[PP.03.10] MORTALITY RISK AMONG DISABLED ELDERLY RESIDENTS OF LONG TERM CARE FACILITIES DURING ONE YEAR FOLLOW-UP

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. e110
Author(s):  
B. Gryglewska ◽  
A. Kantoch ◽  
J. Wojkowska-Mach ◽  
P. Heczko ◽  
T. Grodzicki
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Risk ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Disabled Elderly ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
One Year

scholarly journals 1236. Infection Control Risk Mitigation and Implementation of Best Practice Recommendations in Long-Term Care Facilities

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S375-S376
Author(s):  
Teresa Fitzgerald ◽  
Regina Nailon ◽  
Kate Tyner ◽  
Sue Beach ◽  
Margaret Drake ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infection Control ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Risk Assessments ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Practice Recommendations ◽  
Care Facilities

Abstract Background Nebraska (NE) Infection Control Assessment and Promotion Program (ICAP) is a quality improvement initiative supported by the NE Department of Health and Human Services. This initiative utilizes subject matter experts (SMEs) including infectious diseases physicians and certified infection preventionists (IP) to assess and improve infection prevention and control programs (IPCP) in various healthcare settings. NE ICAP conducted on-site surveys and observations of IPCP in many volunteer facilities to include long-term care facilities (LTCF) between November 2015 and July 2017. SMEs provided on-site coaching and made best practice recommendations (BPR) for priority implementation. Impact of this intervention on LTCF IPCP was examined. Methods Using a standardized questionnaire, follow-up phone calls were made with LTCF to evaluate implementation of the BPR one-year post-assessment. Descriptive analyses were performed to examine BPR implementation in LTCF that had follow-up between 4/4/17 to 4/17/18 and to identify factors that promoted or impeded BPR implementation. Results Overall, 45 LTCF were assessed. The top 5 IC categories requiring improvement were audit and feedback practices (28 of 45, 62%), PPE supplies at point of use (62%), IC risk assessments (58%), TB risk assessments (56%), and supply and linen storage practices (56%). Follow-up assessments were completed for 270 recommendations in 25 LTCF. Recommendations reviewed ranged from three to 26 per LTCF (median = 15). The majority of the 270 recommendations (n = 162, 60%) had been either completely (35%) or partially (25%) implemented by the time of the follow-up calls. The ICAP visit itself was reported as the most helpful resource for BPR implementation (77 of 162). Lack of staffing was the most commonly mentioned barrier to implementation when LTCF implemented BPR partially or implementation was not planned (37 of 85). BPR Implementation most frequently involved additional staff training (64 of 162), review of policies and procedures (38 of 162), and implementing audit (34 of 162) and/or feedback (23 of 162) programs. Conclusion Numerous IC gaps exist in LTCF. Peer-to-peer feedback and coaching by SMEs facilitated implementation of many BPR directed toward mitigating identified IC gaps. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Pharmacoepidemiology of Urinary Tract Infections in Iowa Medicaid Patients in Urban Long-Term-Care Facilities

1997 ◽  
Vol 31 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 837-841 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darrel C. Bjornson ◽  
John P. Rovers ◽  
Julie A. Burian ◽  
Nancy L. Hall
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Urinary Tract Infections ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Treatment Preference ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Tract Infections

OBJECTIVE: To describe the therapeutic management of Medicaid patients with urinary tract infections (UTIs) in urban long-term-care facilities (LTCFs) and to link individual therapies to patient outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective review of medical records in LTCFs of patients who had documented UTIs. METHODS: Patient data were collected from 17 LTCFs in the Des Moines, IA, metropolitan area during a 1-year period starting January 1, 1995. Patients with UTIs were selected from the LTCF infection control logs. Data collected on patients included demographics, concomitant diseases, type of UTI (i.e., symptomatic, asymptomatic, catheter-related), process measures for management, UTI treatment, patient outcomes, and follow-up. Patient outcome data were defined as either cure or no cure. A UTI cure was defined as a negative urine culture while taking antibiotic therapy and/or complete resolution of signs and symptoms, as well as no further treatment given within 2 weeks after the end of treatment. RESULTS: Data were collected on 310 patients who had at least one UTI over the 1-year study period. Patients were primarily elderly (mean age 82.2 ± 12.3 y), white (95.1%), and female (83.9%). Concomitant diseases were common and about one-fourth (23.0%) of the patients were catheterized. There were 536 UTI events (the unit of analysis) documented over the 1-year period, with about one-half (45.9%) being UTIs with symptoms consistent with uncomplicated lower UTI. Nearly two-thirds (62.3%) of the patients were cured, based on the study definition; there was no association between cure and type of antimicrobial therapy (p = 0.99). Over one-third (35.2%) of the UTIs were treated with a quinolone antibiotic. Others were treated with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (24.4%), nitrofurantoin (13.9%), a cephalosporin (10.4%), or ampicillin/amoxicillin (9.8%). Sixty-day follow-up showed no association between type of therapy and hospital readmission, physician follow-up visits, or subsequent UTIs. CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences in cure rates when comparing LTCF UTI patients receiving various regimens. With outcomes being the same, the clinician should closely consider costs of drug therapy in selecting a treatment preference.

