Perioperative Outcomes for Laparotomy Compared to Robotic Surgical Staging of Endometrial Cancer in the Elderly: A Retrospective Cohort

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 1717-1721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Floor J. Backes ◽  
Adam C. ElNaggar ◽  
Michael Ryan Farrell ◽  
Lorna A. Brudie ◽  
Sarfraz Ahmad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Pelvic Lymphadenectomy ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Median Hospital Stay ◽  
Improved Outcomes ◽  
Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence ◽  
Median Hospital

ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare outcomes of endometrial cancer (EMCA) staging in elderly patients performed either robotically or via laparotomy.MethodsA retrospective, multi-institutional chart review was conducted of all robotic and laparotomy staging surgeries for EMCA between 2003 and 2009. Charts were reviewed for intraoperative and postoperative complications and morbidities.ResultsSeven hundred forty-six women were identified who had undergone EMCA staging either robotically or via laparotomy; 89 and 93 patients 70 years or older underwent staging for EMCA via robotic and laparotomy, respectively. Both groups had similar age and body mass index. Among elderly patients being staged robotically, a higher incidence of pelvic lymphadenectomy, and decreased blood loss, incidence of blood transfusion, and overall complications were seen compared to laparotomy. Postoperatively, elderly patients staged robotically had a shorter median hospital stay (1 vs 4 days,P< 0.001), with no increase in readmission or return to the operating theater. No vessel, bowel, or genitourinary injuries occurred. Vaginal cuff dehiscence after robotic surgery was not significantly different, but wound and fascial complications were significantly increased in patients undergoing laparotomy. Thromboembolism rates were similar between both groups.ConclusionsElderly patients can safely undergo robotic EMCA staging with improved outcomes compared to laparotomy. The benefits of robotic staging include higher incidence of completion of lymphadenectomy, decreased hospital stay (without an increase in readmissions or reoperations), decreased transfusions, and decreased wound and fascial complications.

scholarly journals Pacemaker therapy in the elderly and very elderly: comorbidity-burden vs age, as prognostic factors for excess of length of in-hospital stay, complications and mortality

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Marschall ◽  
H Del Castillo Carnevali ◽  
F Goncalves Sanchez ◽  
M Torres Lopez ◽  
F A Delgado Calva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Very Elderly ◽  
Pacemaker Therapy ◽  
Clinical Scenarios ◽  
Comorbidity Burden ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Complications And Mortality

Abstract Background The number of elderly patients undergoing pacemaker (PM) implantation is constantly growing. However, information on survival and prognostic factors of this particular patient group is scarce. Recent studies suggest that comorbidity burden may have an equal, if not greater, effect on length of in-hospital stay (LOS), complications and mortality, as age in a variety of clinical scenarios. Objective The objective of this study was to determine the survival of elderly and very elderly patients undergoing PM implantation, as well as to investigate the impact of comorbidities, as compared to age, on excess of length of in-hospital stay and mortality. Methods This is a retrospective observational study of a single centre. Patients that underwent (both elective and non-elective) PM implantation between June 2016 and December 2018 in our centre, were included for chart review. Elderly patients were defined as those with age 80–89 years, whereas very elderly patients were defined as those with ≥90 years of age. Excess in LOS was defined as an in-hospital stay &gt;3 days. Results A total of 507 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 80.6 (±8.5) years. 255 elderly and 60 very elderly patients were included. Median follow-up time was 24 months. Baseline clinical characteristics are presented in Table 1. The mortality rate for elderly patients was 18.8% for the elderly and 36.7% for the very elderly (p=0.002). The presence of ≥2 comorbidities (defined in Table 1) resulted to be a significant predictor for the excess of LOS, whereas age did not significantly predict excess of LOS (HR: 7.1 (4.4–11.4), p&lt;0.001); HR: 1.01 (0.9–1.1), p=0.56, respectively). Neither age, nor comorbidity burden predicted the appearance of device related complications. Both comorbidites and age predicted mortality. However, the association was stronger for the presence of comorbidites, than for age (HR: 1.9 (1.1–3.1), p=0.002 vs HR: 1.1 (1.1–1.2), p&lt;0.001, respectively). Elderly patients with low comorbidity burden (&lt;2 comorbidities) showed no significant differences with regards to LOS and mortality when compared to younger patients (2 (2–4) vs 3 (2–5) days, p=0.529 and 18.3% vs 17.4%, p=0.702; respectively). Conclusions Our study shows a good life expectancy of elderly and very elderly patients, that underwent PM implantation, with a survival rate that is comparable to the general population. Comorbidity burden, rather than age, significantly predicts excess of LOS and should therefore be the driving factor in the approach of patients undergoing new PM implantation. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

