scholarly journals The ankle brachial index exhibits better association with cardiovascular outcomes than interarm systolic blood pressure difference in patients with type 2 diabetes

Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (19) ◽  
pp. e15556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang-Yu Lin ◽  
Chii-Min Hwu ◽  
Chia-Huei Chu ◽  
Justin G.S. Won ◽  
Harn-Shen Chen ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. e40-e41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimiliano Fedecostante ◽  
Francesco Spannella ◽  
Federico Giulietti ◽  
Maddalena Ricci ◽  
Marianna Pavani ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e000787 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rianneke de Ritter ◽  
Simone J S Sep ◽  
Carla J H van der Kallen ◽  
Miranda T Schram ◽  
Annemarie Koster ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo investigate whether adverse differences in levels of cardiovascular risk factors in women than men, already established when comparing individuals with and without diabetes, are also present before type 2 diabetes onset.Research design and methodsIn a population-based cohort study of individuals aged 40-75 years (n=3410; 49% women, 29% type 2 diabetes (oversampled by design)), we estimated associations with cardiometabolic and lifestyle risk factors of (1) pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes (reference category: normal glucose metabolism) and (2) among non-diabetic individuals, of continuous levels of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Age-adjusted sex differences were analyzed using linear and logistic regression models with sex interaction terms.ResultsIn pre-diabetes, adverse differences in cardiometabolic risk factors were greater in women than men for systolic blood pressure (difference, 3.02 mm Hg; 95% CI:−0.26 to 6.30), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (difference, −0.10 mmol/L; 95% CI: −0.18 to −0.02), total-to-HDL cholesterol ratio (difference, 0.22; 95% CI: −0.01 to 0.44), triglycerides (ratio: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.22), and inflammation markers Z-score (ratio: 1.18; 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.41). In type 2 diabetes, these sex differences were similar in direction, and of greater magnitude. Additionally, HbA1c among non-diabetic individuals was more strongly associated with several cardiometabolic risk factors in women than men: per one per cent point increase, systolic blood pressure (difference, 3.58 mm Hg; 95% CI: −0.03 to 7.19), diastolic blood pressure (difference, 2.10 mm Hg; 95% CI: −0.02 to 4.23), HDL cholesterol (difference, −0.09 mmol/L; 95% CI: −0.19 to 0.00), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (difference, 0.26 mmol/L; 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.47). With regard to lifestyle risk factors, no consistent pattern was observed.ConclusionOur results are consistent with the concept that the more adverse changes in cardiometabolic risk factors in women (than men) arise as a continuous process before the onset of type 2 diabetes.


Diabetes Care ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 1134-1141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Yuk Fai Wan ◽  
Esther Yee Tak Yu ◽  
Weng Yee Chin ◽  
Colman Siu Cheung Fung ◽  
Daniel Yee Tak Fong ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 59 (563) ◽  
pp. 428-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher E Clark ◽  
Colin J Greaves ◽  
Philip H Evans ◽  
Andy Dickens ◽  
John L Campbell

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Anand Jadhao ◽  
Saumya Naik ◽  
Megha Bhonde ◽  
Saurabh Mishra

In type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-2), cardiovascular diseases are the important cause of mortality and morbidity. Regular monitoring of the diabetic condition is essential for the proper management of diabetes & effective controlling of diabetes-related complications. As the recording of IAD (Interarm blood pressure difference) is a simple procedure and it is also related to the vascular complication, it can be a vital indicator of the severity of diabetes. So, it is very important to study IAD concerning Complicated and Non-Complicated DM-2 which will be helpful for planning a better clinical management. In this cross-sectional study, we compare Interarm blood pressure difference in three groups i.e. Control, Non-Complicated DM-2 and Complicated DM-2 groups. There is a significant increase in systolic IAD in DM-2 group as compared to the control group, but no significant difference found between Non-Complicated and Complicated DM-2 groups.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document