CDI rates (Figure 1, Table 1). Oral vancomycin usage also decreased significantly (Figure 2, Table 1). Figure 1. C. difficile testing and Hospital Onset C. difficile Infection Rates by Month, Before and After Intervention Figure 2. Oral Vancomycin Utilization by Month, Before and After Intervention Table 1. Changes in Median Rates of C. difficile testing, Hospital Onset C. difficile Infections and Vancomycin Utilization, Before and After Intervention. Conclusion Our self-assessment driven CCDS-based diagnostic stewardship resulted in a significant reduction in inappropriate C. difficile testing for HO-CDI and HO-CDI rates. Oral vancomycin utilization as a balancing metric also decreased significantly. This was despite the use of a self-assessment driven approach with the freedom to change the answers in order to proceed with the test order. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


Author(s):  
Tiffany Wu ◽  
Susan L. Davis ◽  
Brian Church ◽  
George J. Alangaden ◽  
Rachel M. Kenney

Abstract Objective: To determine the impact of clinical decision support on guideline-concordant Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) treatment. Design: Quasi-experimental study in >50 ambulatory clinics. Setting: Primary, specialty, and urgent-care clinics. Patients: Adult patients were eligible for inclusion if they were diagnosed with and treated for a first episode of symptomatic CDI at an ambulatory clinic between November 1, 2019, and November 30, 2020. Interventions: An outpatient best practice advisory (BPA) was implemented to notify prescribers that “vancomycin or fidaxomicin are preferred over metronidazole for C.difficile infection” when metronidazole was prescribed to a patient with CDI. Results: In total, 189 patients were included in the study: 92 before the BPA and 97 after the BPA. Their median age was 59 years; 31% were male; 75% were white; 30% had CDI-related comorbidities; 35% had healthcare exposure; 65% had antibiotic exposure; 44% had gastric acid suppression therapy within 90 days of CDI diagnosis. The BPA was accepted 23 of 26 times and was used to optimize the therapy of 16 patients in 6 months. Guideline-concordant therapy increased after implementation of the BPA (72% vs 91%; P = .001). Vancomycin prescribing increased and metronidazole prescribing decreased after the BPA. There was no difference in clinical response or unplanned encounter within 14 days after treatment initiation. Fewer patients after the BPA had CDI recurrence within 14–56 days of the initial episode (27% vs 7%; P < .001). Conclusions: Clinical decision support increased prescribing of guideline-concordant CDI therapy in the outpatient setting. A targeted BPA is an effective stewardship intervention and may be especially useful in settings with limited antimicrobial stewardship resources.


2021 ◽  
pp. 089719002199700
Author(s):  
Alex M. Ebied ◽  
Thakul Rattanasuwan ◽  
Yiqing Chen ◽  
Adonice P. Khoury

