scholarly journals Novel regimens of bedaquiline-pyrazinamide combined with moxifloxacin, rifabutin, delamanid and/or OPC-167832 in murine tuberculosis models

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Nuermberger ◽  
Rokeya Tasneen ◽  
Andrew Garcia ◽  
Paul J Converse ◽  
Matthew D Zimmerman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Mouse Model ◽  
Drug Interactions ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Murine Models ◽  
Lung Lesions ◽  
Resistant Tuberculosis

A recent landmark trial showed a 4-month regimen of rifapentine, pyrazinamide, moxifloxacin and isoniazid (PZMH) to be non-inferior to the 6-month standard of care. Here, two murine models of tuberculosis were used to test whether novel regimens replacing rifapentine and isoniazid with bedaquiline and another drug would maintain or increase the sterilizing activity of the regimen. In BALB/c mice, replacing rifapentine in the PZM backbone with bedaquiline (i.e., BZM) significantly reduced both lung CFU counts after 1 month and the proportion of mice relapsing within 3 months after completing 1.5 months of treatment. Addition of rifabutin to BZM (BZMRb) further increased the sterilizing activity. In the C3HeB/FeJ mouse model characterized by caseating lung lesions, treatment with BZMRb resulted in significantly fewer relapses than PZMH after 2 months of treatment. A regimen combining the new DprE1 inhibitor OPC-167832 and delamanid (BZOD) also had superior bactericidal and sterilizing activity compared to PZM in BALB/c mice and was similar in efficacy to PZMH in C3HeB/FeJ mice. Thus, BZM represents a promising backbone for treatment-shortening regimens. Given the prohibitive drug-drug interactions between bedaquiline and rifampin or rifapentine, the BZMRb regimen represents the best opportunity to combine, in one regimen, the treatment-shortening potential of the rifamycin class with that of BZM and deserves high priority for evaluation in clinical trials. Other 4-drug BZM-based regimens and BZOD represent promising opportunities for extending the spectrum of treatment-shortening regimens to rifamycin- and fluoroquinolone-resistant tuberculosis.

scholarly journals Oxazolidinones Can Replace Clarithromycin in Combination with Rifampin in a Mouse Model of Buruli Ulcer

2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepak V. Almeida ◽  
Till F. Omansen ◽  
Si-Yang Li ◽  
Jin Lee ◽  
Jacques H. Grosset ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mouse Model ◽  
Drug Interactions ◽  
Bactericidal Activity ◽  
Buruli Ulcer ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Mycobacterium Ulcerans ◽  
Bacterial Burden ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Combination Regimens ◽  
Culture Negative

ABSTRACT Rifampin (RIF) plus clarithromycin (CLR) for 8 weeks is now the standard of care for Buruli ulcer (BU) treatment, but CLR may not be an ideal companion for rifamycins due to bidirectional drug-drug interactions. The oxazolidinone linezolid (LZD) was previously shown to be active against Mycobacterium ulcerans infection in mice but has dose- and duration-dependent toxicity in humans. Sutezolid (SZD) and tedizolid (TZD) may be safer than LZD. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of these oxazolidinones in combination with rifampin in a murine BU model. Mice with M. ulcerans-infected footpads received control regimens of RIF plus either streptomycin (STR) or CLR or test regimens of RIF plus either LZD (1 of 2 doses), SZD, or TZD for up to 8 weeks. All combination regimens reduced the swelling and bacterial burden in footpads after two weeks of treatment compared with RIF alone. RIF+SZD was the most active test regimen, while RIF+LZD was also no less active than RIF+CLR. After 4 and 6 weeks of treatment, neither CLR nor the oxazolidinones added significant bactericidal activity to RIF alone. By the end of 8 weeks of treatment, all regimens rendered footpads culture negative. We conclude that SZD and LZD warrant consideration as alternative companion agents to CLR in combination with RIF to treat BU, especially when CLR is contraindicated, intolerable, or unavailable. Further evaluation could prove SZD superior to CLR in this combination.

scholarly journals Co-Clinical Trials: An Innovative Drug Development Platform for Cholangiocarcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 51
Author(s):  
Brinda Balasubramanian ◽  
Simran Venkatraman ◽  
Kyaw Zwar Myint ◽  
Tavan Janvilisri ◽  
Kanokpan Wongprasert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Drug Development ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Time Data ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Innovative Drug ◽  
Curative Intent

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), a group of malignancies that originate from the biliary tract, is associated with a high mortality rate and a concerning increase in worldwide incidence. In Thailand, where the incidence of CCA is the highest, the socioeconomic burden is severe. Yet, treatment options are limited, with surgical resection being the only form of treatment with curative intent. The current standard-of-care remains adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy which is ineffective in most patients. The overall survival rate is dismal, even after surgical resection and the tumor heterogeneity further complicates treatment. Together, this makes CCA a significant burden in Southeast Asia. For effective management of CCA, treatment must be tailored to each patient, individually, for which an assortment of targeted therapies must be available. Despite the increasing numbers of clinical studies in CCA, targeted therapy drugs rarely get approved for clinical use. In this review, we discuss the shortcomings of the conventional clinical trial process and propose the implementation of a novel concept, co-clinical trials to expedite drug development for CCA patients. In co-clinical trials, the preclinical studies and clinical trials are conducted simultaneously, thus enabling real-time data integration to accurately stratify and customize treatment for patients, individually. Hence, co-clinical trials are expected to improve the outcomes of clinical trials and consequently, encourage the approval of targeted therapy drugs. The increased availability of targeted therapy drugs for treatment is expected to facilitate the application of precision medicine in CCA.

