scholarly journals The Slit-binding Ig1 domain is required for multiple axon guidance activities of Drosophila Robo2

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
LaFreda J. Howard ◽  
Marie C. Reichert ◽  
Timothy A. Evans
Keyword(s):  
Axon Guidance ◽  
Lateral Position ◽  
Commissural Axons ◽  
Lateral Zone ◽  
Guidance Receptors ◽  
Longitudinal Axon ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Pathway Formation ◽  
Embryonic Neurons

Drosophila Robo2 is a member of the evolutionarily conserved Roundabout (Robo) family of axon guidance receptors. The canonical role of Robo receptors is to signal midline repulsion in response to their cognate Slit ligands, which bind to the N-terminal Ig1 domain in most Robo family members. In the Drosophila embryonic ventral nerve cord, Robo1 and Robo2 cooperate to signal Slit-dependent midline repulsion, while Robo2 also regulates the medial-lateral position of longitudinal axon pathways and acts non-autonomously to promote midline crossing of commissural axons. Although it is clear that Robo2 signals midline repulsion in response to Slit, it is less clear whether Robo2's other activities are also Slit-dependent. To determine which of Robo2's axon guidance roles depend on its Slit-binding Ig1 domain, we have used a CRISPR/Cas9-based strategy replace the endogenous robo2 gene with a robo2 variant from which the Ig1 domain has been deleted (robo2ΔIg1). We compare the expression and localization of Robo2ΔIg1 protein with that of full-length Robo2 in embryonic neurons in vivo, and examine its ability to substitute for Robo2 to mediate midline repulsion and lateral axon pathway formation. We find that removal of the Ig1 domain from Robo2ΔIg1 disrupts both of these axon guidance activities. In addition, we find that the Ig1 domain of Robo2 is required for its proper subcellular localization in embryonic neurons, a role that is not shared by the Ig1 domain of Robo1. Finally, we report that although FasII-positive lateral axons are misguided in embryos expressing Robo2ΔIg1, the axons that normally express Robo2 are correctly guided to the lateral zone, suggesting that Robo2 may guide lateral longitudinal axons through a cell non-autonomous mechanism.

scholarly journals A Theoretical Model of Axon Guidance by the Robo Code

2003 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 549-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey J. Goodhill
Keyword(s):  
Theoretical Model ◽  
Axon Guidance ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Lateral Position ◽  
Commissural Axons ◽  
Coding Scheme ◽  
Simple Theoretical Model ◽  
Robo Receptors ◽  
Different Populations

After crossing the midline, different populations of commissural axons in Drosophila target specific longitudinal pathways at different distances from the midline. It has recently been shown that this choice of lateral position is governed by the particular combination of Robo receptors expressed by these axons, presumably in response to a gradient of Slit released by the midline. Here we propose a simple theoretical model of this combinatorial coding scheme. The principal results of the model are that purely quantitative rather than qualitative differences between the different Robo receptors are sufficient to account for the effects observed following removal or ectopic expression of specific Robo receptors, and that the steepness of the Slit gradient in vivo must exceed a certain minimum for the results observed experimentally to be consistent.

scholarly journals Regulation of axon repulsion by MAX-1 SUMOylation and AP-3

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (35) ◽  
pp. E8236-E8245
Author(s):  
Shih-Yu Chen ◽  
Chun-Ta Ho ◽  
Wei-Wen Liu ◽  
Mark Lucanic ◽  
Hsiu-Ming Shih ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Axon Guidance ◽  
Neural Development ◽  
Biochemical Analysis ◽  
Genetic Interaction ◽  
Motor Axons ◽  
Surface Receptors ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Guidance Receptors ◽  
Axon Repulsion

During neural development, growing axons express specific surface receptors in response to various environmental guidance cues. These axon guidance receptors are regulated through intracellular trafficking and degradation to enable navigating axons to reach their targets. In Caenorhabditis elegans, the UNC-5 receptor is necessary for dorsal migration of developing motor axons. We previously found that MAX-1 is required for UNC-5–mediated axon repulsion, but its mechanism of action remained unclear. Here, we demonstrate that UNC-5–mediated axon repulsion in C. elegans motor axons requires both max-1 SUMOylation and the AP-3 complex β subunit gene, apb-3. Genetic interaction studies show that max-1 is SUMOylated by gei-17/PIAS1 and acts upstream of apb-3. Biochemical analysis suggests that constitutive interaction of MAX-1 and UNC-5 receptor is weakened by MAX-1 SUMOylation and by the presence of APB-3, a competitive interactor with UNC-5. Overexpression of APB-3 reroutes the trafficking of UNC-5 receptor into the lysosome for protein degradation. In vivo fluorescence recovery after photobleaching experiments shows that MAX-1 SUMOylation and APB-3 are required for proper trafficking of UNC-5 receptor in the axon. Our results demonstrate that SUMOylation of MAX-1 plays an important role in regulating AP-3–mediated trafficking and degradation of UNC-5 receptors during axon guidance.

