Evaluation of Biological and Chemical Pruning Wound Protectants to Control Grapevine Trunk Diseases Pathogens Eutypa lata and Neofusicoccum parvum
Grapevine trunk diseases, caused by many different fungal pathogens, are one of the most economically important diseases affecting the grapevine industry worldwide. Pruning wounds are the main point of entry for these fungal pathogens and thus, disease control is focused on preventative pruning wound protection by chemical products and/or biological control agents (BCAs). In this study we evaluated a broad variety of already registered or at the experimental stage of chemical and BCAs in greenhouse and in field trials for the protection of table- and wine-grape vines against infection of Eutypa lata and Neofusicoccum parvum, major pathogens responsible for Eutypa and Botryosphaeria dieback, respectively. Our study showed that Trichoderma asperellum and Trichoderma gamsii consistently provided pruning wound protection in greenhouse and field trials, with a mean percent disease control (MPDC) of 88% and 100% for E. lata and N. parvum, respectively, when compared to the water treated-inoculated positive control (P<0.05). The chemical protectants, thiophanate-methyl + myclobutanil and fluopyram and trifloxystrobin were also able to effectively protect wounds with a MPDC of up to 86% when compared to the water treated-inoculated positive control (P<0.05). When biological treatments were evaluated for recovery from treated canes at the end of the growing season, Trichoderma-based treatments had a rate of recovery between 0 and 100%, Aureobasidium-based treatments had a recovery rate between 25 and 100%, and Bacillus-based treatments had a recovery rate between 0 and 25%.