scholarly journals LB5. A Long-Time Coming: Final 2-year Analysis of Efficacy, Durability, and Microbiome Changes in a Controlled Open-Label Trial of Investigational Microbiota-Based Drug RBX2660 for Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infections

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S994-S995
Author(s):  
Robert Orenstein ◽  
Sarah Mische ◽  
Sarah Mische ◽  
Ken Blount ◽  
Ken Blount ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Historical Control ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Fisher Exact Test ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Stool Samples ◽  
Open Label Trial ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
Age And Sex

Abstract Background Recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) is an urgent public health threat associated with significant mortality and medical cost. Microbiota therapy is gaining acceptance as a strategy to reduce rCDI recurrence. We present the final 24-month analysis of clinical safety, efficacy, and microbiome restoration from a Phase 2 open-label trial of RBX2660 for prevention of CDI recurrence. Methods Participants with multi-recurrent CDI received <2 doses of RBX2660 delivered via enema 7 days apart in this multicenter, open-label Phase 2 study. Efficacy was defined as the absence of CDI recurrence through 56 days after the last dose and was compared with 8-week recurrence-free rates for a historical control cohort that received standard-of-care antibiotic therapy. Fisher exact test compared the proportion of treatment participants who were CDI-free by age and sex. Durability was defined as continued absence of CDI episodes beyond 8 weeks. Safety and durability assessments occurred at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Participant stool samples were collected prior to and for up to 720 days after treatment, and microbiome changes were assessed by shallow shotgun sequencing. Results The efficacy of RBX2660 to prevent rCDI at 8 weeks (78.9%; 112/142) was higher than the CDI-free rate in the historical control group (30.7%, 23/75; P < 0.0001). Age and sex did not impact efficacy. Among participants who achieved treatment success at 8 weeks and were evaluable for long-term durability (n = 95), 8 experienced a new CDI episode by the 24-month follow-up for an overall durability of 91.6%. The safety profile was consistent with previous reports for RBX2660. In total, 503 stool samples from 110 treatment responders were analyzed. Within 7 days of treatment, the relative abundance of Bacteroidia and Clostridia remained shifted higher than pre-treatment levels while Gammaproteobacteria and Bacilli declined sharply after treatment, and these changes persisted to at least 24 months. Conclusion RBX2660, a microbiota-based drug, was safe and efficacious for preventing rCDI with clinical durability to 24 months after treatment, independent of age or sex, and RBX2660 durability associated with durable microbiome shifts from pre-treatment to a healthier composition. Disclosures Robert Orenstein, DO, Rebiotix Inc. (Advisor or Review Panel member), Sarah Mische, PhD, Rebiotix Inc. (Employee), Ken Blount, PhD, Rebiotix Inc. (Employee), Lindy Bancke, PharmD, Rebiotix Inc. (Employee), Xin Su, MD, MSci, Rebiotix Inc. (Employee), Dana Walsh, PhD, Rebiotix Inc. (Employee), Adam Harvey, PhD, Rebiotix Inc. (Employee), Carlos Gonzalez, MS, Rebiotix Inc. (Consultant), Dale N. Gerding, MD, Rebiotix Inc. (Board Member).

scholarly journals 669. Twelve-Month Durability of Microbiota-Based Therapy RBX2660 for Prevention of Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S306-S306
Author(s):  
Courtney Jones ◽  
Sarah Mische ◽  
Ken Blount ◽  
Bill Shannon
Keyword(s):  
Clostridium Difficile ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Operational Taxonomic Unit ◽  
The United States ◽  
Historical Control ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Two Phase

