scholarly journals Mechanisms involved in regulating DNA replication origins during the cell cycle and in response to DNA damage

Author(s):  
Anne Early ◽  
Lucy S. Drury ◽  
John F. X. Diffley

Replication origins in eukaryotic cells never fire more than once in a given S phase. Here, we summarize the role of cyclin–dependent kinases in limiting DNA replication origin usage to once per cell cycle in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae . We have examined the role of different cyclins in the phosphorylation and regulation of several replication/regulatory factors including Cdc6, Sic1, ORC and DNA polymerase α–primase. In addition to being regulated by the cell cycle machinery, replication origins are also regulated by the genome integrity checkpoint kinases, Mec1 and Rad53. In response to DNA damage or drugs which interfere with the progression of replication forks, the activation of late–firing replication origins is inhibited. There is evidence indicating that the temporal programme of origin firing depends upon the local histone acetylation state. We have attempted to test the possibility that checkpoint regulation of late–origin firing operates through the regulation of the acetylation state. We found that overexpression of the essential histone acetylase, Esa1, cannot override checkpoint regulation of origin firing. We have also constructed a temperature–sensitive esa1 mutant. This mutant is unable to resume cell cycle progression after α–factor arrest. This can be overcome by overexpression of the G1 cyclin, Cln2, revealing a novel role for Esa1 in regulating Start.

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen Ho ◽  
Hongwei Luo ◽  
Wei Zhu ◽  
Yi Tang

AbstractCHK1 is a crucial DNA damage checkpoint kinase and its activation, which requires ATR and RAD17, leads to inhibition of DNA replication and cell cycle progression. Recently, we reported that SMG7 stabilizes and activates p53 to induce G1 arrest upon DNA damage; here we show that SMG7 plays a critical role in the activation of the ATR-CHK1 axis. Following genotoxic stress, SMG7-null cells exhibit deficient ATR signaling, indicated by the attenuated phosphorylation of CHK1 and RPA32, and importantly, unhindered DNA replication and fork progression. Through its 14-3-3 domain, SMG7 interacts directly with the Ser635-phosphorylated RAD17 and promotes chromatin retention of the 9-1-1 complex by the RAD17-RFC, an essential step to CHK1 activation. Furthermore, through maintenance of CHK1 activity, SMG7 controls G2-M transition and facilitates orderly cell cycle progression during recovery from replication stress. Taken together, our data reveals SMG7 as an indispensable signaling component in the ATR-CHK1 pathway during genotoxic stress response.


2019 ◽  
Vol 202 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter E. Burby ◽  
Lyle A. Simmons

ABSTRACT All organisms regulate cell cycle progression by coordinating cell division with DNA replication status. In eukaryotes, DNA damage or problems with replication fork progression induce the DNA damage response (DDR), causing cyclin-dependent kinases to remain active, preventing further cell cycle progression until replication and repair are complete. In bacteria, cell division is coordinated with chromosome segregation, preventing cell division ring formation over the nucleoid in a process termed nucleoid occlusion. In addition to nucleoid occlusion, bacteria induce the SOS response after replication forks encounter DNA damage or impediments that slow or block their progression. During SOS induction, Escherichia coli expresses a cytoplasmic protein, SulA, that inhibits cell division by directly binding FtsZ. After the SOS response is turned off, SulA is degraded by Lon protease, allowing for cell division to resume. Recently, it has become clear that SulA is restricted to bacteria closely related to E. coli and that most bacteria enforce the DNA damage checkpoint by expressing a small integral membrane protein. Resumption of cell division is then mediated by membrane-bound proteases that cleave the cell division inhibitor. Further, many bacterial cells have mechanisms to inhibit cell division that are regulated independently from the canonical LexA-mediated SOS response. In this review, we discuss several pathways used by bacteria to prevent cell division from occurring when genome instability is detected or before the chromosome has been fully replicated and segregated.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2687-2687
Author(s):  
Hengyou Weng ◽  
Huilin Huang ◽  
Xi Qin ◽  
He Huang ◽  
Okwang Kwon ◽  
...  