scholarly journals Comparison of Outcomes Between McKeown and Sweet Esophagectomy in the Elderly Patients for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 107327482090470
Author(s):  
Dongni Chen ◽  
Yihuai Hu ◽  
Youfang Chen ◽  
Jia Hu ◽  
Zhesheng Wen
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Term Survival

The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes and long-term survival rates of the McKeown and Sweet procedures in patients with esophageal cancer younger than 70 years or older than 70 years. A total of 1432 consecutive patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received surgery at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from January 2009 to October 2012 were analyzed. Propensity score matching was used to balance the clinical characteristics of the patients who underwent different surgical approaches, and 275 and 71 paired cases were matched among those younger and older than 70 years, respectively. The prognosis and postoperative outcomes were compared between the McKeown and the Sweet esophagectomy. For patients younger than 70 years, those who underwent the McKeown procedure had better overall survival (OS) than those in the Sweet group (log rank = 4.467; P = .035). However, no significant difference in disease-free survival and OS was observed between two approaches for the elderly patients (log rank = 1.562; P = .211 and log rank = 0.668; P = .414, respectively). Cox regression analysis revealed that McKeown approach was a positive prognostic factor compared to the Sweet approach for patients younger than 70 years in univariable analysis (HR = 0.790; 95% CI, 0.625-0.997; P = .047), whereas the surgical approach was not significantly related to the prognosis in the elderly patients. For patients older than 70 years, the occurrence of anastomotic fistula increased in those who underwent the McKeown procedure (23.9% vs 11.3%, P = .038, for the McKeown and Sweet esophagectomy, respectively). The McKeown approach increases the OS in younger patients with ESCC. However, for patients older than 70 years, the Sweet approach was proven to be an effective therapy, given the better perioperative outcomes and similar long-term survival compared with patients in the McKeown group.

Advantages of Laparoscopic Appendectomy in the Elderly

2006 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 474-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew G. Harrell ◽  
Amy E. Lincourt ◽  
Yuri W. Novitsky ◽  
Michael J. Rosen ◽  
Timothy S. Kuwada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Perforated Appendicitis ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Skilled Nursing ◽  
Total Charges

Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has gained in popularity in recent years. The number of elderly patients undergoing appendectomy has increased as that segment of the population has increased in number; however, the utility and benefits of LA in the elderly population are not well established. We hypothesized that LA in the elderly has distinctive advantages in perioperative outcomes over open appendectomy (OA). We queried the 1997 to 2003 North Carolina Hospital Association Patient Data System for all patients with the primary ICD-9 procedure code for OA and LA. Patients ≥65 years of age (elderly) were identified and reviewed. Outcomes including length of stay (LOS), charges, complications, discharge location, and mortality were compared between the groups. There were 29,244 appendectomies performed in adult patients (>18 years old) with 2,722 of these in the elderly. The annual percentage of LA performed in the elderly increased from 1997 to 2003 (11.9–26.9%, P < 0.0001). When compared with OA, elderly patients undergoing LA had a shorter LOS (4.6 vs 7.3 days, P = 0.0001), a higher rate of discharge to home (91.4 vs 78.9%, P = 0.0001) as opposed to a step-down facility, fewer complications (13.0 vs 22.4%, P = 0.0001), and a lower mortality rate (0.4 vs 2.1%, P = 0.007). When LA was compared with OA in elderly patients with perforated appendicitis, LA resulted in a shorter LOS (6.8 vs 9.0 days, P = 0.0001), a higher rate of discharge to home (86.6 vs 70.9%, P = 0.0001), but equivalent total charges ($22,334 vs $23,855, P = 0.93) and mortality (1.0 vs 2.98%, P = 0.10). When elderly patients that underwent LA were compared with adult patients (18–64 years old), they had higher total charges ($16,670 vs $11,160, P = 0.0001) but equivalent mortality (0.37 vs 0.15%, P = 0.20). The use of laparoscopy in the elderly has significantly increased in recent years. In general, the safety and efficacy of LA is demonstrated by a reduction in mortality, complications, and LOS when compared with OA. The laparoscopic approach to the perforated appendix in the elderly patient has advantages over OA in terms of decreased LOS and a higher rate of discharge to home as opposed to rehabilitation centers, nursing homes, or skilled nursing care. When compared with all younger adults, the laparoscopic approach in the elderly was associated with equal mortality rates even though hospitalization charges were higher. Laparoscopy may be the preferred approach in elderly patients who require appendectomy.

