Calcium channel blockers in pancreatic cancer: increased overall survival in a retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 737-741
Author(s):  
Samuel J. Tingle ◽  
George R. Severs ◽  
John A.G. Moir ◽  
Steven A. White
2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15756-e15756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leszek Kraj ◽  
Andrzej Śliwczyński ◽  
Joanna Krawczyk-Lipiec ◽  
Krzysztof Woźniak ◽  
Anna Waszczuk-Gajda ◽  
...  

e15756 Background: Preclinical studies have shown that calcium channel blockers (CCB) may potentiate anticancer effect of chemotherapy via intra-cellular drug accumulation. Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy is commonly used in pancreatic cancer (PC) patients. The aim of this study was to determine whether CCB may affect overall survival (OS) in PC patients receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. Methods: The retrospective cohort of PC patients treated with gemcitabine between 2007 and 2016 was identified in the Polish National Health Fund databases. Electronic records of prescriptions were searched to identify in this cohort patients receiving CCB (amlodipine, nitrendipine, felodipine, lacidipine). The primary endpoint was OS and it was determined by Kaplan-Meier methods and compared by the log-rank test. Results: In total 4628 PC patients treated with gemcitabine (median OS 7.7 months; 95% CI: 7.4-7.9) were identified. Among these 380 patients were prescribed any CCB. There was a significant difference (p < 0.001) in median OS between patients prescribed CCB (n = 380; OS 9.3 months; 95% CI: 7.8-11.0) and those who did not (n = 4214; OS 7.6 months; 95% CI: 7.3-7.8) with hazard ratio for death 0.70 (95% CI: 0.62-0.79). Notably, the survival curves tended to flatten in CCB group, with 24% of patients alive at 2 years (95% CI: 20-29%) and 15% alive at 5 years (95% CI: 11-19%), compared with 11% (95% CI: 10-12%) and 4% (95% CI: 4-5%) in controls respectively. Conclusions: The use of CCB in PC patients receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy was associated with improved OS. Further validation is needed to evaluate effectiveness of CCB-gemcitabine combinations in the management of PC.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. e048442
Author(s):  
Adeladlew Kassie Netere ◽  
Esmael Ali Muhammad ◽  
Mezgebu Silamsaw Asres ◽  
Masho Tigabie Teklie

ObjectiveThe study determined the comparative renal functions on patients with diabetes treated with ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) plus either thiazide diuretics or calcium channel blockers (CCBs) in Northwestern Ethiopia.DesignRetrospective cohort study design was employed to collect the data from medical records of patients with diabetes followed for 1–5 years (N=404).SettingThe medical records of patients in chronic diabetic follow-up clinics of the hospital.ParticipantsAll the patients with diabetes medical records in Northwestern Ethiopian specialised hospital.Main outcome measuresExposures were ACEIs plus thiazide diuretics or CCBs collected from March to June 2020. Outcomes were defined as declining in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values by ≥30% from the baseline recorded from 2015 to 2019. Descriptive and analytical statistics were illustrated to compare the study groups. Kaplan-Meier with log- rank test was used to plot the survival analyses curve. Potential factors substantially associated to renal events were examined using cox proportional hazards model.ResultAbout 20% of patients developed renal events and significant numbers were from hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) users. The mean eGFR levels were significantly higher in patients on CCBs users over the follow-up years compared with HCT-based users. The CCBs users had an 18.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 higher in eGFR levels at the end of the follow-up period than HCT users (p<0.001). HCT users had shorter survival probability overtime to develop the outcomes compared with CCBs users (p=0.003). The CCBs-based regimen prevented risks of declining in renal function by 56.4% than HCT (p=0.001). Hazards of declining in eGFR levels were 93% higher for the patients with initial systolic blood pressure (SBP) levels were more than 150 mm Hg (p=0.006).ConclusionCompared with HCT, patients on CCBs had significantly prevented risks of renal events. However, both groups appeared with the same cardiovascular events. HCT-based regimen and higher initial SBP levels were significantly associated with eGFR reductions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 1440-1447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sjors Klompmaker ◽  
◽  
Jony van Hilst ◽  
Sarah L. Gerritsen ◽  
Mustapha Adham ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Western multicenter studies on distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection (DP-CAR), also known as the Appleby procedure, for locally advanced pancreatic cancer are lacking. We aimed to study overall survival, morbidity, mortality and the impact of preoperative hepatic artery embolization (PHAE). Methods Retrospective cohort study within the European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary-Association, on DP-CAR between 1-1-2000 and 6-1-2016. Primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints were radicality (R0-resection), 90-day mortality, major morbidity, and pancreatic fistulae (grade B/C). Results We included 68 patients from 20 hospitals in 12 countries. Postoperatively, 53% of patients had R0-resection, 25% major morbidity, 21% an ISGPS grade B/C pancreatic fistula, and 16% mortality. In total, 82% received (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy and median overall survival in 62 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients was 18 months (CI 10–37). We observed no impact of PHAE on ischemic complications. Conclusions DP-CAR combined with chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer is associated with acceptable overall survival. The 90-day mortality is too high and should be reduced. Future studies should investigate to what extent increasing surgical volume or better patient selection can improve outcomes.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shilong Han ◽  
Chuanwu Cao ◽  
Yifeng Yuan ◽  
Jun Chen ◽  
Linan Yin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Patients with advanced body/tail pancreatic cancer have poor quality of life and low overall survival rate. In recent years, interventional diagnosis and treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer have become increasingly widespread. This retrospective cohort study investigated the efficacy of routine intravenous chemotherapy (the control group), transcatheter arterial infusion (TAI) chemotherapy, and TAI combined with radioactive particles as therapeutic methods for advanced body/tail cancer pancreatic by assessing the short-term and overall survival rates. Methods We screened our prospective database for patients with advanced body/tail pancreatic cancer, which tumor deemed unresectable and no other confirmed malignant tumors, patients were assigned into three groups according to their treatment. Analyses with regard to the clinical responses, the 6, 12, and 18-month survival rates and overall survival rates were performed. Results The median survival time was 6 months in the control group, 10 months in the TAI group and 13 months in the TAI combined group. The Kaplan–Meier estimates of the OS among the three groups, indicating that there is significant difference among three groups (P༜0.000). The clinical remission rates were 17.5% in the control group, 41.5% in the TAI group, and 48.0% in the TAI combined group. Covariates analyzed showed that different treatment methods and times affected the results significantly (P༜0.002). Conclusions In the treatment of advanced body/tail pancreatic cancer, TAI and TAI combined with radioactive particles significantly improved the clinical outcomes in patients compared with routine intravenous chemotherapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document