scholarly journals Pre-operative withholding of infliximab and the risk of infections after major surgery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (12) ◽  
pp. 3917-3926
Author(s):  
Michael M Ward ◽  
Abhijit Dasgupta

Abstract Objectives Withholding TNF inhibitors (TNFI) before surgery has been recommended due to concern for post-operative infection. We examined the risks of post-operative infections and mortality in patients with RA in relation to the pre-operative timing of infliximab infusion. Methods In this population-based retrospective cohort study, we used US Medicare claims data from 2007 to 2015 to identify patients with RA who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), aortic or vascular surgery, or bowel resection, and who were treated with infliximab in the 90 days prior to surgery. We examined associations between the timing of infusion and infections and mortality in the 30 days after surgery. We adjusted for the predicted probability of post-operative infection or death, demographic characteristics, use of MTX, post-operative blood transfusion and hospital volume. Results We studied 712 patients with CABG, 244 patients with vascular surgery and 862 patients with bowel resections. Post-operative pneumonia occurred in 7.4–11.9%, urinary tract infection in 9.0–15.2%, surgical site infection in 3.2–18.9%, sepsis in 4.2–9.6% and death in 3.5–7.0% among surgery cohorts. There was no association between the time from last infliximab dose to surgery and the risk of post-operative infection or mortality in any surgical cohort. No subgroups were identified that had an increased risk of infection with more proximate use of infliximab. Conclusion Among elderly patients with RA, risks of infection and mortality after major surgery were not related to the pre-operative timing of infliximab infusion.

2011 ◽  
Vol 106 (12) ◽  
pp. 1095-1102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Goldhaber ◽  
Darleen Lessard ◽  
Robert Goldberg ◽  
Catherine Emery ◽  
Frederick Spencer ◽  
...  

SummaryPatients with atherosclerosis have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). We studied patients in the population-based Worcester VTE Study of 1,822 consecutive patients with validated VTE to compare clinical characteristics, prophylaxis, treatment, and outcomes of VTE in patients with and without symptomatic atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, defined as history of ischaemic heart disease, history of positive cardiac catheterisation, percutaneous coronary intervention, or coronary artery bypass graft surgery, or history of peripheral artery disease. Of the 1,818 patients with VTE, 473 (26%) had a history of symptomatic atherosclerosis. Patients with atherosclerosis were significantly older (mean age 71.9 years vs. 61.6 years) and were more likely to have immobility (57.2% vs. 46.7%), prior heart failure (36.9% vs. 10.7%), chronic lung disease (26.4% vs. 15.5%), cerebrovascular disease (18.1% vs. 9.8%), and chronic kidney disease (4.9% vs. 1.9%) (all p<0.001) compared with non-atherosclerosis patients. Thromboprophylaxis was omitted in more than one-third of atherosclerosis patients who had been hospitalised for non-VTE-related illness or had undergone major surgery within the three months prior to VTE. Patients with atherosclerosis were significantly more likely to suffer in-hospital major bleeding (7.6% vs. 3.8%, p=0.0008). In conclusion, patients with atherosclerosis and VTE are more likely to suffer a complicated hospital course. Despite a high frequency of comorbid conditions contributing to the risk of VTE, we observed a low rate of thromboprophylaxis in patients with symptomatic atherosclerosis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 49.2-49
Author(s):  
J. K. Ahn ◽  
J. Hwang ◽  
J. Lee ◽  
H. Kim ◽  
G. H. Seo

