The Use of Multimedia Demonstration on the Test of Gross Motor Development–Second Edition: Performance and Participant Preference

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leah E. Robinson ◽  
Kara K. Palmer ◽  
Jacqueline M. Irwin ◽  
Elizabeth Kipling Webster ◽  
Abigail L. Dennis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Development ◽  
Motor Skill ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
School Age Children ◽  
Semistructured Interview ◽  
Gross Motor ◽  
Gross Motor Development ◽  
Skill Performance ◽  
Live Demonstration ◽  
Testing Condition

This study examined the effect of demonstration conditions (multimedia and live) in school-age children on performance of the Test of Gross Motor Development—Second Edition (TGMD-2) locomotor and object control subscale raw scores, and participants’ enjoyment in the preoperational and operational stages of cognitive development. Forty-five children ages 5–10 years were divided into two age groups: younger (n = 21, Mage = 5.95 years, SD = .80) and older (n = 24, Mage = 8.96 years, SD = .86). Children completed the TGMD-2 under two counterbalanced conditions: live and multimedia demonstration. Immediately following each testing condition, children ranked their enjoyment and completed a semistructured interview. Paired sample t tests examined motor skill and enjoyment differences in each age group. For both groups, no statistically significant differences were present for motor skill performance or participants’ enjoyment between the two demonstration conditions (p ≥ .05). Overall, 44.5% of participants preferred the multimedia demonstration, while 32.5% preferred the live demonstration. Mixed responses were reported by 22.5% of participants. Within age groups, younger participants preferred the multimedia demonstration more than older participants (multimedia = 50%, 41%; live = 23%, 41%, respectively). This study provides evidence that multimedia demonstration may be suitable for administration of the TGMD-2.

scholarly journals The influence of a motor skill intervention on the motor performance and perceived competence of children with motor delays

2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadia Cristina Valentini
Keyword(s):  
Motor Development ◽  
Motor Skill ◽  
Motor Performance ◽  
Social Acceptance ◽  
Perceived Competence ◽  
Gross Motor ◽  
Gross Motor Development ◽  
Motor Skill Intervention

Fundamentado em teorias de motivação (Ames, 1987, 1992a, b; Epstein, 1988, 1989; Nicholls, 1984) o objetivo deste estudo foi determinar a influência de uma intervenção motora, com técnica de motivação orientada para a maestria (TMOM), no desenvolvimento motor e na percepção de competência física de crianças com idades entre seis e 10 anos que demonstraram atrasos motores previamente identificados. Noventa e uma crianças com atrasos motores foram aleatoriamente distribuídas em dois grupos: intervenção (N = 41) e controle (N = 50). Os participantes do grupo de intervenção foram submetidos a 12 semanas (duas sessões semanais). Ao início e término da intervenção, todos os participantes realizaram o Test o f Gross Motor Development - TGMD organizado por Ulrich (1985). Os participantes que experienciaram a intervenção também responderam a Pictorial Scale of Perceived Competence and Social Acceptance - PSPCSA (Harter & Pike, 1984) no início e no término da intervenção. A influência da intervenção na percepção de competência física foi avaliada através de ANOVA com medidas repetidas. Os resultados evidenciaram que a intervenção promoveu mudanças significantes e positivas em relação à percepção de competência física de meninos e meninas com atrasos no desenvolvimento motor. A ênfase na TMOM propicia ao professor oportunidades para criar experiências motoras que suprem as necessidades de todas as crianças, indiferentes de suas experiências prévias e diferentes níveis de habilidades, promovendo a autonomia das crianças colocando-as como sujeitos de suas conquistas. Em outras palavras, permite as crianças explorarem seu próprio processo de aprendizagem

scholarly journals Fundamental Motor Skill Delays in Preschool Children With Disabilities: 2012 National Youth Fitness Survey

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Andrew Pitchford ◽  
Willie Leung ◽  
E. Kipling Webster
Keyword(s):  
Preschool Children ◽  
School Children ◽  
Motor Development ◽  
Motor Skill ◽  
Children With Disabilities ◽  
Sampling Weights ◽  
Gross Motor ◽  
Gross Motor Development ◽  
Disability Status ◽  
Development Delay

