Does the superior colliculus not encode the motor error? A new model of the saccadic system

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Fujita
Keyword(s):  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
New Model ◽  
Saccadic System ◽  
Motor Error

Modified saccades evoked by stimulation of the macaque superior colliculus account for properties of the resettable integrator

1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 1724-1728 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. Kustov ◽  
D. L. Robinson
Keyword(s):  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Pulse Signal ◽  
Good Evidence ◽  
Visually Guided ◽  
Saccadic System ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Motor Error ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. Models of the saccadic system propose that there is an integration of the pulse signal, and there is good evidence that the integrator is reset gradually (Nichols and Sparks 1994, 1995). Other studies of the superior collicular contribution to the saccadic system have proposed a sensory, not motor, nature for its signal. 2. To test experimentally the resetting of the integrator and the nature of the collicular signal, we electrically stimulated the superior colliculus during periods of fixation and during the course of visually guided saccades. Trains of stimuli which were presented during periods of fixation evoked saccades with fixed vectors. Identical stimulation at the beginning of a visually guided saccade evoked saccades whose direction was rotated and amplitude extended from the fixed vector. The direction of the rotation was opposite that of the visually guided saccade, and the magnitude of this rotation could be as large as 80 degrees. 3. Stimulation which was applied at progressively later times during the visually guided saccade, evoked saccades with progressively smaller rotations and progressively less elongations. The time period during which saccades were modified persisted beyond the end of the visually guided saccade, when the eyes were stationary. Thus, we confirm the previous findings (Nichols and Sparks 1994, 1995; Robinson, 1972), that the end of the saccade is not a period of quiescence within the oculomotor pathways. 4. Our results confirm that the resetting of the integration of the saccade signal is gradual rather than abrupt. Furthermore, these data suggest that the superior colliculus signals a motor error.

Evidence That the Superior Colliculus Participates in the Feedback Control of Saccadic Eye Movements

2002 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 679-695 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robijanto Soetedjo ◽  
Chris R. S. Kaneko ◽  
Albert F. Fuchs
Keyword(s):  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Firing Rate ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Burst Duration ◽  
Saccadic Amplitude ◽  
Optimal Vector ◽  
Deceleration Phase ◽  
Acceleration And Deceleration ◽  
Motor Error ◽  
Saccade Duration

There is general agreement that saccades are guided to their targets by means of a motor error signal, which is produced by a local feedback circuit that calculates the difference between desired saccadic amplitude and an internal copy of actual saccadic amplitude. Although the superior colliculus (SC) is thought to provide the desired saccadic amplitude signal, it is unclear whether the SC resides in the feedback loop. To test this possibility, we injected muscimol into the brain stem region containing omnipause neurons (OPNs) to slow saccades and then determined whether the firing of neurons at different sites in the SC was altered. In 14 experiments, we produced saccadic slowing while simultaneously recording the activity of a single SC neuron. Eleven of the 14 neurons were saccade-related burst neurons (SRBNs), which discharged their most vigorous burst for saccades with an optimal amplitude and direction (optimal vector). The optimal directions for the 11 SRBNs ranged from nearly horizontal to nearly vertical, with optimal amplitudes between 4 and 17°. Although muscimol injections into the OPN region produced little change in the optimal vector, they did increase mean saccade duration by 25 to 192.8% and decrease mean saccade peak velocity by 20.5 to 69.8%. For optimal vector saccades, both the acceleration and deceleration phases increased in duration. However, during 10 of 14 experiments, the duration of deceleration increased as fast as or faster than that of acceleration as saccade duration increased, indicating that most of the increase in duration occurred during the deceleration phase. SRBNs in the SC changed their burst duration and firing rate concomitantly with changes in saccadic duration and velocity, respectively. All SRBNs showed a robust increase in burst duration as saccadic duration increased. Five of 11 SRBNs also exhibited a decrease in burst peak firing rate as saccadic velocity decreased. On average across the neurons, the number of spikes in the burst was constant. There was no consistent change in the discharge of the three SC neurons that did not exhibit bursts with saccades. Our data show that the SC receives feedback from downstream saccade-related neurons about the ongoing saccades. However, the changes in SC firing produced in our study do not suggest that the feedback is involved with producing motor error. Instead, the feedback seems to be involved with regulating the duration of the discharge of SRBNs so that the desired saccadic amplitude signal remains present throughout the saccade.

