Prognosis and Reproducibility of New and Existing Binary Grading Systems for Endometrial Carcinoma Compared to FIGO Grading in Hysterectomy Specimens

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 654-660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Guan ◽  
Assaad Semaan ◽  
Sudeshna Bandyopadhyay ◽  
Haitham Arabi ◽  
Jining Feng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Grading System ◽  
Gynecology And Obstetrics ◽  
Grading Systems ◽  
Attractive Option ◽  
Endometrial Carcinomas ◽  
Prognostic Power

Background:The current International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) grade in endometrial carcinomas requires the evaluation of histologic features with proven prognostic value but with questionable reproducibility. This study tests the prognostic power and reproducibility of a new binary grading system.Study Design:Specimens from 254 hysterectomies were graded according to the new 3- and 2-tiered FIGO grading systems described by Alkushi et al. The selected morphologic parameters for the new grading system included the presence of predominant solid or papillary architecture pattern, severe nuclear atypia, tumor necrosis, and vascular invasion. The Cox proportional hazards and κ statistics were used for comparisons.Results:On multivariate analysis, and looking at all tumor cell types, the 4 tested grading systems were independent predictors of survival, with the 3-tiered FIGO grading system being the most predictive (P = 0.005). In the subset of endometrioid tumors, the 3- and 2-tiered FIGO grading systems and the new grading system retained their statistical significance as predictors of survival (P = 0.004, P = 0.03, and P = 0.007, respectively), whereas the grading system of Alkushi et al did not (P = 0.1). In nonendometrioid tumors, the new grading system proved to be the best predictor of survival, reaching near statistical significance (P = 0.06). The new grading system had acceptable intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility assessment (κ = 0.87 and κ = 0.45, respectively).Conclusion:The 3-tiered FIGO grading system retained its superior prognostic power. However, available binary grading systems remain an attractive option by being highly reproducible and by eliminating the clinical ambiguity of intermediate grades of disease.

scholarly journals Prognostic value of the ALBI grade among patients with single hepatocellular carcinoma without macrovascular invasion

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heng Zou ◽  
Wenhao Chen ◽  
Huan Wang ◽  
Li Xiong ◽  
Yu Wen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Grading System ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Proportional Hazards Regression ◽  
Disease Outcomes ◽  
Single Tumor

Abstract Overview and objective: Although evidence for the application of albumin–bilirubin (ALBI) grading system to assess liver function in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is available, less is known whether it can be applied to determine the prognosis of single HCC with different tumor sizes. This study aimed to address this gap.Methods: Here, we enrolled patients who underwent hepatectomy due to single HCC from the year 2010 to 2014. Analyses were performed to test the potential of ALBI grading system to monitor the long-term survival of single HCC subjects with varying tumor sizes.Results: Overall, 265 participants were recruited. The overall survival (OS) among patients whose tumors were ≤ 7 cm was remarkably higher compared to those whose tumors were > 7 cm. The Cox proportional hazards regression model identified the tumor differentiation grade, ALBI grade, and maximum tumor size as key determinants of the OS. The ALBI grade could stratify the patients who had a single tumor ≤ 7 cm into two distinct groups with different prognoses. The OS between ALBI grades 1 and 2 was comparable for patients who had a single tumor > 7 cm.Conclusions: We show that ALBI grading system can predict disease outcomes of single HCC patients with tumor size ≤ 7 cm. However, the ALBI grade may not predict capability the prognosis of patients with single tumor > 7 cm.