Delays in fundamental motor skill (FMS) competency have been observed in a variety of children with disabilities. However, evidence of FMS delays is largely limited to small, geographically specific, limitedly diverse, and non-representative samples. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between FMS competency and reported disability status among pre-school children, ages 3–5 years, using the 2012 National Youth Fitness Survey (NYFS). In total, 329 preschool children (49% female; 4.00 ± 0.04 years of age) from the 2012 NYFS completed the Test of Gross Motor Development−2, including 43 preschoolers identified with a disability based on parental report (44% female; 4.20 ± 0.16 years). Associations were examined with logistic regression using sampling weights. Poor FMS competency, defined as gross motor quotient scores ≤ 79, was observed in significantly more children with disabilities (29%) than children without disabilities (10%, OR = 3.5, p = 0.04). While not statistically significant, there was a growing disparity in FMS competency at age 5 (41 vs. 11%) compared to age 3 (15 vs. 9%, OR = 1.80, p = 0.30). The results provide additional evidence for poor FMS competency among pre-school children with disabilities. FMS should be an early part of comprehensive assessments for all children suspected of disability or development delay as it is critical to identify and intervene upon FMS delays before discrepancies can widen.

scholarly journals A Study of Language Development and Affecting Factors in Children Aged 5 to 27 Months

2016 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-29
Author(s):  
Nuray Bayar Muluk ◽  
Birgül Bayoğlu ◽  
Banu Anlar
Keyword(s):  
Language Development ◽  
Motor Development ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Developmental Screening ◽  
Affecting Factors ◽  
Gross Motor ◽  
Gross Motor Development ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Medical Histories

We conducted a study to assess the factors that affect language development in infants and toddlers using data obtained during developmental screening. Our study group consisted of 505 children–-244 (48.3%) boys and 261 (51.7%) girls, aged 5 to 27 months. The children were divided into four age groups: group 1, which we designated as the “6 months” group (age range: 5 to 7 mo); group 2, designated as the “12 months” group (11 to 13 mo); group 3, designated as the “18 months” group (17 to 19 mo); and group 4, designated as the “24 months” group (23 to 27 mo). In addition to demographic data, we compiled data using the Denver II Developmental Screening Test, as well as neurologic examination findings and medical histories. At 6 months, the social item “Works for toy out of reach” was positively related to all language development items. Two gross motor development items–-“Pull to sit, no head lag” and “Lifs chest with arm support”–-were related to the “Turns to sound” and “Turns to voice” items, respectively. Overall, children whose mothers had higher education levels and who were living in higher socioeconomic areas showed significantly greater language development, as did boys, specifically. At 12 months, higher maternal ages, some gross motor development items, and some social items were related to better language development, and children living in higher socioeconomic areas had a significantly increased ability to pass the “4 words other than mama/dada” item. At 18 months, the ability of girls to pass the “4 words other than mama/dada” item increased, and children who passed the “4 words other than mama/dada” item did not pass the “Throws ball” gross motor item. At 24 months, children whose mothers were older had better “Combines 2 words” and “Speech half intelligible” items, girls had better “Comprehends prepositions (such as under/above)” skills, and boys had better “Shows 4 parts of doll” skills. We conclude that language items appear to change together with gross motor items and social development, and that they can be influenced by a family's socioeconomic level. However, as children get older, language development diverges from gross motor development.

Comparing Children with and without Dyslexia on the Movement Assessment Battery for Children and the Test of Gross Motor Development

2007 ◽  
Vol 105 (1) ◽  
pp. 207-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Getchell ◽  
Priya Pabreja ◽  
Kevin Neeld ◽  
Victor Carrio
Keyword(s):  
Motor Development ◽  
The United States ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Gross Motor ◽  
Assessment Battery ◽  
Gross Motor Development ◽  
Dyslexic Group ◽  
Skill Performance ◽  
Movement Assessment

