The Drosophila chiffon gene is required for chorion gene amplification, and is related to the yeast Dbf4 regulator of DNA replication and cell cycle

Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (19) ◽  
pp. 4281-4293 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Landis ◽  
J. Tower

The Drosophila chorion genes encode the major protein components of the chorion (eggshell) and are arranged in two clusters in the genome. To meet the demand for rapid chorion synthesis, Drosophila ovary follicle cells amplify the chorion gene clusters approximately 80-fold. Amplification proceeds through repeated firing of one or more DNA replication origins located near the center of each gene cluster. Hypomorphic mutant alleles of the chiffon gene cause thin, fragile chorions and female sterility, and were found to eliminate chorion gene amplification. Null alleles of chiffon had the additional phenotypes of rough eyes and thin thoracic bristles: phenotypes often associated with disruption of normal cell cycle. The chiffon locus was cloned by chromosomal walking from the nearby cactus locus. A 6.5 kb transcript was identified and confirmed to be chiffon by sequencing of mutant alleles and by phenotypic rescue with genomic transformation constructs. The protein predicted by translation of the 5.1 kb chiffon ORF contains two domains related to the S. cerevisiae Dbf4 regulator of DNA replication origin firing and cell cycle progression: a 44 residue domain designated CDDN1 (43% identical) and a 41 residue domain designated CDDN2 (12% identical). The CDDN domains were also found in the S. pombe homolog of Dbf4, Dfp1, as well as in the proteins predicted by translation of the Aspergillus nimO gene and specific human and mouse clones. The data suggest a family of eukaryotic proteins related to Dbf4 and involved in initiation of DNA replication.

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidetsugu Kohzaki ◽  
Maki Asano ◽  
Yota Murakami ◽  
Alexander Mazo

AbstractWe have revealed that the chorion gene clusters amplify by repeatedly initiating DNA replication from chorion gene amplification origins in the response to developmental signals, through the transcription factors in Drosophila ovarian follicle cells. Orc1, Orc2, and Cdc6 are forms of DNA replication machinery, which are conserved from yeast to humans; and Orc1 and Orc2 mutants are lethal. Overexpression of Orc1 or Orc2 (subunits of the origin recognition complex) led to female sterility, but overexpression of Cdc6 (an Orc family member) or GFP did not. We propose that DNA replication machinery contributes to development.Recently, we found that H3K4 was trimethylated at chorion gene amplification origins, but not at the Act1 locus. Overexpression of Lsd1H3K4 dimethylase and Lid H3K4 trimethylase are female sterile but not a Lid mutant. These results showed that epigenetic regulation affected fertility. Screening strategies using Drosophila flies could also lead to the development of drugs that reduce sterility and epigenetic effects related histone modification.Summary statementThere are approximately 470,000 infertile individuals in Japan. We knockowned the prereplicative complex components and demethlases during Drosophila ovary development. In these drospohila, we could be the model of infertile.


2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 2123-2134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pelin Cayirlioglu ◽  
William O. Ward ◽  
S. Catherine Silver Key ◽  
Robert J. Duronio

ABSTRACT Individual members of the E2F/DP protein family control cell cycle progression by acting predominantly as an activator or repressor of transcription. In Drosophila melanogaster the E2f1, E2f2, Dp, and Rbf1 genes all contribute to replication control in ovarian follicle cells, which become 16C polyploid and subsequently undergo chorion gene amplification late in oogenesis. Mutation of E2f2, Dp, or Rbf1 causes ectopic DNA replication throughout the follicle cell genome during gene amplification cycles. Here we show by both reverse transcription-PCR and DNA microarray analysis that the transcripts of prereplication complex (pre-RC) genes are elevated compared to the wild type in E2f2, Dp, and Rbf1 mutant follicle cells. For some genes the magnitude of this transcriptional derepression is greater in Rbf1 than in E2f2 mutants. These differences correlate with differences in the magnitude of the replication defects in follicle cells, which attain an inappropriate 32C DNA content in both Rbf1 and Dp mutants but not in E2f2 mutants. The ectopic genomic replication of E2f2 mutant follicle cells can be suppressed by reducing the Orc2, Orc5, or Mcm2 gene dose by half, indicating that small changes in pre-RC gene expression can affect DNA synthesis in these cells. We conclude that RBF1 forms complexes with both E2F1/DP and E2F2/DP that cooperate to repress the expression of pre-RC genes, which helps confine DNA synthesis to sites of gene amplification. In contrast, E2F1 and E2F2 repressors function redundantly for some genes in the embryo. Thus, the relative functional contributions of E2F1 and E2F2 to gene expression and cell cycle control depends on the developmental context.