Background: Albumin has been shown to decrease the incidence of mortality and acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). Albumin administration in SBP is recommended within 6 hours of diagnosis and for reserved use in high-risk patients with the following baseline laboratory tests: serum creatinine >1 mg/dL, blood urea nitrogen >30 mg/dL or total bilirubin >4 mg/dL. Objective: We aimed to assess the impact of an albumin order set restricted to high-risk SBP. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted between Jan 1, 2013 to Feb 28, 2018. The albumin order set was implemented on Sep 20, 2016. Patients were included if they were diagnosed with SBP and had an ascitic fluid polymorphonuclear count ≥ 250 cells/mm3. Results: Out of a total of 137 patients reviewed, 88 met the inclusion criteria. The incidence of AKI in the pre-order set and post-order set were 63.93% and 33.33% (p = 0.01), respectively. The incidence of mortality in the pre-order set and post-order set were 36.07% and 7.41% (p = 0.005), respectively. The percentage of patients administered albumin within 6 hours were 24.59% to 40.74% (p = 0.14) in the pre-order set and post-order set, respectively. The percentage of patients who received the recommended albumin dosing regimen ordered was 42.62% vs 96.30% (p < 0.001), in the pre-order set and post-order set, respectively. Conclusion: The albumin order set restricted to high-risk SBP patients significantly reduced the incidence of AKI and mortality, and improved the appropriateness of albumin regimen ordered.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S437-S437
Author(s):  
Kerui Xu ◽  
Andrea L Benin ◽  
Hsiu Wu ◽  
Jonathan R Edwards ◽  
Qunna Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) are an urgent public health threat, accounting for 223,900 infections and 12,800 deaths in hospitalized patients annually. In early 2018, the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) recommended oral vancomycin or fidaxomicin as the first-line antibiotics for CDIs. To track the uptake of IDSA’s recommendations, we evaluated the association between CDI prevalence and use of first-line antibiotics in hospitals reporting to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC’s) National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). Methods We matched 2018 hospital-level, NHSN data on laboratory-identified CDIs with NHSN antimicrobial use (AU) data for the same time period. Hospitals that submitted &lt; 6 months of either data type in 2018 were excluded. The association between quarterly hospital-level CDI prevalence rates per 100 patient-admissions and use of CDI antibiotics (oral vancomycin plus fidaxomicin) per 1,000 days-present was evaluated using Pearson’s linear correlation coefficient and using Goodman and Kruskal’s gamma (G) on ordinal quartiles to assess rates of discordant pairs. Results Among the 2735 hospital-level quarters based on 714 hospitals included in the study, CDI prevalence (median: 0.46 per 100 patient-admissions) and CDI antibiotic use (median: 8.85 antibiotic-days per 1,000 days-present) demonstrated only a moderately positive correlation (r = 0.48). Among hospitals in the highest quartile for CDI prevalence, 5.1% were in the lowest quartile for antibiotic use. Among hospitals in the highest quartile for antibiotic use, 5.3% were in the lowest quartile for CDI prevalence, and 54.2% were in the highest quartile for CDI prevalence (G = 0.60; 95% CI: 0.57–0.63). Correlation of hospital-level Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) prevalence rates and oral vancomycin and fidaxomicin use in U.S. acute care hospitals, 2018 Distribution of hospital-level Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) prevalence rates and oral vancomycin and fidaxomicin use in ordinal quartiles (Q1–Q4) to access rates of discordant pairs Conclusion The moderate correlation and discordant rates suggest that vancomycin and fidaxomicin are less frequently used as primary antibiotics in some hospitals; whereas in others, CDI antibiotic use is occurring in the absence of positive laboratory tests for CDI. To further investigate this discordance, there is a need to assess hospitals’ prescribing and testing practices in an ongoing manner. These findings may be useful to serve as baseline for measuring progress of appropriateness of treatment and testing for CDIs. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Montauban ◽  
Charannya Balakumar ◽  
Jaideep Rait ◽  
Prizzi Zarsadias ◽  
Sara Iqbal ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Effective training is vital when facing viral outbreaks such as the SARS Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak of 2019. The objective of this study was to measure the impact of in-situ simulation on the confidence of the surgical teams of two hospitals in assessing and managing acutely unwell surgical patients who are high-risk or confirmed to have COVID-19. Methods This was a quasi-experimental study with a pretest-posttest design. The surgical teams at each hospital participated in multi-disciplinary simulation sessions to explore the assessment and management of a patient requiring emergency surgery who is high risk for COVID-19. The participants were surveyed before and after receiving simulation training to determine their level of confidence on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for the premise stated in each of the nine questions in the survey, which represented multiple aspects of the care of these patients. Results 27 participants responded the pre-simulation survey and 24 the one post-simulation. The level of confidence (VAS score) were statistically significantly higher for all nine questions after the simulation. Specific themes were identified for further training and changes in policy. Conclusion In-situ simulation is an effective training method. Its versatility allows it to be set up quickly as rapid-response training in the face of an imminent threat. In this study, it improved the preparedness of two surgical teams for the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (03) ◽  
pp. 505-512
Author(s):  
Julia Whitlow Yarahuan ◽  
Amy Billet ◽  
Jonathan D. Hron

