scholarly journals Defining the Immune Responses for SARS-CoV-2-Human Macrophage Interactions

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mai Mostafa ◽  
Pravin Yeapuri ◽  
Jatin Machhi ◽  
Katherine Olson ◽  
Farah Shahjin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Viral Infection ◽  
Innate Immune Response ◽  
Human Monocyte ◽  
Innate Immune ◽  
Mononuclear Phagocytes ◽  
Human Macrophage ◽  
Type I ◽  
Innate Immune Signaling ◽  
Organ Tissue

Host innate immune response follows severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, and it is the driver of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) amongst other inflammatory end-organ morbidities. Such life-threatening coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is heralded by virus-induced activation of mononuclear phagocytes (MPs; monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells). MPs play substantial roles in aberrant immune secretory activities affecting profound systemic inflammation and end organ malfunctions. All follow an abortive viral infection. To elucidate SARS-CoV-2-MP interactions we investigated transcriptomic and proteomic profiles of human monocyte-derived macrophages. While expression of the SARS-CoV-2 receptor, the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, paralleled monocyte-macrophage differentiation it failed to affect productive viral infection. In contrast, simple macrophage viral exposure led to robust pro-inflammatory cytokine and chemokine expression but attenuated type I interferon (IFN) activity. Both paralleled dysregulation of innate immune signaling pathways specifically those linked to IFN. We conclude that the SARS-CoV-2-infected host mounts a robust innate immune response characterized by a pro-inflammatory storm heralding consequent end-organ tissue damage.

scholarly journals Defining the Innate Immune Responses for SARS-CoV-2-Human Macrophage Interactions

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mai M. Abdelmoaty ◽  
Pravin Yeapuri ◽  
Jatin Machhi ◽  
Katherine E. Olson ◽  
Farah Shahjin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Innate Immune Response ◽  
Human Monocyte ◽  
Innate Immune ◽  
Mononuclear Phagocytes ◽  
Human Macrophage ◽  
Type I ◽  
Innate Immune Signaling ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Organ Tissue

Host innate immune response follows severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, and it is the driver of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) amongst other inflammatory end-organ morbidities. Such life-threatening coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is heralded by virus-induced activation of mononuclear phagocytes (MPs; monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells). MPs play substantial roles in aberrant immune secretory activities affecting profound systemic inflammation and end-organ malfunctions. All follow the presence of persistent viral components and virions without evidence of viral replication. To elucidate SARS-CoV-2-MP interactions we investigated transcriptomic and proteomic profiles of human monocyte-derived macrophages. While expression of the SARS-CoV-2 receptor, the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, paralleled monocyte-macrophage differentiation, it failed to affect productive viral infection. In contrast, simple macrophage viral exposure led to robust pro-inflammatory cytokine and chemokine expression but attenuated type I interferon (IFN) activity. Both paralleled dysregulation of innate immune signaling pathways, specifically those linked to IFN. We conclude that the SARS-CoV-2-infected host mounts a robust innate immune response characterized by a pro-inflammatory storm heralding end-organ tissue damage.

scholarly journals Interferon-Stimulated Genes as Enhancers of Antiviral Innate Immune Signaling

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keaton M. Crosse ◽  
Ebony A. Monson ◽  
Michael R. Beard ◽  
Karla J. Helbig
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Viral Infection ◽  
Innate Immune Response ◽  
Innate Immune ◽  
Regulatory Factor ◽  
Interferon Stimulated Genes ◽  
Innate Immune Signaling ◽  
Recent Advancement ◽  
Antiviral Function

The ability of a host to curb a viral infection is heavily reliant on the effectiveness of an initial antiviral innate immune response, resulting in the upregulation of interferon (IFN) and, subsequently, IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs). ISGs serve to mount an antiviral state within a host cell, and although the specific antiviral function of a number of ISGs has been characterized, the function of many of these ISGs remains to be determined. Recent research has uncovered a novel role for a handful of ISGs, some of them directly induced by IFN regulatory factor 3 in the absence of IFN itself. These ISGs, most with potent antiviral activity, are also able to augment varying arms of the innate immune response to viral infection, thereby strengthening this response. This new understanding of the role of ISGs may, in turn, help the recent advancement of novel therapeutics aiming to augment innate signaling pathways in an attempt to control viral infection and pathogenesis.