Neural Organization of the Pathways From the Superior Colliculus to Trochlear Motoneurons

2007 ◽  
Vol 97 (5) ◽  
pp. 3696-3712 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiko Izawa ◽  
Yuriko Sugiuchi ◽  
Yoshikazu Shinoda
Keyword(s):  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Interstitial Nucleus Of Cajal ◽  
Saccadic System ◽  
Neural Organization ◽  
Premotor Neurons ◽  
Monosynaptic Inhibition ◽  
Disynaptic Inhibition ◽  
Forel's Field H ◽  
Stimulation Of ◽  
Monosynaptic Excitation

The neural organization of the pathways from the superior colliculus (SC) to trochlear motoneurons was analyzed in anesthetized cats using intracellular recording and transneuronal labeling techniques. Stimulation of the ipsilateral or contralateral SC evoked excitation and inhibition in trochlear motoneurons with latencies of 1.1–2.3 and 1.1–3.8 ms, respectively, suggesting that the earliest components of excitation and inhibition were disynaptic. A midline section between the two SCs revealed that ipsi- and contralateral SC stimulation evoked disynaptic excitation and inhibition in trochlear motoneurons, respectively. Premotor neurons labeled transneuronally after application of wheat germ agglutinin-conjugated horseradish peroxidase into the trochlear nerve were mainly distributed ipsilaterally in the Forel's field H (FFH) and bilaterally in the interstitial nucleus of Cajal (INC). Consequently, we investigated these two likely intermediaries between the SC and trochlear nucleus electrophysiologically. Stimulation of the FFH evoked ipsilateral mono- and disynaptic excitation and contralateral disynaptic inhibition in trochlear motoneurons. Preconditioning stimulation of the ipsilateral SC facilitated FFH-evoked monosynaptic excitation. Stimulation of the INC evoked ipsilateral monosynaptic excitation and inhibition, and contralateral monosynaptic inhibition in trochlear motoneurons. Preconditioning stimulation of the contralateral SC facilitated contralateral INC-evoked monosynaptic inhibition. These results revealed a reciprocal input pattern from the SCs to vertical ocular motoneurons in the saccadic system; trochlear motoneurons received disynaptic excitation from the ipsilateral SC via ipsilateral FFH neurons and disynaptic inhibition from the contralateral SC via contralateral INC neurons. These inhibitory INC neurons were considered to be a counterpart of inhibitory burst neurons in the horizontal saccadic system.

Use of interrupted saccade paradigm to study spatial and temporal dynamics of saccadic burst cells in superior colliculus in monkey

1994 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 2754-2770 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. L. Keller ◽  
J. A. Edelman
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Temporal Dynamics ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Eye Position ◽  
Visual Response ◽  
Intermediate Layers ◽  
Saccade Onset ◽  
Spatial And Temporal Dynamics ◽  
Motor Error

