scholarly journals Caring science research in the ambulance services: an integrative systematic review

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birgitta Wireklint Sundström ◽  
Anders Bremer ◽  
Veronica Lindström ◽  
Veronica Vicente
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Caring Science

scholarly journals Health insurance awareness and its uptake in India: a systematic review protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. e043122
Author(s):  
Bhageerathy Reshmi ◽  
Bhaskaran Unnikrishnan ◽  
Shradha S Parsekar ◽  
Eti Rajwar ◽  
Ratheebhai Vijayamma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Insurance ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Adult Population ◽  
Social Science Research ◽  
Healthcare Utilisation ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Universal Healthcare ◽  
Government Websites

IntroductionHealth insurance is one of the important approaches that can help in boosting universal healthcare coverage through improved healthcare utilisation and financial protection. This objectives of this review are to identify various interventions implemented in India to promote awareness of health insurance, and to provide evidence for the effectiveness of such interventions on the awareness and uptake of health insurance by the resident Indian population.Methods and analysisA systematic review will be carried out based on the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. The review will include experimental and analytical observational studies that have included adult population (>18 years) in India. We will include any intervention, policy or programme that directly or indirectly affects awareness or uptake of health insurance. The following outcomes will be eligible to be included: awareness or health insurance literacy, attitude such as readiness to buy health insurance or decision making, uptake of health insurance, demand-side and supply-side factors for awareness of health insurance, and awareness as a factor for uptake and re-enrolment in health insurance. Databases such as MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus, 3ie impact evaluation repository and Social Science Research Network will be searched from January 2010 to 15 July 2020. Additionally, important government websites and references of the included studies will be scanned to identify potential records. Three authors, independently, will carry out screening and data extraction. Studies will be categorised into quantitative and qualitative, and mixed-methods synthesis will be employed to analyse the findings.Ethics and disseminationThis review will be based on published studies and will not recruit human participants directly, therefore, ethical clearance is not applicable. We will disseminate the final review findings in a national or international conference and publish in a peer-reviewed journal.

scholarly journals Prevention of sport injury II: a systematic review of clinical science research

2011 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 174-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kellen McBain ◽  
Ian Shrier ◽  
Rebecca Shultz ◽  
Willem H Meeuwisse ◽  
Martin Klügl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Sport Injury ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Clinical Science

A Guide to Conducting Systematic Reviews of Coaching Science Research

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Bennie ◽  
Nicholas Apoifis ◽  
Jeffrey Caron ◽  
William Falcão ◽  
Demelza Marlin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Systems Theory ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Ecological Systems ◽  
Indigenous Populations ◽  
Test Case ◽  
Journal Articles ◽  
Systematic Review Methodology ◽  
Literature Searches ◽  
Do So

Research in coaching science continues to grow and as such, there is a need for rigorous tools to help make sense of the rapidly expanding literature. The purpose of this paper is to provide a detailed description of a systematic review methodology that can be used to summarise literature in coaching science. To do so, we present a test case of a systematic review we conducted on the sport coaching experiences of global Indigenous populations. More precisely, we conducted a systematic review of English, Spanish, French, Mandarin, and Portuguese peer-reviewed journal articles, spanning twelve databases (e.g., Sport Discus, ERIC, and Scopus) from 1970 to 2014. ENTREQ and COREQ guidelines were followed to report the results of the systematic review, and Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory was used as a theoretical framework to extract and synthesise relevant findings from the included articles. In sum, this paper presents a robust methodology for systematically reviewing research in coaching science and provides practical insights for those who endeavour to conduct rigorous literature searches in this domain.

scholarly journals Review of social science research on the impact of countermeasures against influence operations

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Courchesne ◽  
Julia Ilhardt ◽  
Jacob N. Shapiro
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Social Media ◽  
Social Science ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Social Science Research ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Research Articles ◽  
The Impact