Author(s):  
Anne Early ◽  
Lucy S. Drury ◽  
John F. X. Diffley

Replication origins in eukaryotic cells never fire more than once in a given S phase. Here, we summarize the role of cyclin–dependent kinases in limiting DNA replication origin usage to once per cell cycle in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae . We have examined the role of different cyclins in the phosphorylation and regulation of several replication/regulatory factors including Cdc6, Sic1, ORC and DNA polymerase α–primase. In addition to being regulated by the cell cycle machinery, replication origins are also regulated by the genome integrity checkpoint kinases, Mec1 and Rad53. In response to DNA damage or drugs which interfere with the progression of replication forks, the activation of late–firing replication origins is inhibited. There is evidence indicating that the temporal programme of origin firing depends upon the local histone acetylation state. We have attempted to test the possibility that checkpoint regulation of late–origin firing operates through the regulation of the acetylation state. We found that overexpression of the essential histone acetylase, Esa1, cannot override checkpoint regulation of origin firing. We have also constructed a temperature–sensitive esa1 mutant. This mutant is unable to resume cell cycle progression after α–factor arrest. This can be overcome by overexpression of the G1 cyclin, Cln2, revealing a novel role for Esa1 in regulating Start.


Development ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 128 (24) ◽  
pp. 5085-5098 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pelin Cayirlioglu ◽  
Peter C. Bonnette ◽  
M. Ryan Dickson ◽  
Robert J. Duronio

Drosophila contains two members of the E2F transcription factor family (E2f and E2f2), which controls the expression of genes that regulate the G1-S transition of the cell cycle. Previous genetic analyses have indicated that E2f is an essential gene that stimulates DNA replication. We show that loss of E2f2 is viable, but causes partial female sterility associated with changes in the mode of DNA replication in the follicle cells that surround the developing oocyte. Late in wild-type oogenesis, polyploid follicle cells terminate a program of asynchronous endocycles in which the euchromatin is entirely replicated, and then confine DNA synthesis to the synchronous amplification of specific loci, including two clusters of chorion genes that encode eggshell proteins. E2f2 mutant follicle cells terminate endocycles on schedule, but then fail to confine DNA synthesis to sites of gene amplification and inappropriately begin genomic DNA replication. This ectopic DNA synthesis does not represent a continuation of the endocycle program, as the cells do not complete an entire additional S phase. E2f2 mutant females display a 50% reduction in chorion gene amplification, and lay poorly viable eggs with a defective chorion. The replication proteins ORC2, CDC45L and ORC5, which in wild-type follicle cell nuclei localize to sites of gene amplification, are distributed throughout the entire follicle cell nucleus in E2f2 mutants, consistent with their use at many genomic replication origins rather than only at sites of gene amplification. RT-PCR analyses of RNA purified from E2f2 mutant follicle cells indicate an increase in the level of Orc5 mRNA relative to wild type. These data indicate that E2f2 functions to inhibit widespread genomic DNA synthesis in late stage follicle cells, and may do so by repressing the expression of specific components of the replication machinery.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1249-1249
Author(s):  
Hengyou Weng ◽  
Huilin Huang ◽  
He Huang ◽  
Zhaojin Yu ◽  
Paulina Siejka-Zielinska ◽  
...  

