scholarly journals Diagnostic performance of a novel digital immunoassay (RapidTesta SARS-CoV-2): a prospective observational study with 1,127 nasopharyngeal samples

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiromichi Suzuki ◽  
Yusaku Akashi ◽  
Atsuo Ueda ◽  
Yoshihiko Kiyasu ◽  
Yuto Takeuchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Antigen Test ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients ◽  
Pcr Method ◽  
Antigen Tests ◽  
Positive Line ◽  
Test Cassette

Introduction: Digital immunoassays are generally regarded as superior tests for the detection of infectious disease pathogens, but there have been insufficient data concerning SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays. Methods: We prospectively evaluated a novel digital immunoassay (RapidTesta SARS-CoV-2). Two nasopharyngeal samples were simultaneously collected for antigen tests and RT-PCR. Real-time RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2, using a method developed by the National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Japan, served as the reference RT-PCR method. Results: During the study period, 1,127 nasopharyngeal samples (symptomatic patients: 802, asymptomatic patients: 325) were evaluated. For digital immunoassay antigen tests, the sensitivity was 78.3% (95% CI: 67.3%-87.1%) and the specificity was 97.6% (95% CI: 96.5%-98.5%). When technicians visually analyzed the antigen test results, the sensitivity was 71.6% (95% CI: 59.9%-81.5%) and the specificity was 99.2% (95% CI: 98.5%-99.7%). Among symptomatic patients, the sensitivity was 89.4% (95% CI; 76.9%-96.5%) with digital immunoassay antigen tests, and 85.1% (95% CI; 71.7%-93.8%) with visually analyzed the antigen test, respectively. Conclusions: The findings indicated that RapidTesta SARS-CoV-2 analysis with the DIA device had sufficient analytical performance for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal samples. When positive DIA results are recorded without a visually recognizable red line at the positive line location on the test cassette, additional RT-PCR evaluation should be performed.

scholarly journals Insufficient Sensitivity of RNA Dependent RNA Polymerase Gene of SARS-CoV-2 Viral Genome as Confirmatory Test using Korean COVID-19 Cases

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soyoun Kim ◽  
Dong-Min Kim ◽  
Baeckseung Lee
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Methods ◽  
Confirmatory Test ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Viral Loads ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients ◽  
Pcr Method ◽  
Who Guideline ◽  
Rna Polymerase Gene ◽  
Insufficient Sensitivity

Since mid-December of 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been spreading from Wuhan, China. As of February 21, total 75,773 confirmed cases worldwide have spread to more than two dozen countries. Transmission of COVID-19 can occur early in the course of infection since SARS-CoV-2 viral loads in asymptomatic patients are similar to that in the symptomatic patients. Therefore, more sensitive diagnostic methods are needed to detect early phase of the infection to prevent secondary or tertiary spreads. Here, we compare the RT-PCR confirmatory test results using two different SARS-CoV-2 viral RNAs from two Korean COVID-19 confirmed cases.RT-PCR method targeting the RdRP gene, which was recommended by WHO guideline, was less sensitive than targeting N genes (as per CDC guideline). Because many countries follow the WHO guideline, our findings may contribute to the early diagnosis of COVID-19.

scholarly journals Application of a Serial Antigen Based Testing Strategy for SARS-CoV-2 and Student Adherence in a University Setting, Wisconsin — October–November 2020

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Paul Bigouette ◽  
Laura Ford ◽  
Ian Pray ◽  
Kimberly Langolf ◽  
Juliana Kahrs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Male Students ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Antigen Test ◽  
Testing Strategy ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Testing Strategies ◽  
Serial Testing ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Antigen Tests ◽  
University Setting

Abstract Background Serial SARS-CoV-2 testing has been implemented at institutions of higher education (IHEs) and other settings. Testing strategies can include algorithms specifying confirmatory reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing after an antigen test. It is unknown how testing strategies perform detecting SARS-CoV-2, including individual adherence to serial testing requirements. Methods Student serial testing adherence was defined as completing ≥80% of weekly tests from October 5–November 14, 2020 and evaluated using logistic regression. Medical records were reviewed for all positive antigen test encounters and 10% of daily negative antigen test encounters during October 19–November 30, 2020. Results were used to estimate the proportion of individuals requiring only antigen tests, requiring and completing RT-PCR testing, and associated costs of tests. Results Two-thirds (66.5%; 1,166/1,754) of eligible on-campus students adhered to weekly testing; female students were more adherent (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]:2.07, 95% CI:1.66–2.59) than male students. Of all antigen test encounters, 11.5% (1,409/12,305) reported >1 COVID-19 symptoms. Of non-COVID-19 exposed antigen test encounters, 88% (10,386/11,769) did not require confirmatory RT-PCR testing. Only 28% (390/1,387) of testing encounters had an associated recommended confirmatory RT-PCR test performed. We estimated the testing strategy captured 61% (235/389) of predicted RT-PCR positive specimens. Conclusions At this IHE, most students voluntarily adhered to serial testing. The majority of antigen test results did not require confirmatory RT-PCR testing, but when required, most students did not obtain it. Including strategies to increase the proportion of individuals obtaining indicated confirmatory testing might improve the testing program’s performance.