Background:Palindromic rheumatism (PR) has known to be three patterns of disease course: clinical remission of attacks, persistent attacks, and evolution to chronic arthritis or systemic disease. The spectrum in progression to chronic diseases of PR, however, is quite variable; rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis (SSc), Sjögren’s syndrome (SjS), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), relapsing polychondritis (RP), Behçet’s disease (BD), sarcoidosis, and psoriatic spondylitis and arthropathy. Because of the small numbers in case-control studies and too aged investigations, now we needs to shed new light on the fate of PR.Objectives:The aim was to investigate the epidemiology of PR and the risk of developing various rheumatic diseases compared with non-PR individuals, employing the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) medical claims data, which covers all medical institutions of South Korea.Methods:The study used 2007-2018 claims data from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA). The identified 19,724 PR patients from 2010 to 2016 were assessed for the incidence rate (IR) compared with the population in the given year by 100,000 person-year (py). The date of diagnosis was the index date. After matching with non-PR individuals (1:10) for age, sex and the year of index date, we calculated the hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The risk of developing the various rheumatic diseases and adult immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) as the outcome diseases in PR cohort was estimated. This risk was compared with that of matched non-PR cohort.Results:Of 19,724 PR patients (8,665 males and 11,059 females), the mean age was 50.2 ± 14.9 years (47.7 ± 14.4 years in males and 52.6 ± 14.9 years in females,p< 0.001). The ratio of male to female patients with PR was approximately 1:1.28. The annual IR of PR was 7.02 (6.92-7.12) per 100,000 py (6.22 (6.09-6.35) and 7.80 (7.66-7.95) per 100,000 py in males and females, respectively). The mean duration to develop the outcome diseases was significantly shorter in PR cohort compared that of non-PR cohort (19.4 vs. 35.8 months,p< 0.001). The most common outcome disease was RA (7.34% of PR patients; 80.0% of total outcome diseases), followed by AS, SLE, BD, SjS, MCTD, DM/PM, SSc, RP, psoriatic arthropathy, and AIDS in PR cohort. The patients with PR had an increased risk of RA (HR 46.6, 95% CI [41.1-52.7]), psoriatic arthropathy (44.79 [15.2-132.4]), SLE (24.5 [16.2-37.2]), MCTD (22.0 [7.7-63.3]), BD (21.0 [13.8-32.1]), SjS (12.4 [8.5-17.9]), AS (9.0 [6.7-12.2]), DM/PM (6.1 [2.6-14.8]), and SSc (3.8 [1.5-9.6]) but not of AIDS. The risk of developing RA was greater in male patients (HR 58.9, 95% CI [45.6-76.2] vs. 43.2 [37.4-49.8],pfor interaction = 0.037) while female patients encountered a higher risk of developing AS (15.8 [8.9-28.1] vs. 7.2 [5.0-10.3],pfor interaction = 0.023). The risk of developing RA, SLE, SjS, and BD were significantly more highly affected in younger age (pfor interaction < 0.001, = 0.003, 0.002, and 0.017, at each).Conclusion:This nationwide, population-based cohort study demonstrated that patients with PR had an increased risk of developing various rheumatic diseases, not only RA but also psoriatic arthropathy. Therefore, patients with PR needs to be cautiously followed up for their potential of diverse outcome other than RA: RA, SLE, SjS, and BD in younger patients, RA in males, and AS in females, in particular.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2280-2280
Author(s):  
Inyoung Lee ◽  
Sruthi Adimadhyam ◽  
Edith A. Nutescu ◽  
Karen Sweiss ◽  
Pritesh Patel ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTION Bevacizumab, an angiogenesis inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor A, is used for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma, the most common primary brain malignancy in adults. Multiple studies demonstrate the efficacy of bevacizumab on progression-free and overall survival of patients with recurrent glioblastoma. However, real world safety data of bevacizumab in patients with glioblastoma is limited on serious adverse outcomes including arterial and venous thrombosis. Our study aimed to evaluate the risk of arterial thromboembolism (ATE) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) in a population-based sample of adult patients with high grade gliomas. METHOD We conducted a nested case-control study within a retrospective cohort of patients receiving treatment for high grade gliomas under the protocol by Stupp, et al. (radiotherapy plus concomitant/adjuvant temezolomide). Patients were sampled from the Truven Health MarketScan® Research Database, containing administrative health claims data of over 40 million commercially insured enrollees and their dependents, between 2009 and 2015. A validated algorithm was used to identify patients with high grade gliomas that underwent craniotomy (index time) with external beam radiation and temozolomide-based treatment occurring within 91 days (cohort entry time). Patients were excluded if they received craniotomy, radiation, temozolomide or bevacizumab during year prior to surgery or had one of our outcomes of interest (ATE or VTE) during the cohort ascertainment period (between index and cohort entry dates). Patients were required to have continuous health plan enrollment during the 12-month baseline and follow up periods (unless died). Surgical procedures and chemotherapy treatments were identified using diagnostic and procedural medical and pharmacy claims data. These data sources were also used to identify VTE risk factors, including medical conditions, procedures and medication use, and to calculate modified Charlson comorbidity index scores at baseline. Cases of ATE and VTE were each identified in the overall cohort using a validated algorithm for administrative claims data. For ATE and VTE separately, each case was matched to up to ten controls on sex, age group, index time and follow-up duration using incidence density sampling with replacement. Exposure to bevacizumab was characterized as any use (yes vs. no) and recent use (last bevacizumab infusion within 30 days prior event or control censoring). We estimated relative risk of ATE and VTE associated with bevacizumab in separate models using conditional logistic regression models to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). All multivariable models were adjusted for sex, age, and comorbidity index scores; models for risk of VTE were also adjusted for number of baseline VTE risk factors and VTE prophylaxis received. RESULTS Our final study cohort included 2157 patients undergoing treatment for high grade gliomas. We identified 25 ATE cases and 99 VTE cases and matched incidence density-sampled controls (n=170 for ATE; n=819 for VTE) for our nested case-control analysis. A higher proportion of ATE cases received bevacizumab during follow up compared to the controls (28% vs. 17%). In multivariable analyses, no statistically significant increase in ATE risk was observed with bevacizumab overall (aOR 1.51, 95% CI 0.54-4.24), although confidence intervals were wide given the few events observed. Compared to controls in the VTE analysis, cases had a slightly higher proportion of baseline VTE risk factors (2 or more: 17% vs. 13%) and treatment with bevacizumab (13% vs. 9%). However, we found no significant increased risk of VTE associated with bevacizumab overall (aOR 1.40, 95% CI 0.71-2.75) or recent infusion of bevacizumab (aOR 1.40, 95% CI 0.65-3.01). CONCLUSIONS Our findings from this large retrospective cohort of patients undergoing treatment for high grade glioma provide little evidence in support of the increased risk of ATE and VTE reported with use of bevacizumab in other cancer sites. Our study was limited by an overall small number of ATE events observed, and further research is needed to confirm safety of bevacizumab with respect to arterial thrombosis. These population-based estimates show no significant increase in risk of VTE associated with bevacizumab and suggest its safe use in the treatment of high grade gliomas. Disclosures Lee: AbbVie Inc.: Research Funding. Patel:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Børge Johannesen ◽  
Sigbjørn Smeland ◽  
Stein Aaserud ◽  
Eirik Alnes Buanes ◽  
Anna Skog ◽  
...  

