scholarly journals O03 Continuation of golimumab (anti-TNF) in a patient with SpA and low-risk prostate cancer, what is the right decision?

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amelia Holloway ◽  
Catherine Mathews
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
British Society ◽  
Tnf Alpha ◽  
Risk Category ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Ongoing Treatment ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Case report - Introduction Golimumab is an anti-TNF alpha drug used in the treatment of inflammatory arthritis including spondyloarthritis (SpA). The introduction of this drug class has revolutionised the treatment of SpA over the last 20 years with significantly improved patient outcomes. Despite their treatment benefits multiple adverse effects of TNF-alpha inhibition have been reported through clinical trials including a possible increased risk of malignancy. We describe a case of a patient with known ankylosing spondylitis (AS) on golimumab who was diagnosed with low-grade prostate carcinoma and discuss the factors taken into consideration in guiding our decision-making process regarding ongoing treatment. Case report - Case description A 57-year-old gentleman with known AS presented to the rheumatology clinic for routine review. His AS was well controlled, and he had been taking golimumab for the past 3 years. Upon review he was in clinical remission with a CRP <1 and ESR 5. Prior to the initiation of anti-TNF therapy his disease had been poorly controlled. However, following commencement his symptoms had significantly improved and he was able to work as a professional sports coach whilst bringing up a young family. On review he had recently been diagnosed with low-risk cancer of the prostate by his urologist. A prostate biopsy found Gleason 3 + 3 adenocarcinoma involving 2 out of 22 cores on each side, with a prostate specific antigen (PSA) of 3.95ng/ml. An MRI had shown chronic prostatitis. He was in the lowest risk category of grade group 1 prostate cancer and no treatment for his prostate cancer was indicated. The plan from his urology team was active surveillance with PSA monitoring. Whilst being investigated for possible malignancy his golimumab had been held for six months and during this period he had a significant flare in symptoms. He experienced severe back pain that forced him to stop working. Following his prostate cancer diagnosis, golimumab was restarted by his urologist with a subsequent improvement in his AS symptoms. To guide ongoing treatment his case was reviewed in the local biologics multi-disciplinary team meeting, alongside close communication with his urologist.  The patient was informed of the risks of continuing golimumab in relation to his malignancy. Despite this he was reluctant to stop anti-TNF therapy or switch to another treatment, citing concerns about the impact it might have on his symptoms and ability to work. Case report - Discussion  This case highlights the complexities involved in the management of a patient on anti-TNF therapy, who receives a diagnosis of malignancy, particularly when the diagnosis is classed as low risk. Traditionally anti-TNF therapy was contraindicated for patients with a history of a solid organ tumour within the previous five years. The British Society of Rheumatology (BSR) guidelines recommends that patients should be advised that there is no conclusive evidence for an increased risk of solid organ tumours but that on-going vigilance is required. A holistic patient-centred approach needs to be taken in these contexts, and consideration of cases on an individual basis is needed. Inter-disciplinary and multi-speciality team input, with the effective use of a biologics MDT, is crucial. The patient was understandably reluctant to stop his treatment due to the significant impact this may have on his quality of life. On liaison with his urologist his prostate cancer was in the lowest risk category with 99% 5-year survival rates with low risk of disease progression or spread. Evidence in this field to date has been conflicting and studies have predominantly focused on the safety of anti-TNFs in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Recent large national registry data has been reassuring. Few studies have looked at the AS and psoriatic arthritis anti-TNF treated population; however, a meta-analysis of RCTs found no evidence of increased incidence of malignancy. Taking into account his low-risk cancer, the patient’s wishes and clinical evidence in this field we have made to decision to continue anti-TNF treatment for now but with ongoing surveillance for any tumour progression. The patient will undergo urology follow up alongside regular PSA monitoring, and there will be a low threshold to stop or switch treatment in the future Case report - Key learning points

Concordance of Non–Low-Risk Disease Among Pairs of Brothers With Prostate Cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (18) ◽  
pp. 1847-1852 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fredrik Jansson ◽  
Linda Drevin ◽  
Thomas Frisell ◽  
Pär Stattin ◽  
Ola Bratt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Monozygotic Twins ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Risk Category ◽  
Cancer Etiology ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Risk Prostate Cancer ◽  
Low Risk Prostate Cancer

