Signal-to-noise performance in cesium iodide x-ray fluorescent screens

Author(s):  
Walter Hillen ◽  
W. Eckenbach ◽  
Peter Quadflieg ◽  
Thomas T. Zaengel
Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 1550
Author(s):  
Dominic Greiffenberg ◽  
Marie Andrä ◽  
Rebecca Barten ◽  
Anna Bergamaschi ◽  
Martin Brückner ◽  
...  

Chromium compensated GaAs or GaAs:Cr sensors provided by the Tomsk State University (Russia) were characterized using the low noise, charge integrating readout chip JUNGFRAU with a pixel pitch of 75 × 75 µm2 regarding its application as an X-ray detector at synchrotrons sources or FELs. Sensor properties such as dark current, resistivity, noise performance, spectral resolution capability and charge transport properties were measured and compared with results from a previous batch of GaAs:Cr sensors which were produced from wafers obtained from a different supplier. The properties of the sample from the later batch of sensors from 2017 show a resistivity of 1.69 × 109 Ω/cm, which is 47% higher compared to the previous batch from 2016. Moreover, its noise performance is 14% lower with a value of (101.65 ± 0.04) e− ENC and the resolution of a monochromatic 60 keV photo peak is significantly improved by 38% to a FWHM of 4.3%. Likely, this is due to improvements in charge collection, lower noise, and more homogeneous effective pixel size. In a previous work, a hole lifetime of 1.4 ns for GaAs:Cr sensors was determined for the sensors of the 2016 sensor batch, explaining the so-called “crater effect” which describes the occurrence of negative signals in the pixels around a pixel with a photon hit due to the missing hole contribution to the overall signal causing an incomplete signal induction. In this publication, the “crater effect” is further elaborated by measuring GaAs:Cr sensors using the sensors from 2017. The hole lifetime of these sensors was 2.5 ns. A focused photon beam was used to illuminate well defined positions along the pixels in order to corroborate the findings from the previous work and to further characterize the consequences of the “crater effect” on the detector operation.


Author(s):  
E. Brambrink ◽  
S. Baton ◽  
M. Koenig ◽  
R. Yurchak ◽  
N. Bidaut ◽  
...  

We have developed a new radiography setup with a short-pulse laser-driven x-ray source. Using a radiography axis perpendicular to both long- and short-pulse lasers allowed optimizing the incident angle of the short-pulse laser on the x-ray source target. The setup has been tested with various x-ray source target materials and different laser wavelengths. Signal to noise ratios are presented as well as achieved spatial resolutions. The high quality of our technique is illustrated on a plasma flow radiograph obtained during a laboratory astrophysics experiment on POLARs.


2022 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 015006
Author(s):  
Xiaolong Zhao ◽  
Ming Ye ◽  
Zhi Cao ◽  
Danyang Huang ◽  
Tingting Fan ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 110 (10) ◽  
pp. 109902 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Chabior ◽  
Tilman Donath ◽  
Christian David ◽  
Manfred Schuster ◽  
Christian Schroer ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 70 (a1) ◽  
pp. C1330-C1330
Author(s):  
Joerg Wiesmann ◽  
Andreas Kleine ◽  
Christopher Umland ◽  
André Beerlink ◽  
Juergen Graf ◽  
...  

Parasitic scattering caused by apertures is a well-known problem in X-ray analytics, which forces users and manufacturers to adapt their experimental setup to this unwanted phenomenon. Increased measurement times due to lower photon fluxes, a lower resolution caused by an enlarged beam stop, a larger beam defining pinhole-to-sample distance due to the integration of an antiscatter guard and generally a lower signal-to-noise ratio leads to a loss in data quality. In this presentation we will explain how the lately developed scatterless pinholes called SCATEX overcome the aforementioned problems. SCATEX pinholes are either made of Germanium or of Tantalum and momentarily have a minimum diameter of 30µm. Thus, these novel apertures are applicable to a wide range of different applications and X-ray energies. We will show measurements which were performed either at home-lab small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) systems such as the NANOSTAR of Bruker AXS or at synchrotron beamlines. At the PTB four-crystal monochromator beamline at BESSY II data was collected for a comparison of conventional pinholes, scatterless Germanium slit systems and SCATEX pinholes. At the Nanofocus Endstation P03 beamline at PETRA III we compared the performance of our SCATEX apertures with conventional Tungsten slit systems under high flux density conditions.


Science ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 246 (4930) ◽  
pp. 649-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. K. MAO ◽  
R. J. HEMLEY ◽  
L. C. CHEN ◽  
J. F. SHU ◽  
L. W. FINGER ◽  
...  

1970 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 38-56
Author(s):  
E. M. Proctor ◽  
T. C. Furnas ◽  
W. F. Loranger

AbstractThe efficiency and effectiveness of diffracted beam x-ray monochromators used in powder diffractometry have been described in so many ways that much confusion exists regarding their true performance. Although significant improvements in signal to noise ratios are readily achievable, and they offer a solution to the sample fluorescence problem, it is not without sacrifice to total intensity or achievable resolution or both. This paper discusses and describes a series of comparisons between filtered direct beam, LiF and graphite monochromators.These comparisons include the considerations necessary for the appropriate selection of diffracted beam slit system, the effect of vertical divergence as a function of two theta for singly bent crystals, the effects of a non-uniformity of contribution over the length of the crystal, and the geometry necessary for the singly bent and doubly bent crystals. The total intensity and the resolution of LiF and graphite are discussed, in particular, it is noted that the performance of monochromators with randomly oriented samples is quite different than their performance with samples showing preferred orientation or grain effects.A new diffracted beam monochromator based on the Rowland focusing geometry is described.


2004 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 915-919 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Kalivas ◽  
L. Costaridou ◽  
I. Kandarakis ◽  
D. Cavouras ◽  
C.D. Nomicos ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document