1. We recorded the spatial and temporal dynamics of saccade-related burst neurons (SRBNs) found in the intermediate layers of the superior colliculus (SC) in the alert, behaving monkey. These burst cells are normally the first neurons recorded during radially directed microelectrode penetrations of the SC after the electrode has left the more dorsally situated visual layers. They have spatially delimited movement fields whose centers describe the well-studied motor map of the SC. They have a rather sharp, saccade-locked burst of activity that peaks just before saccade onset and then declines steeply during the saccade. Many of these cells, when recorded during saccade trials, also have an early, transient visual response and an irregular prelude of presaccadic activity. 2. Because saccadic eye movements normally have very stereotyped durations and velocity trajectories that vary systematically with saccade size, it has been difficult in the past to establish quantitatively whether the activity of SRBNs temporally codes dynamic saccadic control signals, e.g., dynamic motor error or eye velocity, where dynamic motor error is defined as a signal proportional to the instantaneous difference between desired final eye position and the actual eye position during a saccade. It has also not been unequivocally established whether SRBNs participate in an organized spatial shift of ensemble activity in the intermediate layers of the SC during saccadic eye movements. 3. To address these issues, we studied the activity of SRBNs using an interrupted saccade paradigm. Saccades were interrupted with pulsatile electrical stimulation through a microelectrode implanted in the omnipauser region of the brain stem while recordings were made simultaneously from single SRBNs in the SC. 4. Shortly after the beginning of the stimulation (which was electronically triggered at saccade onset), the eyes decelerated rapidly and stopped completely. When the high-frequency (typically 300-400 pulses per second) stimulation was terminated (average duration 12 ms), the eye movement was reinitiated and a resumed saccade was made accurately to the location of the target. 5. When we recorded from SRBNs in the more caudal colliculus, which were active for large saccades, cell discharge was powerfully and rapidly suppressed by the stimulation (average latency = 3.8 ms). Activity in the same cells started again just before the onset of the resumed saccade and continued during this saccade even though it has a much smaller amplitude than would normally be associated with significant discharge for caudal SC cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Superior Colliculus Activity Related to Concurrent Processing of Saccade Goals in a Visual Search Task

2002 ◽  
Vol 87 (4) ◽  
pp. 1805-1815 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. McPeek ◽  
Edward L. Keller
Keyword(s):  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Rhesus Monkeys ◽  
Search Task ◽  
Visual Search Task ◽  
Saccadic System ◽  
Concurrent Processing ◽  
Initial Saccade ◽  
Preparatory Activity ◽  
Winner Take All ◽  
Initial Movement

Saccades are typically separated by inter-saccadic fixation intervals (ISFIs) of ≥125 ms. During this time, the saccadic system selects a goal and completes the preparatory processes required prior to executing the subsequent movement. However, in tasks in which competing stimuli are presented, two sequentially executed movements to different goals can be separated by much shorter ISFIs. This suggests that the saccadic system is capable of completing many of the preparatory requirements for a second saccade concurrently with the execution of an initial movement. We recorded single neurons in the superior colliculus (SC) during rapid saccade sequences made by rhesus monkeys performing a search task. We found that during the execution of an initial saccade, activity related to the goal of a quickly following second saccade can be simultaneously maintained in the SC motor map. This activity appears to signal the selection or increased salience of the second saccade goal even before the initial saccade has ended. For movements separated by normal ISFIs (≥125 ms), we did not observe activity related to concurrent processing, presumably because for these longer ISFI responses, the goal of the second saccade is not selected until after the end of the first saccade. These results indicate that, at the time of an initial saccade, the SC does not necessarily act as a strict winner-take-all network. Rather it appears that the salience of a second visual goal can be simultaneously maintained in the SC. This provides evidence that selection or preparatory activity related to the goal of a second saccade can overlap temporally with activity related to an initial saccade and indicates that such concurrent processing is present even in a structure which is fairly close to the motor output.

scholarly journals Elimination of the error signal in the superior colliculus impairs saccade motor learning

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (38) ◽  
pp. E8987-E8995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiko Kojima ◽  
Robijanto Soetedjo
Keyword(s):  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Motor Adaptation ◽  
Causal Link ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Error Signal ◽  
Drive Motor ◽  
Motor Error ◽  
Saccade Adaptation ◽  
Complex Spikes ◽  
Plastic Change