Abstract Background Recurrent Clostridium difficile infections (rCDI) are a public health threat with insufficient treatment options at present. Two Phase 2 clinical studies have reported the efficacy of RBX2660, a standardized, stabilized microbiota-based drug, in preventing rCDI. For one of these trials, we report herein the durability of clinical response (lack of CDI recurrence) and microbiome restoration to 12 months after RBX2660 treatment. Methods Data were drawn from an interim analysis of a multicenter, open-label Phase 2 study in which participants with multi-recurrent rCDI received up to 2 doses of RBX2660 delivered via enema 7 days apart; this analysis includes data to 12 months after treatment, with follow-up ongoing. Efficacy was defined as the absence of CDI recurrence to 56 days after the last dose; and durability is defined as a continued lack of reported recurrence. Participant stool samples collected prior to and at 1, 7, 30, 60 days and 6 and 12 months after treatment were sequenced using a shallow shotgun method, with only treatment responders reported herein. Operational taxonomic unit (OTU) data were used to calculate relative abundance at the class level and Microbiome Health Indices. Results This study included 149 RBX2660-treated participants and 110 historical control patients, in the United States and Canada. As previously reported, the efficacy of RBX2660 in preventing rCDI (79.9%; 119/149) was higher than CDI-free rates in the historical control group (51.8%, 57/110; P < 0.001). Of 109 participants who had a 6-month follow-up, 97.2% (106/109) remained CDI-free, and no new CDI recurrences were reported at 12 months. Among treatment responders, the microbiome composition was restored after treatment to predominance by Bacteroidia- and Clostridia-class bacteria, and these compositions remained stable to 12 months after treatment among participants who provided samples. Conclusion RBX2660, a microbiota-based drug, was efficacious for preventing rCDI, with clinical and microbiome restoration durability to at least 12 months after treatment. The follow-up of efficacy, safety, and microbiome restoration are ongoing. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Open-Label Evaluation of Eteplirsen in Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Amenable to Exon 51 Skipping: PROMOVI Trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Craig M. McDonald ◽  
Perry B. Shieh ◽  
Hoda Z. Abdel-Hamid ◽  
Anne M. Connolly ◽  
Emma Ciafaloni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy ◽  
Muscular Dystrophy ◽  
Natural History ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Exon Skipping ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
M Phase ◽  
Positive Treatment

Background Eteplirsen received accelerated FDA approval for treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) with mutations amenable to exon 51 skipping, based on demonstrated dystrophin production. Objective To report results from PROMOVI, a phase 3, multicenter, open-label study evaluating efficacy and safety of eteplirsen in a larger cohort. Methods Ambulatory patients aged 7–16 years, with confirmed mutations amenable to exon 51 skipping, received eteplirsen 30 mg/kg/week intravenously for 96 weeks. An untreated cohort with DMD not amenable to exon 51 skipping was also enrolled. Results 78/79 eteplirsen-treated patients completed 96 weeks of treatment. 15/30 untreated patients completed the study; this cohort was considered an inappropriate control group because of genotype-driven differences in clinical trajectory. At Week 96, eteplirsen-treated patients showed increased exon skipping (18.7-fold) and dystrophin protein (7-fold) versus baseline. Post-hoc comparisons with patients from eteplirsen phase 2 studies (4658-201/202) and mutation-matched external natural history controls confirmed previous results, suggesting clinically notable attenuation of decline on the 6-minute walk test over 96 weeks (PROMOVI: –68.9 m; phase 2 studies: –67.3 m; external controls: –133.8 m) and significant attenuation of percent predicted forced vital capacity annual decline (PROMOVI: –3.3%, phase 2 studies: –2.2%, external controls: –6.0%; p <  0.001). Adverse events were generally mild to moderate and unrelated to eteplirsen. Most frequent treatment-related adverse events were headache and vomiting; none led to treatment discontinuation. Conclusions This large, multicenter study contributes to the growing body of evidence for eteplirsen, confirming a positive treatment effect, favorable safety profile, and slowing of disease progression versus natural history.

scholarly journals Financial Incentives to Increase Stool Collection Rates for Microbiome Studies in Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Patients

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5775-5775
Author(s):  
Jillian C. Thompson ◽  
Yi Ren ◽  
Kristi M. Romero ◽  
Meagan V. Lew ◽  
Amy T. Bush ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Financial Incentives ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Historical Control Group ◽  
Historical Control ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Stool Samples

