73 Off-label use and safety of drug use in vascular anomalies

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. e53-e55
Author(s):  
Laurence Gariépy-Assal ◽  
Simon Marcoux ◽  
Jerome Coulombe ◽  
Julie Powell ◽  
Sandrine Essouri ◽  
...  

Abstract Primary Subject area Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology Background Vascular anomalies (VA) represent a heterogeneous group of disorders associated with an abnormal development and proliferation of blood and/or lymphatic vessels displaying variable clinical presentations and severity. Infantile hemangiomas, venous, and lymphatic malformations, for example, are commonly encountered in children. Other, less frequent diagnostics include Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome and PIK-3CA-related overgrowth spectrum (PROS). Severe phenotypes can alter organ function and/or lead to pain and chronic functional impairment, and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Management includes surgical, interventional radiology, and pharmacologic modalities. Drugs are administered by systemic (e.g., oral, intravenous) or local (topical, intralesional) routes, or by sclerotherapy (endovascular or percutaneous venous, lymphatic, or arterial injection). Off-label drug use is common in pediatrics and in rare diseases, two characteristics applying to vascular anomalies (VA). Off-label use is associated with an increased risk of adverse drug reactions. Objectives To quantify off-label drug use in VA and assess its safety. Design/Methods A guidelines search was conducted to extract a list of drugs used in VA management. The labelling status and safety of each drug was assessed based on the product monograph, Micromedex, and the FDA data. A drug was considered to have significant safety concerns if a black box warning (the FDA’s most stringent warning dedicated to serious or life-threatening risks) or if a serious adverse drug reaction was reported in at least 1% of the patients (leading to hospitalization, congenital malformation, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, life-threatening condition, or death). Results Among 87 drugs, 13 were unlicensed and 73 off-label. Figure 1 describes the reason for considering the 73 drugs off-label. Among 74 licensed drugs, only the oral solution of propranolol hydrochloride (Hemangeol®) for the treatment of infantile hemangiomas (IH) is approved. 98.9% of the drugs are used off-label or unlicensed. Except infantile hemangioma, all other VA are exclusively treated with off-label drugs. Significant safety issues concerned 73% of the drugs and were more frequent among systemic than locally delivered drugs (Figure 2). Conclusion This first study determining the rate of off-label drug use in vascular anomalies shows that off-label drug use in VA is the rule and not the exception. Significant safety concerns are common. It is needed to carefully weigh risk and benefits for every patient when using systemic and local treatments carrying safety concerns. Patients and families should be openly informed and involved in the decision-making process.

Dermatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Niina Kleiber ◽  
Laurence Gariépy-Assal ◽  
Jérôme Coulombe ◽  
Simon Marcoux ◽  
Sandrine Essouri ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Off-label drug use is associated with an increased risk of adverse drug reactions. It is common in pediatrics and in rare diseases, which are two characteristics applying to vascular anomalies (VA). <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> The aim of this work was to quantify off-label drug use in VA and assess its safety. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A review was conducted to extract a list of drugs used in VA management. A drug was considered to have significant safety concerns if a black box warning was present or if a serious adverse drug reaction (SADR) was reported in at least 1% of the patients (SADR is defined as a noxious and unintended response to a drug that occurs at any dose and results in hospitalization, prolongation of existing hospitalization, congenital malformation, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, life-threatening condition, or death). The labelling status and safety of each drug was assessed based on the product monograph, Micromedex, and the FDA data. <b><i>Results:</i></b> We found that 98.9% of the inventoried drugs were used off-label or unlicensed for VA management. Only the oral solution of propranolol hydrochloride (Hemangeol®) for the treatment of infantile hemangiomas is approved. Significant safety issues concerned 73% of the drugs and were more frequent among systemic than locally delivered drugs. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Off-label drug use in VA is the rule and not the exception. Significant safety concerns are common. It is necessary to carefully weigh risk and benefits for every patient when using systemic and local treatments carrying safety concerns. Patients should be openly informed and involved in the decision-making process.


