Low-dose Ondansetron with Dexamethasone More Effectively Decreases Vomiting after Strabismus Surgery in Children than Does High-dose Ondansetron 

1998 ◽  
Vol 88 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
William M. Splinter ◽  
Elliot J. Rhine

Background Ondansetron and dexamethasone have been observed to decrease the incidence of vomiting by children after general anesthesia. This study compared the effect of high-dose (150 microg/kg) ondansetron with low-dose (50 microg/kg) ondansetron plus 150 microg/kg dexamethasone on the incidence of vomiting after strabismus in children. Methods This study had a double-blind, blocked, stratified, randomized design. With parental consent and Hospital Ethics Committee approval, healthy children aged 2-14 yr who were undergoing elective strabismus surgery were studied. Anesthesia was induced intravenously with propofol or by inhalation with halothane and nitrous oxide. Patients in the high-dose group were given placebo plus 150 microg/kg (maximum dose, 8 mg) of ondansetron intravenously, whereas patients in the low-dose group were given 150 microg/kg dexamethasone (maximum dose, 8 mg) and 50 microg/kg ondansetron intravenously in a double-blind manner. Anesthesia was maintained with halothane and nitrous oxide. All incidences of vomiting occurring as long as 24 h after anesthesia were recorded. Results Three of the 200 patients enrolled in the study were excluded from data analysis. The groups were similar with respect to demographic data and potential confounding variables. Patients vomited from 0-12 times. The low-dose ondansetron plus dexamethasone group had a lower incidence of vomiting, 9% (95% CI = 4-17%) versus 28% (95% CI = 20-38%; P < 0.001). Only 1% of the patients in the low-dose ondansetron plus dexamethasone group vomited while in the hospital. Conclusions Low-dose ondansetron plus dexamethasone is an effective prophylactic antiemetic combination for children undergoing strabismus surgery.

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralf Uebelhack ◽  
Udo Bongartz ◽  
Stephanie Seibt ◽  
Gordana Bothe ◽  
Pee Win Chong ◽  
...  

Objective. This study was performed to determine the efficacy and tolerability/safety of IQP-AE-103 on body weight reduction in overweight to moderately obese adults. Methods. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involved one hundred and eight subjects (BMI between 25 and 35 kg/m2) that were randomly assigned to either the low-dose or the high-dose IQP-AE-103 group, or the placebo group. Following a 2-week run-in period, subjects received two capsules of investigational product after three daily main meals for 12 weeks. Subjects were instructed to maintain a nutritionally balanced hypocaloric diet according to the individual’s energy requirement. Body weight, body fat, and waist and hip circumference were measured at baseline, and after 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Subjects also rated their feelings of hunger and fullness using visual analogue scales, and food craving on a 5-point scale at the same time intervals. Blood samplings for safety laboratory parameters were taken before and at the end of the study. Results. After 12 weeks of intake, the high-dose IQP-AE-103 group had a significantly greater weight loss compared with the placebo (5.03 ± 2.50 kg vs. 0.98 ± 2.06 kg, respectively; p<0.001) and the low-dose group (3.01 ± 2.19 kg; p=0.001). The high-dose group experienced a decrease in body fat of 3.15 ± 2.41 kg compared with a decrease of 0.23 ± 2.74 kg for the placebo group (p<0.001). High-dose IQP-AE-103 also decreased the feeling of hunger in 66% subjects. A beneficial effect of IQP-AE-103 on the lipid metabolism was also demonstrated in the subgroup of subjects with baseline total cholesterol levels above 6.2 mmol/L. No side effects related to the intake of IQP-AE-103 were reported. Conclusions. These findings indicate that IQP-AE-103 could be an effective and safe weight loss intervention. This trial is registered with NCT03058367.


Author(s):  
Seetharaman Hariharan

Objectives Dexamethasone, in the dose of 8 mg or higher, has been advocated to be used as an adjuvant to prolong the duration of brachial plexus blocks with local anaesthetics. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that a lower dose of dexamethasone (4 mg) added to bupivacaine would prolong the duration of analgesia in brachial plexus blocks. Methods A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial was conducted on patients who underwent supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks using an ultrasound. Patients were randomized to receive 19 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with dexamethasone (4 mg) (study group) and saline (1 mL) (control group). Primary outcome measure was the duration of analgesia. Onset and duration of sensory, motor blocks, postoperative 24-hour morphine requirements were also recorded. Results A total of 46 patients were studied with 24 patients in the dexamethasone group and 22 patients in the control group. Demographic data, type and duration of surgery were comparable between the groups. Dexamethasone group patients had significantly longer duration of analgesia [Mean (SD): 19.8 (3.8) hours], compared to control group patients [Mean (SD): 14.5 (4.2); p< 0.001]. Morphine requirements over a 24-hour period were not significantly different between the groups. Conclusion Low-dose dexamethasone significantly prolongs the duration of analgesia when used with bupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks, although it does not significantly decrease the overall opioid requirements for 24 hours postoperatively.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fan-Yue Meng ◽  
Fan Gao ◽  
Si-Yue Jia ◽  
Xiang-Hong Wu ◽  
Jing-Xin Li ◽  
...  