scholarly journals miR-26a Inhibits Feline Herpesvirus 1 Replication by Targeting SOCS5 and Promoting Type I Interferon Signaling

Viruses ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jikai Zhang ◽  
Zhijie Li ◽  
Jiapei Huang ◽  
Hang Yin ◽  
Jin Tian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Viral Infection ◽  
Innate Immune Response ◽  
Antiviral Response ◽  
Innate Immune ◽  
Host Cells ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type I Ifn ◽  
Feline Herpesvirus ◽  
Herpesvirus 1

In response to viral infection, host cells activate various antiviral responses to inhibit virus replication. While feline herpesvirus 1 (FHV-1) manipulates the host early innate immune response in many different ways, the host could activate the antiviral response to counteract it through some unknown mechanisms. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) which serve as a class of regulatory factors in the host, participate in the regulation of the host innate immune response against virus infection. In this study, we found that the expression levels of miR-26a were significantly upregulated upon FHV-1 infection. Furthermore, FHV-1 infection induced the expression of miR-26a via a cGAS-dependent pathway, and knockdown of cellular cGAS significantly blocked the expression of miR-26a induced by poly (dA:dT) or FHV-1 infection. Next, we investigated the biological function of miR-26a during viral infection. miR-26a was able to increase the phosphorylation of STAT1 and promote type I IFN signaling, thus inhibiting viral replication. The mechanism study showed that miR-26a directly targeted host SOCS5. Knockdown of SOCS5 increased the phosphorylation of STAT1 and enhanced the type I IFN-mediated antiviral response, and overexpression of suppressor of the cytokine signalling 5 (SOCS5) decreased the phosphorylation of STAT1 and inhibited the type I IFN-mediated antiviral response. Meanwhile, with the knockdown of SOCS5, the upregulated expression of phosphorylated STAT1 and the anti-virus effect induced by miR-26a were significantly inhibited. Taken together, our data demonstrated a new strategy of host miRNAs against FHV-1 infection by enhancing IFN antiviral signaling.

scholarly journals Released Tryptophanyl-tRNA Synthetase Stimulates Innate Immune Responses against Viral Infection

2018 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun-Cheol Lee ◽  
Eun-Seo Lee ◽  
Md Bashir Uddin ◽  
Tae-Hwan Kim ◽  
Jae-Hoon Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Immune Responses ◽  
Viral Infection ◽  
Innate Immune Response ◽  
Trna Synthetase ◽  
Innate Immune ◽  
Full Length ◽  
Type I ◽  
Innate Immune Responses

ABSTRACT Tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase (WRS) is one of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (ARSs) that possesses noncanonical functions. Full-length WRS is released during bacterial infection and primes the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)-myeloid differentiation factor 2 (MD2) complex to elicit innate immune responses. However, the role of WRS in viral infection remains unknown. Here, we show that full-length WRS is secreted by immune cells in the early phase of viral infection and functions as an antiviral cytokine. Treatment of cells with recombinant WRS protein promotes the production of inflammatory cytokines and type I interferons (IFNs) and curtails virus replication in THP-1 and Raw264.7 cells but not in TLR4−/− or MD2−/− bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs). Intravenous and intranasal administration of recombinant WRS protein induces an innate immune response and blocks viral replication in vivo. These findings suggest that secreted full-length WRS has a noncanonical role in inducing innate immune responses to viral infection as well as to bacterial infection. IMPORTANCE ARSs are essential enzymes in translation that link specific amino acids to their cognate tRNAs. In higher eukaryotes, some ARSs possess additional, noncanonical functions in the regulation of cell metabolism. Here, we report a novel noncanonical function of WRS in antiviral defense. WRS is rapidly secreted in response to viral infection and primes the innate immune response by inducing the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines and type I IFNs, resulting in the inhibition of virus replication both in vitro and in vivo. Thus, we consider WRS to be a member of the antiviral innate immune response. The results of this study enhance our understanding of host defense systems and provide additional information on the noncanonical functions of ARSs.

scholarly journals Lymphocytes are detrimental during the early innate immune response against Listeria monocytogenes

2006 ◽  
Vol 203 (4) ◽  
pp. 933-940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier A. Carrero ◽  
Boris Calderon ◽  
Emil R. Unanue
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Listeria Monocytogenes ◽  
Innate Immune Response ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Bacterial Pathogen ◽  
Interleukin 10 ◽  
Innate Immune ◽  
Type I ◽  
Phagocytic Cells ◽  
Immunodeficient Mice