TET1 was first identified as a fusion partner of the histone H3 Lys4 (H3K4) methyltransferase MLL (mixed-lineage leukemia) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and then was discovered as the founding member of the Ten-Eleven-Translocation (TET) family of DNA hydroxylases which are capable of converting 5-methylcytosine (5mC) to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC). Our group has previously demonstrated that TET1 plays an oncogenic role in MLL-rearranged AML (Huang H, et al. PNAS 2013; 110(29):11994-9) and also other TET1-overexpressing AMLs (e.g., t(8;21) AML and AMLs carrying FLT3-ITD and/or NPM1 mutations) (Jiang X, et al. Nature Communications. 2017; 8(1):2099). The expression of the TET1 protein and the global level of its enzymatic product, 5hmC, are significantly up-regulated in MLL-rearranged leukemia, whereas the opposite has been reported in other cancers where TET1 functions as a tumor suppressor. Therefore, a comprehensive identification of all critical targets of TET1 in AML is important for us to better understand the role and underlying molecular mechanism of TET1 in AML. To this end, we cultured murine inducible MLL-ENL cells and performed stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC)-based proteomic profiling in parallel with RNA-seq to systematically explore the functional targets of TET1 in a genome-wide and unbiased way. Gene ontology (GO) analysis of target genes indicated enrichment in genes associated with DNA replication (FDR<0.001) and cell cycle progression (FDR<0.001). Interestingly, the six main minichromosome maintenance genes, including MCM2, MCM3, MCM4, MCM5, MCM6, and MCM7, showed marked downregulation when TET1 expression was depleted. We further showed that not only the total levels of the MCM2-7 proteins, but also their binding to chromatin, were decreased upon TET1 knockdown in human AML cell lines. Consistent with the roles of MCMs in cell cycle regulation, knockdown of TET1 led to a significant decrease in the S phase population, attributing to the inhibition on DNA replication, as shown by reduced 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EdU) incorporation into newly synthesized DNA upon TET1 knockdown. Furthermore, DNA combing assays suggest that TET1 knockdown inhibits new origin firing but does not influence replication fork speed. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays demonstrated that TET1 binds directly to the CpG islands in the promoters of the MCM genes, suggesting that the regulation of these genes by TET1 may occur at the transcriptional level. However, 5hmC sequencing revealed low abundance of 5hmC around these genomic regions, and more importantly, the abundance was not influenced by TET1 knockdown. In addition, catalytically inactive TET1 showed similar effects to wild-type TET1 on promoting cell cycle progression and DNA replication, suggesting that TET1 regulates MCM genes and cell cycle in a manner independent of its catalytic activity. Interestingly, we found that KAT8, an acetyltransferase that specifically catalyzes histone H4 lysine 16 acetylation (H4K16Ac) and was reported to bind to TET1, plays a role in the regulation of TET1 on transcription of MCM genes. Direct binding of KAT8 with TET1 was confirmed in AML cells. Depletion of TET1 reduced H4K16Ac abundance in the MCM promoters where TET1 bind, suggesting that the binding of KAT8 to such genomic regions is owing to its recruitment by TET1. Similar to TET1 knockdown, KAT8 knockdown also decreased MCM genes expression at both RNA and protein levels and resulted in defects in cell cycle progression and DNA replication. Based on the above data, we speculated that combined inhibition of TET1 and KAT8 could exert potent inhibitory effect on DNA replication in TET1-overexpressing AML cells. Indeed, Tet1 knockout sensitized MLL-AF9-transformed mouse bone marrow (BM) progenitor cells to MG149, a KAT8 inhibitor. In addition, TET1 inhibitor (U514321) synergized with MG149 in inhibiting the viability and growth of human AML cells. Furthermore, co-treatment of MG149 and U514321 exhibited synergistic effect on inhibiting colony-forming ability of MLL-AF9-transformed mouse BM progenitors. Collectively, our findings reveal a catalytic-independent novel function of TET1 on regulating DNA replication in AML cells through cooperating with KAT8 and highlight the therapeutic implication of targeting both TET1 and KAT8 in treating TET1-overexpressing AMLs. Disclosures Chen: Genovel Biotech Corp: Other: scientific founder and Chairman.


2019 ◽  
Vol 202 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter E. Burby ◽  
Lyle A. Simmons

ABSTRACT All organisms regulate cell cycle progression by coordinating cell division with DNA replication status. In eukaryotes, DNA damage or problems with replication fork progression induce the DNA damage response (DDR), causing cyclin-dependent kinases to remain active, preventing further cell cycle progression until replication and repair are complete. In bacteria, cell division is coordinated with chromosome segregation, preventing cell division ring formation over the nucleoid in a process termed nucleoid occlusion. In addition to nucleoid occlusion, bacteria induce the SOS response after replication forks encounter DNA damage or impediments that slow or block their progression. During SOS induction, Escherichia coli expresses a cytoplasmic protein, SulA, that inhibits cell division by directly binding FtsZ. After the SOS response is turned off, SulA is degraded by Lon protease, allowing for cell division to resume. Recently, it has become clear that SulA is restricted to bacteria closely related to E. coli and that most bacteria enforce the DNA damage checkpoint by expressing a small integral membrane protein. Resumption of cell division is then mediated by membrane-bound proteases that cleave the cell division inhibitor. Further, many bacterial cells have mechanisms to inhibit cell division that are regulated independently from the canonical LexA-mediated SOS response. In this review, we discuss several pathways used by bacteria to prevent cell division from occurring when genome instability is detected or before the chromosome has been fully replicated and segregated.


1997 ◽  
Vol 110 (19) ◽  
pp. 2345-2357 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Battistoni ◽  
G. Guarguaglini ◽  
F. Degrassi ◽  
C. Pittoggi ◽  
A. Palena ◽  
...  