scholarly journals Minimal structural elements required for midline repulsive signaling and regulation of Drosophila Robo1

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haley E. Brown ◽  
Timothy A. Evans
Keyword(s):  
Axon Guidance ◽  
Biochemical Properties ◽  
Structural Elements ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Domain Interaction ◽  
Robo Receptors ◽  
Guidance Receptors ◽  
Repulsive Signaling

AbstractThe Roundabout (Robo) family of axon guidance receptors has a conserved ectodomain arrangement of five immunoglobulin-like (Ig) domains plus three fibronectin (Fn) repeats. Based on the strong evolutionary conservation of this domain structure among Robo receptors, as well as in vitro structural and domain-domain interaction studies of Robo family members, this ectodomain arrangement is predicted to be important for Robo receptor signaling in response to Slit ligands. Here, we define the minimal ectodomain structure required for Slit binding and midline repulsive signaling in vivo by Drosophila Robo1. We find that the majority of the Robo1 ectodomain is dispensable for both Slit binding and repulsive signaling. We show that a significant level of midline repulsive signaling activity is retained when all Robo1 ectodomain elements apart from Ig1 are deleted, and that the combination of Ig1 plus one additional ectodomain element (Ig2, Ig5, or Fn3) is sufficient to restore midline repulsion to wild type levels. Further, we find that deleting four out of five Robo1 Ig domains (ΔIg2-5) does not affect negative regulation of Robo1 by Commissureless (Comm) or Robo2, while variants lacking all three fibronectin repeats (ΔFn1-3 and ΔIg2-Fn3) are insensitive to regulation by both Comm and Robo2, signifying a novel regulatory role for Robo1’s Fn repeats. Our results provide an in vivo perspective on the importance of the conserved 5+3 ectodomain structure of Robo receptors, and suggest that specific biochemical properties and/or ectodomain structural conformations observed in vitro for domains other than Ig1 may have limited significance for in vivo signaling in the context of midline repulsion.

scholarly journals Robo recruitment of the Wave Regulatory Complex plays an essential and conserved role in midline repulsion

eLife ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karina Chaudhari ◽  
Madhavi Gorla ◽  
Chao Chang ◽  
Artur Kania ◽  
Greg J Bashaw
Keyword(s):  
Axon Guidance ◽  
Actin Polymerization ◽  
Chick Embryos ◽  
Commissural Axons ◽  
Midline Crossing ◽  
Regulatory Complex ◽  
Axon Repulsion ◽  
Dorsal Spinal ◽  
Receptor Family

The Roundabout (Robo) guidance receptor family induces axon repulsion in response to its ligand Slit by inducing local cytoskeletal changes; however, the link to the cytoskeleton and the nature of these cytoskeletal changes are poorly understood. Here, we show that the heteropentameric Scar/Wave Regulatory Complex (WRC) which drives Arp2/3-induced branched actin polymerization, is a direct effector of Robo signaling. Biochemical evidence shows that Slit triggers WRC recruitment to the Robo receptor's WIRS motif. In Drosophila embryos, mutants of the WRC enhance Robo1-dependent midline crossing defects. Additionally, mutating Robo1's WIRS motif significantly reduces receptor activity in rescue assays in vivo, and CRISPR-Cas9 mutagenesis shows that the WIRS motif is essential for endogenous Robo1 function. Finally, axon guidance assays in mouse dorsal spinal commissural axons and gain-of-function experiments in chick embryos demonstrate that the WIRS motif is also required for Robo1 repulsion in mammals. Together, our data support an essential conserved role for the WIRS-WRC interaction in Robo1-mediated axon repulsion.

scholarly journals Robo recruitment of the Wave Regulatory Complex plays an essential and conserved role in midline repulsion