Mice deficient in lymphocytes are more resistant than normal mice to Listeria monocytogenes infection during the early innate immune response. This paradox remains unresolved: lymphocytes are required for sterilizing immunity, but their presence during the early stage of the infection is not an asset and may even be detrimental. We found that lymphocyte-deficient mice, which showed limited apoptosis in infected organs, were resistant during the first four days of infection but became susceptible when engrafted with lymphocytes. Engraftment with lymphocytes from type I interferon receptor–deficient (IFN-αβR−/−) mice, which had reduced apoptosis, did not confer increased susceptibility to infection, even when the phagocytes were IFN-αβR+/+. The attenuation of innate immunity was due, in part, to the production of the antiinflammatory cytokine interleukin 10 by phagocytic cells after the apoptotic phase of the infection. Thus, immunodeficient mice were more resistant relative to normal mice because the latter went through a stage of lymphocyte apoptosis that was detrimental to the innate immune response. This is an example of a bacterial pathogen creating a cascade of events that leads to a permissive infective niche early during infection.

Type I interferons and the innate immune response—more than just antiviral cytokines

2005 ◽  
Vol 42 (8) ◽  
pp. 869-877 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter L Smith ◽  
Giovanna Lombardi ◽  
Graham R Foster
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Innate Immune Response ◽  
Innate Immune ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Type I

High content screening and computational prediction reveal viral genes that suppress innate immune response

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tai L Ng ◽  
Erika J Olson ◽  
Tae Yeon Yoo ◽  
H. Sloane Weiss ◽  
Yukiye Koide ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Innate Immune Response ◽  
Nuclear Transport ◽  
Computational Prediction ◽  
Viral Proteins ◽  
Innate Immune ◽  
Type I ◽  
Viral Genes ◽  
Genes Encoding

Suppression of the host innate immune response is a critical aspect of viral replication. Upon infection, viruses may introduce one or more proteins that inhibit key immune pathways, such as the type I interferon pathway. However, the ability to predict and evaluate viral protein bioactivity on targeted pathways remains challenging and is typically done on a single virus/gene basis. Here, we present a medium-throughput high-content cell-based assay to reveal the immunosuppressive effects of viral proteins. To test the predictive power of our approach, we developed a library of 800 genes encoding known, predicted, and uncharacterized human viral genes. We find that previously known immune suppressors from numerous viral families such as Picornaviridae and Flaviviridae recorded positive responses. These include a number of viral proteases for which we further confirmed that innate immune suppression depends on protease activity. A class of predicted inhibitors encoded by Rhabdoviridae viruses was demonstrated to block nuclear transport, and several previously uncharacterized proteins from uncultivated viruses were shown to inhibit nuclear transport of the transcription factors NF-kB and IRF3. We propose that this pathway-based assay, together with early sequencing, gene synthesis, and viral infection studies, could partly serve as the basis for rapid in vitro characterization of novel viral proteins.

scholarly journals Tumour viruses and innate immunity

2017 ◽  
Vol 372 (1732) ◽  
pp. 20160267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon E. Hopcraft ◽  
Blossom Damania
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Inflammatory Response ◽  
Viral Infection ◽  
Innate Immune Response ◽  
Innate Immune ◽  
Host Cells ◽  
Oncogenic Viruses ◽  
Barr Virus ◽  
Human T Cell ◽  
Epstein Barr

Host cells sense viral infection through pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), which detect pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and stimulate an innate immune response. PRRs are localized to several different cellular compartments and are stimulated by viral proteins and nucleic acids. PRR activation initiates signal transduction events that ultimately result in an inflammatory response. Human tumour viruses, which include Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus, Epstein–Barr virus, human papillomavirus, hepatitis C virus, hepatitis B virus, human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 and Merkel cell polyomavirus, are detected by several different PRRs. These viruses engage in a variety of mechanisms to evade the innate immune response, including downregulating PRRs, inhibiting PRR signalling, and disrupting the activation of transcription factors critical for mediating the inflammatory response, among others. This review will describe tumour virus PAMPs and the PRRs responsible for detecting viral infection, PRR signalling pathways, and the mechanisms by which tumour viruses evade the host innate immune system. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Human oncogenic viruses’.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document