scholarly journals Is treated hypertension associated with a lower one-year mortality among older residents of long-term care facilities with multimorbidity?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Kańtoch ◽  
Agnieszka Pac ◽  
Barbara Wizner ◽  
Jadwiga Wójkowska-Mach ◽  
Piotr Heczko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Long Term Care ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
One Year

scholarly journals Insomnia, Benzodiazepine Use, and Falls among Residents in Long-term Care Facilities

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (23) ◽  
pp. 4623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiang ◽  
Xia ◽  
Wang ◽  
Zhou ◽  
Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sleep Quality ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Injurious Falls ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Benzodiazepine Use ◽  
Risk Of Falls ◽  
One Year

Background: Falls are leading cause of injury among older people, especially for those living in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Very few studies have assessed the effect of sleep quality and hypnotics use on falls, especially in Chinese LTCFs. The study aimed to examine the association between sleep quality, hypnotics use, and falls in institutionalized older people. Methods: We recruited 605 residents from 25 LTCFs in central Shanghai and conducted a baseline survey for sleep quality and hypnotics use, as well as a one-year follow-up survey for falls and injurious falls. Logistic regression models were applied in univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: Among the 605 participants (70.41% women, mean age 84.33 ± 6.90 years), the one-year incidence of falls and injurious falls was 21.82% and 15.21%, respectively. Insomnia (19.83%) and hypnotics use (14.21%) were prevalent. After adjusting for potential confounders, we found that insomnia was significantly associated with an increased risk of falls (adjusted risk ratio (RR): 1.787, 95% CI, 1.106–2.877) and the use of benzodiazepines significantly increased the risk of injurious falls (RR: 3.128, 95% CI, 1.541–6.350). Conclusion: In elderly LTCF residents, both insomnia and benzodiazepine use are associated with an increased risk of falls and injuries. Adopting non-pharmacological approaches to improve sleep quality, taking safer hypnotics, or strengthening supervision on benzodiazepine users may be useful in fall prevention.

scholarly journals One-year survival and admission to hospital for cardiovascular events among older residents of long-term care facilities who were prescribed intensive- and moderate-dose statins

2019 ◽  
Vol 191 (2) ◽  
pp. E32-E39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Campitelli ◽  
Colleen J. Maxwell ◽  
Laura C. Maclagan ◽  
Dennis T. Ko ◽  
Chaim M. Bell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Moderate Dose ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
One Year

scholarly journals Effectiveness of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine against acquisitions of SARS-CoV-2 among health care workers in long-term care facilities: a prospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khitam Muhsen ◽  
Nimrod Maimon ◽  
Ami Mizrahi ◽  
Omri Bodenneimer ◽  
Dani Cohen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Workers ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Workers ◽  
Care Facilities

Abstract Objective We assessed vaccine effectiveness (VE) of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 acquisition among health care workers (HCWs) of long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Methods This prospective study, in the framework of "Senior Shield" program in Israel, included routine, weekly nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing from all LTCF HCWs since July 2020. All residents and 75% of HCWs were immunized between December 2020 and January 2021. The analysis was limited to HCWs adhering to routine testing. Fully vaccinated (14+ days after second dose; n=6960) and unvaccinated HCWs (n=2202) were simultaneously followed until SARS-CoV-2 acquisition, or end of follow-up, April 11, 2021. Hazard ratios (HRs) for vaccination vs. no vaccination were calculated (Cox proportional hazards regression models, adjusting for socio-demographics and residential-area COVID-19 incidence). VE was calculated as [(1– HR)×100]. RT-PCR cycle threshold values (Cts) were compared between vaccinated and unvaccinated HCWs. Results At >14 days post second dose, 40 vaccinated HCWs acquired SARS-CoV-2 (median follow-up, 66 days; cumulative incidence 0.6%) vs. 84 unvaccinated HCWs (median follow-up 43 days; cumulative incidence, 5.1%); HR=0.11 (95% CI 0.07, 0.17), unadjusted VE=89% (95% CI 83%, 93%). Adjusted VE beyond seven days and >14 days post second dose were similar. The median PCR Cts targeting ORF1ab gene among 20 vaccinated and 40 unvaccinated HCWs was 32.0 vs. 26.7, respectively, p=0.008. Conclusions VE following two doses of BNT162b2 against SARS-CoV-2 acquisition in LTCF HCWs was high. The lower viral loads among SARS-CoV-2 positive HCWs suggests further reduction in transmission.

