Efficacy of different types of treatment in FIGO stage IB2 cervical cancer in Korea: results of a multicenter retrospective Korean study (KGOG-1005)

2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 132-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.-S. Ryu ◽  
S. B. Kang ◽  
K.-T. Kim ◽  
K.-H. Chang ◽  
J. W. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Treatment Modality ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Primary Treatment ◽  
National Registry ◽  
The Past ◽  
Primary Treatment Modality

The purpose of this study is to review FIGO stage IB2 cervical cancers in Korea for the past 10 years, and evaluate the most frequently employed and appropriate management strategy, and also assess the survival benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). This is a retrospective chart review of 727 FIGO stage IB2 patients from 1995 to 2005. Six hundred ninety-two patients were enrolled, and all dates on which the patients died were double checked through the “National Registry of Death Statistics” of the Korea National Statistical Office. Management strategies were divided into five groups according to the primary treatment modality. The most frequently employed primary treatment modality for stage IB2 cervical cancer in Korea during the past 10 years was radical hysterectomy (RH). The next was NAC, followed by radiotherapy (RT) and/or extrafascial hysterectomy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and/or extrafascial hysterectomy, in descending order. The surgery group showed the best results, with an 89% 5-year disease-free survival rate. However, there was no statistical difference between the surgery, NAC, and CCRT groups. For FIGO stage IB2 cervical cancer during the past 10 years in Korea, RH and adjuvant RT or CCRT was the most frequently employed treatment strategy. As a primary modality, RH, NAC, and CCRT showed similar survival rates. However, RH demonstrated the best survival rate among the above treatment strategies

scholarly journals Comparison of Chemoradiotherapy and Radical Radiotherapy in Patients With Cervical Cancer

2020 ◽  
pp. 15-20
Author(s):  
Ozlem Yetmen Dogan ◽  
Ismet Sahinler
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
High Response Rate ◽  
Intracavitary Brachytherapy ◽  
Radical Radiotherapy

Introduction: The current study aimed at comparing the results of radical radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with cervical cancer and evaluating the prognostic factors. Methods: CRT is the standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer with the five-year survival rate of 30%–80%. In 1978-2006, a total of 716 patients with cervical cancer stage IB2-IVB were retrospectively analyzed for RT and CRT. In intracavitary brachytherapy, the median dose was 24 Gy and follow-up was 78 months. CRT was treated with 45 Gy external radiotherapy with cisplatin 40 mg/m2 given once a week. Results: The five-year pelvic control rate was 56.2% in the radical RT arm and 75.8% in the combined arm (P=0.01); disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 47%-56.3% (P=0.09) and 44.9%-52.5% (P=0.03), respectively. Treatment failure was detected in 317(50.5%) of 627 patients in the RT arm and in 30 (33.7%) of 89 patients in the CRT arm (Chi-squared value=8.86, P<0.01). Treatment failure rate was high in the 1st two years. Distant metastases were detected in 116 patients in the RT and 17 patients in the CRT arms. Hematological side effect rates in the CRT arm -anemia, thrombopenia, and leukopenia- were 33.7%, 13.5%, and 28.1%, respectively. The prevalence of rectitis, cystitis, and skin and subcutaneous fibrosis in the RT arm was 9.4%, 4.8%, and 2.2%, and in the CRT arm was 12.4%, 11.2%, and 13.5%, respectively. Conclusions: CRT increased pelvic control and overall survival rate based on the findings; it can be the preferred treatment modality because of its high response rate and acceptable toxicity.

scholarly journals Role of Adjuvant Radiosurgery after Thoracoscopic Microsurgical Resection of a Spinal Schwannoma

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Toba N. Niazi ◽  
Christian A. Bowers ◽  
Meic H. Schmidt
Keyword(s):  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Treatment Modality ◽  
Surgical Excision ◽  
Primary Treatment ◽  
Benign Tumors ◽  
Noninvasive Treatment ◽  
Thoracic Spinal ◽  
Primary Treatment Modality ◽  
Microsurgical Resection ◽  
Spinal Schwannoma

Stereotactic radiosurgery to benign tumors of the spine has not been advocated as a primary treatment modality because of the favorable prognosis for these lesions after gross-total resection. There is even less evidence regarding its use as an adjuvant to neurosurgical resection of benign recurrent spinal disease. We describe the case of a 30-year-old man with a thoracic spinal schwannoma who had an interval increase of his lesion five months after thoracoscopic microsurgical resection. The patient opted for noninvasive stereotactic radiosurgery in lieu of additional surgical excision and has had stable disease 15 months after radiosurgical treatment with the linear accelerator (LINAC) system. In this setting, stereotactic radiosurgery provided a useful adjunct to thoracoscopic microsurgical resection. Future Class I and II evidence should be sought to evaluate the utility of stereotactic radiosurgery as a primary treatment modality or as an adjuvant for microneurosurgical resection of benign spinal lesions in patients who want noninvasive treatment after disease recurrence or who harbor medical comorbidities that would preclude them from being safe surgical candidates.

Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia

2019 ◽  
pp. 23-30
Author(s):  
Oren Sagher
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Microvascular Decompression ◽  
Medical Management ◽  
Treatment Modality ◽  
Primary Treatment ◽  
Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia ◽  
Pain Condition ◽  
Primary Treatment Modality ◽  
Posterior Tongue

Glossopharyngeal neuralgia is an uncommon, but devastating pain condition. It shares many features with trigeminal neuralgia, but predominantly affects the posterior tongue and pharynx. Since glossopharyngeal neuralgia pain is frequently triggered by swallowing or movement of the tongue, patients frequently present with weight loss and dehydration. This chapter describes the classic features of this condition, including its association with syncope. The medical management of glossopharyngeal neuralgia is outlined as a primary treatment modality. Surgical considerations are also described, including microvascular decompression or sectioning of the glossopharyngeal nerve. Surgical pearls for both of these procedures are outlined, as well as strategies for complication avoidance and management.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer: the CSEM 006 study

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-133
Author(s):  
Hua Tu ◽  
He Huang ◽  
Yi Ouyang ◽  
Qing Liu ◽  
Bingna Xian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Sample Size ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Radical Surgery ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Squamous Carcinoma ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Paraaortic Lymphadenectomy

BackgroundConcurrent chemoradiotherapy is the first-line treatment for FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery may provide another treatment option.Primary objectiveTo compare the therapeutic outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery with cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy for stage IIB cervical cancer.Study hypothesisWe hypothesize that the therapeutic effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with surgery and risk-adapted adjuvant treatment will be superior to that of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage IIB cervical cancer.Trial designPatients with stage IIB cervical cancer will be randomized 1:1 to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery (Arm A) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (Arm B). In arm A, patients will receive three cycles of paclitaxel and cisplatin followed by a type C radical hysterectomy and pelvic ±paraaortic lymphadenectomy. Patients showing progression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy will be referred to concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Adjuvant therapy will be recommended according to the presence of pathological risks. In Arm B, all patients will receive definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy, including external beam pelvic radiotherapy combined with concurrent weekly cisplatin followed by brachytherapy.Major inclusion/exclusion criteriaPatients between 18 and 60 years with histologically confirmed, untreated stage IIB cervical squamous carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adeno-squamous carcinoma.Primary endpointThe primary endpoint is 2-year disease-free survival.Sample sizeAn estimated sample size of 240 is required to fulfill the study objectives.Estimated dates for completing accrual and presenting resultsAs of February 2020, 115 eligible patients from four institutions have been enrolled. Enrollment is expected to be completed by December 2022.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials. gov identifier: NCT02595554.

Symptom burden among head and neck cancer patients in the first year after diagnosis: Association with primary treatment modality

Oral Oncology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 99 ◽  
pp. 104434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine O. Allen-Ayodabo ◽  
Antoine Eskander ◽  
Laura E. Davis ◽  
Haoyu Zhao ◽  
Alyson L. Mahar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Treatment Modality ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Primary Treatment ◽  
First Year ◽  
Primary Treatment Modality

Pelvic Irradiation With Concurrent Chemotherapy Versus Pelvic and Para-Aortic Irradiation for High-Risk Cervical Cancer: An Update of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trial (RTOG) 90-01

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 872-880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia J. Eifel ◽  
Kathryn Winter ◽  
Mitchell Morris ◽  
Charles Levenback ◽  
Perry W. Grigsby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Tumor Diameter ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ib ◽  
Disease Free

Purpose To report mature results of a randomized trial that compared extended-field radiotherapy (EFRT) versus pelvic radiotherapy with concomitant fluorouracil and cisplatin (CTRT) in women with locoregionally advanced carcinomas of the uterine cervix. Patients and Methods Four hundred three women with cervical cancer were randomly assigned to receive either EFRT or CTRT. Patients were eligible if they had stage IIB to IVA disease, stage IB to IIA disease with a tumor diameter ≥ 5 cm, or positive pelvic lymph nodes. Patients were stratified by stage and by method of lymph node evaluation. Results The median follow-up time for 228 surviving patients was 6.6 years. The overall survival rate for patients treated with CTRT was significantly greater than that for patients treated with EFRT (67% v 41% at 8 years; P < .0001). There was an overall reduction in the risk of disease recurrence of 51% (95% CI, 36% to 66%) for patients who received CTRT. Patients with stage IB to IIB disease who received CTRT had better overall and disease-free survival than those treated with EFRT (P < .0001); 116 patients with stage III to IVA disease had better disease-free survival (P = .05) and a trend toward better overall survival (P = .07) if they were randomly assigned to CTRT. The rate of serious late complications of treatment was similar for the two treatment arms. Conclusion Mature analysis confirms that the addition of fluorouracil and cisplatin to radiotherapy significantly improved the survival rate of women with locally advanced cervical cancer without increasing the rate of late treatment-related side effects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document