scholarly journals Genomic agonism and phenotypic antagonism between estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. e1501924 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hari Singhal ◽  
Marianne E. Greene ◽  
Gerard Tarulli ◽  
Allison L. Zarnke ◽  
Ryan J. Bourgo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Progesterone Receptors ◽  
Estrogen Signaling ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Estrogen Action ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Estrogen Receptor Positive ◽  
Estrogen Antagonist

The functional role of progesterone receptor (PR) and its impact on estrogen signaling in breast cancer remain controversial. In primary ER+ (estrogen receptor–positive)/PR+ human tumors, we report that PR reprograms estrogen signaling as a genomic agonist and a phenotypic antagonist. In isolation, estrogen and progestin act as genomic agonists by regulating the expression of common target genes in similar directions, but at different levels. Similarly, in isolation, progestin is also a weak phenotypic agonist of estrogen action. However, in the presence of both hormones, progestin behaves as a phenotypic estrogen antagonist. PR remodels nucleosomes to noncompetitively redirect ER genomic binding to distal enhancers enriched for BRCA1 binding motifs and sites that link PR and ER/PR complexes. When both hormones are present, progestin modulates estrogen action, such that responsive transcriptomes, cellular processes, and ER/PR recruitment to genomic sites correlate with those observed with PR alone, but not ER alone. Despite this overall correlation, the transcriptome patterns modulated by dual treatment are sufficiently different from individual treatments, such that antagonism of oncogenic processes is both predicted and observed. Combination therapies using the selective PR modulator/antagonist (SPRM) CDB4124 in combination with tamoxifen elicited 70% cytotoxic tumor regression of T47D tumor xenografts, whereas individual therapies inhibited tumor growth without net regression. Our findings demonstrate that PR redirects ER chromatin binding to antagonize estrogen signaling and that SPRMs can potentiate responses to antiestrogens, suggesting that cotargeting of ER and PR in ER+/PR+ breast cancers should be explored.

scholarly journals MiR-195 and Its Target SEMA6D Regulate Chemoresponse in Breast Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (23) ◽  
pp. 5979
Author(s):  
Diana E. Baxter ◽  
Lisa M. Allinson ◽  
Waleed S. Al Amri ◽  
James A. Poulter ◽  
Arindam Pramanik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Breast Cancer Cell Lines ◽  
Molecular Characteristics ◽  
Chemotherapy Response ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Microrna Target ◽  
Estrogen Receptor Positive

Background: poor prognosis primary breast cancers are typically treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, recurrences remain relatively common even after this aggressive therapy. Comparison of matched tumours pre- and post-chemotherapy can allow identification of molecular characteristics of therapy resistance and thereby potentially aid discovery of novel predictive markers or targets for chemosensitisation. Through this comparison, we aimed to identify microRNAs associated with chemoresistance, define microRNA target genes, and assess targets as predictors of chemotherapy response. Methods: cancer cells were laser microdissected from matched breast cancer tissues pre- and post-chemotherapy from estrogen receptor positive/HER2 negative breast cancers showing partial responses to epirubicin/cyclophosphamide chemotherapy (n = 5). MicroRNA expression was profiled using qPCR arrays. MicroRNA/mRNA expression was manipulated in estrogen receptor positive/HER2 negative breast cancer cell lines (MCF7 and MDA-MB-175 cells) with mimics, inhibitors or siRNAs, and chemoresponse was assessed using MTT and colony forming survival assays. MicroRNA targets were identified by RNA-sequencing of microRNA mimic pull-downs, and comparison of these with mRNAs containing predicted microRNA binding sites. Survival correlations were tested using the METABRIC expression dataset (n = 1979). Results: miR-195 and miR-26b were consistently up-regulated after therapy, and changes in their expression in cell lines caused significant differences in chemotherapy sensitivity, in accordance with up-regulation driving resistance. SEMA6D was defined and confirmed as a target of the microRNAs. Reduced SEMA6D expression was significantly associated with chemoresistance, in accordance with SEMA6D being a down-stream effector of the microRNAs. Finally, low SEMA6D expression in breast cancers was significantly associated with poor survival after chemotherapy, but not after other therapies. Conclusions: microRNAs and their targets influence chemoresponse, allowing the identification of SEMA6D as a predictive marker for chemotherapy response that could be used to direct therapy or as a target in chemosensitisation strategies.

