scholarly journals Absence of Replication fork associated factor CTF4 and F-box motif Encoding Gene SAF1 leads to reduction in Cell Size and Stress Tolerance Phenotype in S. cerevisiae

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meenu Sharma ◽  
Samar Singh ◽  
V. Verma ◽  
Narendra K Bairwa
Keyword(s):  
Cell Size ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Genetic Interaction ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
Calcofluor White ◽  
Gene Deletions ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Rich Media ◽  
Size Growth ◽  
Adenine Deaminase

AbstractChromosome transmission fidelity factor, Ctf4 in S. cerevisiae associates with replication fork and helps in the sister chromatid cohesion. At the replication fork, Ctf4 links DNA helicase with the DNA polymerase. The absence of Ctf4 invokes replication checkpoint in the cells. The Saf1 of S.cerevisiae interacts with Skp1 of SCF-E3 ligase though F box-motif and ubiquitinates the adenine deaminase Aah1 during phase transition due to nutrient stress. The genetic interaction between the CTF4 and SAF1 has not been studied. Here we report genetic interaction between CTF4 and SAF1 which impacts the growth fitness and response to stress. The single and double gene deletions of SAF1 and CTF4 were constructed in the BY4741 genetic background. The strains were tested for growth on rich media and media containing stress causing agents. The saf1Δctf4Δ cells with reduced cell size showed the fastest growth phenotype on YPD medium when compared with the saf1Δ, ctf4Δ, and WT. The saf1Δctf4Δ cells also showed the tolerance to MMS, NaCl, Glycerol, SDS, Calcofluor white, H2O2, DMSO, Benomyl, and Nocodazole when compared with the saf1Δ, ctf4Δ, and WT cells. However, saf1Δctf4Δ cells showed the sensitivity to HU when compared with WT and saf1Δ. Based on these observations we suggest that SAF1 and CTF4 interact genetically to regulate the cell size, growth and stress response.

scholarly journals The yeast Sgs1p helicase acts upstream of Rad53p in the DNA replication checkpoint and colocalizes with Rad53p in S-phase-specific foci

2000 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Frei ◽  
Susan M. Gasser
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Response ◽  
Replication Fork Progression ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Dna Replication Checkpoint

We have examined the cellular function of Sgs1p, a nonessential yeast DNA helicase, homologs of which are implicated in two highly debilitating hereditary human diseases (Werner's and Bloom's syndromes). We show that Sgs1p is an integral component of the S-phase checkpoint response in yeast, which arrests cells due to DNA damage or blocked fork progression during DNA replication. DNA polε and Sgs1p are found in the same epistasis group and act upstream of Rad53p to signal cell cycle arrest when DNA replication is perturbed. Sgs1p is tightly regulated through the cell cycle, accumulates in S phase and colocalizes with Rad53p in S-phase-specific foci, even in the absence of fork arrest. The association of Rad53p with a chromatin subfraction is Sgs1p dependent, suggesting an important role for the helicase in the signal-transducing pathway that monitors replication fork progression.

scholarly journals Genetic Interaction between RLM1 and F-box Motif Encoding gene SAF1 Contributes to Stress Response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meenu Sharma ◽  
V. Verma ◽  
Narendra K Bairwa
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Stress Response ◽  
Experimental Analysis ◽  
Genetic Interaction ◽  
Cellular Growth ◽  
Calcofluor White ◽  
Genome Database ◽  
Adenine Deaminase

AbstractStress response is mediated by transcription of stress responsive genes. F-box motif protein Saf1 involves in SCF-E3 ligase mediated degradation of the adenine deaminase, Aah1 upon nutrient stress. Four transcription regulators, BUR6, MED6, SPT10, SUA7, have been reported for SAF1 gene in genome database of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here in this study an in-silco analysis of gene expression and transcription factor databases was carried out to understand the regulation of SAF1 gene expression during stress for hypothesis generation and experimental analysis. The GEO profile database analysis showed increased expression of SAF1 gene when treated with clioquinol, pterostilbene, gentamicin, hypoxia, genotoxic, desiccation, and heat stress, in WT cells. SAF1 gene expression in stress conditions correlated positively whereas AAH1 expression negatively with RLM1 transcription factor, which was not reported earlier. Based on analysis of expression profile and regulatory association of SAF1 and RLM1, we hypothesized that inactivation of both the genes may contribute to stress tolerance. The experimental analysis with the double mutant, saf1Δrlm1Δ for cellular growth response to stress causing agents, showed tolerance to calcofluor white, SDS, and hydrogen peroxide. On the contrary, saf1Δrlm1Δ showed sensitivity to MMS, HU, DMSO, Nocodazole, Benomyl stress. Based on in-silico and experimental data we suggest that SAF1 and RLM1 both interact genetically in differential response to genotoxic and general stressors.

scholarly journals Interaction of the Warsaw breakage syndrome DNA helicase DDX11 with the replication fork-protection factor Timeless promotes sister chromatid cohesion

PLoS Genetics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. e1007622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Cortone ◽  
Ge Zheng ◽  
Pasquale Pensieri ◽  
Viviana Chiappetta ◽  
Rosarita Tatè ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Protection Factor ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion

scholarly journals Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rrm3p DNA Helicase Promotes Genome Integrity by Preventing Replication Fork Stalling: Viability of rrm3 Cells Requires the Intra-S-Phase Checkpoint and Fork Restart Activities

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 3198-3212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Z. Torres ◽  
Sandra L. Schnakenberg ◽  
Virginia A. Zakian
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Opportunity To Learn ◽  
Normal Growth ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Exogenous Dna ◽  
Fork Stalling ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