Introduction: Dysbiosis of the gut microbiome during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is associated with adverse post-transplant outcomes such as graft-versus-host disease, bloodstream infections, and mortality. In order to learn more about the role of the microbiome in HCT in adverse clinical outcomes, researchers collect stool samples from patients at various time points throughout HCT. However, unlike blood samples or skin swabs, stool collection requires active subject participation, particularly in the outpatient setting, and may be limited by patient aversion to handling stool. By providing study participants with compensation for their stool samples, we hypothesize that we can significantly increase stool collection rates. Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study on the impact of financial incentives on stool collection rates for microbiome studies. The intervention group consisted of allogeneic (allo)-HCT patients from 05/2017-05/2018 who were compensated with a $10 gas gift card for each stool sample. The intervention group was compared to a historical control group consisting of allo-HCT patients from 11/2016-05/2017 who provided stool samples before the incentive was implemented. To control for potential changes in collections over time, we also compared a contemporaneous control group of autologous (auto)-HCT patients from 05/2017-05/2018 with a historical control group of auto-HCT patients from 11/2016-05/2017; neither auto-HCT groups were compensated. Allo-HCT patients were required to give samples at pre-HCT, day 0 (the day of HCT), and days 7, 14, 21, 30, 60, and 90 post-HCT. Auto-HCT patients were required to give samples at pre-HCT and days 7, 14, and 90 post-HCT. Collection rates were defined as the number of samples provided divided by the number of time points for which we attempted to obtain samples. Patient characteristics were summarized by proportions for categorical variables and median with interquartile ranges for continuous variables. Chi-square tests or Fisher's exact tests were used to compare categorical variables, as appropriate, and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests or t-tests were used to compare continuous variables, as appropriate. This study was approved by the Duke Institutional Review Board, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. Results: There were 35 allo-HCT patients in the intervention group, 19 allo-HCT patients in the historical control group, 142 auto-HCT patients in the contemporaneous control group, and 75 auto-HCT patients in the historical control group. Groups were similar with regard to baseline demographics such as age, race, and gender. While allo-HCT patients were more likely to have leukemia and auto-HCT patients were more likely to have lymphoma and multiple myeloma, there were no differences in disease rates across the study periods. Allo-HCT patients in the intervention group had significantly higher average overall collection rates when compared to the historical control group allo-HCT patients (80% vs 37%, p<0.001), as well has significantly higher average outpatient collection rates (84% vs 23%, p<0.001) and average inpatient collection rates (71% vs 46%, p=0.04). In contrast, there were no significant differences in overall average collection rates between the auto-HCT patients in the contemporaneous control and historical control group (36% vs 32%, p=0.28), as well as the average outpatient collection rates (30% vs 28%, p=0.54) and the average inpatient collection rates (46% vs 59%, p=0.25). Discussion: Our results demonstrate that even a modest incentive can significantly increase collection rates. Use of a contemporaneous control group to account for potential differences in stool collection rates over time strengthens our finding that financial incentives increase stool collection rates. Furthermore, the significant increase in collection rates in the outpatient setting highlights the role of the incentive when patient participation is needed, as opposed to the inpatient setting in which the nurse assists with collection. While this study uses a specialized HCT patient population, these results may be generalizable to future studies and aid other researchers in obtaining stool samples needed for future microbiome studies. Disclosures Peled: Seres Therapeutics: Other: IP licensing fees, Research Funding. van den Brink:Acute Leukemia Forum (ALF): Consultancy, Honoraria; Juno Therapeutics: Other: Licensing; Merck & Co, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seres Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Therakos: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Flagship Ventures: Consultancy, Honoraria; Evelo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Magenta and DKMS Medical Council: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sung:Novartis: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Seres: Research Funding.

