scholarly journals 1550: THE EFFICACY OF TREATMENT FOR ELDERLY TRAUMA PATIENTS REQUIRING INTENSIVE CARE

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 759-759
Author(s):  
Kiyohiro Oshima ◽  
Masato Murata ◽  
Makoto Aoki ◽  
Jun Nakajima ◽  
Yusuke Sawada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Elderly Trauma Patients ◽  
Efficacy Of Treatment

Identification of Sarcopenia in Elderly Trauma Patients: The Value of Clinical Competency and Experience

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482098285
Author(s):  
Daisy M. Proksch ◽  
Katherine M. Kelley ◽  
Sasha White ◽  
Jessica R. Burgess
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Functional Status ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Psoas Muscle ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Medical Providers ◽  
Phone Calls ◽  
Elderly Trauma Patients

Introduction There is currently no standard definition of sarcopenia, which has often been associated with frailty. A commonly cited surrogate measure of sarcopenia is psoas muscle size. The purpose of this prospective study is to assess medical providers’ capabilities to identify frail elderly trauma patients and consequent impact on outcomes after intensive care unit admission. Methods Trauma intensive care unit patients over the age of 50 were enrolled. A preadmission functional status questionnaire was completed on admission. Attendings, residents, and nurses, blinded to their patient’s sarcopenic status, completed surveys regarding 6-month prognosis. Chart review included cross-sectional psoas area measurements on computerized tomography scan. Finally, patients received phone calls 3 and 6 months after admission to determine overall health and functional status. Results Seventy-six participants had an average age of 70 years and a corrected psoas area of 383 ± 101 mm2/m2. Injury Severity Score distribution (17.2 ± 8.9) was similar for both groups. Patients also had similar preinjury activities of daily living. Both groups had similar hospital courses. While sarcopenic patients were less likely to be predicted to survive to 6 months (60% vs. 76%, P = 0.017), their actual 6-month mortality was similar (22% vs. 21%, P = 0.915). Conclusion Despite similar objective measures of preadmission health and trauma injury severity, medical providers were able to recognize frail patients and predicted they would have worse outcomes. Interestingly, sarcopenic patients had similar outcomes to the control group. Additional studies are needed to further delineate factors influencing provider insight into functional reserves of elderly trauma patients.

scholarly journals Efficacy of the Treatment of Elderly Trauma Patients Requiring Intensive Care

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiyohiro Oshima ◽  
Masato Murata ◽  
Makoto Aoki ◽  
Jun Nakajima ◽  
Yusuke Sawada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Treatment Costs ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Icu Stay ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Total Treatment ◽  
Elderly Trauma Patients

Purpose. To evaluate the effectiveness of intensive care for the elderly trauma patients aged 80 years and older. Methods. Trauma patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) through the emergency room (ER) at our hospital between January 2013 and December 2016 were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: patients aged 80 and older (group E) and <80 years old (group Y). Clinical courses and the total treatment costs were compared between the two groups. Data are shown as median (interquartile range). Results. A hundred and seven trauma patients were included in the study. There were 26 patients in group E and 81 patients in group Y. There was no significant difference in Injury Severity Score (ISS) (group E, 19 (13, 32); group Y, 17 (14, 25); p=0.708); however, the probability of survival (Ps) was significantly lower in group E (group E, 0.895 (0.757, 0.950); group Y, 0.955 (0.878, 0.986); p=0.004). The duration of ICU stay (days) was significantly longer in group E (10 (5, 23)) than in group Y (4 (3, 9); p=0.001), and the total hospital stay (days) was longer in group E (33 (13, 57)) than in group Y (22 (12, 42); p=0.179). The hospital mortality was higher in group E (11.5%) than in group Y (6.2%) without a significant difference (p=0.365). The total treatment costs were significantly higher in group E ($23,558 (12,456, 42,790) with $1 = ¥110.57) than in group Y ($16,538 (7,412, 25,422); p=0.023). Conclusions. Elderly trauma patients require longer-term treatment including ICU stay and greater cost with higher hospital mortality compared with young trauma patients.