Purpose Prostate cancer among first-degree relatives is a strong risk factor for diagnosis of prostate cancer, and the contribution of heritable factors in prostate cancer etiology is high. We investigated how the concordance of non–low-risk prostate cancer among brothers is affected by their genetic relation. Methods We identified 4,262 pairs of brothers with prostate cancer in the Prostate Cancer Database Sweden. Their cancers were categorized as low risk (Gleason score ≤ 6; clinical stage T1-2, Nx/N0, Mx/M0; and prostate-specific antigen ≤ 10 ng/mL) or non–low risk. The odds ratio (OR) for concordance of non–low-risk cancer was calculated with logistic regression for the different types of fraternity (monozygotic twins, dizygotic twins, full brothers, and half-brothers) Results Among monozygotic twins who both were diagnosed with prostate cancer, the OR for both brothers being in the non–low-risk category was 3.82 (95% CI, 0.99 to 16.72) after adjusting for age and year of diagnosis. Among full brothers, the corresponding adjusted OR was 1.21 (95% CI, 1.04 to 1.39). When the analysis was restricted to brothers who both were diagnosed within 4 years, the results were similar. Conclusion Non–low-risk prostate cancer has a heritable pattern suggesting shared genetic factors, with the highest concordance among monozygotic twins. Our results suggest that a man whose brother has been diagnosed with a non–low-risk prostate cancer is at a clinically relevant increased risk of developing an aggressive prostate cancer himself.

Impact of dose-escalated radiation on overall survival in men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 28-28
Author(s):  
Anusha Kalbasi ◽  
Jiaqi Li ◽  
Abigail T. Berman ◽  
Samuel Swisher-McClure ◽  
Marc C. Smaldone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Risk Category ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Treatment Groups

28 Background: Infive publishedRCTs, dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for prostate cancer resulted in improved biochemical and local control. However, the question of whether dose escalation improves overall survival (OS) remains unanswered. We examined OS among men with non-metastatic prostate cancer undergoing EBRT in the modern era. Methods: Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we conducted non-randomized comparative effectiveness studies of dose-escalated versus standard-dose EBRT in men diagnosed from 2004-2006 in three analytic cohorts defined by NCCN risk category: low- (N=12,848), intermediate- (N=14,966) or high-risk (N=14,587) prostate cancer. We categorized patients in each risk cohort into 2 treatment groups: standard-dose (68.4 Gy to <75.6 Gy) or dose-escalated (≥75.6 Gy to 90 Gy) EBRT. The primary outcome was time to death from any cause, measured from diagnosis to NCDB date of death or end of follow-up (December 31, 2011). We compared OS between treatment groups in the three analytic cohorts using Cox proportional hazard models. Inverse probability weighted propensity score methods were used to balance differences between treatment groups in age, race, year of diagnosis, AJCC T- and N-stage, PSA, Gleason score, androgen deprivation therapy, IMRT use, comorbid disease, income, insurance, urban/rural location, facility type and facility volume. In secondary analyses, we evaluated dose response for survival by categorizing dose in approximately 2 Gy increments. Results: Median follow up for survivors was between 73 and 74 months in all three risk cohorts. Dose-escalated EBRT was associated with improved survival in the intermediate-risk (adjusted HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.77 and 0.85, p<0.0001) and high-risk groups (aHR 0.85, 95% CI 0.81 and 0.89, p<0.0001), but not the low-risk group (aHR 0.99, 95% CI 0.92-1.06, p=0.803). For every incremental ~2Gy increase in dose, there was a 9% (95% CI 6% – 11%, p<0.0001) and 7% (95% CI 3% - 10%, p=0.004) reduction in the hazard of death for intermediate- and high-risk patients, respectively. Conclusions: Dose-escalated EBRT is associated with improved survival in men with intermediate- and high-risk, but not low-risk, prostate cancer.