Abstract DNA cytosine methylation is one of the best-characterized epigenetic modifications that play important roles in diverse cellular and pathological processes. The mechanism underlying the dynamic regulation of the level and distribution of 5-methylcytosine (5mC) as well as the biological consequence of DNA methylation deregulation have been interesting research topics in recent years. TET1, first identified as a fusion partner of the histone H3 Lys4 (H3K4) methyltransferase MLL (mixed-lineage leukemia) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), is the founding member of the Ten-Eleven-Translocation (TET) family of DNA hydroxylases which are capable of converting 5mC to 5hmC (5-hydroxymethylcytosine) and lead to gene activation. Our group has previously demonstrated that TET1 plays an oncogenic role in MLL-rearranged leukemia (Huang H, et al. PNAS 2013; 110(29):11994-9). The expression of the TET1 protein and the global level of its enzymatic product, 5hmC, are significantly up-regulated in MLL-rearranged leukemia, whereas the opposite has been reported in other cancers where TET1 functions as a tumor suppressor. Therefore, a global understanding of the targets of TET1 in MLL-rearranged leukemia would greatly help to understand the role of TET1 in this specific type of AML. To this end, we performed proteomics study in parallel with RNA-seq to systematically explore the functional targets of TET1 in a genome-wide and unbiased way. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC)-based proteomic profiling showed that when Tet1 was knocked down in MLL-ENL-estrogen receptor inducible (ERtm) mouse myeloid leukemia cells, a total of 123 proteins were down-regulated whereas 191 were up-regulated with a fold-change cutoff of 1.2 (Fig. 1A and B), representing positively and negatively regulated targets of TET1, respectively. Most of the proteins with altered expression upon Tet1 knock-down showed a corresponding change at the mRNA level as reflected by the RNA-seq data. Interestingly, gene ontology (GO) analysis indicated enrichment on genes associated with DNA replication and cell cycle progression. Among these genes, the minichromosome maintenance complex genes, including MCM2, MCM3, MCM4, MCM5, MCM6, and MCM7, showed significant downregulation when Tet1 expression was depleted. We further conducted chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays and demonstrated that TET1 binds directly to the CpG islands in the promoters of these MCM genes, suggesting that the regulation of the MCM genes by TET1 may occur at the transcriptional level. The six main minichromosome maintenance proteins (MCM2-7) are recruited to DNA replication origins in early G1 phase of the cell cycle and constitute the core of the replicative DNA helicase. We showed that not only the total levels of the MCM2-7 proteins, but also their binding to chromatin (Fig. 1C), were decreased by shRNAs against TET1 in human leukemia cell lines. Examination on cell cycle distribution revealed a significant decrease in the S phase population upon TET1 knockdown (Fig. 1D), which could be phenocopied by silencing of individual MCM genes. Consistently, incorporation of 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EdU) into newly synthesized DNA in the S phase can be inhibited by TET1 shRNAs (Fig. 1E), indicating the inhibition on DNA replication by TET1 silencing. Furthermore, DNA combing assays suggest that TET1 knockdown inhibits new origin firing (Fig. 1F) but does not influence replication fork speed. Collectively, our findings reveal a novel role of TET1 on regulating DNA replication in MLL-rearranged leukemia through targeting of MCM genes and highlight the therapeutic implication of targeting the TET1/MCM signaling. Figure 1 Role of TET1 in regulate DNA replication by controlling expression of MCM genes Figure 1. Role of TET1 in regulate DNA replication by controlling expression of MCM genes Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 1346-1357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavol Cekan ◽  
Keisuke Hasegawa ◽  
Yu Pan ◽  
Emily Tubman ◽  
David Odde ◽  
...  

The coordination of cell cycle progression with the repair of DNA damage supports the genomic integrity of dividing cells. The function of many factors involved in DNA damage response (DDR) and the cell cycle depends on their Ran GTPase–regulated nuclear–cytoplasmic transport (NCT). The loading of Ran with GTP, which is mediated by RCC1, the guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Ran, is critical for NCT activity. However, the role of RCC1 or Ran⋅GTP in promoting cell proliferation or DDR is not clear. We show that RCC1 overexpression in normal cells increased cellular Ran⋅GTP levels and accelerated the cell cycle and DNA damage repair. As a result, normal cells overexpressing RCC1 evaded DNA damage–induced cell cycle arrest and senescence, mimicking colorectal carcinoma cells with high endogenous RCC1 levels. The RCC1-induced inhibition of senescence required Ran and exportin 1 and involved the activation of importin β–dependent nuclear import of 53BP1, a large NCT cargo. Our results indicate that changes in the activity of the Ran⋅GTP–regulated NCT modulate the rate of the cell cycle and the efficiency of DNA repair. Through the essential role of RCC1 in regulation of cellular Ran⋅GTP levels and NCT, RCC1 expression enables the proliferation of cells that sustain DNA damage.


