scholarly journals Risk of heart disease following breast cancer: results from a population-based cohort study

Author(s):  
Haomin Yang ◽  
Nirmala Bhoo Pathy ◽  
Judith Brand ◽  
Elham Hedayati ◽  
Felix Grassmann ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: There is a rising concern about treatment-associated cardiotoxicities in breast cancer patients.<br />OBJECTIVES?This study aimed to determine the time- and treatment-specific incidence of arrhythmia, heart failure and ischemic heart disease in women diagnosed with breast cancer.<br /> METHODS: A register-based matched cohort study was conducted including 8338 breast cancerpatients diagnosed from 2001-2008 in the Stockholm-Gotland region and followed-up until 2017. Overall and time dependent risks of arrhythmia, ischemic heart disease and heart failure in breast cancer patients were assessed using flexible parametric models as compared to matched controls from general population. Treatment-specific effects were estimated in breast cancer patients using Cox model.<br />RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 10.8 years, the hazard ratios for arrhythmia, heart failure and ischemic heart disease, were 1.27 (95% CI = 1.18-1.37), 1.38 (95% CI = 1.23-1.55), and 0.93 (95% CI = 0.84-1.03), respectively. Time-dependent analyses revealed long-term increased risks of arrhythmia, and heart failure in breast cancer patients compared to matched controls. The risk of ischemic heart disease was only elevated in the first year after cancer diagnosis. Trastuzumab and anthracyclines were associated with increased risk of heart failure. Aromatase inhibitors, but not tamoxifen, were associated with risk of ischemic heart disease. No increased risk of heart disease was identified following loco-regional radiotherapy.<br />CONCLUSIONS: Administration of systemic adjuvant therapies appear to be associated with increased risks of heart disease. The risk estimates observed in this study may serve as reference to aid adjuvant therapy decision-making and patient counseling in oncology practices.

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Jakobsen ◽  
Christophe Kolodziejczyk ◽  
Morten Sall Jensen ◽  
Peter Bo Poulsen ◽  
Humma Khan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background There is increasing concern about cardiovascular disease (CVD) after breast cancer (BC). The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of different types of CVD in women diagnosed with BC compared to cancer-free controls as well as the incidence of CVD after BC diagnosis. Methods We performed a cohort study based on data from national registries covering the entire Danish population. We followed 16,505 cancer-naïve BC patients diagnosed from 2003 to 2007 5 years before and up to 10 years after BC diagnosis compared to 165,042 cancer-free controls. Results We found that 15.6% of BC patients were registered with at least one CVD diagnosis in hospital records before BC diagnosis. Overall, BC patients and controls were similar with regard to CVD comorbidity before BC diagnosis. After BC diagnosis, the incidence of all CVD diagnoses combined was significantly higher in BC patients than controls up to approximately 6 years after the index date (BC diagnosis). After 10 years, 28% of both BC patients and controls (without any CVD diagnosis up to 5 years before the index date) had at least one CVD diagnosis according to hospital records. However, the incidence of heart failure, thrombophlebitis/thrombosis and pulmonary heart disease including pulmonary embolism remained higher in BC patients than controls during the entire 10-year follow-up period. After 10 years, 2.7% of BC patients compared to 2.5% of controls were diagnosed with heart failure, 2.7% of BC patients compared to 1.5% of controls were diagnosed with thrombophlebitis/thrombosis, and 1.5% of BC patients compared to 1.0% of controls were diagnosed with pulmonary heart disease according to hospital records. Furthermore, we found that the risk of heart failure and thrombophlebitis/thrombosis was higher after chemotherapy. Conclusions Focus on CVD in BC patients is important to ensure optimum treatment with regard to BC as well as possible CVD. Strategies to minimise and manage the increased risk of heart failure, thrombophlebitis/thrombosis and pulmonary heart disease including pulmonary embolism in BC patients are especially important.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Senbeta Guteta Abdissa ◽  
Wakgari Deressa ◽  
Amit J Shah