scholarly journals Rationalisations for women-only randomised controlled trials in conditions that affect both sexes: a scoping review protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e043370
Author(s):  
Ainsley Matthewson ◽  
Olena Bereznyakova ◽  
Brian Dewar ◽  
Alexandra Davis ◽  
Mark Fedyk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trials ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Theory Approach ◽  
Reference Centre ◽  
Cochrane Database ◽  
Randomised Controlled

IntroductionWomen have historically been under-represented in randomised controlled trials (RCTs), including many landmark RCTs that established standards of care. In light of this fact, some modern researchers are calling for replication of earlier landmark trials with women only. This approach is ethically concerning, in that it would require some enrolled women to be deprived of treatments that are currently considered standard of care.ObjectiveIn an attempt to better understand the justification of a women-only approach to designing clinical trials, this study looks to systematically categorise the number of women-only RCTs for conditions that affect both men and women and the reasons given within the medical and philosophical literatures to perform them.MethodologyThis scoping review of the literature will search, screen and select articles based on predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria, after which a grounded theory approach will be used to synthesise the data. It is expected that there will be a variety of reasons given for why a women-only trial may be justified. Electronic databases that will be searched include MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Clinical Trials Register, Web of Science Proceedings, ClinicalTrials.gov, Philosopher’s Index, Phil Papers, JSTOR, Periodicals Archive Online, Project MUSE and the National Reference Centre for Bioethics.SignificanceThe scope of this study is to determine published rationales used to justify women-only randomised trials, both in the case of new trials and in the repetition of landmark trials.Ethics and disseminationResearch ethics board approval is not required for this study as there is no participant involvement. Results will be published as a stand-alone manuscript and will inform a larger project related to the ethics of a women-only RCT of carotid intervention for women with symptomatic high-grade carotid stenosis.

scholarly journals Stereotactic cisternal lavage in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage with urokinase and nimodipine for the prevention of secondary brain injury (SPLASH): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Roland Roelz ◽  
Fabian Schubach ◽  
Volker A. Coenen ◽  
Carolin Jenkner ◽  
Christian Scheiwe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Neurological Outcome ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Secondary Brain Injury ◽  
Ringer’S Solution ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Therapy Protocol

Abstract Background Delayed cerebral infarction (DCI) is a major cause of death and poor neurological outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Direct intrathecal therapies with fibrinolytic and spasmolytic drugs have appeared promising in clinical trials. However, access to the subarachnoid space for intrathecal drug administration is an unsolved problem so far, especially in patients with endovascular aneurysm securing. We investigate a therapy protocol based on stereotactic catheter ventriculocisternostomy (STX-VCS), a new approach to overcome this problem. The primary objective of this study is to assess whether cisternal lavage with urokinase, nimodipine, and Ringer’s solution administered via a stereotactically implanted catheter into the basal cisterns (= investigational treatment (IT)) is safe and improves neurological outcome in patients with aSAH. Methods This is a randomized, controlled, parallel-group, open-label phase II trial. Fifty-four patients with severe aSAH (WFNS grade ≥ 3) will be enrolled at one academic tertiary care center in Southern Germany. Patients will be randomized at a ratio of 1:1 to receive either standard of care only or standard of care plus the IT. The primary endpoint is the proportion of subjects with a favorable outcome on the Modified Rankin Scale (defined as mRS 0–3) at 6 months after aSAH. Further clinical and surrogate outcome parameters are defined as secondary endpoints. Discussion New approaches for the prevention and therapy of secondary brain injury in patients with aSAH are urgently needed. We propose this RCT to assess the clinical safety and efficacy of a novel therapy protocol for intrathecal administration of urokinase, nimodipine, and Ringer’s solution. Trial registration Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien (German Clinical Trials Register), DRKS00015645. Registered on 8 May 2019

scholarly journals Effect of reasons for screen failure (RFSF) on standard of care in cancer patients screened for clinical trials

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. ix170-ix171
Author(s):  
C. Tiu ◽  
Z. Loh ◽  
C. Gan ◽  
J. Hakanson ◽  
H. Gan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Screen Failure

scholarly journals Immunocompetent Mouse Models in the Search for Effective Immunotherapy in Glioblastoma

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Roxanne Wouters ◽  
Sien Bevers ◽  
Matteo Riva ◽  
Frederik De Smet ◽  
An Coosemans
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Mouse Models ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Preclinical Studies ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Immunocompetent Mouse ◽  
Full Spectrum ◽  
Effective Immune Response ◽  
Radio Chemotherapy

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive intrinsic brain tumor in adults. Despite maximal therapy consisting of surgery and radio/chemotherapy, GBM remains largely incurable with a median survival of less than 15 months. GBM has a strong immunosuppressive nature with a multitude of tumor and microenvironment (TME) derived factors that prohibit an effective immune response. To date, all clinical trials failed to provide lasting clinical efficacy, despite the relatively high success rates of preclinical studies to show effectivity of immunotherapy. Various factors may explain this discrepancy, including the inability of a single mouse model to fully recapitulate the complexity and heterogeneity of GBM. It is therefore critical to understand the features and limitations of each model, which should probably be combined to grab the full spectrum of the disease. In this review, we summarize the available knowledge concerning immune composition, stem cell characteristics and response to standard-of-care and immunotherapeutics for the most commonly available immunocompetent mouse models of GBM.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document