2000 ◽  
Vol 113 (7) ◽  
pp. 1199-1211
Author(s):  
G. Buscemi ◽  
F. Saracino ◽  
D. Masnada ◽  
M.L. Carbone

The organization of the actin cytoskeleton is essential for several cellular processes. Here we report the characterization of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae novel gene, SDA1, encoding a highly conserved protein, which is essential for cell viability and is localized in the nucleus. Depletion or inactivation of Sda1 cause cell cycle arrest in G(1) by blocking both budding and DNA replication, without loss of viability. Furthermore, sda1-1 temperature-sensitive mutant cells arrest at the non-permissive temperature mostly without detectable structures of polymerized actin, although a normal actin protein level is maintained, indicating that Sda1 is required for proper organization of the actin cytoskeleton. To our knowledge, this is the first mutation shown to cause such a phenotype. Recovery of Sda1 activity restores proper assembly of actin structures, as well as budding and DNA replication. Furthermore we show that direct actin perturbation, either in sda1-1 or in cdc28-13 cells released from G(1) block, prevents recovery of budding and DNA replication. We also show that the block in G(1) caused by loss of Sda1 function is independent of Swe1. Altogether our results suggest that disruption of F-actin structure can block cell cycle progression in G(1) and that Sda1 is involved in the control of the actin cytoskeleton.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Divya Ramalingam Iyer ◽  
Nicholas Rhind

AbstractIn response to DNA damage during S phase, cells slow DNA replication. This slowing is orchestrated by the intra-S checkpoint and involves inhibition of origin firing and reduction of replication fork speed. Slowing of replication allows for tolerance of DNA damage and suppresses genomic instability. Although the mechanisms of origin inhibition by the intra-S checkpoint are understood, major questions remain about how the checkpoint regulates replication forks: Does the checkpoint regulate the rate of fork progression? Does the checkpoint affect all forks, or only those encountering damage? Does the checkpoint facilitate the replication of polymerase-blocking lesions? To address these questions, we have analyzed the checkpoint in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe using a single-molecule DNA combing assay, which allows us to unambiguously separate the contribution of origin and fork regulation towards replication slowing, and allows us to investigate the behavior of individual forks. Moreover, we have interrogated the role of forks interacting with individual sites of damage by using three damaging agents—MMS, 4NQO and bleomycin—that cause similar levels of replication slowing with very different frequency of DNA lesions. We find that the checkpoint slows replication by inhibiting origin firing, but not by decreasing fork rates. However, the checkpoint appears to facilitate replication of damaged templates, allowing forks to more quickly pass lesions. Finally, using a novel analytic approach, we rigorously identify fork stalling events in our combing data and show that they play a previously unappreciated role in shaping replication kinetics in response to DNA damage.Author SummaryFaithful duplication of the genome is essential for genetic stability of organisms and species. To ensure faithful duplication, cells must be able to replicate damaged DNA. To do so, they employ checkpoints that regulate replication in response to DNA damage. However, the mechanisms by which checkpoints regulate DNA replication forks, the macromolecular machines that contain the helicases and polymerases required to unwind and copy the parental DNA, is unknown. We have used DNA combing, a single-molecule technique that allows us to monitor the progression of individual replication forks, to characterize the response of fission yeast replication forks to DNA damage that blocks the replicative polymerases. We find that forks pass most lesions with only a brief pause and that this lesion bypass is checkpoint independent. However, at a low frequency, forks stall at lesions, and that the checkpoint is required to prevent these stalls from accumulating single-stranded DNA. Our results suggest that the major role of the checkpoint is not to regulate the interaction of replication forks with DNA damage, per se, but to mitigate the consequences of fork stalling when forks are unable to successfully navigate DNA damage on their own.


Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (19) ◽  
pp. 4281-4293 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Landis ◽  
J. Tower

The Drosophila chorion genes encode the major protein components of the chorion (eggshell) and are arranged in two clusters in the genome. To meet the demand for rapid chorion synthesis, Drosophila ovary follicle cells amplify the chorion gene clusters approximately 80-fold. Amplification proceeds through repeated firing of one or more DNA replication origins located near the center of each gene cluster. Hypomorphic mutant alleles of the chiffon gene cause thin, fragile chorions and female sterility, and were found to eliminate chorion gene amplification. Null alleles of chiffon had the additional phenotypes of rough eyes and thin thoracic bristles: phenotypes often associated with disruption of normal cell cycle. The chiffon locus was cloned by chromosomal walking from the nearby cactus locus. A 6.5 kb transcript was identified and confirmed to be chiffon by sequencing of mutant alleles and by phenotypic rescue with genomic transformation constructs. The protein predicted by translation of the 5.1 kb chiffon ORF contains two domains related to the S. cerevisiae Dbf4 regulator of DNA replication origin firing and cell cycle progression: a 44 residue domain designated CDDN1 (43% identical) and a 41 residue domain designated CDDN2 (12% identical). The CDDN domains were also found in the S. pombe homolog of Dbf4, Dfp1, as well as in the proteins predicted by translation of the Aspergillus nimO gene and specific human and mouse clones. The data suggest a family of eukaryotic proteins related to Dbf4 and involved in initiation of DNA replication.