RanBP1 is a molecular partner of the Ran GTPase, which is implicated in the control of several processes, including DNA replication, mitotic entry and exit, cell cycle progression, nuclear structure, protein import and RNA export. While most genes encoding Ran-interacting partners are constitutively active, transcription of the RanBP1 mRNA is repressed in non proliferating cells, is activated at the G1/S transition in cycling cells and peaks during S phase. We report here that forced expression of the RanBP1 gene disrupts the orderly execution of the cell division cycle at several stages, causing inhibition of DNA replication, defective mitotic exit and failure of chromatin decondensation during the telophase-to-interphase transition in cells that achieve nuclear duplication and chromosome segregation. These results suggest that deregulated RanBP1 activity interferes with the Ran GTPase cycle and prevents the functioning of the Ran signalling system during the cell cycle.


PeerJ ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. e5203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Faujul Kabir ◽  
Johari Mohd Ali ◽  
Onn Haji Hashim

BackgroundWe have previously reported anticancer activities ofMelicope ptelefolia(MP) leaf extracts on four different cancer cell lines. However, the underlying mechanisms of actions have yet to be deciphered. In the present study, the anticancer activity of MP hexane extract (MP-HX) on colorectal (HCT116) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) cell lines was characterized through microarray gene expression profiling.MethodsHCT116 and HepG2 cells were treated with MP-HX for 24 hr. Total RNA was extracted from the cells and used for transcriptome profiling using Applied Biosystem GeneChip™ Human Gene 2.0 ST Array. Gene expression data was analysed using an Applied Biosystems Expression Console and Transcriptome Analysis Console software. Pathway enrichment analyses was performed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software. The microarray data was validated by profiling the expression of 17 genes through quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR).ResultsMP-HX induced differential expression of 1,290 and 1,325 genes in HCT116 and HepG2 cells, respectively (microarray data fold change, MA_FC ≥ ±2.0). The direction of gene expression change for the 17 genes assayed through RT-qPCR agree with the microarray data. In both cell lines, MP-HX modulated the expression of many genes in directions that support antiproliferative activity. IPA software analyses revealed MP-HX modulated canonical pathways, networks and biological processes that are associated with cell cycle, DNA replication, cellular growth and cell proliferation. In both cell lines, upregulation of genes which promote apoptosis, cell cycle arrest and growth inhibition were observed, while genes that are typically overexpressed in diverse human cancers or those that promoted cell cycle progression, DNA replication and cellular proliferation were downregulated. Some of the genes upregulated by MP-HX include pro-apoptotic genes (DDIT3, BBC3, JUN), cell cycle arresting (CDKN1A, CDKN2B), growth arrest/repair (TP53, GADD45A) and metastasis suppression (NDRG1). MP-HX downregulated the expression of genes that could promote anti-apoptotic effect, cell cycle progression, tumor development and progression, which include BIRC5, CCNA2, CCNB1, CCNB2, CCNE2, CDK1/2/6, GINS2, HELLS, MCM2/10 PLK1, RRM2 and SKP2. It is interesting to note that all six top-ranked genes proposed to be cancer-associated (PLK1, MCM2, MCM3, MCM7, MCM10 and SKP2) were downregulated by MP-HX in both cell lines.DiscussionThe present study showed that the anticancer activities of MP-HX are exerted through its actions on genes regulating apoptosis, cell proliferation, DNA replication and cell cycle progression. These findings further project the potential use of MP as a nutraceutical agent for cancer therapeutics.


1994 ◽  
Vol 125 (4) ◽  
pp. 705-719 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Kornbluth ◽  
M Dasso ◽  
J Newport

TC4, a ras-like G protein, has been implicated in the feedback pathway linking the onset of mitosis to the completion of DNA replication. In this report we find distinct roles for TC4 in both nuclear assembly and cell cycle progression. Mutant and wild-type forms of TC4 were added to Xenopus egg extracts capable of assembling nuclei around chromatin templates in vitro. We found that a mutant TC4 protein defective in GTP binding (GDP-bound form) suppressed nuclear growth and prevented DNA replication. Nuclear transport under these conditions approximated normal levels. In a separate set of experiments using a cell-free extract of Xenopus eggs that cycles between S and M phases, the GDP-bound form of TC4 had dramatic effects, blocking entry into mitosis even in the complete absence of nuclei. The effect of this mutant TC4 protein on cell cycle progression is mediated by phosphorylation of p34cdc2 on tyrosine and threonine residues, negatively regulating cdc2 kinase activity. Therefore, we provide direct biochemical evidence for a role of TC4 in both maintaining nuclear structure and in the signaling pathways that regulate entry into mitosis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document