Baseline disease activity influences subsequent achievement of patient acceptable symptom state in Sjögren’s syndrome

Rheumatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun Hye Park ◽  
You-Jung Ha ◽  
Eun Ha Kang ◽  
Yeong Wook Song ◽  
R Hal Scofield ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Activity ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Prognostic Information ◽  
Longitudinal Changes ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Fatigue Severity ◽  
Patient Acceptable Symptom State

Abstract Objectives To investigate longitudinal changes of the EULAR SS Patient-Reported Index (ESSPRI) and EULAR SS Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI), and identify factors associated with patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) in patients with primary SS (pSS). Methods We assessed ESSPRI, ESSDAI, clinical ESSDAI (ClinESSDAI), EULAR Sicca Score, EuroQoL 5-dimension (EQ-5D), Fatigue Severity Score, Beck Depression Inventory, and patient global assessment (PGA) for pSS, and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for glandular and extra-glandular symptoms at baseline and follow-up. The responses to the currently available standards of care were evaluated by the PASS, the minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) of ESSPRI and ESSDAI, and a modified SS Responder Index-30 (mSSRI-30) response. Results Among 115 patients enrolled, 102 (88.7%) completed a median 3-year follow-up. The ESSPRI, ClinESSDAI and EQ-5D levels remained stable, although the PGA and ESSDAI significantly improved (both P <0.05). Of the 102 patients, 52 (51.0%) patients achieved the PASS at the follow-up and tended to attain the ESSPRI-MCII and mSSRI-30 (both P < 0.001) more frequently than the non-PASS group. Multivariate analysis revealed that the PASS was significantly associated with baseline ESSPRI negatively [odds ratio (OR) 0.609] and ESSDAI positively (OR 1.224). When categorized using baseline ESSPRI and ESSDAI, a subgroup of low ESSPRI and high ESSDAI reached a PASS achievement rate of 79.3%. Conclusion Although longitudinal changes in ESSPRI and ClinESSDAI are stable in pSS, baseline ESSPRI and ESSDAI could provide prognostic information on the subsequent achievement of PASS, using currently available treatments. A categorization model using ESSPRI and ESSDAI may have clinical implications.

The relationship between patient acceptable symptom state and disease activity in patients with psoriatic arthritis

Rheumatology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanie Z Fei ◽  
Anthony V Perruccio ◽  
Justine Y Ye ◽  
Dafna D Gladman ◽  
Vinod Chandran
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
High Disease Activity ◽  
Operating Characteristics ◽  
Low Disease Activity ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Patient Acceptable Symptom State

Abstract Objectives The Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) and Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) are composite PsA disease activity measures. We sought to identify the PASDAS and DAPSA cut-off points consistent with patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), the threshold of symptoms beyond which patients consider themselves well, and examine PASS across published PASDAS and DAPSA thresholds for low, moderate and high disease activity. Methods We used a standard protocol including physician assessment and patient-reported outcomes to prospectively record measures required to calculate PASDAS and DAPSA. We identified PASS thresholds for the PASDAS and DAPSA using receiver operating characteristics curve analyses. We assessed the frequency of reporting acceptable symptom state across disease activity thresholds for PASDAS and DAPSA scores. Results A total of 229 patients (58.5% male, mean age 55.5 years, mean disease duration 17.1 years) were recruited. The PASS threshold for the PASDAS was 3.79 [area under the curve (AUC) 0.86, sensitivity 0.75, specificity 0.82] and for the DAPSA was 11.10 (AUC 0.91, sensitivity 0.89, specificity 0.82). With the PASDAS, 90% of patients defined as having low disease activity considered their symptom state acceptable, compared with 55% and 17% among those with moderate and high disease activity, respectively. With the DAPSA, 98% of patients in disease remission considered their symptom state acceptable compared with 85, 22 and 18% among those with low, moderate and high disease activity, respectively. Conclusion We have defined PASS thresholds for PASDAS and DAPSA. The PASDAS target for low disease activity and DAPSA targets of low disease activity or remission align well with PASS.