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karina Chaudhari ◽  
Madhavi Gorla ◽  
Chao Chang ◽  
Artur Kania ◽  
Greg J. Bashaw
Keyword(s):  
Axon Guidance ◽  
Actin Polymerization ◽  
Biochemical Evidence ◽  
Commissural Axons ◽  
Midline Crossing ◽  
Regulatory Complex ◽  
Axon Repulsion ◽  
Dorsal Spinal ◽  
Receptor Family

SUMMARYThe Roundabout (Robo) guidance receptor family induces axon repulsion in response to its ligand Slit by inducing local cytoskeletal changes; however, the link to the cytoskeleton and the nature of these cytoskeletal changes are unclear. Here we show that the heteropentameric Scar/Wave Regulatory Complex (WRC) which drives Arp2/3-induced branched actin polymerization, is a direct effector of Robo signaling. Biochemical evidence shows that Slit triggers WRC recruitment to the Robo receptor’s WIRS motif. In Drosophila embryos, mutants of the WRC enhance Robol-dependent midline crossing defects. Additionally, mutating Robo1’s WIRS motif significantly reduces receptor activity in rescue assays in vivo, and CRISPR-Cas9 mutagenesis shows that the WIRS motif is essential for endogenous Robo1 function. Finally, axon guidance assays in mouse dorsal spinal commissural axons demonstrate that the WIRS motif is also required for Robo1 repulsion in mammals. Together, our data support an essential conserved role for the WRC in commissural axon repulsion.

scholarly journals Endoglycan plays a role in axon guidance by modulating cell adhesion

eLife ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Baeriswyl ◽  
Alexandre Dumoulin ◽  
Martina Schaettin ◽  
Georgia Tsapara ◽  
Vera Niederkofler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Adhesion ◽  
Axon Guidance ◽  
Negative Regulator ◽  
Fine Tuning ◽  
In Vivo Studies ◽  
Commissural Axons ◽  
Guidance Cue ◽  
Cell Cell

Axon navigation depends on the interactions between guidance molecules along the trajectory and specific receptors on the growth cone. However, our in vitro and in vivo studies on the role of Endoglycan demonstrate that in addition to specific guidance cue – receptor interactions, axon guidance depends on fine-tuning of cell-cell adhesion. Endoglycan, a sialomucin, plays a role in axon guidance in the central nervous system of chicken embryos, but it is neither an axon guidance cue nor a receptor. Rather, Endoglycan acts as a negative regulator of molecular interactions based on evidence from in vitro experiments demonstrating reduced adhesion of growth cones. In the absence of Endoglycan, commissural axons fail to properly navigate the midline of the spinal cord. Taken together, our in vivo and in vitro results support the hypothesis that Endoglycan acts as a negative regulator of cell-cell adhesion in commissural axon guidance.

scholarly journals Proteolytic cleavage of Slit by the Tolkin protease converts an axon repulsion cue to an axon growth cue in vivo

Development ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 147 (20) ◽  
pp. dev196055
Author(s):  
Riley Kellermeyer ◽  
Leah M. Heydman ◽  
Taylor Gillis ◽  
Grant S. Mastick ◽  
Minmin Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Axon Guidance ◽  
Axon Growth ◽  
Biologically Active ◽  
Longitudinal Axon ◽  
Axon Repulsion ◽  
Embryonic Cns ◽  
Cns Midline ◽  
Primary Substrate

ABSTRACTSlit is a secreted protein that has a canonical function of repelling growing axons from the CNS midline. The full-length Slit (Slit-FL) is cleaved into Slit-N and Slit-C fragments, which have potentially distinct functions via different receptors. Here, we report that the BMP-1/Tolloid family metalloprotease Tolkin (Tok) is responsible for Slit proteolysis in vivo and in vitro. In Drosophilatok mutants lacking Slit cleavage, midline repulsion of axons occurs normally, confirming that Slit-FL is sufficient to repel axons. However, longitudinal axon guidance is highly disrupted in tok mutants and can be rescued by midline expression of Slit-N, suggesting that Slit is the primary substrate for Tok in the embryonic CNS. Transgenic restoration of Slit-N or Slit-C does not repel axons in Slit-null flies. Slit-FL and Slit-N are both biologically active cues with distinct axon guidance functions in vivo. Slit signaling is used in diverse biological processes; therefore, differentiating between Slit-FL and Slit fragments will be essential for evaluating Slit function in broader contexts.