Prevalence, Classification, and Risk Factors for Postoperative Lower Extremity Lymphedema in Women With Gynecologic Malignancies: A Retrospective Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 751-757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hitoshi Hareyama ◽  
Kenichi Hada ◽  
Kumiko Goto ◽  
Sawako Watanabe ◽  
Minako Hakoyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Gynecology And Obstetrics ◽  
Independent Risk Factors ◽  
Stage 1

ObjectiveLower extremity lymphedema (LEL) is a major long-term complication of radical surgery. We aimed to estimate the incidence and grading of LEL in women who underwent lymphadenectomy and to evaluate risk factors associated with LEL.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 358 patients with cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancer who underwent transabdominal complete systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy between 1997 and 2011. Lower extremity lymphedema was graded according to criteria of the International Society of Lymphology. Incidence of LEL and its correlation with various clinical characteristics were investigated using Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazards methods.ResultsOverall incidence of LEL was 21.8% (stage 1, 60%; stage 2, 32%; and stage 3, 8%). Cumulative incidence increased with observation period: 12.9% at 1 year, 20.3% at 5 years, and 25.4% at 10 years. Age, cancer type, stage (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics), body mass index, hysterectomy type, lymphocyst formation, lymph node metastasis, and chemotherapy were not associated with LEL. Multivariate analysis confirmed that removal of circumflex iliac lymph nodes (hazard ratio [HR], 4.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.09–8.77; P < 0.0001), cellulitis (HR, 3.48; 95% CI, 2.03–5.98; P < 0.0001), and number of removed lymph nodes (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98–0.99; P = 0.038) were independent risk factors for LEL.ConclusionsPostoperative LEL incidence increased over time. The results of the present study showed a significant correlation with removal of circumflex iliac lymph nodes and cellulitis with the incidence of LEL. Multicenter or prospective studies are required to clarify treatment efficacies.

Digoxin exposure and prostate cancer mortality: A matched cohort study.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13096-e13096 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evelyn Flahavan ◽  
Kathleen Bennett ◽  
Linda Sharp ◽  
Thomas Ian Barron
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Hypoxia Inducible Factor ◽  
Epidemiological Studies ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
Covariate Balance ◽  
Exposure Response

e13096 Background: Digoxin (DIG) exposure has been associated with reduced prostate cancer (PC) incidence in epidemiological studies. Preclinical data suggests that this anti-cancer effect is mediated through the inhibition of hypoxia-inducible factor 1-α by DIG. This retrospective cohort study examines associations between DIG exposure and mortality in men with PC. Methods: Men diagnosed with PC during 2001–2006 were identified from National Cancer Registry Ireland records and linked prescription claims data. Propensity scores for DIG exposure in the 90 days prior to PC diagnosis were estimated. DIG exposed and unexposed men were matched (1:1) within a calliper of 0.2 standard deviations of the propensity score logit, using greedy matching without replacement. Standardized differences were used to assess covariate balance (z-score <0.1) between matched cohorts. Hazard ratios (HR) for associations between DIG exposure and all-cause (ACM) or PC-specific (PCM) mortality were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, comorbidity, tumour stage and grade. Categorical exposure-response analyses were carried out using tertiles of exposure (low, intermediate, high) in the 90 days pre-diagnosis. Results: 5734 PC cases were identified from the linked database. 395 cases received DIG in the 90 days pre-diagnosis, of which 391 were matched to unexposed controls. Matched covariate balance was acceptable. In adjusted analyses, DIG exposure was not associated with ACM (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.88-1.27) but was associated with a small but non-significant reduction in the risk of PCM (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.68-1.17). In the exposure-response analysis, DIG exposure in the highest tertile, but not in the intermediate or lower tertiles, was associated with a reduced risk of PCM approaching statistical significance (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.47-1.01, p=0.059). Men in the high DIG exposure group received a supply of DIG for 98% of their eligible follow up in the year post diagnosis. Post diagnostic DIG exposure in the intermediate and lower tertiles was 94% and 80% respectively. Conclusions: DIG exposure was associated with a non-significant decrease in PCM. Stratification by exposure suggests the presence of an exposure-response relationship.