AbstractCOVID-19 vaccines from multiple manufacturers are needed to cope with the problem of insufficient supply. We did two single-center, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1 and phase 2 trials to assess the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of a recombinant COVID-19 vaccine (Sf9 cells) in healthy population aged 18 years or older in China. Eligible participants were enrolled, the ratio of candidate vaccine and placebo within each dose group was 3:1 (phase 1) or 5:1 (phase 2). From August 28, 2020, 168 participants were sequentially enrolled and randomly assigned to receive the low dose vaccine, high dose vaccine or placebo with the schedule of 0, 28 days or 0, 14, 28 days in phase 1 trial. From November 18, 2020, 960 participants were randomly assigned to receive the low dose vaccine, high dose vaccine or placebo with the schedule of 0, 21 days or 0, 14, 28 days in phase 2 trial. The most common solicited injection site adverse reaction within 7 days in both trials was pain. The most common solicited systematic adverse reactions within 7 days were fatigue, cough, sore throat, fever and headache. ELISA antibodies and neutralising antibodies increased at 14 days, and peaked at 28 days (phase 1) or 30 days (phase 2) after the last dose vaccination. The GMTs of neutralising antibody against live SARS-CoV-2 at 28 days or 30 days after the last dose vaccination were highest in the adult high dose group (0, 14, 28 days), with 102.9 (95% CI 61.9–171.2) and 102.6 (95% CI 75.2–140.1) in phase 1 and phase 2 trials, respectively. Specific T-cell response peaked at 14 days after the last dose vaccination in phase 1 trial. This vaccine is safe, and induced significant immune responses after three doses of vaccination.


Rheumatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Li ◽  
Mengtao Li ◽  
Di Wu ◽  
Jiaxin Zhou ◽  
Shui-on Leung ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective SM03, a novel chimaeric mAb specific to B cell-restricted antigen CD22, has been developed to treat RA and other B-cell-related diseases. This 24-week phase II randomized, double-blind, multi-dose, placebo-controlled study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SM03 in moderately-to-severely active RA patients in China. Methods One hundred and fifty-six patients on background MTX were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive a cumulative dose of 3600 mg (high dose, 600 mg × 6 infusions at weeks 0, 2, 4, 12, 14 and 16) or 2400 mg SM03 (low dose, 600 mg × 4 infusions at weeks 0, 2, 12 and 14) or the placebo. The primary outcome was the 24-week ACR 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) response rate. Safety was also assessed. Results The 24-week ACR20 response rate was significantly higher with high- (65.3%, P = 0.002) and low-dose SM03 (56.9%, P = 0.024) than with placebo (34.0%), but comparable between the high- and low-dose group. The rate of adverse events was not statistically different among the high-dose group (35.3%), the low-dose group (51.9%) and the placebo group (34.6%). Thirteen (12.6%) patients receiving SM03 reported treatment-emergent infections, including 3.9% patients in the high-dose group. No patients reported severe treatment-emergent infections or malignancies. Conclusions In active RA Chinese patients receiving background MTX, SM03 at a cumulative dose of both 2400 mg and 3600 mg is efficacious and well-tolerated throughout the 24 weeks of treatment. Moreover, SM03 has demonstrated a good safety profile. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04192617.


2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 76-82
Author(s):  
C. Bergeron ◽  
A. Ferenczy

The aim of the study was to determine the endometrial safety of oral 17/3- oestradiol combined continuously with dydrogesterone in preventing endometrial proliferation. The low dose group comprised three 52-week (13 cycles of 28 days) studies (two of which were double blind) using a 17ft- о estradiol dose of 1 mg daily combined with dydrogesterone 2,5; 5; 10 or 20 mg daily. The high dose group comprised two 24-week double-blind studies using a 17ft-oestradiol dose of 2 mg daily combined with dydrogesterone 2,5; 5; 10 or 15 mg daily. Endometrial safety was verified by aspiration endometrial biopsies. Inadequate progestational response was defined as proliferative endometrium, endometrial polyp, hyperplasia and carcinoma. Endometrial protection was achieved with dydrogesterone at doses of 5 mg or higher combined with 1 or 2 mg 17^-oestradiol. So, 5 mg daily dydrogesterone appears to be the lowest effective dose to ensure endometrial safety in a continuous combined regimen with 1 or 2 mg 17p-oestradiol.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-246
Author(s):  
Beryl J. Rosenstein ◽  
Howard Eigen