When movements become dysmetric, the resultant motor error induces a plastic change in the cerebellum to correct the movement, i.e., motor adaptation. Current evidence suggests that the error signal to the cerebellum is delivered by complex spikes originating in the inferior olive (IO). To prove a causal link between the IO error signal and motor adaptation, several studies blocked the IO, which, unfortunately, affected not only the adaptation but also the movement itself. We avoided this confound by inactivating the source of an error signal to the IO. Several studies implicate the superior colliculus (SC) as the source of the error signal to the IO for saccade adaptation. When we inactivated the SC, the metrics of the saccade to be adapted were unchanged, but saccade adaptation was impaired. Thus, an intact rostral SC is necessary for saccade adaptation. Our data provide experimental evidence for the cerebellar learning theory that requires an error signal to drive motor adaptation.

Evidence Against a Moving Hill in the Superior Colliculus During Saccadic Eye Movements in the Monkey

2002 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. 2778-2789 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robijanto Soetedjo ◽  
Chris R. S. Kaneko ◽  
Albert F. Fuchs
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Conclusive Evidence ◽  
Topographic Map ◽  
Hill Model ◽  
Saccade Onset ◽  
Motor Error ◽  
Deep Layers ◽  
The Hill

Saccadic eye movements of different sizes and directions are represented in an orderly topographic map across the intermediate and deep layers of the superior colliculus (SC), where large saccades are encoded caudally and small saccades rostrally. Based on experiments in the cat, it has been suggested that saccades are initiated by a hill of activity at the caudal site appropriate for a particular saccade. As the saccade evolves and the remaining distance to the target, the motor error, decreases, the hill moves rostrally across successive SC sites responsible for saccades of increasingly smaller amplitudes. When the hill reaches the “fixation zone” in the rostral SC, the saccade is terminated. A moving hill of activity has also been posited for the monkey, in which it is supposed to be transported via so-called build-up neurons (BUNs), which have a prelude of activity that culminates in a burst for saccades. However, several studies using a variety of approaches have yet to provide conclusive evidence for or against a moving hill. The moving hill scenario predicts that during a large saccade the burst of a BUN in the rostral SC will be delayed until the motor error remaining in the evolving saccade is equal to the saccadic amplitude for which that BUN discharges best, i.e., its optimal amplitude. Therefore a plot of the burst lead preceding the “optimal” motor error against the time of occurrence of the optimal motor error should have a slope of zero. A slope of −1 indicates no moving hill. For our 20 BUNs, we used three measures of burst timing: the leads to the onset, peak, and center of the burst. The average slopes of these relations were −1.09, −0.79, and −0.58, respectively. For individual BUNs, the slopes of all three relations always differed significantly from zero. Although the peak and center leads fall between −1 and 0, a hill of activity moving rostrally at a rate indicated by either of these slopes would arrive at the fixation zone much too late to terminate the saccade at the appropriate time. Calculating our same three timing measures from averaged data leads us to the same conclusion. Thus our data do not support the moving hill model. However, we argue in the discussion that the constant lead of the burst onset relative to saccade onset (∼27 ms) suggests that the BUNs may help to trigger the saccade.

Model of the Control of Saccades by Superior Colliculus and Cerebellum

1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (2) ◽  
pp. 999-1018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Quaia ◽  
Philippe Lefèvre ◽  
Lance M. Optican
Keyword(s):  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Experimental Evidence ◽  
Brain Stem ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Feedback Information ◽  
Saccadic System ◽  
Intermediate Layers ◽  
Directional Control ◽  
The Brain