Integration of bone scan (BS) and computerized tomography (CT) findings as an endpoint to assess bone metastasis in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 191-191
Author(s):  
Scott J. Parker ◽  
Gregory Russell Pond ◽  
Guru Sonpavde ◽  
Anitha Alex ◽  
Marta Elise Heilbrun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Bone Metastasis ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Bone Lesions ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Ct Findings ◽  
Significant Difference

191 Background: Progression of bone metastasis in mCRPC is assessed solely by BS findings and correlates modestly with overall survival (OS). Given the lack of reliability of BS findings and the ready availability of routinely performed CT scans, which commonly identify bone metastases, we aimed to better assess progression in bone by integrating BS and CT findings and to explore their association with OS. Methods: Data were obtained from patients treated at the University of Utah receiving docetaxel-based chemotherapy (D) or post-docetaxel therapy with orteronel (O). Patients with both baseline and on-therapy CT and BS within 90 days were eligible for analysis. CT and BS underwent central radiology review for bone lesions by a single radiologist. Progressive disease (PD) was defined as ≥ 1 new lesion. Survival was measured from start of therapy. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to explore potential prognosticators of overall survival (OS). Statistical significance was defined as 2-sided p < 0.05. Therapy was a stratification factor. Results: Twenty-eight patients were evaluable including 18 patients receiving D, and 10 receiving O post-docetaxel. The mean age of these patients was 71.4 years and median (95% CI) overall survival was 18.4 (9.7-35.4) months. Four patients had PD on both BS and CT, while 2 (7%) had PD on CT but not BS and 3 had PD on BS but not CT. Patients with PD on BS or CT had worse OS (HR = 2.68, 95% CI = 1.04-6.90, p = 0.041) than those with no PD on either CT or BS. Looking at individual lesions, 4 (14%) patients had new lesions identified on CT which was not observed using BS, and they were associated with worse OS (HR = 3.72, 1.01-13.66, p = 0.048). Conversely, no significant difference in OS was observed for 4 patients with lesions identified on BS which were not observed using CT (HR = 2.67, 0.58-12.32, p = 0.21). Conclusions: This hypothesis-generating study suggests that CT can complement and enhance the ability of BS to capture PD and predict OS. Integration of BS findings using Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG)-3 guidelines to define PD and CT bone findings should be investigated in a larger study as an intermediate endpoint.

Neutrophils lymphocyte ratio role in predicting response to checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic non-small lung cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20646-e20646
Author(s):  
Hosam Hakim ◽  
Ahmed Abdalla ◽  
Tarik H. Hadid
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Immune Therapy ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
P Value ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Metastatic Nsclc

e20646 Background: There have been numerous advances in the management of metastatic lung cancer, including targeted therapy against certain mutations in cancer cells and later developing immune therapy with check point inhibitors.From the pre-immune therapy era, a simple blood test allowing the calculation of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was established as a strong prognostic marker associated with worse overall survival (OS) in several tumor types including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: We have retrospectively reviewed electronic medical records for patients with Metastatic NSCLC whom received at least one dose of Checkpoint Inhibitors from January 2014 till January 2019 in Van Eslander Cancer Center.The analysis was done using SPSS v. 25.0 and a p-value of 0.05 or less was considered to indicate statistical significance. A univariant analysis was done using Student’s t-test, the Mann-Whitney U test and the chi-squared test. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan Meier methodology as well as Cox proportional hazards models. Results: There were 80 patients with metastatic NSCLC received at least one dose of a checkpoint inhibitor. Median age was 63.9 ± 9.3; Males were 45%; Whites were 62.5%. 67.5% of patient had adenocarcinoma and 24% had squamous cell carcinoma. Twenty patients had brain metastasis (25%) and nineteen patients had liver metastasis (24.6%). Eleven patients (13.8%) had PDL-1 greater than 50% and 11 patients (13.8%) had PDL-1 between 1%-50% and 22 patients (27.5%) had negative PD-L1 status. 18.8% received immunotherapy as a first-line treatment and 65% got immunotherapy on their second line and 16.3% had immunotherapy as the third line of treatment or more. Sixty-one patients (76.2%) received Nivolumab and nineteen patients (23.8%) received pembrolizumab. Mean duration of immunotherapy was 13.7 months ± 20.7. Mean NLR was 6.1 ± 5. Patient with NLR > 5:1 had statistically significant higher progression-free survival (PFS) 27.5 months compared to 12 months P = 0.02. Also, Patients with baseline NLR > 5:1 had a trend toward higher median overall survival (OS) but was not statistically significant 41 months compared to 12 months P = 0.08. Conclusions: Our data showed similar finding to Bagley et al and other retrospective analysis from multiple institutes showing that NLR could be a good predictor of response to checkpoint inhibitors And a cutoff of NLR higher than 5.1 was associated with statistically significant better PFS and a trend towards a better OS.