scholarly journals Occupational Chemical Exposure and Breast Cancer Risk According to Hormone Receptor Status: A Systematic Review

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1882 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veruscka Leso ◽  
Maria Luigia Ercolano ◽  
Dante Luigi Cioffi ◽  
Ivo Iavicoli
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Progesterone Receptors ◽  
Chemical Exposure ◽  
Occupational Risk ◽  
Synthetic Fiber ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Occupational Risk Factors ◽  
Receptor Status ◽  
Estrogen Receptor Positive

Breast cancers include a heterogeneous group of diseases with clinical behaviors that may vary according to the hormonal receptor status. However, limited knowledge is available on the role of breast cancer environmental and occupational risk factors in the onset of specific molecular disease phenotypes. Therefore, the aim of this review was to provide an overview on the possible correlation between occupational chemical exposures and breast cancers with a specific receptor pattern. Pubmed, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science databases were systematically reviewed to identify all the studies addressing chemical exposure in workplaces and risk of breast cancer classified according to the presence of estrogen and/or progesterone receptors. Some positive associations were reported between solvent, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon, organophosphoric insecticide, and synthetic fiber exposure and estrogen receptor-positive cases, while other investigations demonstrated a relationship with receptor-negative tumors or failed to detect any significant effect. Overall, further investigation should overcome limitations due to the self-reported information on work histories, the chemical classification in general categories, and the lack of environmental or biological monitoring exposure data. This may support the development of suitable and individually “tailored” occupational risk assessment and management strategies to protect the health of exposed workers, particularly those with hypersusceptibility conditions.

Prognostic Role of Hedgehog-GLI1 Signaling Pathway in Aggressive and Metastatic Breast Cancers

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prasuja Rokkam ◽  
Shailender Gugalavath ◽  
Deepak Kakara Gift Kumar ◽  
Rahul Kumar Vempati ◽  
Rama Rao Malla
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Signaling Pathway ◽  
Neural Development ◽  
Splice Variants ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Basic Function ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Aberrant Expression ◽  
Cellular Processes

Glioma-associated oncogene homolog 1 (GLI1) is reported as an amplified gene in human glioblastoma cells. It is a krupple like transcription factor, belonging to the zinc finger family. The basic function of GLI1 is normal neural development at various stages of human. The GLI1 gene was first mapped on the chromosome sub-bands 12q13.3-14.1. Further, single nucleotide polymorphism is mostly observed in translating a region of 5’ and 3’- UTR of GLI1 gene in addition to two post-transcriptional splice variants, GLIΔN and tGLI. Additionally, it also regulates a plethora of gene which mediates crucial cellular processes like proliferation, differentiation, oncogenesis, EMT, and metastasis. It also regulates tumor tolerance, chemoresistance, and radioresistance. Aberrant expression of GLI1 predicts the poor survival of breast cancer patients. GLI1 is an essential mediator of the SHH signaling pathway regulating self-renewal of stem cells, angiogenesis, and expression of FOXS1, CYR61. GLI1 mediated HH pathway can induce apoptosis. Hence, GLI1 can be a future diagnostic, prognostic marker, and as well as a potent target of therapeutics in breast cancer.

scholarly journals TrkA Interacts with and Phosphorylates STAT3 to Enhance Gene Transcription and Promote Breast Cancer Stem Cells in Triple-Negative and HER2-Enriched Breast Cancers

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 2340
Author(s):  
Angelina T. Regua ◽  
Noah R. Aguayo ◽  
Sara Abu Jalboush ◽  
Daniel L. Doheny ◽  
Sara G. Manore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Stem Cells ◽  
Cancer Stem Cells ◽  
Gene Transcription ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Breast Cancer Stem Cells ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Co Activation ◽  
Stat3 Phosphorylation