scholarly journals Five Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2: Virus Viability Matters

Viruses ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 684
Author(s):  
Miroslav Homza ◽  
Hana Zelena ◽  
Jaroslav Janosek ◽  
Hana Tomaskova ◽  
Eduard Jezo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
False Negative ◽  
Antigen Test ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
False Negatives ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
Antigen Tests ◽  
Antigen Testing ◽  
Excellent Tool

Antigen testing for SARS-CoV-2 (AGT) is generally considered inferior to RT-PCR testing in terms of sensitivity. However, little is known about the infectiousness of RT-PCR positive patients who pass undetected by AGT. In a screening setting for mildly symptomatic or asymptomatic patients with high COVID-19 prevalence (30–40%), 1141 patients were tested using one of five AGTs and RT-PCR. Where the results differed, virus viability in the samples was tested on cell culture (CV-1 cells). The test battery included AGTs by JOYSBIO, Assure Tech, SD Biosensor, VivaChek Biotech and NDFOS. Sensitivities of the ATGs compared to RT-PCR ranged from 42% to 76%. The best test yielded a 76% sensitivity, 97% specificity, 92% positive, and 89% negative predictive values, respectively. However, in the best performing ATG tests, almost 90% of samples with “false negative” AGT results contained no viable virus. Corrected on the virus viability, sensitivities grew to 81%–97% and, with one exception, the tests yielded high specificities >96%. Performance characteristics of the best test after adjustment were 96% sensitivity, 97% specificity, 92% positive, and 99% negative predictive values (high prevalence population). We, therefore, believe that virus viability should be considered when assessing the AGT performance. Also, our results indicate that a well-performing antigen test could in a high-prevalence setting serve as an excellent tool for identifying patients shedding viable virus. We also propose that the high proportion of RT-PCR-positive samples containing no viable virus in the group of “false negatives” of the antigen test should be further investigated with the aim of possibly preventing needless isolation of such patients.

scholarly journals Detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection by rapid antigen test in comparison with RT-PCR in a public setting

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathrine Kronberg Jakobsen ◽  
Jakob Schmidt Jensen ◽  
Tobias Todsen ◽  
Freddy Lippert ◽  
Cyril Jean-Marie Martel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
False Negative ◽  
Pcr Analysis ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Antigen Test ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Public Setting ◽  
Antigen Tests ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

AbstractBackgroundRapid and accurate detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection is essential in limiting the spread of infection during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of the STANDARD Q COVID-19 Ag test (SD BIOSENSOR) by comparison with RT-PCR in a public setting.MethodIndividuals aged 18 years or older who had booked an appointment for a RT-PCR test on December 26-31, 2020 at a public test center in Copenhagen, Denmark, were invited to participate. An oropharyngeal swab was collected for RT-PCR analysis, immediately followed by a nasopharyngeal swab examined by the STANDARD Q COVID-19 Ag test (SD BIOSENSOR). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the antigen test were calculated with test results from RT-PCR as reference.ResultsOverall, 4697 individuals were included (female n=2456, 53.3%; mean age: 44.7 years, SD: 16.9 years); 196 individuals were tested twice or more. Among 4811 paired conclusive test results from the RT-PCR and antigen tests, 221 (4.6%) RT-PCR tests were positive. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the antigen test were 69.7% and 99.5%, the positive and negative predictive values were 87.0% and 98.5%. Ct values were significantly higher among individuals with false negative antigen tests compared to true positives.ConclusionThe sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values found indicate that the STANDARD Q COVID-19 Ag is a good supplement to RT-PCR testing.