scholarly journals Patient Acceptable Symptom State in Self-Report Questionnaires and Composite Clinical Disease Index for Assessing Rheumatoid Arthritis Activity: Identification of Cut-Off Points for Routine Care

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fausto Salaffi ◽  
Marina Carotti ◽  
Marwin Gutierrez ◽  
Marco Di Carlo ◽  
Rossella De Angelis
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
State Level ◽  
Clinical Disease ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Patient Acceptable Symptom State

Objective. To provide information on the value of Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by the identification of PASS thresholds for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) composite scores.Methods. The characteristics of RA patients with affirmative and negative assignment to PASS were compared. Contributors to physician response were estimated by logistic regression models and PASS thresholds by the 75th percentile and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve methods.Results. 303 RA patients completed the study. All PROs were different between the PASS (+) and PASS (−) groups (p<0.0001). The thresholds with the 75th percentile approach were 2.0 for the RA Impact of Disease (RAID) score, 2.5 for the PRO-CLinical ARthritis Activity (PRO-CLARA) index, and 1.0 for the Recent-Onset Arthritis Disability (ROAD) questionnaire. The cut-off values for Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) were in the moderate range of disease activity. Assessing the size of the logistic regression coefficients, the strongest predictors of PASS were the disease activity (p=0.0007) and functional state level (0.006).Conclusion. PASS thresholds were relatively high and many patients in PASS had moderate disease activity states according to CDAI. Factors such as disease activity and physical function may influence a negative PASS.

scholarly journals SAT0364 DATA TO BE COLLECTED FOR AN OPTIMAL MANAGEMENT OF AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS IN DAILY PRACTICE: PROPOSAL FROM AN EVIDENCE BASED AND CONSENSUAL APPROACHES

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1129.1-1129
Author(s):  
A. Baillet ◽  
X. Romand ◽  
A. Pfimlin ◽  
M. Dalecky ◽  
M. Dougados
Keyword(s):  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Daily Practice ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Periodic Review ◽  
Grade Scale

Background:Standardization of clinical practice has been proven to be effective in management of chronic diseases. This is particularly true at the time where the concept of treat to target is becoming more and more important in the field of axial spondyloarthritis (ax-SpA).Objectives:To propose a list of variables to be collected at the time of the diagnosis and over the follow-up of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (ax-SpA) for an optimal management in daily practice.Methods:The process comprised (1) the evaluation of the interest of 51 variables proposed for the assessment of axSpA via a systematic literature research, (2) a consensus process involving 78 hospital-based or office-based rheumatologists, considering the collection of the variable in a 4 grade scale from ”potentially useful” to “mandatory”, (3) a consensus on optimal timeline for periodic assessment of the selected variables on a 5 grade scale from “at each visit” to “never to be re-collected”.Results:The systematic literature research retrieved a total of 14,133 abstracts, of which 213 were included in the final qualitative synthesis. Concerning the data to be collected at the time of the diagnosis and during follow-up, we proposed to differentiate the results based on a) the way of collection of the variables (e.g. questionnaires by the patient, interview by the physician, physical examination, investigations) b) the usefulness these variables in daily practice based on the opinion of the rheumatologists ” c) the optimal timeline between 2 evaluations of the variable based on the opinion of the rheumatologists. In the initial systematic review, symptoms of heart failure history of inflammatory bowel disease, psoriasis or uveitis, patient global visual analogic scale, spine radiographs, modified Schöber test, coxo-femoral rotations, swollen joint count, urine strip test, BASDAI and ASDAS global scores were considered very useful and nocturnal back pain/morning stiffness, sacro-iliac joints radiographs and CRP were considered mandatory (Figure 1). Timeline between 2 evaluations of variables to collect in the periodic review are summarized inFigure 2.Figure 1.Core sets of items to collect and report in the systematic review in axial spondyloarthritis management in daily practice ASDAS=Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score, BASDAI=Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, BASFI=Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functionnal Index, BASMI=Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index, CRP=C Reactive Protein, CT=computerized tomography, FIRST=Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool, HLA=Human Leukocyte Antigen, MRI=Magnetic resonance imaging, PET=positron emission tomography.Figure 2.Periodic review timeline of variables to collectASDAS=Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score, BASDAI=Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, Spondylitis Metrology Index, CRP=C Reactive Protein, IBD = inflammatory bowel diseases, PRO = Patient Reported OutcomesConclusion:Using an evidence-based and an expert consensus approaches, this initiative defined a core set of variables to be collected and reported at the time of the diagnosis and during follow-up of patients with ax-SpA in daily practice.Acknowledgments:this study has been conducted in two parts: the first one (evidence-based) was conducted thanks to a support from Abbvie France. AbbVie did not review the content or have influence on this manuscript. The second part of this initiative (consensus) has been conducted thanks to a support from the scientific non-profit organization: Association de Recherche Clinique en RhumatologieDisclosure of Interests:Athan Baillet Consultant of: Athan BAILLET has received honorarium fees from Abbvie for his participation as the coordinator of the systematic literature review, Xavier Romand Consultant of: Xavier ROMAND has received honorarium fees from Abbvie, Arnaud Pfimlin Consultant of: Arnaud PFIMLIN has received honorarium fees from Abbvie, Mickael Dalecky Consultant of: Mickael DALECKY has received honorarium fees from Abbvie, Maxime Dougados Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma

