scholarly journals What to put on (and what to take off) a wound: treating a chronic neuropathic ulcer with an autologous homologous skin construct, offloading and common sense

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Grant A Murphy ◽  
Stephanie L Woelfel ◽  
David G Armstrong

ABSTRACT Closure of chronic lower extremity wounds is important for minimizing the risk of infection and amputation in a very high-risk population. Developments in tissue cultures and matrix therapies have shown promise in enhancing healing. The use of autologous homologous skin constructs in wound treatment may enable the regeneration of functional dermal structures. We present the case of a chronic medial heel ulcer that dehisced following intraoperative debridement, which was subsequently treated using a combination of an autologous homologous skin construct and total contact casting. This case emphasizes the importance of proper offloading for healing and preventing recurrence of lower extremity wounds.

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 347-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leyre Bento ◽  
Antonio Diaz-Lopez ◽  
Gilberto Israel Barranco ◽  
Ana Maria Martin Moreno ◽  
Monica Baile ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction DLBCL is the most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma and a heterogeneous subtype from the biological and clinical point of view. 20-40% of the patients relapse so it is important to identify a high risk population that could benefit from different therapeutic approaches. For this purpose, several scores have been developed. The IPI has been the most widely used but lacks the ability to identify this very high risk population in Rituximab era. Low absolute lymphocyte count and high levels of blood monocytes have shown to be unfavorable risk factors. The red cell distribution width (RDW) has been associated with aging and active inflammatory processes and beta-2-microglobulin (B2M) with tumor load and proliferation as well as comorbidities such as kidney failure. All these variables are easily obtainable at the time of diagnosis. Patients and methods From the national database of GELTAMO-IPI Project, we selected those patients with DLBCL homogeneously treated with R-CHOP ± radiotherapy. The complete blood count (CBC) values were standardized using the normal reference values of each centre. The survival analysis was estimated with Kaplan-Meier method. The comparison between variables was performed through Log-Rank test and multivariate analysis with Cox regression. The CBC quantitative variables cut points were calculated through MAXSTAT. A new prognosis score was generated taking into account the results of multivariate analysis for progression free survival (PFS), spliting the sample in two cohorts (discovery and validation). Results Nine hundred and ninety-two patients with DLBCL were retrospectively analyzed with a median follow up of 55 months (12-185). The characteristic of the patients are summarized in table 1. In the multivariate analysis, age, ECOG, stage, bulky mass, B2M, RDW and lymphocytes/monocytes ratio (LMR) were significantly independent variables for PFS. A new prognosis score was generated with these variables including age categorized in 3 groups (18-64, 65-80 y >80) with 0, 1 y 2 points, ECOG>3-4 with 2 points, stage III-IV, bulky mass, high B2M, LMR<2.25 and RDW>0.96 with 1 point each for a maximum of 9. This score could improve the discrimination of a very high risk subgroup with a 5-year PFS of 17% (Figure 1) versus 45%, 52%, 32% or 29% of R-IPI, NCCN-IPI, R-TS and GELTAMO-IPI, respectively and 5-year overall survival (OS) of 20% (Figure 2) versus 59%, 46%, 45% and 40% for R-IPI, NCCN-IPI, R-TS and GELTAMO-IPI. Conclusion A new prognosis score including easily obtainable CBC variables (LMR and RDW) and B2M is presented. This score identifies a high risk population both for PFS and OS in comparison with other scores for DLBCL. The addition of other biological or image markers could improve these results. Disclosures Martín: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Servier: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses. Sancho:SERVIER: Honoraria; JANSSEN: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; MUNDIPHARMA: Honoraria; SANOFI: Honoraria; GILEAD: Honoraria, Research Funding; KERN FHARMA: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; CELGENE: Honoraria; ROCHE: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Hoepli ◽  
K Ahmed ◽  
H Rickli ◽  
F Eberli ◽  
R Kobza ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In 2016 and subsequently again in 2019 the ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemia established a more intensive reduction of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) treatment recommendations. We aim to characterize patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with regards to achievement of recommended LDL-C goals and their current lipid lowering therapy. Methods We retrospectively analysed patients with AMI admitted to Swiss hospitals between 2016 and 2020. Patients were classified as “very high risk” due to prior atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ACSVD) events including at least one of the following: Myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus with target organ damage. The remaining patients were classified as “other risk”. LDL-C treatment recommendation goals for the “very high risk” population were set to 1.8mmol/L (2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines) or 1.4mmol/L (2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines) and for the “other risk” population to 2.6mmol/L or 1.8mmol/L. To identify differences between the two groups the Mann-Whitney test was used and for differences within a group the Kruskal-Wallis test. In-hospital outcomes were summarised as major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). Results Among 7114 patients included, 18.4% were categorized as “very high risk” and 81.6% as “other risk” (p&lt;0.001). In general, the “very high risk” patients were older (69.2y vs. 63.6y, p&lt;0.001), more likely to be men (78.8% vs. 75.3%, p=0.007), had poorer in-hospital outcomes (6.0% vs. 3.4%, p&lt;0.001) and were more often on lipid lowering treatment (statin/ezetimibe/combination) (LLT) prior to admission (64.8% vs 14.0%, p&lt;0.001). The overall LDL-C median for the “very high risk” population was significantly lower than for the “other risk” population (2.4mmol/L vs. 3.5mmol/L, p&lt;0.001). In addition, median (IQR) LDL-C increased in the “other risk” group over the years from 3.5mmol/L (2.7; 4.2) in 2016 to 3.7mmol/L (3.1; 4.4) in 2020. In contrast, no change in LDL-C was observed in the patients at higher risk (Fig. 1). Patients in the “other risk” group were more likely to miss the recommended LDL-C goals (2016 Guidelines: 80.0% vs. 75.4%, 2019 Guidelines: 94.2% vs. 89.1%). Patients without LLT prior to admission had a higher chance of not reaching the recommendations compared to patients with LLT prior to admission (without LLT: 2016: 85.3% vs. 91.0%, 2019: 96.1% vs. 96.6%), (with LLT: 2016: 50.8% vs. 66.8%, 2019: 83.2% vs.85.2%) (Fig. 2). Conclusion Median LDL-C levels have tended to increase in recent years in patients with very high CV risk and AMI admitted to Swiss hospitals. Despite existing lipid lowering therapies only few patients met guideline recommended LDL-C goals. Our results indicate that clinical implementation of guidelines remains to be optimised with regards to achievement of LDL-C goals to reduce CV risk and improve outcomes. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1. LDL-C development Figure 2. Recommended LDL-C goal achievement


