scholarly journals Psychometric Properties of the Test of Gross Motor Development, Third Edition (German Translation): Results of a Pilot Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias O. Wagner ◽  
E. Kipling Webster ◽  
Dale A. Ulrich
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Measurement Invariance ◽  
Motor Development ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Kindergarten Children ◽  
Skill Assessment ◽  
Gross Motor ◽  
German Translation ◽  
Gross Motor Development ◽  
And Gender

The Test of Gross Motor Development, 3rd Edition (TGMD-3) is a process-oriented fundamental movement skill assessment to examine the movement patterns displayed by children between the ages of 3 and 10 years. Within this paper, results of a pilot study on the reliability, validity, and measurement invariance across gender of the TGMD-3 (German translation) are presented. In total, performances of 189 typically developing children (99 boys, 90 girls, 56 kindergarten children, 133 elementary school children, Mage = 7.15 ± 2.02 years) are analyzed. Results provide preliminary evidence for test-retest, interrater and intrarater reliability, internal consistency, age- and gender- specific performance trends, factorial validity, measurement invariance across gender, divergent validity, and ball skill–related concurrent and predictive validity of the TGMD-3 (German translation). Subsequent research should be focused on a verification of the present findings on a representative database to foster the application of the TGMD-3 (German translation) in different settings.

The Test of Gross Motor Development—Third Edition: A Bifactor Model, Dimensionality, and Measurement Invariance

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Sedigheh Salami ◽  
Paulo Felipe Ribeiro Bandeira ◽  
Cristiano Mauro Assis Gomes ◽  
Parvaneh Shamsipour Dehkordi
Keyword(s):  
Measurement Invariance ◽  
Motor Development ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Bifactor Model ◽  
General Factor ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Gross Motor ◽  
Measurement Models ◽  
Gross Motor Development

Aim: To examine the latent structure of the Test of Gross Motor Development—Third Edition (TGMD-3) with a bifactor modeling approach. In addition, the study examines the dimensionality and model-based reliability of general and specific contributions of the test’s subscales and measurement invariance of the TGMD-3. Methods: A convenience sample of (N = 496; Mage = 7.23 ± 2.03 years; 53.8% female) typically developed children participated in this study. Three alternative measurement models were tested: (a) a unidimensional model, (b) a correlated two-factor model, and (c) a bifactor model. Results: The totality of results, including item loadings, goodness-of-fit indexes, and reliability estimates, all supported the bifactor model and strong evidence of a general factor, namely gross motor competence. Additionally, the reliability of subscale scores was poor, and it is thus contended that scoring, reporting, and interpreting of the subscales scores are probably not justifiable. Conclusions: This study shows the advantages of using bifactor approach to examine the TGMD-3 factor structure and suggests that the two traditionally hypothesized factors are better understood as “grouping” factors rather than as representative of latent constructs. In addition, our findings demonstrate that the bifactor model appears invariant for sex.

scholarly journals Relationship between segmental trunk control and gross motor development in typically developing infants aged from 4 to 12 months: a pilot study

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamis W. Pin ◽  
Penelope B. Butler ◽  
Hon-Ming Cheung ◽  
Sandra Lai-Fong Shum
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Motor Development ◽  
Full Term ◽  
Developmental Trend ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Trunk Control ◽  
Term Infants ◽  
Gross Motor ◽  
Gross Motor Development ◽  
Young Infants

Abstract Background Trunk control is generally considered to be related to gross motor development. However, this assumption has not been validated with clinical data. This pilot study was the first of its kind to examine the longitudinal development of segmental trunk control and gross motor development from 4 to 12 months of age in typically developing full-term infants. Methods A convenience cohort of 20 healthy full-term infants (mean gestation = 39.0 weeks, SD 1.2; mean birthweight = 2975.0 g, SD 297.0; males = 10) was recruited. All study infants were tested and scored monthly by independent assessors using the Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control and the Alberta Infant Motor Scale from 4 to 12 months of age. Results A developmental trend of segmental trunk control was found in the infants. Static vertical upright trunk control developed prior to active and reactive control. Statistically significant correlations were found between trunk control status and gross motor development mainly in prone and sitting positions from 8 months of age onwards (all p < 0.004, Spearman’s r ranged from 0.644 to 0.798). Conclusions This pilot study provides preliminary clinical evidence to support the inter-dependency between vertical upright trunk control and gross motor development in young infants, particularly as upright functional skills are gained. This suggests that a dual focus on training upright trunk control alongside gross motor skills could be of benefit in the treatment of infants with movement disorders.