scholarly journals DAPSA and ultrasound show different perspectives of psoriatic arthritis disease activity: results from a 12-month longitudinal observational study in patients starting treatment with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs

RMD Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. e000765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silva Pukšić ◽  
Pernille Bolton-King ◽  
Joseph Sexton ◽  
Brigitte Michelsen ◽  
Tore K Kvien ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Clinical Assessment ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Power Doppler ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Joint Disease ◽  
Patient Reported

ObjectivesDisease Activity index for PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) (sum score 68/66 tender/swollen joint counts (68TJC/66SJC), patient’s global assessment, pain and C-reactive protein (CRP)) is recommended for clinical assessment of disease activity in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Ultrasound (US) (grey scale (GS) and power Doppler (PD)) detects inflammation in joints and extra-articular structures. The present objectives were to explore the longitudinal relationships between DAPSA, clinical assessment as well as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with US in patients with PsA initiating biological DMARDs and the associations between DAPSA and US remission.Methods47 patients with PsA were examined at baseline and after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Assessments included 68TJC/66SJC, examiner’s global assessment (EGA), PROMs, CRP, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and US GS and PD (48 joints, 10 flexor tendons, 14 entheses, 4 bursae). Clinical composite scores and PD sum scores (0=remission) were calculated. Longitudinal associations were explored by generalised estimating equations with linear and logistic regression.ResultsDAPSA was not longitudinally associated to PD. 66SJC, ESR, 28-joint Disease Activity Score, EGA and CRP were longitudinally associated with PD (p<0.001–0.03), whereas the pain-related components of DAPSA (68TJC and pain) as well as PROMs were not associated. At 6–12 months, remission was achieved in 29%–33 % of the patients for DAPSA and 59%–70 % for PD. The association between DAPSA and PD remission was not significant (p=0.33).ConclusionsDAPSA was not associated with US inflammatory findings which indicates that DAPSA and US may assess different aspects of PsA activity.