scholarly journals Is simultaneous surgery for nodes and primary in carcinoma penis safe?

2017 ◽  
Vol 03 (01) ◽  
pp. 050-053
Author(s):  
Senthil Chandrasekhar ◽  
Kathiresan Narayanswamy
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Median Hospital Stay ◽  
Staged Surgery ◽  
Surgery Group ◽  
Simultaneous Surgery ◽  
Simultaneous Group ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Carcinoma Penis ◽  
Median Hospital

Abstract Introduction: Historically, the combination of primary and nodal surgeries for carcinoma penis is thought to increase the morbidity and hospital stay. Despite the modifications in surgery including modified inguinal lymphadenectomies, morbidity of the procedure is high. Methods: A prospective, nonrandomized study to analyze a total of 56 consecutive patients from 2006 to 2009, who were evaluated and underwent surgery for primary and nodes for carcinoma penis at our center, was done. The median follow-up was 34 months (range from 12 to 48 months). The procedures included both prophylactic and therapeutic groin dissections. Various parameters were tested using SPSS version 17 statistics software. Results: Duration of drains, hospital stay, wound morbidity, and long-term complications were found to be similar in the simultaneous and staged surgery groups. The mean duration of drains for the simultaneous group of 18 patients was 12.56 days and the corresponding duration of drains for the staged surgery group of 36 patients was 12.83 days. The minor morbidity and major morbidity for the simultaneous group were 27.8% and 38.9% and the corresponding figures for the staged group were 22.2% and 44.4%, respectively. The mean and median hospital stay for the simultaneous surgery group were 21.5 and 27.5 days, respectively. The mean and median hospital stay for the staged surgery group were 17.5 and 21.36 days, respectively. The study revealed no statistically significant difference between the two groups with regard to all the above parameters. Conclusions: Simultaneous surgery for the primary and nodes in carcinoma penis is very much feasible. Simultaneous and early-staged lymphadenectomy have no difference in results with respect to drain duration, hospital stay, wound morbidity, and long-term complications. Simultaneous lymphadenectomy can be combined with penectomy both in the prophylactic and therapeutic settings.

Robotic Surgery Versus Laparotomy in Elderly Patients with Endometrial Cancer: Perioperative Outcomes and Complications

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 272-276
Author(s):  
Lina Salman ◽  
Liora Guy ◽  
Adi Borovich ◽  
Oded Raban ◽  
Gad Sabah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes

Differences in the Clinical Course of Acute Appendicitis in the Elderly in Comparison to Younger Population

2016 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Zbierska ◽  
Jakub Kenig ◽  
Anna Lasek ◽  
Mateusz Rubinkiewicz ◽  
Piotr Wałęga
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Time Delays ◽  
Clinical Presentation ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Elderly Group ◽  
Abdominal Emergency ◽  
Children And Young Adults