In recent years an immune-mediated inflammatory process has been implicated in the genesis of the pulmonary damage seen in patients with cystic fibrosis.1,2 A 4-year double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of alternate-day prednisone (2 mg/kg) was conducted in 45 cystic fibrosis patients with mild-to-moderate pulmonary disease to assess the effect of this drug on the pulmonary inflammatory process.3 The patients in the prednisone group showed better growth and pulmonary function and less morbidity compared with those in the placebo group. No complications were reported among the prednisone-treated patients. To extend these observations, the United States Cystic Fibrosis Foundation sponsored a multicenter double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of alternate-day prednisone. Since March 1986, 283 patients with cystic fibrosis, followed up at 15 centers in the United States and Canada, have been enrolled in this trial. Patients 5 through 14 years of age with mild-to-moderate pulmonary disease were randomly assigned to receive prednisone 2 mg/kg (high-dose) every other day, prednisone 1 mg/kg (low-dose) every other day, or placebo. On entry into the study, patients in the three groups were closely matched by a variety of clinical and laboratory parameters (Table 1). Patients are closely monitored at 3-month intervals for both efficacy and side effects. An interim analysis is carried out every 6 months and the results are reviewed by an unblinded study ombudsman. Initially, 95 patients were randomly assigned to the high-dose group, 94 to the low-dose group, and 94 to the placebo group. At the time of the most recent interim analysis, mean duration in the study was 33.9 months for the high-dose group, 35.3 months for the low-dose group, and 36.8 months for the placebo group.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 109-114
Author(s):  
Jie Xu ◽  
Yilong Wang ◽  
Anxin Wang ◽  
Zhiqiang Gao ◽  
Xiaoping Gao ◽  
...  

BackgroundEdaravone Dexborneol is a novel neuroprotective agent that comprised edaravone and (+)-borneol, a food additive with an anti-inflammatory effect in animal ischaemic stroke models. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of Edaravone Dexborneol compared with edaravone in treating patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS).MethodsIn this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, multiple-dose, active-controlled, phase II clinical trial, patients with AIS within 48 hours after stroke onset were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to low-dose (12.5 mg), medium-dose (37.5 mg) or high-dose (62.5 mg) Edaravone Dexborneol groups, and an active control group with edaravone (30 mg) by 30 min intravenous infusion every 12 hours, for 14 consecutive days. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of modified Rankin Scale (mRS)score ≤1 at 90 days and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score change from baseline to 14 days after randomisation. The safety outcome included any adverse event during 90 days after treatment.ResultsOf 385 patients included in the efficacy analysis, 94 were randomised to low-dose group, 97 to medium-dose group, 98 to high-dose group and 96 to the control group. No significant difference was observed among the four groups on mRS score (mRS ≤1, p=0.4054) at 90 days or NIHSS score change at 14 days (p=0.6799). However, a numerically higher percentage of patients with mRSscore ≤1 at 90 days in the medium-dose (69.39%) and high-dose (65.63%) groups was observed than in the control group (60.64%). No significant difference in severe adverse events was found among the four groups (p=0.3815).ConclusionsCompared with edaravone alone, Edaravone Dexborneol was safe and well tolerated at all doses, although no significant improvement in functional outcomes was observed at 90days.Trial registration numberNCT01929096.


1984 ◽  
Vol 52 (03) ◽  
pp. 276-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sam Schulman ◽  
Dieter Lockner ◽  
Kurt Bergström ◽  
Margareta Blombäck

SummaryIn order to investigate whether a more intensive initial oral anticoagulation still would be safe and effective, we performed a prospective randomized study in patients with deep vein thrombosis. They received either the conventional regimen of oral anticoagulation (“low-dose”) and heparin or a more intense oral anticoagulation (“high-dose”) with a shorter period of heparin treatment.In the first part of the study 129 patients were randomized. The “low-dose” group reached a stable therapeutic prothrombin complex (PT)-level after 4.3 and the “high-dose” group after 3.3 days. Heparin was discontinued after 6.0 and 5.0 days respectively. There was no difference in significant hemorrhage between the groups, and no clinical signs of progression of the thrombosis.In the second part of the study another 40 patients were randomized, followed with coagulation factor II, VII, IX and X and with repeated venograms. A stable therapeutic PT-level was achieved after 4.4 (“low-dose”) and 3.7 (“high-dose”) days, and heparin was discontinued after 5.4 and 4.4 days respectively. There were no clinical hemorrhages, the activity of the coagulation factors had dropped to the same level in both groups at the time when heparin was discontinued and no thromboembolic complications occurred.Our oral anticoagulation regimen with heparin treatment for an average of 4.4-5 days seems safe and reduces in-patient costs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 176
Author(s):  
Toshiaki Iba ◽  
Jerrold H. Levy ◽  
Koichiro Aihara ◽  
Katsuhiko Kadota ◽  
Hiroshi Tanaka ◽  
...  

