scholarly journals Molecular convergence by differential domain acquisition is a hallmark of chromosomal passenger complex evolution

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinichiro Komaki ◽  
Eelco C Tromer ◽  
Geert De Jaeger ◽  
Nancy De Winne ◽  
Maren Heese ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Common Ancestor ◽  
Eukaryotic Cell ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Phosphate Binding ◽  
Fha Domain ◽  
Developmental Defects ◽  
Chromosomal Passenger Complex ◽  
Chromosomal Passenger ◽  
Similarity Searches ◽  
Bir Domain

The chromosomal passenger complex (CPC) is a heterotetrameric regulator of eukaryotic cell division, consisting of an Aurora-type kinase and a scaffold built of INCENP, Borealin and Survivin. While most CPC components are conserved across eukaryotes, orthologs of the chromatin reader Survivin have previously only been found in animals and fungi, raising the question of how its essential role is carried out in other eukaryotes. By characterizing proteins that bind to the Arabidopsis Borealin ortholog, we identified BOREALIN RELATED INTERACTOR 1 and 2 (BORI1 and BORI2) as redundant Survivin-like proteins in the context of the CPC in plants. Loss of BORI function is lethal and a reduced expression of BORIs causes severe developmental defects. Similar to Survivin, we find that the BORIs bind to phosphorylated histone H3, relevant for correct CPC association with chromatin. However, this interaction is not mediated by a BIR domain as in previously recognized Survivin orthologs, but by an FHA domain, a widely conserved phosphate-binding module. We propose that the unifying criterion of Survivin-type proteins is a helix that facilitates complex formation with the other two scaffold components, and that the addition of a phosphate-binding domain, necessary for concentration at the inner centromere, evolved in parallel in different eukaryotic groups. Using sensitive similarity searches, we indeed find conservation of this helical domain between animals and plants, and identify the missing CPC component in most eukaryotic supergroups. Interestingly, we also detect Survivin orthologs without a defined phosphate-binding domain, possibly reflecting the situation in the last eukaryotic common ancestor.

scholarly journals Uncoupling the Central Spindle-associated Function of the Chromosomal Passenger Complex from Its Role at Centromeres

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1897-1909 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne M.A. Lens ◽  
Jose A. Rodriguez ◽  
Gerben Vader ◽  
Simone W. Span ◽  
Giuseppe Giaccone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Deletion Mutants ◽  
Chromosomal Passenger Complex ◽  
Central Spindle ◽  
Survivin Protein ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Chromosomal Passenger ◽  
Associated Function ◽  
Bir Domain

Survivin is a component of the chromosomal passenger complex (CPC) that plays a role in maintenance of an active spindle checkpoint and in cytokinesis. To study whether these different functions can be attributed to distinct domains within the Survivin protein, we complemented Survivin-depleted cells with a variety of point- and deletion-mutants of Survivin. We show that an intact baculovirus IAP repeat (BIR) domain is required for proper spindle checkpoint functioning, but dispensable for cytokinesis. In line with this, mutants lacking an intact BIR domain localized normally to the central spindle, but their localization to inner centromeres was severely perturbed. Consequently, these mutants failed to recruit Aurora B, Borealin/Dasra B, and BubR1 to centromeres and kinetochores, but they had retained the ability to recruit Aurora B and Borealin/Dasra B to the midzone and midbody. Thus, the C terminus of Survivin is sufficient for central spindle localization and execution of cytokinesis, but the additional presence of a functional BIR domain is essential for centromere targeting and spindle checkpoint function. Importantly, our data show that the function of the CPC at the centromere can be separated from its function at the central spindle and that execution of cytokinesis does not require prior concentration of the CPC at centromeres.

Phosphate Binding to Isolated Chloroplast Coupling Factor (CF1)

1988 ◽  
Vol 43 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 213-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernhard Huchzermeyer
Keyword(s):  
Atpase Activity ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Inorganic Phosphate ◽  
Coupling Factor ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Atp Binding ◽  
Phosphate Binding ◽  
Chloroplast Coupling Factor ◽  
Single Binding Site ◽  
Site Binding