BackgroundCancer has been suggested as a risk factor for severe outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection. In this population-based study we aimed to identify factors associated with higher risk of COVID-19 and adverse outcome.MethodsData on all confirmed SARS-CoV-2 positive patients in the period January 1 to May 31, 2020 were extracted from the Norwegian Surveillance System for Communicable Diseases. Data on cancer and treatment was available from the Cancer Registry of Norway, the Norwegian Patient Registry and the Norwegian Prescription Database. Deaths due to COVID-19 were extracted from the Cause of Death Registry. From the Norwegian Intensive Care and Pandemic Registry we retrieved data on admittance to hospital and intensive care. We determined rates of COVID-19 disease in cancer patients and the rest of the population. We also ran multivariate analyses adjusting for age and gender.ResultsA total of 8 410 patients were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection in Norway during the study period, of which 547 (6.5%) were cancer patients. Overall, we found similar age adjusted rates of COVID-19 in the population with cancer as in the population without cancer. Unadjusted analysis showed that patients having undergone major surgery within the past 3 months had an increased risk of COVID-19 while we did not find increased Odds Ratio (OR) related to other oncological treatment modalities. No patients treated with stem cell or bone marrow transplant were diagnosed with COVID-19. The fatality rate of COVID-19 among cancer patients was 0.10. This was similar to non-cancer patients, when adjusting for age and sex with OR (95% CI) for death= 0.99 (0.68–1.42). Patients with distant metastases had significantly increased OR of death due to COVID-19 disease of 9.31 (95% CI 2.60–33.34). For the combined outcome death and/or admittance to hospital due to COVID-19, we found significant two-fold increased risk estimates for patients diagnosed with cancer less than one 1 year ago (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.14–3.80), for those treated with anti-cancer drugs during the past 3 months (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.07–3.01) and for patients undergoing major surgery during the past 3 months (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.40–3.44).


2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. 57-58
Author(s):  
Joseph E. Malone ◽  
Linh Tran ◽  
Jeah Jung ◽  
Chen Zhao

Objective:To examine whether periodontal disease increases the risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) among hepatitis C patients in Medicare claims data.Background:Periodontal disease and hepatitis C virus (HCV) represent chronic infectious statesthat are common in elderly adults. Both conditions have independently been associated with an increased risk for dementia. Chronic infections are thought to lead to neurodegenerative changes in the central nervous system possibly by promoting a proinflammatory state. This is consistent with growing literature on the etiological role of infections in dementia. No studies have evaluated the association of periodontal disease with dementia in HCV patients.Methods:We used Medicare claims data for HCV patients to assess the incidence rate of ADRDwith and without exposure to periodontal disease between 2014 and 2017. Diagnosis of periodontal disease, HCV, and ADRD were based on ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. A Cox multivariate regression model was used to estimate the association between periodontal disease and development of ADRD, controlling for age, gender, race, ZIP-level income and education, and medical comorbidities.Results:Of the 440,578 patients in the dataset, the incidence rate of ADRD in the periodontal disease group was higher compared to those without periodontal disease (10.77% vs. 9.27%, p<0.001, and those with periodontal disease developed ADRD earlier compared to those withoutperiodontal disease (1.15 vs. 1.78 years, p<0.001). The hazard of developing ADRD was 1.23 times higher in those with periodontal disease (95% CI, 1.19 to 1.27, p< 0.001) after adjusting for all covariates, including age.Conclusion:Periodontal disease increased the risk of developing ADRD in HCV patients in anational Medicare claims dataset.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document