2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 355-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natan R. Kahan ◽  
Dan-Andrei Waitman ◽  
Shimon Blackmon ◽  
Daniel A. Vardy

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18031-e18031 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan McCafferty ◽  
Kartikey Grover ◽  
Li Li ◽  
Zhiqiang Li ◽  
Marc Y. Fink ◽  
...  

e18031 Background: Off-label drug use is common in cancer treatment (tx) due to limited approved tx options. Systematic analysis of RWD for off-label drug use facilitates hypothesis generation and design of clinical studies for new indications. Methods: We analyzed systemic tx data of > 145,000 cancer patients at Mount Sinai hospitals for 60 chemotherapy, 80 targeted, 16 hormonal therapy drugs, and 6 immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs). Off-label use was determined when patients received a drug for cancer indications that had not received regulatory approval, and the tx was not in a clinical trial setting. Clinical response to off-label tx was assessed using time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) as a surrogate endpoint. Results: Chemotherapy drugs were used off-label more frequently than targeted and hormonal agents. Across all cancer tx regimens involving a chemotherapy drug , 31% were off-label. In contrast, for tx regimens involving targeted and hormonal therapy drugs, only 11% and 6.7%, respectively, were used off-label. Further investigation revealed that chemotherapy often combines multiple drugs, where the combinations may include one or more drugs not approved for the disease. For example, cisplatin is approved only for bladder, ovarian and testicular cancers, but is widely used in combination to treat other cancers. Consequently, we observed an 84% off-label use of cisplatin. Several targeted drugs and CPIs were used off-label at high frequencies. 53% of nivolumab tx was off-label, primarily for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (before FDA approval) and relapsed/refractory multiple myelomas (RRMM). Trametinib targeting MEK and venetoclax targeting Bcl-2 were used off-label at a frequency of 84% and 89%, respectively, mainly in RRMM. In MM patients treated with trametinib (n = 91) and venetoclax (n = 121), 14 (15%) and 42 (35%), respectively, had TTD > 120 days. Conclusions: Off-label uses of novel targeted and immunotherapy drugs are likely based on disease mechanisms and when clinical trials deliver early, encouraging results. A thorough chart review would help us better understand clinical response as well as adverse events in these patients and potentially guide future clinical studies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 19-26
Author(s):  
D. V. Ivashchenko ◽  
N. I. Buromskaya ◽  
A. D. Malakhova ◽  
N. A. Tsarkova ◽  
L. M. Savchenko ◽  
...  

