scholarly journals Collective movement in ecology: from emerging technologies to conservation and management

2018 ◽  
Vol 373 (1746) ◽  
pp. 20170004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter A. H. Westley ◽  
Andrew M. Berdahl ◽  
Colin J. Torney ◽  
Dora Biro

Recent advances in technology and quantitative methods have led to the emergence of a new field of study that stands to link insights of researchers from two closely related, but often disconnected disciplines: movement ecology and collective animal behaviour. To date, the field of movement ecology has focused on elucidating the internal and external drivers of animal movement and the influence of movement on broader ecological processes. Typically, tracking and/or remote sensing technology is employed to study individual animals in natural conditions. By contrast, the field of collective behaviour has quantified the significant role social interactions play in the decision-making of animals within groups and, to date, has predominantly relied on controlled laboratory-based studies and theoretical models owing to the constraints of studying interacting animals in the field. This themed issue is intended to formalize the burgeoning field of collective movement ecology which integrates research from both movement ecology and collective behaviour. In this introductory paper, we set the stage for the issue by briefly examining the approaches and current status of research in these areas. Next, we outline the structure of the theme issue and describe the obstacles collective movement researchers face, from data acquisition in the field to analysis and problems of scale, and highlight the key contributions of the assembled papers. We finish by presenting research that links individual and broad-scale ecological and evolutionary processes to collective movement, and finally relate these concepts to emerging challenges for the management and conservation of animals on the move in a world that is increasingly impacted by human activity. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Collective movement ecology’.

2018 ◽  
Vol 373 (1746) ◽  
pp. 20170012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin J. Torney ◽  
J. Grant C. Hopcraft ◽  
Thomas A. Morrison ◽  
Iain D. Couzin ◽  
Simon A. Levin

A central question in ecology is how to link processes that occur over different scales. The daily interactions of individual organisms ultimately determine community dynamics, population fluctuations and the functioning of entire ecosystems. Observations of these multiscale ecological processes are constrained by various technological, biological or logistical issues, and there are often vast discrepancies between the scale at which observation is possible and the scale of the question of interest. Animal movement is characterized by processes that act over multiple spatial and temporal scales. Second-by-second decisions accumulate to produce annual movement patterns. Individuals influence, and are influenced by, collective movement decisions, which then govern the spatial distribution of populations and the connectivity of meta-populations. While the field of movement ecology is experiencing unprecedented growth in the availability of movement data, there remain challenges in integrating observations with questions of ecological interest. In this article, we present the major challenges of addressing these issues within the context of the Serengeti wildebeest migration, a keystone ecological phenomena that crosses multiple scales of space, time and biological complexity. This article is part of the theme issue 'Collective movement ecology'.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Lennox ◽  
Samuel Westrelin ◽  
Allan T. Souza ◽  
Marek Šmejkal ◽  
Milan Říha ◽  
...  

AbstractMovement ecology is increasingly relying on experimental approaches and hypothesis testing to reveal how, when, where, why, and which animals move. Movement of megafauna is inherently interesting but many of the fundamental questions of movement ecology can be efficiently tested in study systems with high degrees of control. Lakes can be seen as microcosms for studying ecological processes and the use of high-resolution positioning systems to triangulate exact coordinates of fish, along with sensors that relay information about depth, temperature, acceleration, predation, and more, can be used to answer some of movement ecology’s most pressing questions. We describe how key questions in animal movement have been approached and how experiments can be designed to gather information about movement processes to answer questions about the physiological, genetic, and environmental drivers of movement using lakes. We submit that whole lake telemetry studies have a key role to play not only in movement ecology but more broadly in biology as key scientific arenas for knowledge advancement. New hardware for tracking aquatic animals and statistical tools for understanding the processes underlying detection data will continue to advance the potential for revealing the paradigms that govern movement and biological phenomena not just within lakes but in other realms spanning lands and oceans.


Author(s):  
P. K. Galenko ◽  
D. V. Alexandrov

Transport processes around phase interfaces, together with thermodynamic properties and kinetic phenomena, control the formation of dendritic patterns. Using the thermodynamic and kinetic data of phase interfaces obtained on the atomic scale, one can analyse the formation of a single dendrite and the growth of a dendritic ensemble. This is the result of recent progress in theoretical methods and computational algorithms calculated using powerful computer clusters. Great benefits can be attained from the development of micro-, meso- and macro-levels of analysis when investigating the dynamics of interfaces, interpreting experimental data and designing the macrostructure of samples. The review and research articles in this theme issue cover the spectrum of scales (from nano- to macro-length scales) in order to exhibit recently developing trends in the theoretical analysis and computational modelling of dendrite pattern formation. Atomistic modelling, the flow effect on interface dynamics, the transition from diffusion-limited to thermally controlled growth existing at a considerable driving force, two-phase (mushy) layer formation, the growth of eutectic dendrites, the formation of a secondary dendritic network due to coalescence, computational methods, including boundary integral and phase-field methods, and experimental tests for theoretical models—all these themes are highlighted in the present issue. This article is part of the theme issue ‘From atomistic interfaces to dendritic patterns’.