Significance of tertiary pattern 5 in patients with gleason score 7 after radical prostatectomy.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 117-117
Author(s):  
Jiakun Li ◽  
Yaochuan Guo ◽  
Shi Qiu ◽  
Mingjing He ◽  
Kun Jin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Strong Association ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Gleason Pattern ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Models

117 Background: To evaluate the association between tertiary Gleason pattern (TGP) 5 and the biochemical recurrence (BCR) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) of Gleason score (GS) 7 after radical prostatectomy(RP). Methods: This retrospective study collected 387 patients received RP and diagnosed GS 7 (3+4 or 4+3) in the West China Hospital from January 2009 to December 2017.Regardlessly the first Gleason pattern, patients were divide into 2 groups: TGP5 absence and TGP5 presence. Furthermore, we added the primary Gleason pattern to divided patients into 4 groups: GS 3+4, GS 3+4/TGP 5, Gleason 4+3, Gleason 4+3/TGP 5. Cox proportional-hazards models was used to evaluate the association between the status of TGP5 and BCR after adjusting the confounding factors with follow-up time as the underlying time scale. All the analyses were conducted with the use of statistical software packages Rnand EmpowerStats and conducted as two sides and P values less than 0.05 were considered statistical significance. Results: In the results by using Cox proportional-hazards model, regardless the primary Gleason pattern, comparing TGP5 absence (89.7%) and presence (10.3%), the risk of BCR for patients with tertiary Gleason pattern 5 presence was statistically significantly higher than absence (P = 0.02, HR = 2.24, 95%Cl: 1.12-4.49). In terms of the patients with primary Gleason pattern 4, the risk of BCR for patients with Gleason 4+3/TGP5 was statistically significantly higher than Gleason 4+3.(P = 0.02, HR = 2.56, 95%Cl: 1.16-5.67). There was a marked trend that patients with Gleason 3+4/TGP 5 has a higher risk of BCR compared with patients with Gleason 3+4, although there was no statistical difference (P = 0.58, HR = 1.82, 95%Cl: 0.22-14.96). Conclusions: The TGP5 in patients with GS 7 had strong association with the risk of BCR and it was an independent predictor for BCR. This result was more obvious in patients with GS 7 (4+3) in our study. Further researches with larger data size were needed to confirm these funding.

scholarly journals Statins in Patients with COVID-19: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Iranian COVID-19 Patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Payam Peymani ◽  
Tania Dehesh ◽  
Farnaz Aligolighasemabadi ◽  
Mohammadamin Sadeghdoust ◽  
Katarzyna Kotfis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lower Risk ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Statin Treatment ◽  
Careful Consideration ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Statin Use