Olanzapine for Prevention of Vomiting in Children and Adolescents Receiving Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy: Investigator-Initiated, Randomized, Open-Label Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (32) ◽  
pp. 3785-3793 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramavath D. Naik ◽  
Sreenivas V ◽  
Vishwajeet Singh ◽  
Ashwati S. Pillai ◽  
Deepa Dhawan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Safety Evaluation ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Emetogenic Chemotherapy ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy ◽  
Acute Period ◽  
Open Label Trial

PURPOSE Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a significant toxicity of chemotherapy. Olanzapine is recommended in adult patients for the prevention of CINV but has not been prospectively investigated in children. METHODS This investigator-initiated, randomized, open-label trial evaluated olanzapine in children (ages 5-18 years) scheduled to receive the first cycle of highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). All participants received aprepitant, ondansetron, and dexamethasone during and 2 days after chemotherapy. Participants in the study group additionally received oral olanzapine 0.14 mg/kg/day (rounded to the nearest 2.5 mg; maximum, 10 mg) during the chemotherapy block and 3 days postchemotherapy. The primary objective was to compare complete response (CR) rates (no vomiting and no rescue medication) between the groups in the acute, delayed, and overall periods. Nausea comparison and safety evaluation were secondary and additional objectives, respectively. The collection of outcomes and adverse events was performed daily until the completion of the overall period. RESULTS A total of 240 patients underwent randomization. We performed a modified intention-to-treat analysis on 231 patients (116 in the control group and 115 in the study group). A higher proportion of patients in the olanzapine group achieved CR in the acute period (78% v 59%; P = .001), delayed period (74% v 47%; P < .001) and overall period (64% v 38%; P < .001) than in the control group. The proportion of patients with no nausea was significantly higher in the olanzapine group in the acute period (74% v 52%; P < .001), delayed period (74% v 47%; P < .001), and overall period (64% v 37%; P < .001). Grade 1/2 somnolence was greater in the olanzapine group (35% v 11%; P < .001). There was no grade 3/4 somnolence reported. CONCLUSION Olanzapine significantly improved CR rates for vomiting in children receiving the first cycle of HEC.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of memantine in children with autism spectrum disorder: Results from three phase 2 multicenter studies

Autism ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 2096-2111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Y Hardan ◽  
Robert L Hendren ◽  
Michael G Aman ◽  
Adelaide Robb ◽  
Raun D Melmed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Extended Release ◽  
Children With Autism ◽  
Autism Spectrum ◽  
Social Responsiveness Scale ◽  
Social Responsiveness ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Three Phase ◽  
Open Label Trial

Three phase 2 trials were conducted to assess the efficacy and long-term safety of weight-based memantine extended release (ER) treatment in children with autism spectrum disorder. MEM-MD-91, a 50-week open-label trial, identified memantine extended-release treatment responders for enrollment into MEM-MD-68, a 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal trial. MEM-MD-69 was an open-label extension trial in which participants from MEM-MD-68, MEM-MD-91, and open-label trial MEM-MD-67 were treated ⩽48 weeks with memantine extended release. In MEM-MD-91, 517 (59.6%) participants were confirmed Social Responsiveness Scale responders at week 12; mean Social Responsiveness Scale total raw scores improved two to three times a minimal clinically important difference of 10 points. In MEM-MD-68, there was no difference between memantine and placebo on the primary efficacy parameter, the proportion of patients with a loss of therapeutic response (defined as ⩾10-point increase from baseline in Social Responsiveness Scale total raw score). MEM-MD-69 exploratory analyses revealed mean standard deviation improvement in Social Responsiveness Scale total raw score of 32.4 (26.4) from baseline of the first lead-in study. No new safety concerns were evident. While the a priori–defined efficacy results of the double-blind trial were not achieved, the considerable improvements in mean Social Responsiveness Scale scores from baseline in the open-label trials were presumed to be clinically important.

scholarly journals 670. VRE Clearance in Patients with Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection Following Treatment with Microbiota-Based Drug RBX2660

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S306-S307
Author(s):  
Heidi Hau ◽  
Sarah Mische ◽  
Sarah Klein ◽  
Ken Blount
Keyword(s):  
Clostridium Difficile ◽  
Clostridium Difficile Infection ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Intestinal Microbiome ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Recurrent Clostridium Difficile Infection ◽  
Gram Staining ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Stool Samples