Can Gleason 7 prostate cancer ever be low-risk? Results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 57-57
Author(s):  
Kathleen F. McGinley ◽  
Xizi Sun ◽  
Lauren E. Howard ◽  
William J. Aronson ◽  
Martha K. Terris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Pathological Features ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Logistic Regression Models ◽  
Risk Criteria ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Risk Prostate Cancer ◽  
Low Risk Prostate Cancer ◽  
Low Volume

57 Background: Overtreatment of low-risk prostate cancer (PC) is a major issue. Increasing use of active surveillance (AS) will ease this burden. Limited data are available on including men with intermediate risk PC (i.e. Gleason 7) into AS protocols. We examined if a subset of men with Gleason 7 (3+4) PC could be reasonable AS candidates. Methods: We used SEARCH to identify men who had radical prostatectomy from 2001-13 with >8 cores on biopsy and complete data. We compared men who fulfilled low-risk disease criteria (cT1c/T2a; biopsy Gleason ≤6; PSA ≤10 ng/mL) with the exception of biopsy Gleason 7 (3+4) vs. men who met all 3 low-risk criteria. Logistic regression models were used to test the association between biopsy Gleason 3+4 vs. ≤6 and pathological features. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) was examined using multivariable Cox hazards analysis adjusted for clinical and demographic features. To examine if there was a subset of men with low-volume Gleason 7 who would have comparable outcomes to low-risk men, we repeated all analyses limiting the percent positive cores to ≤ 33% and positive cores to ≤ 4, ≤ 3, or ≤ 2. Results: 885 men met inclusion criteria: 505 had low-risk PC and 380 had Gleason 7 low-risk PC. Overall, the Gleason 7 low-risk men had increased risk of pathological Gleason ≥4+3 (p<0.001), positive margins (p=0.069), extracapsular extension (p<0.001), and seminal vesicle invasion (p<0.001) on univariable analysis. Men in the Gleason 7 low-risk group had significantly higher BCR risk (HR 1.65, p=0.004). Analyses were repeated using increasingly strict definitions of low-volume PC. With the exception of higher pathological Gleason score (p<0.001), at ≤3 positive cores, there was no difference in adverse pathological features between groups (all p>0.1). Among men with ≤3 positive cores who met the other low-risk criteria (cT1c/T2a; PSA ≤10 ng/mL), BCR risk was similar in men with Gleason 6 or Gleason 7 (3+4) (HR 1.30; p=0.347) PC. Conclusions: Among men with PSA≤10 ng/mL and stage cT1c/T2a, those with Gleason 7 (3+4) PC in ≤3 positive cores have similar rates of adverse pathology and BCR as men with Gleason ≤6 PC. This finding may expand inclusion criteria of AS protocols to reduce PC overtreatment.

Associations of cell cycle genetic variants with aggressive prostate cancer in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 175-175
Author(s):  
Melissa Huynh ◽  
Chirag Vyas ◽  
Kathryn L. Penney ◽  
Adam S. Kibel
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
At Risk ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Cancer Screening Trial ◽  
Screening Trial

175 Background: The need to differentiate patients at risk for developing aggressive prostate cancer (CaP) from those at risk for less aggressive disease has led to efforts to identify genetic markers to predict disease course and personalize treatment. A study with participants from Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions (JHMI) and Washington University (WU) found single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in cell cycle genes were associated with risk of aggressive CaP. We sought to replicate those results in the European-American population of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. Methods: We focused on variants associated with aggressive CaP in the JHMI and WU cohorts, which included 13 SNPs in 12 genes ( CCNC, CCND3, CCNG1, CCNT2, CDK2, CDK6, MDM2, SKP2, TERF2, WEE1, YWHAB, YWHAH). Variants were genotyped using the Pyrosequencing assay. Patients were classified into high risk (Gleason≥8, pT3b, N+, M+), low risk (Gleason≤7, ≤pT3a, N0, M0) or non-cancer control groups based on clinicopathologic characteristics. Logistic regression analysis was used to compare genotype frequencies of each variant between groups using the dominant model. Results: There were 108 aggressive and 1080 non-aggressive CaP patients, and 1155 controls . CDK6 ( rs8) was associated with increased risk of any CaP (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.02-1.42; p = 0.032) and high risk disease (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.09-2.42; p = 0.017) vs. controls. In contrast, the JHMI and WU cohort found CDK6 variants to be protective against aggressive CaP. CCNG1 ( rs11541970) approached significance (p = 0.052) between high risk and control groups, and CCNC conferred a protective effect consistent with the prior study, but did not reach significance (p = 0.101). No associations with any cell cycle gene variants were detected when comparing high and low risk patients. Conclusions: Our study did not replicate the results from the JHMI and WU cohorts. CDK6 predicted an increased risk of developing any CaP and high risk CaP. However, directionality was opposite to the prior study, indicating that this variant is unlikely to be a true predictor of increased risk of or protection from aggressive CaP.