Abstract Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has profoundly affected the lives of millions of people. To date, there is no approved vaccine or specific drug to prevent or treat COVID-19, while the infection is spreading at an alarming rate globally. Because the development of effective vaccines or novel drugs could take several months (if not years), repurposing existing drugs is considered a more efficient strategy that could save lives now. Statins constitute a class of lipid-lowering drugs with proven safety profiles and many known beneficial pleiotropic effects. Our previous investigations showed that statins have antiviral effects and are involved in the process of wound healing in the lung. This triggered us to evaluate if statin use reduces mortality in COVID-19 patients. Results: After initial recruitment of 459 patients with COVID-19 (Shiraz province, Iran) and careful consideration of the exclusion criteria, a total of 150 patients, of which 75 received statins, were included in our retrospective study. Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used to estimate the association between statin use and rate of death. After propensity score matching, we found that statin use appeared to be associated with a lower risk of morbidity [HR=0.85, 95% CI=(0.02, 3.93), P=0.762] and lower risk of death [(HR= 0.76; 95% CI=(0.16, 3.72), P=0.735)]; however, these associations did not reach statistical significance. Furthermore, statin use reduced the chance of being subjected to mechanical ventilation [OR=0.96, 95% CI=(0.61–2.99), P=0.942] and patients on statins had a more normal computed tomography (CT) scan result [OR=0.41, 95% CI= (0.07–2.33), P=0.312]. Conclusions: Although we could not demonstrate a significant association between statin use and a reduction in mortality in patients with COVID19 , we do feel that our results are promising and of clinical relevance and warrant the need for prospective randomized controlled trials and extensive retrospective studies to validate the potential beneficial effects of statin treatment on clinical symptoms and mortality rates associated with COVID-19.

scholarly journals Factors that Influence the Duration of Symptom Resolution in COVID-19 Patients in Ethiopia: A Follow up Study Involving 60 Symptomatic Cases.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saro Abrahim ◽  
Masresha Tesema ◽  
Eshetu Ejeta ◽  
Mahammed Ahmed ◽  
Atkure Defar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Duration ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Treatment Center ◽  
Symptom Resolution ◽  
Proportional Hazards Regression ◽  
Study Participants

Abstract Background: The newly identified virus, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus-two (SARS-CoV-2) has claimed more than a million lives worldwide since it was first recognized in Wuhan, China in December 2019. Understanding the clinical features of COVID-19 and duration for resolution of symptoms is crucial for isolation of patients and tailoring public health messaging, interventions, and policy. Therefore, this study aims to assess the median duration of COVID-19 signs and symptoms resolution and explore it’s predictors among symptomatic COVID-19 patients in EthiopiaMethods: A hospital-based prospective cohort study involving 60 COVID-19 cases was conducted at Eka Kotebe General Hospital, COVID-19 Isolation and Treatment Center. The study participants were all symptomatic COVID-19 adult patients admitted to the hospital from March 18 to June 27, 2020. Physicians at the center recorded the data using a log sheet. Cox proportional-hazards regression model was conducted. Statistical significance was defined at P<0.05. All analyses were done using STATA version 16.1 software.Results: A total of 60 symptomatic COVID-19 patients with a mean age of 34.8 years (+1.8) were involved in the study. The median duration of symptom resolution of COVID-19 was seven days with a minimum of two and a maximum of 68 days. Sex and Body Mass Index (BMI) were statistically significant predictors of the symptom resolution. The hazard of having delayed sign or symptom resolution in males was 55% higher than in females (P=0.039, CI: 0.22 to 0.96) and the hazard of the delayed sign or symptom in those with BMI ≥25 was 48% higher than in those with BMI <25 (P=0.051; CI: 0.272 to 1.003). In this study, age and comorbidity had no association with the duration of sign or symptom resolution in COVID-19 patients.Conclusions: The median duration of COVID-19 symptom resolution was seven days. Being male or having a BMI ≥ 25 were predictors for having a delayed sign or symptom resolution time. Therefore, understanding the duration of COVID-19 sign or symptom resolution helps to guide the patient isolation period and prioritize COVID-19 patients to be shielded.

scholarly journals A molecularly integrated grade for meningioma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Driver ◽  
Samantha E Hoffman ◽  
Sherwin Tavakol ◽  
Eleanor Woodward ◽  
Eduardo A Maury ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
World Health ◽  
Brier Score ◽  
Gradient Boosting ◽  
Grading System ◽  
Prognostic Information ◽  
Who Grade