JAK2–STAT3 and TrkA signaling pathways have been separately implicated in aggressive breast cancers; however, whether they are co-activated or undergo functional interaction has not been thoroughly investigated. Herein we report, for the first time that STAT3 and TrkA are significantly co-overexpressed and co-activated in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and HER2-enriched breast cancer, as shown by immunohistochemical staining and data mining. Through immunofluorescence staining–confocal microscopy and immunoprecipitation–Western blotting, we found that TrkA and STAT3 co-localize and physically interact in the cytoplasm, and the interaction is dependent on STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation. TrkA–STAT3 interaction leads to STAT3 phosphorylation at Y705 by TrkA in breast cancer cells and cell-free kinase assays, indicating that STAT3 is a novel substrate of TrkA. β-NGF-mediated TrkA activation induces TrkA–STAT3 interaction, STAT3 nuclear transport and transcriptional activity, and the expression of STAT3 target genes, SOX2 and MYC. The co-activation of both pathways promotes breast cancer stem cells. Finally, we found that TNBC and HER2-enriched breast cancer with JAK2–STAT3 and TrkA co-activation are positively associated with poor overall metastasis-free and organ-specific metastasis-free survival. Collectively, our study uncovered that TrkA is a novel activating kinase of STAT3, and their co-activation enhances gene transcription and promotes breast cancer stem cells in TNBC and HER2-enriched breast cancer.

scholarly journals Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Adjuvant Therapeutic Options

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayca Gucalp ◽  
Tiffany A. Traina
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progesterone Receptors ◽  
Cytotoxic Chemotherapy ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Targeted Agents ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Disproportionate Number

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), a subtype distinguished by negative immunohistochemical assays for expression of the estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER/PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2(HER2) represents 15% of all breast cancers. Patients with TNBC generally experience a more aggressive clinical course with increased risk of disease progression and poorer overall survival. Furthermore, this subtype accounts for a disproportionate number of disease-related mortality in part due to its aggressive natural history and our lack of effective targeted agents beyond conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy. In this paper, we will review the epidemiology, risk factors, prognosis, and the molecular and clinicopathologic features that distinguish TNBC from other subtypes of breast cancer. In addition, we will examine the available data for the use of cytotoxic chemotherapy in the treatment of TNBC in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting and explore the ongoing development of newer targeted agents.

scholarly journals RORγ is a targetable master regulator of cholesterol biosynthesis in a cancer subtype

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Demin Cai ◽  
Junjian Wang ◽  
Bei Gao ◽  
Jin Li ◽  
Feng Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Cholesterol Biosynthesis ◽  
Cholesterol Content ◽  
Cholesterol Homeostasis ◽  
Synthesis Rate ◽  
Master Regulator ◽  
Cancer Subtype ◽  
Estrogen Receptor Positive ◽  
Chromatin Acetylation

Abstract Tumor subtype-specific metabolic reprogrammers could serve as targets of therapeutic intervention. Here we show that triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) exhibits a hyper-activated cholesterol-biosynthesis program that is strongly linked to nuclear receptor RORγ, compared to estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Genetic and pharmacological inhibition of RORγ reduces tumor cholesterol content and synthesis rate while preserving host cholesterol homeostasis. We demonstrate that RORγ functions as an essential activator of the entire cholesterol-biosynthesis program, dominating SREBP2 via its binding to cholesterol-biosynthesis genes and its facilitation of the recruitment of SREBP2. RORγ inhibition disrupts its association with SREBP2 and reduces chromatin acetylation at cholesterol-biosynthesis gene loci. RORγ antagonists cause tumor regression in patient-derived xenografts and immune-intact models. Their combination with cholesterol-lowering statins elicits superior anti-tumor synergy selectively in TNBC. Together, our study uncovers a master regulator of the cholesterol-biosynthesis program and an attractive target for TNBC.

scholarly journals A Molecular and Morphological Deep-Dive Into Metaplastic Breast Cancers