2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (24) ◽  
pp. 7442-7450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sathyavageeswaran Shreeram ◽  
Weng Kee Hee ◽  
Dmitry V. Bulavin

ABSTRACT The cell division cycle 25A (Cdc25A) phosphatase is a critical regulator of cell cycle progression under normal conditions and after stress. Stress-induced degradation of Cdc25A has been proposed as a major way of delaying cell cycle progression. In vitro studies pointed toward serine 123 as a key site in regulation of Cdc25A stability after exposure to ionizing radiation (IR). To address the role of this phosphorylation site in vivo, we generated a knock-in mouse in which alanine was substituted for serine 123. The Cdc25 S123A knock-in mice appeared normal, and, unexpectedly, cells derived from them exhibited unperturbed cell cycle and DNA damage responses. In turn, we found that Cdc25A was present in centrosomes and that Cdc25A levels were not reduced after IR in knock-in cells. This resulted in centrosome amplification due to lack of induction of Cdk2 inhibitory phosphorylation after IR specifically in centrosomes. Further, Cdc25A knock-in animals appeared sensitive to IR-induced carcinogenesis. Our findings indicate that Cdc25A S123 phosphorylation is crucial for coupling centrosome duplication to DNA replication cycles after DNA damage and therefore is likely to play a role in the regulation of tumorigenesis.


1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 4291-4302 ◽  
Author(s):  
E A Vallen ◽  
F R Cross

The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has three G1 cyclin (CLN) genes with overlapping functions. To analyze the functions of the various CLN genes, we examined mutations that result in lethality in conjunction with loss of cln1 and cln2. We have isolated alleles of RAD27/ERC11/YKL510, the yeast homolog of the gene encoding flap endonuclease 1, FEN-1.cln1 cln2 rad27/erc11 cells arrest in S phase; this cell cycle arrest is suppressed by the expression of CLN1 or CLN2 but not by that of CLN3 or the hyperactive CLN3-2. rad27/erc11 mutants are also defective in DNA damage repair, as determined by their increased sensitivity to a DNA-damaging agent, increased mitotic recombination rates, and increased spontaneous mutation rates. Unlike the block in cell cycle progression, these phenotypes are not suppressed by CLN1 or CLN2. CLN1 and CLN2 may activate an RAD27/ERC11-independent pathway specific for DNA synthesis that CLN3 is incapable of activating. Alternatively, CLN1 and CLN2 may be capable of overriding a checkpoint response which otherwise causes cln1 cln2 rad27/erc11 cells to arrest. These results imply that CLN1 and CLN2 have a role in the regulation of DNA replication. Consistent with this, GAL-CLN1 expression in checkpoint-deficient, mec1-1 mutant cells results in both cell death and increased chromosome loss among survivors, suggesting that CLN1 overexpression either activates defective DNA replication or leads to insensitivity to DNA damage.


2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1540-1548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deanna M. Koepp ◽  
Andrew C. Kile ◽  
Swarna Swaminathan ◽  
Veronica Rodriguez-Rivera

Ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis plays a key role in many pathways inside the cell and is particularly important in regulating cell cycle transitions. SCF (Skp1/Cul1/F-box protein) complexes are modular ubiquitin ligases whose specificity is determined by a substrate-binding F-box protein. Dia2 is a Saccharomyces cerevisiae F-box protein previously described to play a role in invasive growth and pheromone response pathways. We find that deletion of DIA2 renders cells cold-sensitive and subject to defects in cell cycle progression, including premature S-phase entry. Consistent with a role in regulating DNA replication, the Dia2 protein binds replication origins. Furthermore, the dia2 mutant accumulates DNA damage in both S and G2/M phases of the cell cycle. These defects are likely a result of the absence of SCFDia2 activity, as a Dia2 ΔF-box mutant shows similar phenotypes. Interestingly, prolonging G1-phase in dia2 cells prevents the accumulation of DNA damage in S-phase. We propose that Dia2 is an origin-binding protein that plays a role in regulating DNA replication.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document