(1) Background: The endothelial glycocalyx is a primary target during the early phase of sepsis. We previously reported a newly developed recombinant non-fucosylated antithrombin has protective effects in vitro. We further evaluated the effects of this recombinant antithrombin on the glycocalyx damage in an animal model of sepsis. (2) Methods: Following endotoxin injection, in Wistar rats, circulating levels of hyaluronan, syndecan-1 and other biomarkers were evaluated in low-dose or high-dose recombinant antithrombin-treated animals and a control group (n = 7 per group). Leukocyte adhesion and blood flow were evaluated with intravital microscopy. The glycocalyx was also examined using side-stream dark-field imaging. (3) Results: The activation of coagulation was inhibited by recombinant antithrombin, leukocyte adhesion was significantly decreased, and flow was better maintained in the high-dose group (both p < 0.05). Circulating levels of syndecan-1 (p < 0.01, high-dose group) and hyaluronan (p < 0.05, low-dose group; p < 0.01, high-dose group) were significantly reduced by recombinant antithrombin treatment. Increases in lactate and decreases in albumin levels were significantly attenuated in the high-dose group (p < 0.05, respectively). The glycocalyx thickness was reduced over time in control animals, but the derangement was attenuated and microvascular perfusion was better maintained in the high-dose group recombinant antithrombin group (p < 0.05). (4) Conclusions: Recombinant antithrombin maintained vascular integrity and the microcirculation by preserving the glycocalyx in this sepsis model, effects that were more prominent with high-dose therapy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Takahashi ◽  
K Tsuchida ◽  
Y Sato ◽  
S Iimuro ◽  
K Kario ◽  
...  

Abstract Background/Introduction The REAL-CAD study identified that aggressive lipid lowering with high-dose statin reduced cardiovascular events also in Japanese patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). However, data from the SPARCL trial found that the benefits of high-dose atorvastatin treatment were partially offset by an increase in haemorrhagic stroke (HS). Although meta-analysis showed statin does not increase HS in Western countries, the evidence about the relation between statin and HS in Asian countries is still conflicting. In addition, the CREDO-Kyoto score is one of the prediction scorings for bleeding after coronary revascularization and might be a useful tool for the prediction of HS in this cohort. Recognizing the risk of HS and predicting of HS in the Asian cohort is clinically important. Purpose This study examined the factors associated with HS using the REAL-CAD cohort. Furthermore, we evaluated the performance of the CREDO-Kyoto bleeding risk score to predict HS in this cohort. We also performed the corresponding analysis of ischaemic stroke for reference purposes. Methods We sub-analysed the REAL-CAD study, prospective, multicentre, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint study, in which 13,054 Japanese patients with stable CAD were randomized to high-dose (4 mg/day) or low-dose (1 mg/day) pitavastatin. Associations for stroke were determined using competing risk models: the Fine and Gray subdistribution hazards model accounting for the competing risk of death in models of haemorrhagic and ischaemic stroke in REAL-CAD trial. Patients were categorized to low (score 0), moderate (score 1–2), and high (score&gt;3) according to CREDO-Kyoto bleeding score for predicting of HS. Results The HS events in high-dose group tended to be higher than low-dose group (4mg vs. 1mg: 43 (0.7%) vs. 30 (0.5%)). The associated factors of HS on univariate analysis were non-prior myocardial (hazard ratio (HR): 0.62, 95% CI: 0.39–0.99) and non-prior cerebral (HR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.09–0.70) infarction, atrial fibrillation (HR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.2–4.7), prior HS (HR: 4.2, 95% CI: 1.5–11.8), anaemia (HR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.4–4.1), and non-statins use before run-in period (HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.28–0.99). High-dose pitavastatin was not a correlate with HS. The multivariate analysis revealed anaemia might have a relation with HS (HR: 4.3, 95% CI: 0.90–20.6). The number of HS was the highest in the high CREDO-Kyoto bleeding score group (Figure 1, HR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.3–4.6), whereas there was no significant difference in the number of HS between the moderate- and low-risk groups (HR: 1.4, 95% CI: 0.84–2.3). Conclusions High-dose pitavastatin was not associated with the incidence of HS in this large Japanese cohort with stable CAD. High CREDO-Kyoto bleeding score was associated with HS as compared with low or moderate scores, even each of the variables consisting of CREDO-Kyoto score was not associated with HS. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document