scholarly journals The Effects of an Advanced Movable Restraint Design on the Elderly Residents at Long-Term Care Facilities in Taiwan

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (33) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
Meng-Ping Wu ◽  
Lee-Ing Tsao
Keyword(s):  
Long Term Care ◽  
Muscle Power ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Exercise Frequency ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Experimental Group

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects, both initially and after 6 months, of an “advanced movable restraint” with openended palm sleeve restraint bands for the elderly residents at long-term care facilities in northern Taiwan. Background. Elderly residents in long-term care facilities are often forced to remain bed-ridden by traditional bed restraint bands due to their irritable, confused conditions and the associated risks of self-extubating their nasogastric (NG) tubes, urinary catheters, etc. However, the traditional bed restraint bands can themselves lead to further physical and mental complications such as skin damage, depression, hostility, and even rhabdomyolysis, increasing the risk of death. Design. Quasiexperimental design. Methods: This parallel-design study was conducted with elderly residents at eight long-term care facilities. The newly designed advanced movable restraint featuring movable open-ended palm sleeve restraint bands was applied to the elderly residents in the experimental group, allowing them greater freedom of movement such that they were not required to remain bed-ridden. In contrast, the elderly residents in the control group were restrained with traditional bed restraints requiring that they remain bedridden. The following four instruments and indicators were then used to compare the effects of the two types of restraints: (1) an activities of daily living (ADL) survey based on the Barthel Index, (2) a muscle power test, (3) an exercise frequency and duration survey, and (4) self-extubation rates. The effects of the interventions were tested by using the t test or chi-square test to compare pre-test results for the ADL survey, muscle power test, exercise frequency and duration survey, and self-extubation rates to those at a 6-month follow-up. Results: A total of 80 elderly residents were included in the experimental group, while 80 elderly residents were included in the control group. At the 6-month follow-up, the residents restrained with the advanced movable restraint had a significantly increased mean muscle power score (χ2 =17.212, P < 0.001), significantly decreased self-extubation rate (χ2 =40.733, P < .001), and significantly increased exercise frequency and duration per week (χ2=27.095 P < 0.001; 26.241 P < 0.001). Conclusions: This study showed that the advanced movable restraint can improve muscle power scores, self-extubation rates, and exercise frequencies and durations by allowing residents greater freedom of movement without the need to remain bed-ridden. It is thus crucial to use such advanced movable restraints and develop standardized technology systems to support the elderly residents and nurses in long-term care facilities.

scholarly journals Hospice use and one-year survivorship of residents in long-term care facilities in Canada: a cohort study

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Beibei Xiong ◽  
Shannon Freeman ◽  
Davina Banner ◽  
Lina Spirgiene
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Hospice Care ◽  
Lower Percentage ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Diagnosis Of Dementia ◽  
One Year ◽  
Hospice Use

Abstract Background Hospice care is designed for persons in the final phase of a terminal illness. However, hospice care is not used appropriately. Some persons who do not meet the hospice eligibility receive hospice care, while many persons who may have benefitted from hospice care do not receive it. This study aimed to examine the characteristics of, and one-year survivorship among, residents who received hospice care versus those who did not in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) in Canada. Methods This retrospective cohort study used linked health administrative data from the Canadian Continuing Reporting System (CCRS) and the Discharge Abstract Database (DAD). All persons who resided in a LTCF and who had a Resident Assessment Instrument Minimum Data Set Version 2.0 (RAI-MDS 2.0) assessment in the CCRS database between Jan. 1st, 2015 and Dec 31st, 2015 were included in this study (N = 185,715). Death records were linked up to Dec 31th, 2016. Univariate, bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results The reported hospice care rate in LTCFs is critically low (less than 3%), despite one in five residents dying within 3 months of the assessment. Residents who received hospice care and died within 1 year were found to have more severe and complex health conditions than other residents. Compared to those who did not receive hospice care but died within 1 year, residents who received hospice care and were alive 1 year following the assessment were younger (a mean age of 79.4 [+ 13.5] years vs. 86.5 [+ 9.2] years), more likely to live in an urban LTCF (93.2% vs. 82.6%), had a higher percentage of having a diagnosis of cancer (50.7% vs. 12.9%), had a lower percentage of having a diagnosis of dementia (30.2% vs. 54.5%), and exhibited more severe acute clinical conditions. Conclusions The actual use of hospice care among LTCF residents is very poor in Canada. Several factors emerged as potential barriers to hospice use in the LTCF population including ageism, rurality, and a diagnosis of dementia. Improved understanding of hospice use and one-year survivorship may help LTCFs administrators, hospice care providers, and policy makers to improve hospice accessibility in this target group.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document