AbstractAcute appendicitis (AA) still remains the most common acute surgical abdominal emergency. Although 90% of cases occur in children and young adults, the incidence in the elderly amounts up to 10% and is constantly rising.The aim of the study was to assess the differences between clinical presentation in the elderly patients with AA compared to the younger patients. Additional aim was to assess the correlation between in-hospital time delays and patients’ outcomes.Material and methods. We conducted a retrospective analysis of medical data of 274 patients admitted to 3rd Department of General Surgery in Cracow between January 2011 and December 2013 due to AA. The elderly group comprised 23 patients aged 65 and above and the non-elderly group consisted of 251 patients.Results. The groups did not differ in symptoms and their duration, type of surgery and its duration. However, time from admission to ED to the beginning of the procedure was significantly lower in the elderly group (575.56 vs 858.9 min; p=0.03). The elderly had longer hospital stay (6.08 vs 4.69 days; p=0.004). In the elderly group the perforation rate was close to reaching statistical significance (26.1% vs 12.4%; p=0.06). No mortality was noted in both groups and morbidity was slightly higher in elderly group (17.4% vs 10%; p=0.26).Conclusions. There was no difference in the clinical presentation between elderly and non-elderly patients group. However, elderly patients presented with a more progressed inflammation of the appendix. The hospital stay was longer in the elderly group, without any mortality and with higher rate of morbidity in this group. The length of the preoperative phase was significantly shorter, confirming the awareness of importance of time in the elderly patients with acute abdomen.

Morbidity and Mortality of C2 Fractures in the Elderly

Neurosurgery ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. 1055-1059 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Ren Chen ◽  
Maxwell Boakye ◽  
Robert T. Arrigo ◽  
Paul S. A. Kalanithi ◽  
Ivan Cheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Treatment Modality ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Cord Injury

Abstract BACKGROUND: Closed C2 fractures commonly occur after falls or other trauma in the elderly and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Controversy exists as to best treatment practices for these patients. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes for elderly patients with closed C2 fractures by treatment modality. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 28 surgically and 28 nonsurgically treated cases of closed C2 fractures without spinal cord injury in patients aged 65 years of age or older treated at Stanford Hospital between January 2000 and July 2010. Comorbidities, fracture characteristics, and treatment details were recorded; primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and complication rates; secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay and long-term survival. RESULTS: Surgically treated patients tended to have more severe fractures with larger displacement. Charlson comorbidity scores were similar in both groups. Thirty-day mortality was 3.6% in the surgical group and 7.1% in the nonsurgical group, and the 30-day complication rates were 17.9% and 25.0%, respectively; these differences were not statistically significant. Surgical patients had significantly longer lengths of hospital stay than nonsurgical patients (11.8 days vs 4.4 days). Long-term median survival was not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: The 30-day mortality and complication rates in surgically and nonsurgically treated patients were comparable. Elderly patients faced relatively high morbidity and mortality regardless of treatment modality; thus, age alone does not appear to be a contraindication to surgical fixation of C2 fractures.

scholarly journals Differential Management Strategies and Outcomes in Patients over 65 years with Acute Calculous Biliary Disease—Results and Insights from the ESTES Complicated Biliary Calculous Disease Snapshot Audit

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary Alan Bass ◽  
Amy E. Gillis ◽  
Yang Cao ◽  
Shahin Mohseni ◽  
ESTES Cohort Studies Collaborative Group
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Operative Mortality ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Operative Intervention ◽  
Ageing Population ◽  
Biliary Disease ◽  
Elderly Cohort

Abstract Background: Acute complicated calculous biliary disease (ACCBD) may pose challenges in an ageing population. Frailty and comorbidities increase the potential risks of surgery; thus, surgeons may opt to offer operative treatments less often to their older patients. We set out to capture the incidence and treatment algorithms used across Europe to treat older patients presenting with ACCBD.Methods: Analysis of the European Society of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ESTES) 2018 Acute Complicated Calculous Biliary Disease audit was performed. Patients undergoing emergency hospital admission with ACCBD between 1 October 2018 and 31 October 2018 were included. The primary outcome measure was operative intervention in patients over and under 65 years of age. Mortalities, post-operative morbidity, time to operative intervention, post-acute disposition and length of hospital stay were measured as secondary outcomes.Results: The median age of the 338 patients admitted to the snapshot was 67 years; 185 patients (54.7%) were over 65 years at time of admission. Significantly fewer patients over 65 underwent definitive surgical treatment, compared with those under 65 (37.8% vs. 64.7%, p <0.001). Surgical complications were seen more frequently in the over 65 cohort. Post-operative mortality was seen in 2.2% of over 65s versus 0.7% under 65(p=0.253). Mean post-operative length of stay was significantly longer in the elderly cohort. In patients surviving to discharge, post-acute convalescence or rehabilitation was required in 13.3% in the elderly cohort versus 1.9% of those under 65 (p=0.002).Conclusions: Elderly patients commonly present with ACCBD. Increased frailty and incidence of comorbid disease in this population increases the potential surgical risk. In our snapshot, elderly patients represented the majority, but far fewer were offered definitive surgical treatment. Post-operative mortality, morbidity, length of post-operative in-hospital stay and the requirement for post-discharge convalescence were higher in this group.

scholarly journals Percutaneous or Transurethral Cystolithotomy for Bladder Lithiasis: Which is Safer?