The Association Between Disease Activity and Duration in Systemic Sclerosis

2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 2299-2306 ◽  
Author(s):  
JENNIFER G. WALKER ◽  
RUSSELL J. STEELE ◽  
MIREILLE SCHNITZER ◽  
SUZANNE TAILLEFER ◽  
MURRAY BARON ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Sclerosis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Disease Duration ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Disease Onset ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Diffuse Disease ◽  
Patient Reported

Objective.The absence of a standardized disease activity index has been an important barrier in systemic sclerosis (SSc) research. We applied the newly derived Valentini Scleroderma Disease Activity Index (SDAI) among our cohort of patients with SSc to document changes in disease activity over time and to assess possible differences in activity between limited and diffuse disease.Methods.Cross-sectional study of a national cohort of patients enrolled in the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group Registry. Disease activity was measured using the SDAI. Depression scores were measured using the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D).Results.A total of 326 out of 639 patients had complete datasets at the time of this analysis; 87% were female, of mean age 55.6 years, with mean disease duration 14.1 years. SDAI declined steeply in the first 5 years after disease onset and patients with diffuse disease had 42% higher SDAI scores than patients with limited disease with the same disease duration and depression scores (standardized relative risk 1.42, 95% CI 1.21, 1.65). Patients with higher CES-D scores had higher SDAI scores relative to patients with the same disease duration and disease subset (standardized RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.14, 1.31). Among the 10 components that make up the SDAI, only skin score (standardized OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.43, 0.82) and patient-reported change in skin (standardized OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.45, 0.92) decreased with increasing disease duration. High skin scores (standardized OR 32.2, 95% CI 15.8, 72.0) were more likely and scleredema (standardized OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37, 0.92) was less likely to be present in patients with diffuse disease. High depression scores were associated with positive responses for patient-reported changes in skin and cardiopulmonary function.Conclusion.Disease activity declined with time and patients with diffuse disease had consistently higher SDAI scores. Depression was found to be associated with higher patient activity scores and strongly associated with patient self-response questions. The role of depression should be carefully considered in future applications of the SDAI, particularly as several components of the score rely upon patient recall.

FRI0362 COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF USTEKINUMAB (UST) AND TNF INHIBITORS (TNFI) IN PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS (PSA) IN THE REAL-WORLD, MULTINATIONAL PSABIO STUDY: 12-MONTH FOLLOW-UP

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 778-779
Author(s):  
J. S. Smolen ◽  
S. Siebert ◽  
T. Korotaeva ◽  
P. Bergmans ◽  
K. De Vlam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Real World ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Rapid Screening ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Real World Data