scholarly journals Prediction of mortality in critically-ill elderly trauma patients: a single centre retrospective observational study and comparison of the performance of trauma scores

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Egglestone ◽  
David Sparkes ◽  
Ahilanandan Dushianthan
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Prediction Of Mortality ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Elderly Trauma Patients

Abstract Background Trauma in the elderly (≥ 65 years) population is increasing. This study compares the performance of trauma scoring systems in predicting 30-day mortality among the traumatised elderly patients admitted to the intensive care unit in a major trauma centre. Methods We collected retrospective data for all elderly trauma patients admitted to our intensive care units between January 2012 and December 2017. We assessed Injury Severity Score (ISS), Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score (GTOS) and the Trauma Audit and Research Network’s (TARN) Probability of Survival (Ps17) between survivors and non-survivors. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the performance of these scoring systems. Results There were 255 elderly trauma patients with overall 30-day survival of 76%. There was a statistically significant difference in ISS, GTOS and Ps17 scores between survivors and non-survivors (p < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) was statistically significant for all 3, with AUROC of 0.66 (95% CI 0.59–0.74) for the ISS, 0.68 (95% CI 0.61–0.76) for the GTOS and 0.79 (95% CI 0.72–0.85) for the Ps17. The optimal cut-off points were ≥ 28, ≥ 142, ≤ 76.73 for ISS, GTOS and Ps17, respectively. Conclusion Both ISS and GTOS scoring systems preformed equally in predicting 30-day mortality in traumatised elderly patients admitted to the intensive care unit, however neither were robust enough to utilise in clinical practise. The Ps17 performed more robustly, although was not developed for prognosticating on individual patients. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate these scoring systems in critically-ill elderly traumatised patients, which may help to facilitate early prognostication.

scholarly journals A preliminary study of intensivist-performed DVT ultrasound screening in trauma ICU patients (APSIT Study)

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lloyd Roberts ◽  
Tom Rozen ◽  
Deirdre Murphy ◽  
Adam Lawler ◽  
Mark Fitzgerald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

Abstract Background Multiple screening Duplex ultrasound scans (DUS) are performed in trauma patients at high risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the intensive care unit (ICU). Intensive care physician performed compression ultrasound (IP-CUS) has shown promise as a diagnostic test for DVT in a non-trauma setting. Whether IP-CUS can be used as a screening test in trauma patients is unknown. Our study aimed to assess the agreement between IP-CUS and vascular sonographer performed DUS for proximal lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (PLEDVT) screening in high-risk trauma patients in ICU. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted at the ICU of Alfred Hospital, a major trauma center in Melbourne, Australia, between Feb and Nov 2015. All adult major trauma patients admitted with high risk for DVT were eligible for inclusion. IP-CUS was performed immediately before or after DUS for PLEDVT screening. The paired studies were repeated twice weekly until the DVT diagnosis, death or ICU discharge. Written informed consent from the patient, or person responsible, or procedural authorisation, was obtained. The individuals performing the scans were blinded to the others’ results. The agreement analysis was performed using Cohen’s Kappa statistics and intraclass correlation coefficient for repeated binary measurements. Results During the study period, 117 patients had 193 pairs of scans, and 45 (39%) patients had more than one pair of scans. The median age (IQR) was 47 (28–68) years with 77% males, mean (SD) injury severity score 27.5 (9.53), and a median (IQR) ICU length of stay 7 (3.2–11.6) days. There were 16 cases (13.6%) of PLEDVT with an incidence rate of 2.6 (1.6–4.2) cases per 100 patient-days in ICU. The overall agreement was 96.7% (95% CI 94.15–99.33). The Cohen’s Kappa between the IP-CUS and DUS was 0.77 (95% CI 0.59–0.95), and the intraclass correlation coefficient for repeated binary measures was 0.75 (95% CI 0.67–0.81). Conclusions There is a substantial agreement between IP-CUS and DUS for PLEDVT screening in trauma patients in ICU with high risk for DVT. Large multicentre studies are needed to confirm this finding.