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 117693511985015
Author(s):  
Amy E McCart Reed ◽  
Sunil R Lakhani
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Breast Cancer Mortality ◽  
Progesterone Receptors ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Her2 Expression ◽  
Deep Dive ◽  
Whole Exome ◽  
Morphological Assessment ◽  
Made In

Metaplastic breast cancers (MBC) are relatively rare but account for significant global breast cancer mortality. Typically presenting without oestrogen and progesterone receptors or HER2 expression, these triple negative breast cancers are the archetypal ‘stem cell-like’ tumours that show a variety of metaplastic elements, including squamous, spindle, and chondroid. Given the vast heterogeneity in MBC by definition, large cohort studies are needed to draw conclusions. Together with our consortium colleagues, a cohort of 347 MBC was established, and a detailed morphological assessment made in an effort to understand the clinical relevance of the current diagnostic guidelines. Biomarker expression was investigated, and whole exome sequencing was performed. Herein, we provide an overview and contextualisation of the study.

scholarly journals Triple Negative Breast Cancer Profile, from Gene to microRNA, in Relation to Ethnicity

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ishita Gupta ◽  
Rasha Sareyeldin ◽  
Israa Al-Hashimi ◽  
Hamda A. Al-Thawadi ◽  
Halema Al Farsi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Progesterone Receptors ◽  
Geographic Location ◽  
Gene Profiling ◽  
Cancer Therapies ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
New Techniques ◽  
Metastatic Behavior ◽  
Her 2

Breast cancer is the most frequent cause of cancer-related deaths among women worldwide. It is classified into four major molecular subtypes. Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs), a subgroup of breast cancer, are defined by the absence of estrogen and progesterone receptors and the lack of HER-2 expression; this subgroup accounts for ~15% of all breast cancers and exhibits the most aggressive metastatic behavior. Currently, very limited targeted therapies exist for the treatment of patients with TNBCs. On the other hand, it is important to highlight that knowledge of the molecular biology of breast cancer has recently changed the decision-making process regarding the course of cancer therapies. Thus, a number of new techniques, such as gene profiling and sequencing, proteomics, and microRNA analysis have been used to explore human breast carcinogenesis and metastasis including TNBC, which consequently could lead to new therapies. Nevertheless, based on evidence thus far, genomics profiles (gene and miRNA) can differ from one geographic location to another as well as in different ethnic groups. This review provides a comprehensive and updated information on the genomics profile alterations associated with TNBC pathogenesis associated with different ethnic backgrounds.

scholarly journals ER-Negative Breast Cancer Is Highly Responsive to Cholesterol Metabolite Signalling

Nutrients ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 2618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha A Hutchinson ◽  
Priscilia Lianto ◽  
Hanne Roberg-Larsen ◽  
Sebastiano Battaglia ◽  
Thomas A Hughes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Cholesterol Metabolism ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Er Positive ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

Interventions that alter cholesterol have differential impacts on hormone receptor positive- and negative-breast cancer risk and prognosis. This implies differential regulation or response to cholesterol within different breast cancer subtypes. We evaluated differences in side-chain hydroxycholesterol and liver X nuclear receptor signalling between Oestrogen Receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative breast cancers and cell lines. Cell line models of ER-positive and ER-negative disease were treated with Liver X Receptor (LXR) ligands and transcriptional activity assessed using luciferase reporters, qPCR and MTT. Publicly available datasets were mined to identify differences between ER-negative and ER-positive tumours and siRNA was used to suppress candidate regulators. Compared to ER-positive breast cancer, ER-negative breast cancer cells were highly responsive to LXR agonists. In primary disease and cell lines LXRA expression was strongly correlated with its target genes in ER-negative but not ER-positive disease. Expression of LXR’s corepressors (NCOR1, NCOR2 and LCOR) was significantly higher in ER-positive disease relative to ER-negative, and their knock-down equalized sensitivity to ligand between subtypes in reporter, gene expression and viability assays. Our data support further evaluation of dietary and pharmacological targeting of cholesterol metabolism as an adjunct to existing therapies for ER-negative and ER-positive breast cancer patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document