ABSTRACT Rrm3p is a 5′-to-3′ DNA helicase that helps replication forks traverse protein-DNA complexes. Its absence leads to increased fork stalling and breakage at over 1,000 specific sites located throughout the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. To understand the mechanisms that respond to and repair rrm3-dependent lesions, we carried out a candidate gene deletion analysis to identify genes whose mutation conferred slow growth or lethality on rrm3 cells. Based on synthetic phenotypes, the intra-S-phase checkpoint, the SRS2 inhibitor of recombination, the SGS1/TOP3 replication fork restart pathway, and the MRE11/RAD50/XRS2 (MRX) complex were critical for viability of rrm3 cells. DNA damage checkpoint and homologous recombination genes were important for normal growth of rrm3 cells. However, the MUS81/MMS4 replication fork restart pathway did not affect growth of rrm3 cells. These data suggest a model in which the stalled and broken forks generated in rrm3 cells activate a checkpoint response that provides time for fork repair and restart. Stalled forks are converted by a Rad51p-mediated process to intermediates that are resolved by Sgs1p/Top3p. The rrm3 system provides a unique opportunity to learn the fate of forks whose progress is impaired by natural impediments rather than by exogenous DNA damage.

scholarly journals Fbh1 Limits Rad51-Dependent Recombination at Blocked Replication Forks

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (17) ◽  
pp. 4742-4756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Lorenz ◽  
Fekret Osman ◽  
Victoria Folkyte ◽  
Sevil Sofueva ◽  
Matthew C. Whitby
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Gene Conversion ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Direct Repeat ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Replicative Stress ◽  
Recombinant Formation ◽  
A Site

ABSTRACT Controlling the loading of Rad51 onto DNA is important for governing when and how homologous recombination is used. Here we use a combination of genetic assays and indirect immunofluorescence to show that the F-box DNA helicase (Fbh1) functions in direct opposition to the Rad52 orthologue Rad22 to curb Rad51 loading onto DNA in fission yeast. Surprisingly, this activity is unnecessary for limiting spontaneous direct-repeat recombination. Instead it appears to play an important role in preventing recombination when replication forks are blocked and/or broken. When overexpressed, Fbh1 specifically reduces replication fork block-induced recombination, as well as the number of Rad51 nuclear foci that are induced by replicative stress. These abilities are dependent on its DNA helicase/translocase activity, suggesting that Fbh1 exerts its control on recombination by acting as a Rad51 disruptase. In accord with this, overexpression of Fbh1 also suppresses the high levels of recombinant formation and Rad51 accumulation at a site-specific replication fork barrier in a strain lacking the Rad51 disruptase Srs2. Similarly overexpression of Srs2 suppresses replication fork block-induced gene conversion events in an fbh1Δ mutant, although an inability to suppress deletion events suggests that Fbh1 has a distinct functionality, which is not readily substituted by Srs2.

Cell wall alterations in staphylococci growing in situ in experimental osteomyelitis

1987 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. Costerton ◽  
D. W. Lambe Jr. ◽  
K.-J. Mayberry-Carson ◽  
B. Tober-Meyer
Keyword(s):  
Cell Wall ◽  
Cell Size ◽  
Wall Structure ◽  
Specific Cell ◽  
Experimental Osteomyelitis ◽  
Rich Media ◽  
Rabbit Tibia ◽  
Rabbit Bone

When cells of both Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis are grown in batch culture in nutrient-rich media, their cell walls are regular in thickness, their cell size is within the normal range for each species, and their septation patterns are orderly. When cells of each of these species are examined directly in infected tissue in the rabbit tibia model infection, their cell wall thickness is often much increased and very irregular around the circumference of the cell, their cell size is often increased, and their septation patterns are often severely deranged. All of these alterations in cell wall structure occur in the absence of antibiotics, and we suggest that they may be an expression of phenotypic plasticity in response to altered environmental conditions such as specific nutrient limitations, the presence of antibacterial factors, and growth of the cells on hard surfaces such as rabbit bone or plastic catheters. Some of these specific cell wall alterations are also seen when staphylococcal cells are exposed, in vitro or in vivo, to antibiotics such as clindamycin, but we emphasize that growth in tissue alone is sufficient for their induction.

scholarly journals Maturation of telomere 3’-overhangs is linked to the replication stress response

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin E. Henninger ◽  
Pascale Jolivet ◽  
Emilie Fallet ◽  
Mohcen Benmounah ◽  
Zhou Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Stress Response ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Damage Tolerance ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
Dna Damage Tolerance ◽  
Telomeric Repeats ◽  
Telomere Replication

AbstractPassage of the replication fork through telomeric repeats necessitates additional DNA processing by DNA repair factors, to regenerate the terminal 3’-overhang structure at leading telomeres. These factors are prevented from promoting telomeric recombination or fusion by an uncharacterized mechanism. Here we show that Rad5, a DNA helicase and ubiquitin ligase involved in the DNA damage tolerance pathway, participates in this mechanism. Rad5 is enriched at telomeres during telomere replication. Accelerated senescence seen in the absence of telomerase and Rad5, can be compensated for by a pathway involving the Rad51 recombinase and counteracted by the helicase Srs2. However, this pathway is only active at short telomeres. Instead, the ubiquitous activity of Rad5 during telomere replication is necessary for the proper reconstitution of the telomeric 3’-overhang, indicating that Rad5 is required to coordinate telomere maturation during telomere replication.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document