2018 ◽  
Vol 373 (1753) ◽  
pp. 20170244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Ireland ◽  
Simon Garnier

The similarities between the structures built by social insects and by humans have led to a convergence of interests between biologists and architects. This new, de facto interdisciplinary community of scholars needs a common terminology and theoretical framework in which to ground its work. In this conceptually oriented review paper, we review the terms ‘information’, ‘space’ and ‘architecture’ to provide definitions that span biology and architecture. A framework is proposed on which interdisciplinary exchange may be better served, with the view that this will aid better cross-fertilization between disciplines, working in the areas of collective behaviour and analysis of the structures and edifices constructed by non-humans; and to facilitate how this area of study may better contribute to the field of architecture. We then use these definitions to discuss the informational content of constructions built by organisms and the influence these have on behaviour, and vice versa. We review how spatial constraints inform and influence interaction between an organism and its environment, and examine the reciprocity of space and information on construction and the behaviour of humans and social insects. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Interdisciplinary approaches for uncovering the impacts of architecture on collective behaviour’.


Author(s):  
J. Arrieta ◽  
R. Jeanneret ◽  
P. Roig ◽  
I. Tuval

Diatoms are one of the most abundant, diverse and ecologically relevant phytoplanktonic group, contributing enormously to global biogeochemical processes like the carbon and silica cycles. This large success has been partly attributed to the mechanical and optical properties of the silica shell (the frustule) that envelops their body. But since they lack motility it is difficult to conceive how they cope with the fast-fluctuating environment they live in and where distributions of resources are very heterogeneous and dynamical. This pinpoints an important but yet poorly understood feature of diatoms physiology: buoyancy regulation that helps them controlling their sinking speed and position in the water column. While buoyancy regulation by light and nutrients availability has been well studied, the effect of hydromechanical stress via fluid shear has been rather overlooked when considering diatoms dynamics. Here, we aim to start filling this gap by first presenting direct experimental evidences for buoyancy control in response to hydro-mechanical stress and then review recent theoretical models where simple couplings between local shear and buoyancy control always result in heterogeneous cell distributions, specific accumulation regions within complex flows and increased sedimentation times to the depths, features of direct ecological relevance. We conclude by suggesting future experiments aiming to unveil such coupling and therefore gain better understanding on the fate of these fascinating microorganisms in their natural habitat. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Stokes at 200 (part 2)’.


2014 ◽  
Vol 978 ◽  
pp. 257-260
Author(s):  
Ying Zhao ◽  
Ru Kun Li ◽  
Kun Le Xu

Smart grids have a close relationship to advanced sensing technology and communication technology and also have provided a new application platform for wireless sensor networks. From wireless sensor networks research development and characteristics, combined with current status of wireless sensor networks applications in power system, this paper describes its key technologies of wireless sensor networks, then analyze applications and data analysis of the wireless sensor network in the smart grids.


2018 ◽  
Vol 373 (1753) ◽  
pp. 20170232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noa Pinter-Wollman ◽  
Alan Penn ◽  
Guy Theraulaz ◽  
Stephen M. Fiore

Built structures, such as animal nests or buildings that humans occupy, serve two overarching purposes: shelter and a space where individuals interact. The former has dominated much of the discussion in the literature. But, as the study of collective behaviour expands, it is time to elucidate the role of the built environment in shaping collective outcomes. Collective behaviour in social animals emerges from interactions, and collective cognition in humans emerges from communication and coordination. These collective actions have vast economic implications in human societies and critical fitness consequences in animal systems. Despite the obvious influence of space on interactions, because spatial proximity is necessary for an interaction to occur, spatial constraints are rarely considered in studies of collective behaviour or collective cognition. An interdisciplinary exchange between behavioural ecologists, evolutionary biologists, cognitive scientists, social scientists, architects and engineers can facilitate a productive exchange of ideas, methods and theory that could lead us to uncover unifying principles and novel research approaches and questions in studies of animal and human collective behaviour. This article, along with those in this theme issue aims to formalize and catalyse this interdisciplinary exchange. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Interdisciplinary approaches for uncovering the impacts of architecture on collective behaviour’.


2018 ◽  
Vol 373 (1753) ◽  
pp. 20180253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Penn ◽  
J. Scott Turner

The search for general common principles that unify disciplines is a longstanding challenge for interdisciplinary research. Architecture has always been an interdisciplinary pursuit, combining engineering, art and culture. The rise of biomimetic architecture adds to the interdisciplinary span. We discuss the similarities and differences among human and animal societies in how architecture influences their collective behaviour. We argue that the emergence of a fully biomimetic architecture involves breaking down what we call ‘pernicious dualities’ that have permeated our discourse for decades, artificial divisions between species, between organism and environment, between genotype and phenotype, and in the case of architecture, the supposed duality between the built environment and its builders. We suggest that niche construction theory may serve as a starting point for unifying our thinking across disciplines, taxa and spatial scales. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Interdisciplinary approaches for uncovering the impacts of architecture on collective behaviour’.


2018 ◽  
Vol 285 (1870) ◽  
pp. 20172272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim S. Doherty ◽  
Don A. Driscoll

Habitat conversion in production landscapes is among the greatest threats to biodiversity, not least because it can disrupt animal movement. Using the movement ecology framework, we review animal movement in production landscapes, including areas managed for agriculture and forestry. We consider internal and external drivers of altered animal movement and how this affects navigation and motion capacities and population dynamics. Conventional management approaches in fragmented landscapes focus on promoting connectivity using structural changes in the landscape. However, a movement ecology perspective emphasizes that manipulating the internal motivations or navigation capacity of animals represents untapped opportunities to improve movement and the effectiveness of structural connectivity investments. Integrating movement and landscape ecology opens new opportunities for conservation management in production landscapes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document