A single binding site for phosphate was found on isolated chloroplast coupling factor in the absence of nucleotides. In our experiments the phosphate binding site showed a Kd of 170 μᴍ. We did not observe any differences whether the ATPase activity of CF] had been activated or not. If the enzyme was incubated with [γ-32P]ATP the amount of 32P bound per CF1 depended on the pretreatment of the enzyme: In the presence of ADP no ATP or phosphate was bound to CF,. After activation of ATPase activity one mol of ATP per mol CF, was rapidly bound and hydrolyzed while there was a slowly occurring binding of another phosphate without concomitant nucleotide binding. We conclude that there are two different types of phosphate binding observed in our experiments: 1) Inorganic phosphate can be bound by one catalytic site per mol of CF1 2) The γ-phosphate of ATP is able to bind to an ATP binding domain of the enzyme if this domain can exchange substrates with the incubation medium. This ATP binding domain appears to differ from the site binding inorganic phosphate, because at least a portion of the coupling factor contains more than one labelled phosphate during our ATPase tests.

scholarly journals Effects of Full-Length Borealin on the Composition and Protein−Protein Interaction Activity of a Binary Chromosomal Passenger Complex†

Biochemistry ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 1156-1161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lihong Zhou ◽  
Jiejin Li ◽  
Roger George ◽  
Sandrine Ruchaud ◽  
Hong-Gang Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interaction ◽  
Full Length ◽  
Chromosomal Passenger Complex ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction ◽  
Chromosomal Passenger

scholarly journals The Survivin Isoform Survivin-3B is Cytoprotective and can Function as a Chromosomal Passenger Complex Protein

Cell Cycle ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 1501-1508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shirley K. Knauer ◽  
Carolin Bier ◽  
Peter Schlag ◽  
Johannes Fritzmann ◽  
Wolfgang Dietmaier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosomal Passenger Complex ◽  
Complex Protein ◽  
Chromosomal Passenger

scholarly journals Liquid-liquid phase separation of the chromosomal passenger complex drives parallel bundling of midzone microtubules

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ewa Niedzialkowska ◽  
Tan M Truong ◽  
Luke A Eldredge ◽  
Stefanie Redemann ◽  
Denis Chretien ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Separation ◽  
Liquid Phase ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Dynamic Structure ◽  
Liquid Phase Separation ◽  
Chromosomal Passenger Complex ◽  
Chromosomal Passenger ◽  
Spindle Midzone ◽  
Liquid Liquid Phase Separation

The spindle midzone is a dynamic structure that forms during anaphase, mediates chromosome segregation, and provides a signaling platform to position the cleavage furrow. The spindle midzone comprises two antiparallel bundles of microtubules (MTs) but the process of their formation is poorly understood. Here, we show that the Chromosomal Passenger Complex (CPC) undergoes liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) to generate parallel MT bundles in vitro when incubated with free tubulin and GTP. MT bundles emerge from CPC droplets with protruding minus-ends that then grow into long, tapered MT structures. During this growth, the CPC in condensates apparently reorganize to coat and bundle the resulting MT structures. CPC mutants attenuated for LLPS or MT binding prevented the generation of parallel MT bundles in vitro and reduced the number of MTs present at spindle midzones in HeLa cells. Our data uncovers a kinase-independent function of the CPC and provides models for how cells generate parallel-bundled MT structures that are important for the assembly of the mitotic spindle.

scholarly journals Structural characterization of a Thorarchaeota profilin indicates eukaryotic-like features but with an extended N-terminus

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Celestine N Chi ◽  
Ravi Teja Inturi ◽  
Sandra Martinez Lara ◽  
Mahmoud Darweesh
Keyword(s):  
Common Ancestor ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Eukaryotic Cell ◽  
Dimensional Structure ◽  
Resonance Spectroscopy ◽  
Last Eukaryotic Common Ancestor ◽  
Rigid Core ◽  
N Terminus ◽  
Metagenomics Analysis

The emergence of the first eukaryotic cell was preceded by evolutionary events which are still highly debatable. Recently, comprehensive metagenomics analysis has uncovered that the Asgard super-phylum is the closest yet known archaea host of eukaryotes. However, it remains to be established if a large number of eukaryotic signature proteins predicated to be encoded by the Asgard super-phylum are functional at least, in the context of a eukaryotic cell. Here, we determined the three-dimensional structure of profilin from Thorarchaeota by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and show that this profilin has a rigid core with a flexible N-terminus which was previously implicated in polyproline binding. In addition, we also show that thorProfilin co-localizes with eukaryotic actin in cultured HeLa cells. This finding reaffirm the notion that Asgardean encoded proteins possess eukaryotic-like characteristics and strengthen likely existence of a complex cytoskeleton already in a last eukaryotic common ancestor

scholarly journals Gene Cloning and Molecular Characterization of Lysine Decarboxylase from Selenomonas ruminantiumDelineate Its Evolutionary Relationship to Ornithine Decarboxylases from Eukaryotes