Experimental evidence indicates that the superior colliculus (SC) is important but neither necessary nor sufficient to produce accurate saccadic eye movements. Furthermore both clinical and experimental evidence points to the cerebellum as an indispensable component of the saccadic system. Accordingly, we have devised a new model of the saccadic system in which the characteristics of saccades are determined by the cooperation of two pathways, one through the SC and the other through the cerebellum. Both pathways are influenced by feedback information: the feedback determines the decay of activity for collicular neurons and the timing of the activation for cerebellar neurons. We have modeled three types of cells (burst, buildup, and fixation neurons) found in the intermediate layers of the superior colliculus. We propose that, from the point of view of motor execution, the burst neurons and the buildup neurons are not functionally distinct with both providing a directional drive to the brain stem circuitry. The fixation neurons determine the onset of the saccade by disfacilitating the omnipause neurons in the brain stem. Excluding noise-related variations, the ratio of the horizontal to the vertical components of the collicular drive is fixed throughout the saccade (i.e., its direction is fixed); the duration of the drive is such that it always would produce hypermetric movements. The cerebellum plays three roles: first, it provides an additional directional drive, which improves the acceleration of the eyes; second, it keeps track of the progress of the saccade toward the target; and third, it ends the saccade by choking off the collicular drive. The drive provided by the cerebellum can be adjusted in direction to exert a directional control over the saccadic trajectory. We propose here a control mechanism that incorporates a spatial displacement integrator in the cerebellum; under such conditions, we show that a partial directional control arises automatically. Our scheme preserves the advantages of several previous models of the saccadic system (e.g., the lack of a spatial-to-temporal transformation between the SC and the brain stem; the use of efference copy feedback to control the saccade), without incurring many of their drawbacks, and it accounts for a large amount of experimental data.

Neurons in the Primate Superior Colliculus Coding for Arm Movements in Gaze-Related Coordinates

2000 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 1283-1299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veit Stuphorn ◽  
Erhard Bauswein ◽  
Klaus-Peter Hoffmann
Keyword(s):  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Reference Frame ◽  
Target Location ◽  
Arm Movements ◽  
Target Position ◽  
Arm Movement ◽  
Mesencephalic Reticular Formation ◽  
The Gaze ◽  
Motor Error ◽  
Deep Layers

In the intermediate and deep layers of the superior colliculus (SC), a well-established oculomotor structure, a substantial population of cells is involved in the control of arm movements. To examine the reference frame of these neurons, we recorded in two rhesus monkeys ( Macaca mulatta) the discharges of 331 neurons in the SC and the underlying mesencephalic reticular formation (MRF) while monkeys reached to the same target location during different gaze orientations. For 65 reach-related cells with sufficient data and for simultaneously recorded electromyograms (EMGs) of 11 arm muscles, we calculated an ANOVA (factors: target position, gaze angle) and a gaze-dependency (GD) index. EMGs and the activity of many (60%) of the reach-related neurons were not influenced by the target representation on the retina or eye position. We refer to these as “gaze-independent” reach neurons. For 40%, however, the GD fell outside the range of the muscle modulation, and the ANOVA showed a significant influence of gaze. These “gaze-related” reach neurons discharge only when the monkey reaches for targets having specific coordinates in relation to the gaze axis, i.e., for targets in a gaze-related “reach movement field” (RMF). Neuronal activity was not modulated by the specific path of the arm movement, the muscle pattern that is necessary for its realization or the arm that was used for the reach. In each SC we found gaze-related neurons with RMFs both in the contralateral and in the ipsilateral hemifield. The topographical organization of the gaze-related reach neurons in the SC could not be matched with the well-known visual and oculomotor maps. Gaze-related neurons were more modulated in their strength of activity with different directions of arm movements than were gaze-independent reach neurons. Gaze-related reach neurons were recorded at a median depth of 2.03 mm below SC surface in the intermediate layers, where they overlap with saccade-related burst neurons (median depth: 1.55 mm). Most of the gaze-independent reach cells were found in a median depth of 4.01 mm below the SC surface in the deep layers and in the underlying MRF. The gaze-related reach neurons operating in a gaze-centered coordinate system could signal either the desired target position with respect to gaze direction or the motor error between gaze axis and reach target. The gaze-independent reach neurons, possibly operating in a shoulder- or arm-centered reference frame, might carry signals closer to motor output. Together these two types of reach neurons add evidence to our hypothesis that the SC is involved in the sensorimotor transformation for eye-hand coordination in primates.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document