scholarly journals Vasectomy and Risk of Aggressive Prostate Cancer: A 24-Year Follow-Up Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (27) ◽  
pp. 3033-3038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohummad Minhaj Siddiqui ◽  
Kathryn M. Wilson ◽  
Mara M. Epstein ◽  
Jennifer R. Rider ◽  
Neil E. Martin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
The United States ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Follow Up Study ◽  
Increased Risk

Purpose Conflicting reports remain regarding the association between vasectomy, a common form of male contraception in the United States, and prostate cancer risk. We examined prospectively this association with extended follow-up and an emphasis on advanced and lethal disease. Patients and Methods Among 49,405 US men in the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study, age 40 to 75 years at baseline in 1986, 6,023 patients with prostate cancer were diagnosed during the follow-up to 2010, including 811 lethal cases. In total, 12,321 men (25%) had vasectomies. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate the relative risk (RR) and 95% CIs of total, advanced, high-grade, and lethal disease, with adjustment for a variety of possible confounders. Results Vasectomy was associated with a small increased risk of prostate cancer overall (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.17). Risk was elevated for high-grade (Gleason score 8 to 10; RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.45) and lethal disease (death or distant metastasis; RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.43). Among a subcohort of men receiving regular prostate-specific antigen screening, the association with lethal cancer was stronger (RR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.36). Vasectomy was not associated with the risk of low-grade or localized disease. Additional analyses suggested that the associations were not driven by differences in sex hormone levels, sexually transmitted infections, or cancer treatment. Conclusion Our data support the hypothesis that vasectomy is associated with a modest increased incidence of lethal prostate cancer. The results do not appear to be due to detection bias, and confounding by infections or cancer treatment is unlikely.

scholarly journals Prostate Cancer-Associated Trousseau´S Syndrome Versus Asymptomatic Isolated Muscular Calf Vein Thrombosis as the Origin of Acute Submassive Pulmonary Embolism: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Antonis Tsamaloukas ◽  
Antonis Tsamaloukas ◽  
Aristoteles Giagounidis ◽  
Jan Roigas ◽  
Stefan Glück
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Factor Xii ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Calf Vein

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. Cancer patients have a four to sevenfold increased risk of VTE compared with non-cancer patients and approximately 20% -30% of all VTE occurs in patients with cancer. Incidence of VTE varies with cancer type and is the highest among patients with metastatic-stage disease. Assessing risk of VTE in the patients with cancer and risk stratification tools as the Khorana score may predict VTE. The highest risk is associated with cancers of the pancreas, stomach, brain, and lung and some hematologic malignancies, whereas lower risks are associated with breast and prostate cancer. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) for prostate cancer is 3.25(2,56 - 4,13) and for pancreas 15.56 (10.50-23.0). We give a case report with a quite perplexing undertaking, where a submassive acute pulmonary embolism (PE) originated from an asymptomatic calf vein thrombosis or intertwined with the Trousseau´s syndrome. Essential Section: One of the authors (A.T) was unexpected faced with the diagnosis of poorly differentiated prostate cancer. There were no signs of the disease, the PSA level was normal. As a retired medical oncologist, he had to care for many patients with prostate cancer and had now to cope with this cancer. To make the matter worse he suffered after the radical prostatectomy a submassive asymptomatic pulmonary embolism. Clinically there were no signs if a deep venous thrombosis. The coincidence of both events without clinical signs of a thrombosis could be caused by the Trousseau´s syndrome. Prostasomes extracellular vesicles synthesizes by prostate cancer cells and secreted into body fluids are prothrombotic by virtue of the expression of polyphosphate-activated coagulation factor XII.

scholarly journals Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Proportion Is Predictive of Risk and Outcomes in Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5439-5439
Author(s):  
Alexander Chan ◽  
Yanming Zhang ◽  
Sean M. Devlin ◽  
Natasha Lewis ◽  
Jeeyeon Baik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Dendritic Cells ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Risk Category ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Type I ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Hla Dr ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Provision Of Services