DIAGNOSTIC ROLE OF CHEST CT USING CO-RADS CATEGORIZATION IN SARS-COV-2 INFECTION WITH EMPHASIS ON IMPACT OF CT IN PATIENTS WITH DELAYED OR NEGATIVE INITIAL RTPCR TEST

2021 ◽  
pp. 51-52
Author(s):  
Tharani Putta ◽  
Kaushik Deconda
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Virus Disease ◽  
Vital Role ◽  
Chest Ct ◽  
Lung Involvement ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Diagnostic Role ◽  
Pcr Test

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Role of chest CT in diagnosis of corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been controversial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of chest CT when utilizing COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS). METHODOLOGY: Retrospective study including consecutive patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test (initial or repeat test) and chest CT done in our institute between June and September 2020. Spectrum of CT ndings, CO-RADS score and 25 point CT severity score (CTSS) were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 300 consecutive patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were included in the analysis. Out of the 168 patients who underwent CT prior to positive RT-PCR result, 125 (74.4%) had CO-RADS 3, 4 or 5 score on chest CT. 32 study patients (10.6%) had initial negative RT-PCR of which 24 (75%) had CO-RADS 4 or 5 score. Of the total patients with CO-RADS 3 to 5 score (227), 20 (8.8%) had severe lung involvement (CTSS 18-25), 83 (36.6%) had moderate lung involvement (CTSS 8-17) and 124 (54.6%) had mild lung involvement (CTSS 1-7). The mean CTSS was 7.9 with mean lobar score being higher in lower lobes (RLL=1.82, LLL=1.78) compared to the upper and middle lobes (RUL=1.61, RML=1.19, LUL=1.53). CONCLUSION:CT using CO-RADS scoring system has good diagnostic performance. In addition to assessing disease severity, it plays a vital role in triage of patients with suspected COVID-19 especially when there is limited availability of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests, delay in RT-PCR test results or in negative RT-PCR cases when there is high index of clinical suspicion.

scholarly journals An assessment of a rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen test in Bangladesh

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zannat Kawser ◽  
Mohabbat Hossain ◽  
Sara Suliman ◽  
Shahin Lockman ◽  
Jesse Gitaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
False Positive ◽  
Rapid Test ◽  
Field Evaluation ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Large Field ◽  
Antigen Test ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Rapid Antigen Detection Test ◽  
Antigen Tests ◽  
Asymptomatic Individuals

Early detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection is crucial to prevent the spread of the virus. In this study, we evaluated the performance of a commercial rapid antigen detection test, BD Veritor, and compared this (and another rapid test, Standard Q) against a gold-standard of nasopharyngeal (NP) swab tested by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in prospectively recruited adults in Dhaka, Bangladesh. We compared the sensitivity and specificity of the two rapid antigen tests against RT-PCR results in 130 symptomatic and 130 asymptomatic adults. In addition, we evaluated the suitability and ease-of-use of the BD Veritor test in a subsample of study participants (n=42) and implementers (n=5). The sensitivity of the BD Veritor rapid antigen 66 test was 70% in symptomatic (95% confidence interval [CI]: 51-85%) and 87% (95% CI: 69-96%) in asymptomatic individuals with positive SARSCoV-2 RT-PCR, for overall sensitivity of 78% (95% CI: 66-88%). The sensitivity of the Standard Q rapid antigen test was 63% (95% CI: 44-69 80%) in symptomatic and 73% (95% CI: 54-87%) in asymptomatic individuals. One false positive in BD Veritor test (specificity 99.5) and no false positive in Standard Q tests were observed (specificity 100%). The BD Veritor rapid antigen test was 78% sensitive when compared with RT-PCR irrespective of the cycle threshold (Ct) levels in this evaluation in Bangladesh. The implementation evaluation data showed good acceptability in the field settings. This warrants large field evaluation as well as use of the rapid antigen test for quick assessment of SARS-CoV-2 for containment of epidemics in the country.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Hepatic Biochemical Parameters during Antiviral Treatment in COVID-19 Patients

Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Felicia Marc ◽  
Corina Moldovan ◽  
Anica Hoza ◽  
Patricia Restea ◽  
Liliana Sachelarie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Normal Values ◽  
Antiviral Treatment ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Antigen Test ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Medicine Department ◽  
Liver Parameters ◽  
Pcr Method ◽  
The Mean

(1) Background: The antiviral treatment for COVID-19 disease started to be largely used in 2020 and has been found to be efficient, although it is not specific for SARS-CoV-2 virus. There were some concerns that it may produce liver damage or other side effects. (2) Methods: The aim of this study was to observe if antiviral therapy is affecting liver parameters or producing other side-effects in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 disease. The study included a group of patients hospitalized in the internal medicine department of Oradea Municipal Clinical Hospital, Romania, between August 2020–June 2021, diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 viral infection by RT-PCR method or rapid antigen test. During hospitalization, patients were treated with a Lopinavir/Ritonavir (Kaletra) combination, or with Favipiravir or Remdesivir. In addition to monitoring the evolution of the disease (clinical and biochemical), also hepatic parameters were analyzed at admission, during hospitalization, and at discharge. (3) Results: In the group of studied patients, the mean value of aspartat aminotrensferase did not increase above normal at discharge, alanin aminotransferase increased, but below twice the normal values, and cholestasis registered a statistically insignificant slight increase. (4) Conclusions: In our study, we found that all three antivirals were generally well tolerated and their use did not alter liver function in a significant manner.

