An Investigational Study on the Healing Process of Anterior Spinal Arthrodesis Using a Bioactive Ceramic Spacer and the Change in Load-Sharing of Spinal Instrumentation

Spine ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. E195-E203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiko Takahata ◽  
Yoshihisa Kotani ◽  
Kuniyoshi Abumi ◽  
Manabu Ito ◽  
Takashige Takada ◽  
...  
2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Morone ◽  
Henry Feuer

The goal of spinal arthrodesis is a solid osseous union across one or more spinal segments. A solid bone union after arthrodesis is commonly known as a spinal fusion. Surgeons have begun to understand the biomechanical and biological factors that influence the bone-healing process. One of the most commonly used adjuncts is spinal instrumentation. Instrumentation has increased the spinal fusion rate; however, fusion failure (that is, nonunion or pseudarthrosis) remains significant. A less commonly used adjunct is electrical stimulation (ES). Investigators in experimental studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of ES on increasing the fusion rate. In this review the authors discuss the evidence concerning the benefits of ES as an adjunct to spinal arthrodesis. In addition, the different types of ES devices are described along with the current experimental and clinical evidence for each type of device.


1997 ◽  
Vol 79 (11) ◽  
pp. 1710-1720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Kanayama ◽  
Bryan W. Cunningham ◽  
James C. Weis ◽  
Larry M. Parker ◽  
Kiyoshi Kaneda ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S12-S22
Author(s):  
Timothy Y Wang ◽  
Vikram A Mehta ◽  
Eric W Sankey ◽  
Christopher I Shaffrey ◽  
Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr ◽  
...  

Abstract Spinal fusion has undergone significant evolution and improvement over the past 50 yr. Historically, spine fusion was noninstrumented and arthrodesis was based entirely on autograft. Improved understanding of spinal anatomy and materials science ushered in a new era of spinal fusion equipped with screw-based technologies and various interbody devices. Osteobiologics is another important realm of spine fusion, and the evolution of various osteobiologics has perhaps undergone the most change within the past 20 yr. A new element to spinal instrumentation has recently gained traction—namely, surface technology. New data suggest that surface treatments play an increasingly well-recognized role in inducing osteogenesis and successful fusion. Until now, however, there has yet to be a unified resource summarizing the existing data and a lack of consensus exists on superior technology. Here, authors provide an in-depth review on surface technology and its impact on spinal arthrodesis.


2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 170-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sohum K. Desai ◽  
Alison Brayton ◽  
Valerie B. Chua ◽  
Thomas G. Luerssen ◽  
Andrew Jea

Spinal arthrodesis was the first successful treatment for scoliosis, performed by Dr. Russell A. Hibbs in 1911 and later by Dr. Fred H. Albee for tuberculosis. In 1914, Dr. H.P.H. Galloway and Dr. Hibbs began using the method to treat neuromuscular scoliosis in patients with poliomyelitis. However, this treatment approach was plagued by loss of deformity correction over time and high pseudarthrosis rates. The turning point in the operative management of spinal deformities began in 1947 with Dr. Paul Randall Harrington when he started a decade-long process to revolutionize surgical treatment of spinal deformities culminating in the advent of the Harrington Rod, the first successful implantable spinal instrumentation system. During the epoch that he was in practice, Dr. Harrington's achievement influenced the technology and art of spine surgery for his contemporaries and the coming generations of spine surgeons. The purpose of this article is to review the life of Dr. Harrington, and how he has arguably come to be known as “Father of the Modern Treatment of Scoliosis.”


Author(s):  
Michael J. Gigliotti ◽  
Noa Farou ◽  
Sandip Savaliya ◽  
Elias Rizk

AbstractNonaccidental trauma (NAT), causing spinal injury is rare and occurs in up to 3% of cases. Management of these injuries is typically conservative, and thus surgical management is not widely reported in the literature. In this case report, we presented three patients to review the effectiveness of spinal instrumentation and posterior fusion in pediatric patients due to NAT. All patients recovered well and were neurologically intact at last follow-up with no postprocedural complications noted. Spinal arthrodesis is a safe, effective way to manage spinal injuries due to NAT in cases of fracture-dislocation, distraction injuries, as well as cases involving neurologic compromise.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takaya Kato ◽  
Santo Ishikawa ◽  
Tadashi Inaba ◽  
Yuichi Kasai ◽  
Permsak Paholpak ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In recent years, pedicle screw (PS) fixation has often been used to stabilize the spine and correct deformities, yielding good clinical results. On the other hand, PS fixation is known to show problems such as instrumentation failure. However, few biomechanical studies have described causes of instrumentation failure. In this study, causes of instrumentation failure in lumbar PS fixation were investigated from the perspective of load sharing by measuring both strains generated in the rod and intradiscal pressure.Methods Four human cadaveric multi-segmental lumbar vertebrae (L2-L5) were used to prepare a control model and a PS fixation model. Next, axial compression tests were performed on each model using a universal material testing machine, and the strains generated in the rods and the intradiscal pressures were measured from strain gauges attached to the rods and a pressure sensor installed between L3-L4.Results Combined compressive and bending stresses were found to be generated in the rod, with bending stress around 10 times higher than compressive stress, and with vast differences in the levels of stress generated between right and left rods. Moreover, the stress shielding by PS fixation was small, and intervertebral discs were still subjected to a large load. Conclusion Preventing instrumentation failure in lumbar spine PS fixation, it seems necessary to strengthen the durability of the rod against bending stress and to ensure the stability of the anterior stabilizing element of the spine.


Spine ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 1058-1065 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Kanayama ◽  
Bryan W. Cunningham ◽  
John C. Sefter ◽  
Jeffrey A. Goldstein ◽  
Geoffrey Stewart ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document