Background Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a clonal, pre-leukemic stem cell disorder characterized by decreased blood counts due to ineffective hematopoiesis. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (PDC) are stem cell derived, type I interferon producing dendritic cells, that are readily identifiable by flow cytometry (FC) using expression of CD123 and HLA-DR. PDCs have been shown to be decreased in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Our study uses FC to evaluate PDC in MDS, their relationship to the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) for MDS, as well as their relationship to clinical outcomes. Methods We identified 197 patients with new MDS diagnoses and examined FC data of bone marrow aspirates (BMA) at first presentation to our institution for blast and PDC percentages. Patients who presented with an outside diagnosis of MDS greater than 1 year before presentation to our institution were excluded. MDS with excess blasts 1 and 2 (MDS-EB1/EB2) were designated as high grade, while MDS with isolated del5q (MDS-d5q), single lineage dysplasia (MDS-SLD), and multilineage dysplasia (MDS-MLD) were designated as low grade, with or without ring sideroblasts. 163 patients had sufficient data to calculate their IPSS-R risk categories. Sixteen patients with a history of solid tumor malignancies undergoing BMA for cytopenias were used as controls. The bone marrow of these control patients showed no evidence of morphologic dysplasia, they had normal karyotypes, and no pathogenic variants were detected on a 28 gene next generation sequencing based myeloid panel. We used CD34 and CD117 to quantify blasts, and CD123 and HLA-DR to quantify PDCs. Results The proportion of PDCs expressed as a percentage of total WBCs was significantly lower in higher risk MDS diagnoses (p <0.001) (Table 1A), as well as with worsening IPSS-R risk category (p <0.001) (Table 1B, Figure 1A). Sixteen percent of patients received disease modifying therapy (hypomethylating agents or lenalidomide) prior to presentation at our institution; PDC proportions in these patients were not significantly different from patients who presented untreated (p = 0.79). In the entire cohort, a lower proportion of PDC at the time of presentation was significantly associated with an increased risk of death (one-unit decrease in log PDC, HR 2.42, 95% CI 1.01-5.78, p = 0.046), but was not significantly associated with risk of progression to AML. Thirty-one patients progressed to AML, and these patients showed a significant decrease in the proportion of bone marrow PDCs at the time of progression to AML (p=0.002) (Table 1C, Figure 1B). Discussion This study demonstrates that PDC proportions decrease with MDS disease progression and are progressively lower as IPSS-R risk category increases. We also demonstrate that quantification of PDC in MDS can aid in predicting outcomes, although this may be due to a strong association with IPSS-R categories. FC is a useful and clinically feasible tool for quantitating PDCs in bone marrow aspirates, and this measurement is correlated with risk in MDS. Disclosures Arcila: Invivoscribe, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Roshal:Celgene: Other: Provision of Services; Auron Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Other: Provision of services; Physicians' Education Resource: Other: Provision of services.

scholarly journals Linking obesogenic dysregulation to prostate cancer progression

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. R68-R80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renea A Taylor ◽  
Jennifer Lo ◽  
Natasha Ascui ◽  
Matthew J Watt
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Adipose Tissue ◽  
Cancer Progression ◽  
Prostate Gland ◽  
The Body ◽  
Endocrine Function ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Prostate Cancer Progression ◽  
Cancer Aggressiveness ◽  
Increased Risk

The global epidemic of obesity is closely linked to the development of serious co-morbidities, including many forms of cancer. Epidemiological evidence consistently shows that obesity is associated with a similar or mildly increased incidence of prostate cancer but, more prominently, an increased risk for aggressive prostate cancer and prostate cancer-specific mortality. Studies in mice demonstrate that obesity induced by high-fat feeding increases prostate cancer progression; however, the mechanisms underpinning this relationship remain incompletely understood. Adipose tissue expansion in obesity leads to local tissue dysfunction and is associated with low-grade inflammation, alterations in endocrine function and changes in lipolysis that result in increased delivery of fatty acids to tissues of the body. The human prostate gland is covered anteriorly by the prominent peri-prostatic adipose tissue and laterally by smaller adipose tissue depots that lie directly adjacent to the prostatic surface. We discuss how the close association between dysfunctional adipose tissue and prostate epithelial cells might result in bi-directional communication to cause increased prostate cancer aggressiveness and progression. However, the literature indicates that several ‘mainstream’ hypotheses regarding obesity-related drivers of prostate cancer progression are not yet supported by a solid evidence base and, in particular, are not supported by experiments using human tissue. Understanding the links between obesity and prostate cancer will have major implications for the health policy for men with prostate cancer and the development of new therapeutic or preventative strategies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document