Dyslexia is the most commonly occurring learning disability in the United States, characterized by difficulties with word recognition, spelling, and decoding. A growing body of literature suggests that deficits in motor skill performance exist in the dyslexic population. This study compared the performance of children with and without dyslexia on different subtests of the Test of Gross Motor Development and Movement Assessment Battery for Children and assessed whether there were developmental changes in the scores of the dyslexic group. Participants included 26 dyslexic children (19 boys and 7 girls; 9.5 yr. old, SD = 1.7) and 23 age- and sex-matched typically developing (17 boys and 6 girls; 9.9 yr. old, SD = 1.3) children as a control group. Mann-Whitney U tests indicated that the dyslexic group performed significantly lower than the control group only on the Total Balance subtest of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children. Additionally, the young dyslexic group performed significantly better on the Total Balance subtest, compared to the older dyslexic group. These results suggest that cerebellar dysfunction may account for differences in performance.

An Inclusive Mastery Climate Intervention and the Motor Skill Development of Children with and Without Disabilities

2004 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 330-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadia C. Valentini ◽  
Mary E. Rudisill
Keyword(s):  
Motor Development ◽  
Motor Skill ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
Skill Development ◽  
Learning Opportunities ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Gross Motor Development ◽  
Skill Performance ◽  
Motor Skill Development ◽  
Before And After

The intent of this study was to examine how students (ages 5.9 to 10.9 years) with and without disabilities benefit from an inclusive mastery climate intervention. Participants were randomly distributed into intervention (19 participants with disabilities and 31 participants without disabilities) and comparison (17 participants with disabilities and 37 without disabilities) groups. Participants performed the Test of Gross Motor Development before and after the intervention. The analyses revealed that children with and without disabilities who received the 12-week intervention demonstrated significant improvement in motor skill performance from pre- to post- intervention while the comparison group did not. These findings suggest that the mastery climate intervention provided similar learning opportunities for students with and without disabilities.

Fundamental Gross Motor Skill Performance by Girls and Boys with Learning Disabilities

1997 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 867-870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca J. Woodard ◽  
Paul R. Surburg
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
Motor Skills ◽  
Motor Development ◽  
Gross Motor ◽  
Gross Motor Skills ◽  
Object Control ◽  
Gross Motor Development ◽  
Skill Performance ◽  
Gross Motor Skill ◽  
Development Quotient

The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of fundamental gross motor skills by 10 girls and 10 boys, 7 yr. old, with learning disabilities. Their skills were assessed on the Test of Gross Motor Development. The boys achieved significantly higher mean scores than the girls on the subtests of Locomotor Skills and Object Control Skills, and on the Gross Motor Development Quotient.

Psychometric Properties of the Test of Gross Motor Development-3 for Children With Visual Impairments

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Brian ◽  
Sally Taunton ◽  
Lauren J. Lieberman ◽  
Pamela Haibach-Beach ◽  
John Foley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Motor Development ◽  
Visual Impairments ◽  
Model Fit ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Gross Motor ◽  
Gross Motor Development ◽  
Skill Performance ◽  
High Internal Consistency ◽  
Children With Visual Impairments

Results of the Test of Gross Motor Development-2 (TGMD-2) consistently show acceptable validity and reliability for children/adolescents who are sighted and those who have visual impairments. Results of the Test of Gross Motor Development-3 (TGMD-3) are often valid and reliable for children who are sighted, but its psychometric properties are unknown for children with visual impairments. Participants (N = 66;Mage = 12.93,SD = 2.40) with visual impairments completed the TGMD-2 and TGMD-3. The TGMD-3 results from this sample revealed high internal consistency (ω = .89–.95), strong interrater reliability (ICC = .91–.92), convergence with the TGMD-2 (r = .96), and good model fit, χ2(63) = 80.10,p = .072, χ2/dfratio = 1.27, RMSEA = .06, CFI = .97. Researchers and practitioners can use the TGMD-3 to assess the motor skill performance for children/adolescents with visual impairments and most likely produce results that are valid and reliable.