Abstract Background: In population studies of heart failure (HF), diabetes has been shown to be an independent risk factor. However, the evidence evaluating diabetes mellitus (DM) as an independent risk factor in incident HF in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) is scarce. Our study aimed to assess the incidence of HF in diabetic IHD patients compared to non-diabetic IHD patients in Ethiopia.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among 306 patients with IHD followed-up at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. The IHD patients who did not have HF at baseline were followed for 24 months beginning from November 30, 2015. We assessed the incidence of HF in patients with diabetic IHD versus the non-diabetic IHD. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association between diabetic IHD and HF after controlling for important covariates. Hypertension was examined as a possible effect modifier as well.Results: The mean age was 56.8 years, 69% were male, and 31% were diabetic. During the 24 months follow-up period, 196 (64.1%) had incident HF. On multivariate Cox regression, DM was significantly associated with incident HF [Hazard Ratio = 2.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.32-3.14, p = 0.001]. Furthermore, when the patients were stratified by hypertension (HTN), DM was associated with worse prognosis, the strongest association being in those with co-existing DM and HTN [HR = 2.57,95% CI =1.66-3.98, p<0.0001] followed by the presence of DM without HTN [HR 2.27, 95% CI = 1.38-3.71, p=0.001] (compared to those with neither). Conclusion: DM is the strongest predictor of incident HF, compared to other traditional risk factors, in Ethiopian patients with IHD. Those with both DM and HTN are at the highest risk.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Senbeta Guteta Abdissa ◽  
Wakgari Deressa ◽  
Amit J Shah

Abstract Background: In population studies of heart failure (HF), diabetes mellitus (DM) has been shown to be an independent risk factor. However, the evidence evaluating it as an independent risk factor in incident HF in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) is scarce. Our study aimed to assess the incidence of HF in diabetic IHD patients compared to non-diabetic IHD patients in Ethiopia. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among 306 patients with IHD followed-up at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. The IHD patients who did not have HF at baseline were followed for 24 months beginning from November 30, 2015. We assessed the incidence of HF in patients with diabetic IHD versus the non-diabetic IHD. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association between diabetic IHD and HF after controlling for important covariates. Hypertension was examined as a possible effect modifier as well. Results: The mean age was 56.8 years, 69% were male, and 31% were diabetic. During the 24 months follow-up period, 196 (64.1%) had incident HF. On multivariate Cox regression, DM was significantly associated with incident HF [Hazard Ratio = 2.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.32-3.14, p = 0.001]. Furthermore, when the patients were stratified by hypertension (HTN) status, DM was associated with worse prognosis, and the strongest association was in those with co-existing DM and HTN [HR = 2.57,95% CI =1.66-3.98, p<0.0001], followed by the presence of DM without HTN [HR 2.27, 95% CI = 1.38-3.71, p=0.001] (compared to those with neither). Conclusion: DM is the strongest predictor of incident HF, compared to other traditional risk factors, in Ethiopian patients with IHD. Those with both DM and HTN are at the highest risk. Key Words: Ischemic heart disease; Heart failure; Incidence; Diabetes Mellitus; Retrospective cohort study


2010 ◽  
Vol 55 (10) ◽  
pp. A28.E269
Author(s):  
Jakob Raunso ◽  
Ole D. Pedersen ◽  
Helena Dominguez ◽  
Morten L. Hansen ◽  
Jacob E. Moller ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emil Loefroth ◽  
Xian Shen ◽  
Rachel Studer ◽  
Raymond Schlienger ◽  
Clare Proudfoot ◽  
...  

Background: The clinical development program of sacubitril/valsartan (sac/val) for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) only included a very limited number of patients being naive to prior angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) or angiotensin II receptor antagonists (ARBs). Recent studies support the use of sac/val in hospitalised HF patients without prior ACEis/ARBs. This study aims to compare HF patients newly prescribed either sac/val or ACEis/ARBs. Methods: Retrospective non-interventional cohort study describing two mutually exclusive adult patient cohorts diagnosed with HFrEF either initiating sac/val or ACEis/ARBs. All patients were naive to both sac/val and ACEis/ARBs for 12 months prior to the first prescription. All patients had a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40%. Patients were identified any time between 1 st July 2015 and 31 st Dec 2018 in the Optum® de-identified EHR dataset from providers across the continuum of care. Results: 2,414 patients were initiated on sac/val, 36,563 on ACEis/ARBs. Mean age was 66.1 (SD 12.9) and 67.2 years (SD 13.7) for sac/val and ACEis/ARBs users, respectively. Sac/val patients were more likely to be male: 70.8% vs 67.2% (p<0.0001) and had a lower mean LVEF: 26.9% vs 29.3% (p<0.0001). Patients newly initiated on sac/val had similar proportion of ischemic heart disease (67.9% vs 68.2%, p=0.72), and more often valvular heart disease (48.6% vs 44.3%, p<0.0001), and use of cardio resynchronization therapy device (40.9% vs 24.0%, p<0.0001). Conclusions: This real-world study indicates that sac/val tends to be newly prescribed to younger, male HFrEF patients with lower LVEF and a higher proportion of cardio resynchronization therapy devices compared with patients newly initiated on ACEis/ARBs. The prevalence of ischemic heart disease is similar between the groups.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document