Despite ongoing discussion of the need for increased regulation and oversight of social media, as well as debate over the extent to which the platforms themselves should be responsible for containing misinformation, there is little consensus on which interventions work to address the problem of influence operations and disinformation campaigns. To provide policymakers and scholars a baseline on academic evidence about the efficacy of countermeasures, the Empirical Studies of Conflict Project conducted a systematic review of research articles that aimed to estimate the impact of interventions that could reduce the impact of misinformation.

scholarly journals Hermeneutics and Human Interplay: A Clinical Caring Science Research Method

2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Lindberg ◽  
Iréne von Post ◽  
Katie Eriksson
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Caring Science

scholarly journals Integracija Kvantitativne In Kvalitativne Metodologije V Raziskavah V Zdravstvu: Sistematična Pregledna Študija / Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Methodology in Health Science Research: A Systematic Review

2013 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-235
Author(s):  
Joca Zurc
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Qualitative Methodology ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Health Science ◽  
Health Science Research

Izvleček Izhodišča: Priljubljenost integracije kvantitativne in kvalitativne metodologije v isti raziskavi je neverjetno narasla v zadnjih letih. Nimamo pa veliko podatkov o uspešnosti njihove uporabe v raziskovalni praksi na področju zdravstva. Namen te raziskave je bil analizirati področja, osrednje raziskovalne tematike, vrste raziskovalnih načrtov, uspešnost uporabe in nadaljnja odprta vprašanja integracije metod v raziskavah v zdravstvu. Metode: Raziskava temelji na sistematični pregledni študiji 25 znanstvenih člankov s področja zdravstva, ki so pri svojem raziskovanju uporabili integracijo metod. Vključitvena merila: izvirni znanstveni članek z uporabo in evalvacijo integracije metod, objavljen v obdobju julij 2006-julij 2011 v reviji z recenzijo, ki je vključena v mednarodne baze podatkov: WebSurvey Methodology, CINAHL, MEDLINE in PubMed. Rezultati: Vseh 25 analiziranih raziskav je potrdilo uspešnost uporabe integracije metod v raziskavah v zdravstvu. Uporaba integracije metod je najpogostejša na področju zdravstvene nege (32%) in promocije zdravja (28%). Prevladuje zaporedni način izvedbe kvantitativne in kvalitativne faze raziskave (64,3%), pri čemer je prva faza v večini primerov dominantna (71,4%). Razmerje med kvantitativnim (57,2%) in kvalitativnim (42,8%) prioritetnim pristopom je uravnoteženo. Najpogosteje uporabljeni nameni integracije metod v raziskavah v zdravstvu so komplementarnost (57,1%), triangulacija (28,6%) in ekspanzija (14,3%). Zaključki: Dobljene ugotovitve potrjujejo uporabnost integracije metod pri raziskovanju kompleksnih in manj raziskanih problematik v zdravstvu ter izkazujejo potrebe po nadaljnjih raziskovanjih, kot so: konceptualizacija integracije metod v posameznih disciplinah zdravstvenih ved, razvoj meril in standardov ocenjevanja kakovosti raziskav z integracijo metod ter razširitev uvedbe integracije metod v klinično prakso kot podpore pri razvoju na dokazih podprte prakse.

scholarly journals Ethics in economic and management sciences: a researcher’s resource

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-189
Author(s):  
Jaco Pienaar
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Biomedical Research ◽  
International Research ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Ethical Review ◽  
Economic Science ◽  
Biomedical Model ◽  
The Social ◽  
Research Climate

In an international research climate of increasingly demanding ethical review, based on a biomedical model, reflection on best practices in social, behavioural and economic science research is necessary. It is widely believed that these sciences cannot be held to the same practical requirements as those for biomedical research, although the principles of ethical research are surely universal. This article considers the ethical requirements, principles and guidelines directing research in the social, behavioural and economic sciences, recognised in the national and international arena. By means of a systematic review of available best practices, it is anticipated that general guidelines for social, behavioural and economic science research could be developed and offered to researchers in these fields. Specific consideration is given to the unique characteristics of social, behavioural and economic science research.

Caring Science Research

2015 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 235-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Watson ◽  
Barbara B. Brewer
Keyword(s):  
Science Research ◽  
Caring Science
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document