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 17-22
Author(s):  
Joao Pimentel Torres ◽  
Vítor Fernandes ◽  
Nuno Morais ◽  
Sara Anacleto ◽  
Paulo Mota ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Prostate Hyperplasia ◽  
Median Hospital Stay ◽  
Urethral Strictures ◽  
Previous Diagnosis ◽  
Urethral Trauma ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Benign Prostate ◽  
Median Hospital

Introduction: Although the risk of urethral trauma while treating bladder stones is worrisome, evidence about the best treatment approach is scarce. The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of transurethral cystolithotomy and percutaneous suprapubic cystolithotomy in adults´ bladder lithiasis treatment. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 120 patients (January 2012 to December 2017) who were surgically treated for bladder lithiasis with percutaneous suprapubic cystolithotomy (n= 20) and transurethral cystolithotomy (n= 100). Age, gender, calculi size, surgery duration, hospital stay, post-operative infections, haematuria, pain and urethral strictures were evaluated. Previous diagnosis of benign prostate hyperplasia and urethral strictures were also considered. Results: Both groups were homogeneous according to the pre-operative variables evaluated, including calculi dimensions and simultaneous diagnosis. Median surgery time in percutaneous suprapubic cystolithotomy and transurethral cystolithotomy were 65 and 58 minutes, respectively (p= 0.043). Pain and haematuria were similar in both groups. Median hospital stay was 2.0 days in both groups. Median follow-up time was 13 months. In the transurethral cystolithotomy, three patients (3%) developed urethral stricture while none of the patients treated with PSC developed urethral strictures during the follow-up (p= 0.435). Discussion: Percutaneous suprapubic cystolithotomy theoretically offers an advantage over transurethral cystolithotomy in terms of urethral trauma, although we did not observe a significant difference. However, it deserves to be considered, especially in patients with known urethral strictures that may hinder transurethral access. Further prospective studies with more patients may however confirm these theoretical advantages.

scholarly journals Enhanced Recoveryafter Colorectal Surgery. Results from Aprospective Observational Two-Centre Study

2009 ◽  
Vol 98 (3) ◽  
pp. 155-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. C. Miohn ◽  
S. V. Bernardshaw ◽  
S.-M. Ristesund ◽  
P. E. Hovde Hansen ◽  
O. Rœkke
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Leisure Activities ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Daily Activities ◽  
Median Hospital Stay ◽  
Surgical Department ◽  
Preparation Period ◽  
Median Hospital

Background and Aims: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has reduced the median hospital stay from 8–10 days with traditional peri-operative routines to four days. The aim of the present study was to introduce the principles of ERAS in our hospital and measure the effect on hospital stay, complications and quality of life after discharge from hospital. Material and Methods: 94 consecutive patients, 40 males, 54 females, median age 66 years, were included in a prospective non-randomised observational study at Haukeland University Hospital and Haugesund Hospital from October 2000 until February 2003. After a three-month preparation period, the principles of ERAS were implemented. The results were evaluated with questionnaires and by follow-ups 8–10 and 30 days after surgery. The results were compared to the results of colorectal surgery before introduction of accelerated recovery. Results: 45 (48%) and 73 (78%) patients were discharged within three and five days after surgery with ERAS, compared to zero and seven (5%) patients with traditional recovery. The complication rate with ERAS was 31%, and the readmission rate was 15%. After one week, 57% had resumed their daily activities at home. After 30 days, 65% of the patients had resumed their normal and leisure activities. Conclusion: After a proper preparation period, ERAS principles may be implemented in surgical department, and is followed by a reduced median hospital stay and rapid return to normal daily activities for most patients after colorectal surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document