Background and Objectives Clinical decision support (CDS) and computerized provider order entry have been shown to improve health care quality and safety, but may also generate previously unanticipated errors. We identified multiple CDS tools for platelet transfusion orders. In this study, we sought to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of those CDS tools while creating and testing a framework for future evaluation of other CDS tools. Methods Using a query of an enterprise data warehouse at a tertiary care pediatric hospital, we conducted a retrospective analysis to assess baseline use and performance of existing CDS for platelet transfusion orders. Our outcome measure was the percentage of platelet undertransfusion ordering errors. Errors were defined as platelet transfusion volumes ordered which were less than the amount recommended by the order set used. We then redesigned our CDS and measured the impact of our intervention prospectively using statistical process control methodology. Results We identified that 62% of all platelet transfusion orders were placed with one of two order sets (Inpatient Service 1 and Inpatient Service 2). The Inpatient Service 1 order set had a significantly higher occurrence of ordering errors (3.10% compared with 1.20%). After our interventions, platelet transfusion order error occurrence on Inpatient Service 1 decreased from 3.10 to 0.33%. Conclusion We successfully reduced platelet transfusion ordering errors by redesigning our CDS tools. We suggest that the use of collections of clinical data may help identify patterns in erroneous ordering, which could otherwise go undetected. We have created a framework which can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of other similar CDS tools.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S936-S936
Author(s):  
Emily Blumberg ◽  
Collins Gary ◽  
Jo-Anne H Young ◽  
Minh-Hong Nguyen ◽  
David Michonneau ◽  
...  

Abstract Background CDI is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in SOT and HCT patients (pts). In retrospective single-center analyses, severe disease and relapse were common. We undertook a multicenter prospective observational study to evaluate outcomes of CDI among both SOT and HCT patients. Methods Adults with a first episode of CDI, defined as 3 liquid stools/24 h with the detection of C. difficile toxin in stool, within the first 2 years of SOT or HCT were recruited from 12 centers internationally in the INSIGHT network. At enrollment, demographics, comorbidities, medication histories and outcomes were collected prospectively over 90 days to assess clinical cure, recurrences and complications and to define baseline risk factors for clinical cure and recurrent CDI. Results 132 patients (81 SOT, 51 HCT (32 allogeneic)) were enrolled: median age 56 years, 62.1% were males, 97% were hospitalized. 80.3% were diagnosed by DNA assay. CDI occurred a median of 20 days post transplant (IQR: 6–133). 108 patients were on PPIs. 98.5% were on antibiotics before CDI. 1st line treatment regimen was oral vancomycin in 66 patients (40 SOT, 26 HCT), metronidazole in 48 patients (27 SOT, 21 HCT), both drugs in 14 (10 SOT, 4 HCT), fidaxomicin (3) and linezolid (1). Rejection within 60 days before CDI was uncommon (6.2% SOT) as was GVHD (27.5%). 110 patients (83%, 95% CI: 46–89)) (65 SOT, 45 HCT) had clinical cure; 18% (95% CI: 11–27) had recurrent CDI, 2 were admitted to the ICU due to CDI, 11 (8.3%) died (2 HCT related to CDI). Among baselines variables, only first-line regimen was associated with a higher rate of clinical cure (P = 0.003), most notably for SOT. Factors that did not have a statistically significant negative impact on clinical cure included sex, age > 60, race, country, transplant type, steroids, diabetes, CMV viremia/disease, WBC > 15,000, creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL, or specific antibiotic given prior to CDI. Higher recurrence rates were associated with metronidazole-only regimen (OR: 4.6, 95% CI: 1.6–12.8; P = 0.004) and a history of CMV after transplant (OR: 5.2, 95% CI: 1.7–15.7; P = 0.003). Conclusion Despite their immunosuppressed state, recurrence, ICU admission and mortality occurred in a minority of SOT and HCT with CDI. Initial use of metronidazole and CMV viremia/disease were associated with higher recurrence rates. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document