Ultrastructure of melanocyte-keratinocyte interactions and pigment transfer in vitro

1978 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 650-651
Author(s):  
Raul I. Garcia ◽  
Evelyn A. Flynn ◽  
George Szabo
Keyword(s):  
Direct Injection ◽  
Skin Pigmentation ◽  
Freeze Fracture ◽  
Pigment Granule ◽  
Time Lapse ◽  
Ultrastructural Level ◽  
Lanthanum Tracer ◽  
A Cell

Skin pigmentation in mammals involves the interaction of epidermal melanocytes and keratinocytes in the structural and functional unit known as the Epidermal Melanin Unit. Melanocytes(M) synthesize melanin within specialized membrane-bound organelles, the melanosome or pigment granule. These are subsequently transferred by way of M dendrites to keratinocytes(K) by a mechanism still to be clearly defined. Three different, though not necessarily mutually exclusive, mechanisms of melanosome transfer have been proposed: cytophagocytosis by K of M dendrite tips containing melanosomes, direct injection of melanosomes into the K cytoplasm through a cell-to-cell pore or communicating channel formed by localized fusion of M and K cell membranes, release of melanosomes into the extracellular space(ECS) by exocytosis followed by K uptake using conventional phagocytosis. Variability in methods of transfer has been noted both in vivo and in vitro and there is evidence in support of each transfer mechanism. We Have previously studied M-K interactions in vitro using time-lapse cinemicrography and in vivo at the ultrastructural level using lanthanum tracer and freeze-fracture.

The metalloproteinase ADAM10 is required for retinal ganglion cell axon guidance in the developing visual systems

2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 77
Author(s):  
Y. Y. Chen ◽  
C. L. Hehr ◽  
K. Atkinson-Leadbeater ◽  
J. C. Hocking ◽  
S. McFarlane
Keyword(s):  
Ganglion Cell ◽  
Axon Guidance ◽  
Retinal Ganglion Cell ◽  
Growth Cone ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Optic Tract ◽  
Axon Growth ◽  
Proteolytic Processing ◽  
Retinal Ganglion

Background: The growth cone interprets cues in its environment in order to reach its target. We want to identify molecules that regulate growth cone behaviour in the developing embryo. We investigated the role of A disintegrin and metalloproteinase 10 (ADAM10) in axon guidance in the developing visual system of African frog, Xenopus laevis. Methods: We first examined the expression patterns of adam10 mRNA by in situ hybridization. We then exposed the developing optic tract to an ADAM10 inhibitor, GI254023X, in vivo. Lastly, we inhibited ADAM10 function in diencephalic neuroepithelial cells (through which retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axons extend) or RGCs by electroporating or transfecting an ADAM10 dominant negative (dn-adam10). Results: We show that adam10 mRNA is expressed in the dorsal neuroepithelium over the time RGC axons extend towards their target, the optic tectum. Second, pharmacological inhibition of ADAM10 in an in vivo exposed brain preparation causes the failure of RGC axons to recognize their target at low concentrations (0.5, 1 μM), and the failure of the axons to make a caudal turn in the mid-diencephalon at higher concentration (5 μM). Thus, ADAM10 function is required for RGC axon guidance at two key guidance decisions. Finally, molecular inhibition of ADAM10 function by electroporating dn-adam10 in the brain neuroepithelium causes defects in RGC axon target recognition (57%) and/or defects in caudal turn (12%), as seen with the pharmacological inhibitor. In contrast, molecular inhibition of ADAM10 within the RGC axons has no effect. Conclusions: These data argue strongly that ADAM10 acts cell non-autonomously within the neuroepithelium to regulate the guidance of RGC axons. This study shows for the first time that a metalloproteinase acts in a cell non-autonomous fashion to direct vertebrate axon growth. It will provide important insights into candidate molecules that could be used to reform nerve connections if destroyed because of injury or disease. References Hattori M, Osterfield M, Flanagan JG. Regulated cleavage of a contact-mediated axon repellent. Science 2000; 289(5483):1360-5. Janes PW, Saha N, Barton WA, Kolev MV, Wimmer-Kleikamp SH, Nievergall E, Blobel CP, Himanen JP, Lackmann M, Nikolov DB. Adam meets Eph: an ADAM substrate recognition module acts as a molecular switch for ephrin cleavage in trans. Cell 2005; 123(2):291-304. Pan D, Rubin GM. Kuzbanian controls proteolytic processing of Notch and mediates lateral inhibition during Drosophila and vertebrate neurogenesis. Cell 1997; 90(2):271-80.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document