Antipsychotics are often used to treat children and adolescents. Because of their age, there are a lot of off-label prescribed antipsychotics in that population. However, the off-label use of medications is considered to be potentially unsafe.Objective: to evaluate whether the off-label prescription of antipsychotics outside of the approved age group increased the risk of adverse drug reactions in adolescents experiencing an acute psychotic episode.Patients and methods. We analyzed 450 charts of adolescents hospitalized due to an acute psychotic episode (only completed cases). In addition, we evaluated adverse drug reactions adjusted by off-label antipsychotics prescription outside the approved age group using the Global Trigger Tool (GTT). We also registered prescriptions with duplicates drug classes and potentially dangerous drug interactions.Results and discussion. Off-label antipsychotics prescription outside the approved age group was less frequently associated with adverse drug reactions (3.2% vs. 10.5%; p=0.013). The logistic regression analysis did not show any significant associations between the off-label antipsychotic use and increased risk of adverse drug reactions (Odds ratio=0.994 (95% confidence interval 0.572-1.726), p=0.982). Although, patients with off-label use of antipsychotics were more likely to have potentially dangerous drug interactions (35.2% vs. 16.15%; p=0.0001) and prescriptions with duplicates drug classes (39.6% vs. 15.43%; p=0.0001).Conclusion. Off-label antipsychotic prescription outside the approved age group in adolescents with acute psychotic episode does not increase the risk of adverse drug reactions. However, an increase in potentially dangerous drug interactions and prescriptions with duplicates drug classes frequency could be considered red flags. Therefore, we have concluded that the concerns about off-label antipsychotics prescription outside of approved age groups in adolescents with acute psychotic episodes were overrated.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5622-5622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Maria Quinto ◽  
Elena De March ◽  
Monica Castelli ◽  
Francesco Piazza ◽  
Fausto Adami ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and objectives. Infectionsare commonandpotentially fatal events affecting patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Predisposing factors that are likely to be associated with increased risk of infections in MDS patients are neutropenia and/or neutrophil functional impairment; B-, T- and NK-cell defects; secondary iron overload related to red blood cell transfusions; comorbidities; treatment toxicity; previous severe infections. Few data are available on the incidence and pathogens involved in infectious events, most of these originating from retrospective studies or clinical trials with primary end points other than infection. An Italian single Center real-life experience assessing the incidence, risk factors and impact of infections on outcome of patients with MDS treated with hypomethylating agents is herein reported. Design and methods. From March 2008 to October 2013, 50 patients, aged 40 years and older (median age: 69, 40-84 years) with diagnosis of MDS (WHO2008 categories: 22.4% RA/RCMD, 32.6% RAEB-1, 28.5% RAEB-2, 12.2% CMML, 4% AML), were treated with 5-azacitidine (75 mg/m2/die for 7 days every 4 weeks), both in on-label and off-label drug use setting. Forty-four percent of patients had intermediate-2 or high International Prognostic Scoring System, 68% were neutropenic and 12% had high MDS-Comorbidity Index. Prophylactic antibiotics were administered to 12 patients (24%), prophylactic antifungal to 17 patients (34%) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was administered to 24 patients (48%). Results. Median number of cycles received by a single patient was 5 (range 1-21); 48% received more than 6 cycles of therapy. 30.4% of the entire cohort was considered responsive to treatment (14.4% hematologic improvement, 8% partial response, 8% complete response, according to IWG2006 criteria); 24% of patients achieved a stable disease. Out of 50 patients, 25 (50%) developed 25 infectious events (1 for each patient), during 325 treatment cycles (7.7%); 14/25 (56%) events required hospitalization. Only one patient died from an infectious complication. Twenty-two of 25 infectious events (84%) were bacterial, mostly pneumonia; 3 (12%) were fungal (invasive aspergillosis) and 1 (4%) was viral (H1N1). Infectious events did not significantly affect overall survival (27 vs 18 months, p=0.606), progression free survival (6.0 vs 6.1 months, p=0.48) or overall response to therapy (13 vs 17.4%, p=0.693). However, no complete responses were documented in the cohort of patients who suffered from infectious episodes. In a univariate analysis, age, sex, low neutrophil count, high comorbidity index, antibiotic prophylaxis and use of G-CSF were not found to be associated with infections. Only high IPSS and the presence of pancytopenia, seemed to be correlated with an increased risk for infections. Conclusions. Infectious events, specifically bacterial infections, are one of the most frequent complications during therapy with azacitidine in patients with MDS. These data suggest that there are not predisposing risk factors for infection in patients except those connected with disease severity (high IPSS and pancytopenia). Routine antibiotics, antifungal prophylaxis and/or use of G-CSF appear not to reduce the incidence of infectious events. Moreover, bearing in mind the risk of bacterial and fungal resistance associated with extended use of anti-infective drugs, they should be used with caution in selected subsets of MDS patients. Disclosures Off Label Use: Off-label use of azacitidine for low risk MDS patients with severe transfusions dependence after ESAs failure (primary resistance or relapse after a response).