Fundamental Motor Skill Performance of Indigenous and Nonindigenous Children

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Marcelo Gonçalves Duarte ◽  
Glauber Carvalho Nobre ◽  
Thábata Viviane Brandão Gomes ◽  
Rodolfo Novelino Benda
Keyword(s):  
Motor Development ◽  
Motor Skill ◽  
Effect Sizes ◽  
Medium Effect ◽  
Significant Group ◽  
Object Control ◽  
Gross Motor Development ◽  
Skill Performance ◽  
Main Effect ◽  
Overhand Throwing

Background: Studies related to the motor performance of children have suggested an interaction between organisms and the environment. Although motor development seems to be similar among people, the behavior is specific to the context that people are part of. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the fundamental motor skill performance between indigenous (IN) and nonindigenous children. Methods: One hundred and thirteen children (43 IN and 70 nonindigenous children) between 8 and 10 years of age underwent the Test of Gross Motor Development—2. Results: A multivariate analysis showed a significant group main effect on both locomotor (p < .01) and object control (p < .01) performance with large and medium effect sizes ( values = .57–.40, respectively). The IN showed the highest scores for galloping, hopping, leaping, jumping, sliding, striking a stationary ball, stationary dribbling, catching a ball, kicking, and overhand throwing (p < .01) with small to large effect sizes ( values = .05–.50). Conclusion: The IN presented the highest levels of performance in fundamental motor skills compared with those of nonindigenous children. Most likely, IN have more opportunities for motor development in the environmental context (i.e., villages) where they live.

Young Children's Divergent Movement Ability

1993 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 535-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances E. Cleland ◽  
David L. Gallahue
Keyword(s):  
Motor Development ◽  
Motor Skill ◽  
Stepwise Regression ◽  
Gross Motor ◽  
Movement Experience ◽  
Gross Motor Development ◽  
Forward Stepwise ◽  
Movement Ability ◽  
Fundamental Movement Patterns ◽  
Gross Motor Skill

To examine the relations of age, gender, movement experience, and gross motor development to young children's scores on divergent movement (i.e., ability to perform and modify fundamental movement patterns), 40 boys and girls ages 4, 6, and 8 years were tested. Ability to make divergent movements was evaluated by having subjects perform 3 different fundamental movement tasks. Movement experience was assessed by asking parents to complete a questionnaire. Ulrich's Test of Gross Motor Development was used to evaluate subjects' gross motor skill. Testing sessions were videotaped for analysis. Based on a forward stepwise regression analysis, experience and age accounted for 45% of the variance in children's gross motor skill.

scholarly journals THE IMPROVEMENT OF GROSS MOTOR DEVELOPMENT ON PRE-SCHOOL THROUGH PLAYING THROW AND CATCH BALL

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-13
Author(s):  
Etika Purnama Sari ◽  
Okta Nurul Izzah
Keyword(s):  
Motor Development ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Preschool Age ◽  
School Age Children ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
P Value ◽  
Gross Motor ◽  
Sample Number ◽  
Gross Motor Development

Background: Early childhood gross motor skills should have been able to perform activities such as jumping both one foot and two feet, catching balls, and exercising. Some children have good gross motor, but on the other hand there are children who have obstacles in the development of gross motor, so it is slower than other children. Objective: This study aims to analyze the Influence of playing throw and catch ball on gross Motor of Pre-School Age Children in Garuda Kindergarten. Method: This research design uses pre-experimental with a one-group pre-post test design approach. The population in this study was all grade A students of Garuda Surabaya Kindergarten which numbered 35 students and the sample number were 35 students. The sampling technique in this study is Total Sampling. The independent variable in the study playing throw and catch ball and the dependent variable is a gross motor development. Instruments used are observation sheets and SOP. Data analysis using Wilcoxon signed rank test. Result: The results showed that there was an increasing in children's motor development in Garuda Kindergarten The results of statistical tests showed the p value (0.000) < ɑ (0.05). Conclusion: There is an influence of playing throw and catch ball to the gross motor development of preschool-age children, this is because playing the ball will stimulate nerves and increase movement in the child so that the gross motor becomes better. To improve the development of gross Motor in children can playing throw and catch ball at home and at school.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document