THE TEST OF GROSS MOTOR DEVELOPMENT-THIRD EDITION: A BIFACTOR MODEL, DIMENSIONALITY, AND MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sedigheh Salami ◽  
Paulo Felipe Ribeiro Bandeira ◽  
Cristiano Mauro Assis Gomes ◽  
Parvaneh Shamsipour Dehkordi
Keyword(s):  
Measurement Invariance ◽  
Motor Development ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Bifactor Model ◽  
Gross Motor ◽  
Measurement Models ◽  
Gross Motor Development ◽  
Bifactor Modeling ◽  
Iranian Children

Aim: To examine the latent structure of the Test of Gross Motor Development, 3rd Edition (TGMD-3) with a bifactor modeling approach. Furthermore, the study examines the dimensionality, model-based reliability of general and specific contributions of the test's subscales and measurement invariance of the TGMD-3. Methods: Using a sample of 496 Iranian children (M age = 7.23±2.03 years; 53.8 female) from the five main geographic regions of Tehran city, three alternative measurement models were tested: (a) a unidimensional model, (b) a correlated 2-factor model, (c) a bifactor model. Results: The totality of results including item loadings, goodness-of-fit indexes and reliability estimates all supported the bifactor model and strong evidence of general fundamental movement factor. Additionally, the reliability of subscale scores was poor, it is thus contended that scoring, reporting and interpreting of the subscales scores are probably not justifiable. Suggesting that the 2 traditionally hypothesized factors are better understood as “grouping” factors rather than as representative of latent constructs. Furthermore, the bifactor model appears invariant for gender. Conclusion: This study is the first to address the bifactor model and new insights regarding the application and interpretation of the test battery most widely used with children.

scholarly journals Reliability of the test of gross motor development second edition (TGMD-2) for Kindergarten children in Myanmar

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 1726-1731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thanda Aye ◽  
Khin Saw Oo ◽  
Myo Thuzar Khin ◽  
Tsugumi Kuramoto-Ahuja ◽  
Hitoshi Maruyama
Keyword(s):  
Motor Development ◽  
Kindergarten Children ◽  
Gross Motor ◽  
Gross Motor Development

Apnea of Infancy and Subsequent Neurologic, Cognitive, and Behavioral Status

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. 638-645
Author(s):  
Eva Deykin ◽  
Margaret L. Bauman ◽  
Dorothy H. Kelly ◽  
Chung-Cheng Hsieh ◽  
Daniel Shannon
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Selection Bias ◽  
Motor Development ◽  
Subsequent Development ◽  
Threshold Effect ◽  
Gross Motor ◽  
Gross Motor Development ◽  
Poor Outcome ◽  
Significant Impairment ◽  
Cognitive Deficiencies

A pilot study investigated the neurologic, cognitive, and behavioral consequences of nonfatal infancy apnea. Fifteen formerly apneic, monitored children were compared with age-similar siblings and with agesex matched playmates. Significant impairment in gross motor development and mild cognitive deficiencies were observed when those who had had apnea were compared with their siblings but not when contrasted with their playmates. Lack of difference between those who had had apnea and playmates might have been due to a selection bias involving assortive friendships. The frequency and the severity of apneic episodes were associated but neither one showed a clear gradient of risk for poor outcome in the areas under study, indicating the possibility that apnea may have a threshold effect on subsequent development.

Gross Motor Development of Asian and European Children on Four Motor Assessments: A Literature Review

2007 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 148-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanja Anick Mayson ◽  
Susan R. Harris ◽  
Catherine L. Bachman
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Motor Development ◽  
Gross Motor ◽  
Gross Motor Development

scholarly journals Intra-Rater (Live vs. Video Assessment) and Inter-Rater (Expert vs. Novice) Reliability of the Test of Gross Motor Development—Third Edition

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 1652
Author(s):  
Aida Carballo-Fazanes ◽  
Ezequiel Rey ◽  
Nadia C. Valentini ◽  
José E. Rodríguez-Fernández ◽  
Cristina Varela-Casal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Education ◽  
Motor Development ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Slow Motion ◽  
Healthy Children ◽  
Gross Motor ◽  
Rater Reliability ◽  
Video Assessment ◽  
Gross Motor Development ◽  
Ball Skills

The Test of Gross Motor Development (TGMD) is one of the most common tools for assessing the fundamental movement skills (FMS) in children between 3 and 10 years. This study aimed to examine the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the TGMD—3rd Edition (TGMD-3) between expert and novice raters using live and video assessment. Five raters [2 experts and 3 novices (one of them BSc in Physical Education and Sport Science)] assessed and scored the performance of the TGMD-3 of 25 healthy children [Female: 60%; mean (standard deviation) age 9.16 (1.31)]. Schoolchildren were attending at one public elementary school during the academic year 2019–2020 from Santiago de Compostela (Spain). Raters scored each children performance through two viewing moods (live and slow-motion). The ICC (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient) was used to determine the agreement between raters. Our results showed moderate-to-excellent intra-rater reliability for overall score and locomotor and ball skills subscales; moderate-to-good inter-rater reliability for overall and ball skills; and poor-to-good for locomotor subscale. Higher intra-rater reliability was achieved by the expert raters and novice rater with physical education background compared to novice raters. However, the inter-rater reliability was more variable in all the raters regardless of their experience or background. No significant differences in reliability were found when comparing live and video assessments. For clinical practice, it would be recommended that raters reach an agreement before the assessment to avoid subjective interpretations that might distort the results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document