Abstract Background Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumor in adults. Clinical care is currently guided by the World Health Organization (WHO) grade assigned to meningiomas, a 3-tiered grading system based on histopathology features, as well as extent of surgical resection. Clinical behavior, however, often fails to conform to the WHO grade. Additional prognostic information is needed to optimize patient management. Methods We evaluated whether chromosomal copy-number data improved prediction of time-to-recurrence for patients with meningioma who were treated with surgery, relative to the WHO schema. The models were developed using Cox proportional hazards, random survival forest, and gradient boosting in a discovery cohort of 527 meningioma patients and validated in 2 independent cohorts of 172 meningioma patients characterized by orthogonal genomic platforms. Results We developed a 3-tiered grading scheme (Integrated Grades 1-3), which incorporated mitotic count and loss of chromosome 1p, 3p, 4, 6, 10, 14q, 18, 19, or CDKN2A. 32% of meningiomas reclassified to either a lower-risk or higher-risk Integrated Grade compared to their assigned WHO grade. The Integrated Grade more accurately identified meningioma patients at risk for recurrence, relative to the WHO grade, as determined by time-dependent area under the curve, average precision, and the Brier score. Conclusion We propose a molecularly integrated grading scheme for meningiomas that significantly improves upon the current WHO grading system in prediction of progression-free survival. This framework can be broadly adopted by clinicians with relative ease using widely available genomic technologies and presents an advance in the care of meningioma patients.

scholarly journals Remdesivir treatment in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a comparative analysis of in-hospital all-cause mortality in a large multi-center observational cohort

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Essy Mozaffari ◽  
Aastha Chandak ◽  
Zhiji Zhang ◽  
Shuting Liang ◽  
Mark Thrun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Supplemental Oxygen ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Healthcare Database ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽  
High Flow Oxygen ◽  
Oxygenation Level

Abstract Background Remdesivir (RDV) improved clinical outcomes among hospitalized COVID-19 patients in randomized trials, but data from clinical practice are limited. Methods We examined survival outcomes for US patients hospitalized with COVID-19 between Aug-Nov 2020 and treated with RDV within two-days of hospitalization vs. those not receiving RDV during their hospitalization using the Premier Healthcare Database. Preferential within-hospital propensity score matching with replacement was used. Additionally, patients were also matched on baseline oxygenation level (no supplemental oxygen charges (NSO), low-flow oxygen (LFO), high-flow oxygen/non-invasive ventilation (HFO/NIV) and invasive mechanical ventilation/ECMO (IMV/ECMO) and two-month admission window and excluded if discharged within 3-days of admission (to exclude anticipated discharges/transfers within 72-hrs consistent with ACTT-1 study). Cox Proportional Hazards models were used to assess time to 14-/28-day mortality overall and for patients on NSO, LFO, HFO/NIV and IMV/ECMO. Results 28,855 RDV patients were matched to 16,687 unique non-RDV patients. Overall, 10.6% and 15.4% RDV patients died within 14- and 28-days, respectively compared with 15.4% and 19.1% non-RDV patients. Overall, RDV was associated with a reduction in mortality at 14-days (HR[95% CI]: 0.76[0.70−0.83]) and 28-days (0.89[0.82−0.96]). This mortality benefit was also seen for NSO, LFO and IMV/ECMO at 14-days (NSO:0.69[0.57−0.83], LFO:0.68[0.80−0.77], IMV/ECMO:0.70[0.58−0.84]) and 28-days (NSO:0.80[0.68−0.94], LFO:0.77[0.68−0.86], IMV/ECMO:0.81[0.69−0.94]). Additionally, HFO/NIV RDV group had a lower risk of mortality at 14-days (0.81[0.70−0.93]) but no statistical significance at 28-days. Conclusions RDV initiated upon hospital admission was associated with improved survival among COVID-19 patients. Our findings complement ACTT-1 and support RDV as a foundational treatment for hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document