Abstract Background Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) infection is frequently associated with immunocompromised and critically ill patients. VRE carriers are at increased risk for infection due to VRE colonization and they pose a risk as a transmission source. VRE infection and Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) share common risk factors, including disruption of the intestinal microbiome. Thus, therapeutic approaches that decolonize VRE would be valuable. Herein, we report on stool VRE clearance in a cohort analysis from a Phase 2 open-label study of RBX2660, standardized microbiota-based drug, for recurrent CDI. Methods This prospective, multicenter, open-label Phase 2 study enrolled subjects with recurrent CDI. Participants received up to 2 doses of RBX2660 delivered via enema with doses 7 days apart. Patients were requested to voluntarily submit stool samples at baseline and at 7, 30 and 60 days, 6, 12, and 24 months after the last administration of RBX2660. Stool samples were tested for VRE using bile esculin azide agar with 6 µg/mL vancomycin and gram staining. Vancomycin resistance was confirmed via blood agar and etest. Results Stool samples were available for 143 patients. Twenty-one patients were VRE-positive at the first test (baseline or 7 day). Of the 19 VRE-positive patients that provided additional samples at later timepoints, 18 (94.7%) converted to negative as of the last available follow-up (30 or 60 days and 6, 12, or 24 months). The remaining patient remained positive at all follow-ups. Conclusion This cohort analysis of VRE-positive patients within an rCDI population provides additional support that microbiota-based formulations, such as RBX2660, may have additional benefit beyond reducing the recurrence of CDI. Additional study is needed to confirm the role of microbiome restoration on VRE clearance. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures

Preliminary product parameter and safety results from NeuACT, a phase 2 randomized, open-label trial of DN24-02 in patients with surgically resected HER2+ urothelial cancer at high risk for recurrence.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4541-4541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dean F. Bajorin ◽  
Leonard G. Gomella ◽  
Padmanee Sharma ◽  
Elizabeth R. Plimack ◽  
Peter H. O'Donnell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Product Parameter ◽  
Open Label Trial

scholarly journals An Open Label Trial to Assess Safety of Losartan for Treating Worsening Respiratory Illness in COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles D. Bengtson ◽  
Robert N. Montgomery ◽  
Usman Nazir ◽  
Lewis Satterwhite ◽  
Michael D. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers ◽  
Renin Angiotensin System ◽  
Respiratory Illness ◽  
External Control ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Respiratory Compromise ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Trial

Rationale: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can cause disruption of the renin-angiotensin system in the lungs, possibly contributing to pulmonary capillary leakage. Thus, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may improve respiratory failure.Objective: Assess safety of losartan for use in respiratory failure related to COVID-19 (NCT04335123).Methods: Single arm, open label trial of losartan in those hospitalized with respiratory failure related to COVID-19. Oral losartan (25 mg daily for 3 days, then 50 mg) was administered from enrollment until day 14 or hospital discharge. A post-hoc external control group with patients who met all inclusion criteria was matched 1:1 to the treatment group using propensity scores for comparison.Measures: Primary outcome was cumulative incidence of any adverse events. Secondary, explorative endpoints included measures of respiratory failure, length of stay and vital status.Results: Of the 34 participants enrolled in the trial, 30 completed the study with a mean age SD of 53.8 ± 17.7 years and 17 males (57%). On losartan, 24/30 (80%) experienced an adverse event as opposed to 29/30 (97%) of controls, with a lower average number of adverse events on losartan relative to control (2.2 vs. 3.3). Using Poisson regression and controlling for age, sex, race, date of enrollment, disease severity at enrollment, and history of high-risk comorbidities, the incidence rate ratio of adverse events on losartan relative to control was 0.69 (95% CI: 0.49–0.97)Conclusions: Losartan appeared safe for COVID-19-related acute respiratory compromise. To assess true efficacy, randomized trials are needed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document