Background:Among treatment options for PsA, IL-12/23 inhibition with UST was the first new biologic mode of action after TNFi. Few real-world data comparing UST with TNFi are available.Objectives:Comparison of UST and TNFi treatment effectiveness within the prospectively followed PsABio cohort at 12-month (mo) follow-up.Methods:The PsABio study (NCT02627768) evaluates effectiveness, tolerability and persistence of 1st, 2nd or 3rd-line UST or TNFi in PsA. Proportions of patients (pts) reaching MDA/very low disease activity (VLDA) and clinical Disease Activity index for PSoriatic Arthritis (cDAPSA) LDA/remission are described. Comparison across UST and TNFi cohorts was done on last observation carried forward up to 12 (±3) mo, with non-response imputation for pts who had stopped/switched initial treatment. Logistic regression analysis was used, including propensity score (PS) analysis to adjust for imbalanced prognostic baseline (BL) covariates: country, age, sex, BMI, smoking (yes/no), comorbidities (cardiovascular/metabolic syndrome), PsA type (axial, polyarticular, oligoarticular), psoriasis body surface area (BSA), disease duration, cDAPSA, 12-item PsA Impact of Disease (PsAID-12), dactylitis, enthesitis, Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool (FiRST) score, line of biologic (b)DMARD, synthetic DMARD use, and steroid or NSAID use.Results:Of 929 eligible pts, 893 had evaluable data at BL and at follow-up; 438 (95.6%) were treated with UST and 455 (96.6%) with TNFi (including stoppers/switchers). UST and TNFi groups had BL differences in mean age (51.0 vs 48.5 years, respectively), concurrent comorbidities (68.7% vs 60.9%), time since diagnosis (7.5 vs 6.2 years), line of treatment (1st-line 45.0% vs 55.2%; 3rd-line 20.5% vs 12.1%), NSAID use (54.8% vs 68.8%), concomitant MTX use (29.9% vs 42.0%) and psoriasis skin involvement (BSA >10% in 26.6% vs 14.8%).In 714 pts with available data, mean (standard deviation) BL cDAPSA was 30.6 (20.2; n=358) for UST and 29.3 (18.6; n=356) for TNFi. Observed data showed differences in proportion of pts achieving MDA/VLDA and cDAPSA LDA/remission in favour of TNFi, but after PS adjustment for BL differences (such as line of therapy, skin psoriasis, concomitant conventional DMARD, etc.), odds ratios for reaching targets at 12 mo did not significantly differ between UST and TNFi groups (Fig. 1).Comparison of 6- and 12-mo unadjusted data showed sustained MDA/VLDA responses with both UST (21.8%) and TNFi (29.5%), with comparable proportions of additional pts achieving these targets between 6 and 12 mo (17.0% and 20.3%, respectively). Sustained efficacy became lower with successive lines of treatment (data not shown).Conclusion:Various factors, including patient characteristics such as comorbidities, influence the physician’s selection of treatment modality for patients needing a bDMARD. Our real-world results demonstrate differences in observed clinical effectiveness between UST and TNFi. However, after PS adjustment for a number of BL differences, clinical results at 12 mo were comparable between UST and TNFi groups. Data at 12 mo also show sustained response with both UST and TNFi treatment, as well as a similar rate of pts achieving targets after 6 to 12 mo of treatment.Acknowledgments:This study was funded by Janssen.Disclosure of Interests:Josef S. Smolen Grant/research support from: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, ILTOO, Janssen, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer Inc, Samsung, Sanofi, Consultant of: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, ILTOO, Janssen, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer Inc, Samsung, Sanofi, Stefan Siebert Grant/research support from: BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Tatiana Korotaeva Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Consultant of: Abbvie, BIOCAD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, UCB, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, BIOCAD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, UCB, Paul Bergmans Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen, Kurt de Vlam Consultant of: Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB – consultant, Speakers bureau: Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB – speakers bureau and honoraria, Elisa Gremese Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Sanofi, UCB, Roche, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Sanofi, UCB, Roche, Pfizer, Beatriz Joven-Ibáñez Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Wim Noel Employee of: Janssen Pharmaceuticals NV, Michael T Nurmohamed Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, GlaxoSmithKline, Jansen, Eli Lilly, Menarini, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, USB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, GlaxoSmithKline, Jansen, Eli Lilly, Menarini, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, USB, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, GlaxoSmithKline, Jansen, Eli Lilly, Menarini, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, USB, Petros Sfikakis Grant/research support from: Grant/research support from Abvie, Novartis, MSD, Actelion, Amgen, Pfizer, Janssen Pharmaceutical, UCB, Elke Theander Employee of: Janssen-Cilag Sweden AB, Laure Gossec Grant/research support from: Lilly, Mylan, Pfizer, Sandoz, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB

scholarly journals Methotrexate achieves major cDAPSA response, and improvement in dactylitis and functional status in psoriatic arthritis

Rheumatology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 58 (5) ◽  
pp. 869-873 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sravan Kumar Appani ◽  
Phani Kumar Devarasetti ◽  
Rajendra Vara Prasad Irlapati ◽  
Liza Rajasekhar
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Tender Joint Count ◽  
Minimal Disease Activity ◽  
Randomized Controlled Studies ◽  
Minimal Disease