2000 ◽  
Vol 182 (23) ◽  
pp. 6732-6741 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yumiko Takatsuka ◽  
Yoshihiro Yamaguchi ◽  
Minenobu Ono ◽  
Yoshiyuki Kamio
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Substrate Specificity ◽  
Pyridoxal Phosphate ◽  
Evolutionary Relationship ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Sequencing Analysis ◽  
Lysine Decarboxylase ◽  
Amino Acid Residues ◽  
Phosphate Binding ◽  
Link Type

ABSTRACT Lysine decarboxylase (LDC; EC 4.1.1.18 ) from Selenomonas ruminantium comprises two identical monomeric subunits of 43 kDa and has decarboxylating activities toward both l-lysine andl-ornithine with similar Km andVmax values (Y. Takatsuka, M. Onoda, T. Sugiyama, K. Muramoto, T. Tomita, and Y. Kamio, Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 62:1063–1069, 1999). Here, the LDC-encoding gene (ldc) of this bacterium was cloned and characterized. DNA sequencing analysis revealed that the amino acid sequence of S. ruminantium LDC is 35% identical to those of eukaryotic ornithine decarboxylases (ODCs; EC 4.1.1.17 ), including the mouse,Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Neurospora crassa,Trypanosoma brucei, and Caenorhabditis elegansenzymes. In addition, 26 amino acid residues, K69, D88, E94, D134, R154, K169, H197, D233, G235, G236, G237, F238, E274, G276, R277, Y278, K294, Y323, Y331, D332, C360, D361, D364, G387, Y389, and F397 (mouse ODC numbering), all of which are implicated in the formation of the pyridoxal phosphate-binding domain and the substrate-binding domain and in dimer stabilization with the eukaryotic ODCs, were also conserved inS. ruminantium LDC. Computer analysis of the putative secondary structure of S. ruminantium LDC showed that it is approximately 70% identical to that of mouse ODC. We identified five amino acid residues, A44, G45, V46, P54, and S322, within the LDC catalytic domain that confer decarboxylase activities toward bothl-lysine and l-ornithine with a substrate specificity ratio of 0.83 (defined as thek cat/Km ratio obtained with l-ornithine relative to that obtained withl-lysine). We have succeeded in converting S. ruminantium LDC to form with a substrate specificity ratio of 58 (70 times that of wild-type LDC) by constructing a mutant protein, A44V/G45T/V46P/P54D/S322A. In this study, we also showed that G350 is a crucial residue for stabilization of the dimer in S. ruminantium LDC.

scholarly journals The chromosomal passenger complex and centralspindlin independently contribute to contractile ring assembly

2011 ◽  
Vol 193 (1) ◽  
pp. 155-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay Lewellyn ◽  
Ana Carvalho ◽  
Arshad Desai ◽  
Amy S. Maddox ◽  
Karen Oegema
Keyword(s):  
Contractile Ring ◽  
Chromosomal Passenger Complex ◽  
Ring Assembly ◽  
Assembly Pathway ◽  
Chromosomal Passenger ◽  
Spindle Midzone ◽  
Ring Constriction ◽  
Simultaneous Inhibition ◽  
Control Transformation ◽  
Equatorial Band

The chromosomal passenger complex (CPC) and centralspindlin are conserved cytokinesis regulators that localize to the spindle midzone, which forms between the separating chromosomes. Previous work placed the CPC and centralspindlin in a linear pathway that governs midzone formation. Using Caenorhabditis elegans embryos, we test whether there is a similar linear relationship between centralspindlin and the CPC in contractile ring constriction during cytokinesis. We show that simultaneous inhibition of the CPC kinase Aurora BAIR-2 and the centralspindlin component MKLP1ZEN-4 causes an additive constriction defect. Consistent with distinct roles for the proteins, inhibition of filamentous septin guanosine triphosphatases alleviates constriction defects in Aurora BAIR-2–inhibited embryos, whereas inhibition of Rac does so in MKLP1ZEN-4-inhibited embryos. Centralspindlin and the CPC are not required to enrich ring proteins at the cell equator but instead regulate formation of a compact mature ring. Therefore, in contrast to the linear midzone assembly pathway, centralspindlin and the CPC make independent contributions to control transformation of the sheet-like equatorial band into a ribbon-like contractile ring at the furrow tip.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document