scholarly journals Outcome of Cervical Spine Trauma Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit at a Tertiary Government Referral Trauma Center in Nepal

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822098070
Author(s):  
Gyanendra Shah ◽  
Gaurav Raj Dhakal ◽  
Anil Gupta ◽  
Pawan Kumar Hamal ◽  
Siddhartha Dhungana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Cervical Spinal Cord ◽  
Limited Resource ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Cervical Spine Injuries ◽  
Resource Setting ◽  
Cord Injury ◽  
Huge Impact

Study Design: Retrospective study. Objectives: Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating event for patient and family. It has a huge impact on society because of intensive resources required to manage the patient in both acute and rehabilitation phases. With the limited resource setting in underdeveloped countries like Nepal, questions are often raised regarding whether the outcome justifies the expenses of their care. The objective was to assess the outcomes of cervical SCI patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: All cervical SCI admitted in ICU during May 2017 to August 2018 were included in this study. Demographic details, mode, morphology, and neurological level of injury, intervention performed and outcomes of ICU stay were analyzed. Results: Out of 48 patients, 36 (75%) were male and 12 female with mean age 43.9 ± 15.9 years. Fall injury was the commonest mode of injury (83.3%). Most patients presented within 1 to 3 days of injury and C5-C6 (33.3%) was the most common involved level and 75% presented with ASIA A neurology. Mechanical ventilation was required in 95.8% of the patients and 22 patients were operated upon. The average stay in ICU was 15 days and 13 patients died in the ICU. Conclusions: Majority of cervical SCI with complete motor paraplegia required ICU care. Inspite of the intensive care, a subset of these patients succumbed to the complications of the injury. Therefore, it is essential to establish trauma ICU care with specific protocols on managing cervical spine injuries.

Admission of elderly blunt thoracic trauma patients directly to the intensive care unit improves outcomes

2017 ◽  
Vol 219 ◽  
pp. 334-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Owen J. Pyke ◽  
Jerry A. Rubano ◽  
James A. Vosswinkel ◽  
Jane E. McCormack ◽  
Emily C. Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Thoracic Trauma ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Blunt Thoracic Trauma

scholarly journals 186 Acute Kidney Injury in Skeletal Trauma Admissions to Intensive Care: An Under-Estimated Complication

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
O Brown ◽  
T Crisp ◽  
M Flatman ◽  
C Hing
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Penetrating Trauma ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Long Bone ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Skeletal Trauma ◽  
Body Regions ◽  
Intensive Care Stay

Abstract Introduction Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with prolonged admission and 3.5 times increased mortality for trauma patients requiring intensive care (ICU) treatment. Blunt trauma confers greater risk of AKI than penetrating trauma, potentially related to long bone fracture. The relationship between skeletal trauma and AKI in ICU has not previously been investigated. Method Retrospective data was analysed from 202 consecutive adult patients admitted to ICU with skeletal trauma from 01/06/2018 to 01/06/2019. AKI was defined by creatinine rise &gt;1.5 times baseline. Results AKI was found in 70/202 (34.65%) patients aged 16-99 years, 138 males and 64 females. Mean limb Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) was significantly higher in AKI (AIS= 2.57 (SD 0.53) versus non-AKI AIS=2.38 (SD 0.61), p = 0.027). Other body regions and total Injury Severity Score (ISS) were non-significant. AKI was associated with a significantly worse Glasgow Outcome Score (AKI 3.28 (SD 1.52) versus 4.02 (SD 1.08) p &lt; 0.001), increased intensive care stay (AKI 7.03 (SD 8.30) days versus non-AKI 3.8 (SD 4.1) days p &lt; 0.001) and increased 30-day mortality (AKI 18/70 (25.71%) versus non-AKI 10/132 (7.58%) p &lt; 0.001) Conclusions Skeletal trauma patients have a high incidence of AKI, which was significantly correlated with severity of skeletal limb trauma but not overall ISS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document