Abstract Objective Despite the widespread clinical use of MTX in PsA, data from published randomized controlled studies suggest limited efficacy. The objective of the present study was to document the efficacy of MTX. Methods This was an open-label, prospective study of patients satisfying the ClASsification criteria for Psoriatic ARthritis study (CASPAR) criteria for PsA who received MTX in doses of ⩾15 mg/week throughout the follow-up period of 9 months. Disease activity was assessed across various domains by tender and swollen joint count, physician and patient global assessment, DAS-28 ESR, Clinical Disease Activity Index for PsA (cDAPSA), Leeds Dactylitis Instrument basic, Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI), Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Minimal Disease Activity and HAQ (CRD Pune version) at baseline and at 3, 6 and 9 months of follow-up. Response to therapy was assessed by EULAR DAS28 ESR, Disease Activity Index for PsA (cDAPSA) response, HAQ response and PASI75. MTX dose escalation and the use of combination DMARDS were dictated by disease activity. Results A total of 73 patients were included, with mean (s.d.) age 44 (9.7) years. The mean (s.d.) dose of MTX used was 17.5 (3.8) mg/week. Seven patients received additional DMARDS (LEF/SSZ). At the end of 9 months, significant improvement (P < 0.05) was noted in the tender joint count, swollen joint count, global activity, DAS-28ESR, cDAPSA, Leeds Dactylitis Index basic, LEI, PASI and HAQ. Major cDAPSA response was achieved in 58.9% of patients. EULAR DAS28 moderate and good response was achieved in 74% and 6.8% of patients, respectively. Minimal Disease Activity was achieved in 63% of patients. A PASI75 response and HAQ response was achieved in 67.9% and 65.8% of patients, respectively. Conclusion MTX initiated at ⩾15 mg/week with targeted escalation resulted in significant improvement in the skin, joint, dactylitis, enthesitis and functional domains of PsA.

OP129 Predictors Of Effectiveness In Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. 59-60
Author(s):  
Jéssica dos Santos ◽  
Haliton Oliveira ◽  
Francisco Acurcio Michael da Silva ◽  
Alessandra Almeida ◽  
Flávia Rodrigues ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Low Disease Activity ◽  
Gender Education

INTRODUCTION:Biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) have become firmly established in the management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but some patients do not improve despite therapy. This study evaluated the predictors of effectiveness of the bDMARDs on a cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the Brazilian Public Health System.METHODS:RA individuals treated with bDMARDs, were included in the open prospective cohort study. The Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) was used to assess the effectiveness comparing results at baseline and after 6 months of follow-up. The association between socio-demographic and clinical characteristics with the disease activity measured by the CDAI was also investigated. The bDMARDs was considered effective when the patient achieved remission or low disease activity and considered not effective when there was still moderate or high disease activity. Pearson's chi-square was applied for the univariate analysis to evaluate the association of effectiveness measured by the CDAI with the socio-demographic (gender, education, marital status and race) and clinical variables (type of drug, EuroQol (EQ)-5D and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)). Logistic regression was applied in the multivariate analysis of the variables that presented a p< .20 value during the univariate analysis.RESULTS:All 266 RA patients completed six months of follow-up. The most widely used bDMARDs was adalimumab (57.1 percent), with etanercept used by 22.2 percent, golimumab by 7.5 percent, abatacept by 4.5 percent, tocilizumab by 3.4 percent, infliximab by 2.6 percent, certolizumab by 1.5 percent, and rituximab by 1.1 percent. The bDMARDs reduced disease activity as measured by CDAI at six months of follow-up (p<.001). The percentage of patients achieving remission or low disease activity was 40.6 percent. bDMARDs were more effective in patients with better functionality (Odds Ratio, OR = 2.140 / 95 percent Confidence Interval, CI 1.219 - 3.756) at beginning of treatment and in patients who not had a previous bDMARDs (OR = 2.150 / 95 percent CI 1.144 - 4.042).CONCLUSIONS:In this real-world study, functionality and use of previous bDMARDs are predictors in patients with RA treated with bDMARDs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document