Diabetes Care ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. e48-e49
Author(s):  
Alyson J. Littman ◽  
Andrew K. Timmons ◽  
Kathryn P. Moore ◽  
Chin-Lin Tseng ◽  
Gregory Landry ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maitri Kalra ◽  
Yan Tong ◽  
David R. Jones ◽  
Tom Walsh ◽  
Michael A. Danso ◽  
...  

AbstractPatients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who have residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy have a high risk of recurrence. We tested the impact of DNA-damaging chemotherapy alone or with PARP inhibition in this high-risk population. Patients with TNBC or deleterious BRCA mutation (TNBC/BRCAmut) who had >2 cm of invasive disease in the breast or persistent lymph node (LN) involvement after neoadjuvant therapy were assigned 1:1 to cisplatin alone or with rucaparib. Germline mutations were identified with BROCA analysis. The primary endpoint was 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) with 80% power to detect an HR 0.5. From Feb 2010 to May 2013, 128 patients were enrolled. Median tumor size at surgery was 1.9 cm (0–11.5 cm) with 1 (0–38) involved LN; median Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) score was 2.6. Six patients had known deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations at study entry, but BROCA identified deleterious mutations in 22% of patients with available samples. Toxicity was similar in both arms. Despite frequent dose reductions (21% of patients) and delays (43.8% of patients), 73% of patients completed planned cisplatin. Rucaparib exposure was limited with median concentration 275 (82–4694) ng/mL post-infusion on day 3. The addition of rucaparib to cisplatin did not increase 2-year DFS (54.2% cisplatin vs. 64.1% cisplatin + rucaparib; P = 0.29). In the high-risk post preoperative TNBC/BRCAmut setting, the addition of low-dose rucaparib did not improve 2-year DFS or increase the toxicity of cisplatin. Genetic testing was underutilized in this high-risk population.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Stepien ◽  
P Furczynska ◽  
M Zalewska ◽  
K Nowak ◽  
A Wlodarczyk ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Recently heart failure (HF) has been found to be a new dementia risk factor, nevertheless their relations in patients following HF decompensation remain unknown. Purpose We sought to investigate whether a screening diagnosis for dementia (SDD) in this high-risk population may predict unfavorable long-term clinical outcomes. Methods 142 patients following HF decompensation requiring hospitalization were enrolled. Within a median time of 55 months all patients were screened for dementia with ALFI-MMSE scale whereas their compliance was assessed with the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale. Any incidents of myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), revascularization, HF hospitalization and bleedings during follow-up were collected. Results SDD was established in 37 patients (26%) based on the result of an ALFI-MMSE score of &lt;17 points. By multivariate analysis the lower results of the ALFI-MMSE score were associated with a history of stroke/TIA (β=−0.29, P&lt;0.001), peripheral arterial disease (PAD) (β=−0.20, P=0.011) and lower glomerular filtration rate (β=0.24, P=0.009). During the follow-up, patients with SDD were more often rehospitalized following HF decompensation (48.7% vs 28.6%, P=0.014) than patients without SDD, despite a similar level of compliance (P=0.25). Irrespective of stroke/TIA history, SDD independently increased the risk of rehospitalization due to HF decompensation (HR 2.22, 95% CI 1.23–4.01, P=0.007). Conclusions As shown for the first time in literature patients following decompensated HF, a history of stroke/TIA, PAD and impaired renal function independently influenced SDD. In this high-risk population, SDD was not associated with patients' compliance but irrespective of the stroke/TIA history it increased the risk of recurrent HF hospitalization. The survival free of rehospitalization Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document