scholarly journals Diagnostic Efficiency of Three Fully Automated Serology Assays and Their Correlation with a Novel Surrogate Virus Neutralization Test in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic SARS-COV-2 Individuals

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 245
Author(s):  
Salma Younes ◽  
Hadeel Al-Jighefee ◽  
Farah Shurrab ◽  
Duaa W. Al-Sadeq ◽  
Nadin Younes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Neutralization Test ◽  
Cross Reactivity ◽  
Diagnostic Efficiency ◽  
Receptor Binding Domain ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Viral Antibodies ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients ◽  
Intended Use ◽  
Control Samples

To support the deployment of serology assays for population screening during the COVID-19 pandemic, we compared the performance of three fully automated SARS-CoV-2 IgG assays: Mindray CL-900i® (target: spike [S] and nucleocapsid [N]), BioMérieux VIDAS®3 (target: receptor-binding domain [RBD]) and Diasorin LIAISON®XL (target: S1 and S2 subunits). A total of 111 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR- positive samples collected at ≥ 21 days post symptom onset, and 127 pre-pandemic control samples were included. Diagnostic performance was assessed in correlation to RT-PCR and a surrogate virus-neutralizing test (sVNT). Moreover, cross-reactivity with other viral antibodies was investigated. Compared to RT-PCR, LIAISON®XL showed the highest overall specificity (100%), followed by VIDAS®3 (98.4%) and CL-900i® (95.3%). The highest sensitivity was demonstrated by CL-900i® (90.1%), followed by VIDAS®3 (88.3%) and LIAISON®XL (85.6%). The sensitivity of all assays was higher in symptomatic patients (91.1–98.2%) compared to asymptomatic patients (78.4–80.4%). In correlation to sVNT, all assays showed excellent sensitivities (92.2–96.1%). In addition, VIDAS®3 demonstrated the best correlation (r = 0.75) with the sVNT. The present study provides insights on the performance of three fully automated assays, which could help diagnostic laboratories in the choice of a particular assay according to the intended use.

scholarly journals Nasopharyngeal Panbio COVID-19 antigen performed at point-of-care has a high sensitivity in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with higher risk for transmission and older age

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mar Masiá ◽  
Marta Fernández-González ◽  
Manuel Sánchez ◽  
Mar Carvajal ◽  
José Alberto García ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Test Performance ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Rapid Test ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Older Age ◽  
Antigen Test ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients ◽  
Clinical Scenarios ◽  
Nasal Swabs

Abstract Background Performance of point-of-care tests in different clinical scenarios and on different samples remains undetermined. We comprehensively evaluated the performance of the nasopharyngeal Panbio COVID-19 antigen Rapid-Test-Device. Method Prospective study including consecutive patients attending three primary care centers (PCC) and an emergency department. The antigen test was performed at point-of-care in nasopharyngeal and nasal swabs, and in saliva. Positive and negative percent agreement (PPA, NPA) were calculated with the RT-PCR assay as reference standard. Results Of 913 patients included, 296 (32.3%) were asymptomatic and 690 (75.6%) came from the PCC. Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from 913, nasal swabs from 659, and saliva from 611 patients. RT-PCR was positive in 196 (21.5%) nasopharyngeal samples (NPS). Overall PPA (95% CI) in NPS was 60.5% (53.3-67.4), and it was lower in nasal swabs (44.7%) and saliva (23.1%). Test performance in NPS was largely dependent on the cycle threshold (Ct) in RT-PCR, with PPA of 94% for Ct≤25 and 80% for Ct<30. In symptomatic patients, the PPA was 95% for Ct≤25; 85% for Ct<30, and 89% for the symptom triad of fever, cough and malaise. Performance was also dependent on age, with PPA of 100% in symptomatic patients >50 years with Ct<25. In asymptomatic patients, the PPA was 86% for Ct<25. In all cases, NPA was 100%. Conclusion The nasopharyngeal Panbio COVID-19 antigen test performed at point-of-care has a good sensitivity in symptomatic patients with Ct<30 and older age. The test was useful to identify asymptomatic patients with lower Ct values.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document