2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 650-662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vera Hagemann ◽  
Claudia Bausewein ◽  
Constanze Remi

Background: Drug use beyond the licence (off-label use, off-label drug use) is a common practice in palliative care and respective recommendations can often be identified in the literature. It is both risky and offers opportunities at the same time and, therefore, requires special attention in clinical practice. Aim: To determine the prevalence of off-label drug use in palliative care and to identify, evaluate and critically appraise studies describing the clinical practice, healthcare professionals’ awareness, knowledge and attitudes towards off-label-use and management strategies. Design: Systematic literature review following the guidance of the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Data sources: Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Current Contents Connect were searched in July 2018 as well as hand searches. The reference lists of pertinent studies were screened for further relevant publications, and citation tracking was performed. Results: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Due to the variety in study designs and settings, no meta-analysis or meaningful statistical analysis was possible and a narrative synthesis of the data was performed. Frequency of off-label drug use ranged from 14.5% to 35%. Up to 97% of palliative care units did not have any policy or guidance on handling off-label drug use. About 20% of prescribers never obtain consent in the context of off-label use. Conclusion: Off-label use is common in palliative care with up to one-third of prescriptions affected. Challenges are often related to obtaining informed consent. Little is known about the decision-making process. More information and guidance for the prescribers are needed to enable safe handling of drugs outside their licence in palliative care.


2020 ◽  
pp. 001857872094222
Author(s):  
Aeshah AlAzmi ◽  
Zahra Alasmari ◽  
Consuela Yousef ◽  
Ahmed Alenazi ◽  
Mohammed AlOtaibi ◽  
...  

Objective: Prescribing a drug for a child is not an easy task and requires using the best available evidence as a guide, especially when a drug is used off-label. The practice of prescribing a drug for off-label use is fairly widespread worldwide. The FDA does not regulate prescribing patterns or practices of individual practitioners and, therefore, allows off-label use. The main objective of this study is to evaluate off-label prescribing among the pediatric population in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Method: This is a retrospective, simple random selection observational study of children (≤15 years) who visited pediatric clinics and had at least 1 drug prescribed over a 12-month period (January to December 2018). Results: A total of 865 drugs (mean 1 and SD 0.24) were prescribed to 326 children. Off-label was identified in 39.4% of the drugs with a frequency of 512 (as 1 drug may belong to more than 1 off-label category). The most common reason for off-label prescribing was related to doses that were “higher or lower than the recommended use” (48.6%), and the most frequently identified drug class prescribed for off-label use was anti-infective drugs for systemic use (39.9%). The percentage of off-label drug use was found to be higher in girls and in the age group of 1 month to 2 years ( P = .001) for both variables. In addition, a significant association was found between off label drug use and the total number of drugs prescribed, P < .001. Conclusion: The findings of this study showed a high incidence of off-label prescribing mainly related to dosing and indication. The results of this observational study support the need to establish a unified national pediatric dosing formulary guide to ensure safe drug use in pediatrics.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 2617
Author(s):  
Federico Semeraro ◽  
Giovanni Corona ◽  
Tommaso Scquizzato ◽  
Lorenzo Gamberini ◽  
Anna Valentini ◽  
...  

Background: The National Early Warning Score (NEWS) is an assessment scale of in-hospital patients’ conditions. The purpose of this study was to assess the appropriateness of a potential off-label use of NEWS by the emergency medical system (EMS) to facilitate the identification of critical patients and to trigger appropriate care in the pre-hospital setting. Methods: A single centre, longitudinal, prospective study was carried out between July and August 2020 in the EMS service of Bologna. Home patients with age ≥ 18 years old were included in the study. The exclusion criterion was the impossibility to collect all the parameters needed to measure NEWS. Results: A total of 654 patients were enrolled in the study. The recorded NEWS values increased along with the severity of dispatch priority code, the EMS return code, the emergency department triage code, and with patients’ age (r = 0.135; p = 0.001). The aggregated value of NEWS was associated with an increased risk of hospitalization (OR = 1.30 (1.17; 1.34); p < 0.0001). Conclusion: This study showed that the use of NEWS in the urgent and emergency care services can help patient assessment while not affecting EMS crew operation and might assist decision making in terms of severity-code assignment and resources utilization.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document