scholarly journals Targeting the nucleotide salvage factor DNPH1 sensitizes BRCA-deficient cells to PARP inhibitors

Science ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 372 (6538) ◽  
pp. 156-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kasper Fugger ◽  
Ilirjana Bajrami ◽  
Mariana Silva Dos Santos ◽  
Sarah Jane Young ◽  
Simone Kunzelmann ◽  
...  

Mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 tumor suppressor genes predispose individuals to breast and ovarian cancer. In the clinic, these cancers are treated with inhibitors that target poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP). We show that inhibition of DNPH1, a protein that eliminates cytotoxic nucleotide 5-hydroxymethyl-deoxyuridine (hmdU) monophosphate, potentiates the sensitivity of BRCA-deficient cells to PARP inhibitors (PARPi). Synthetic lethality was mediated by the action of SMUG1 glycosylase on genomic hmdU, leading to PARP trapping, replication fork collapse, DNA break formation, and apoptosis. BRCA1-deficient cells that acquired resistance to PARPi were resensitized by treatment with hmdU and DNPH1 inhibition. Because genomic hmdU is a key determinant of PARPi sensitivity, targeting DNPH1 provides a promising strategy for the hypersensitization of BRCA-deficient cancers to PARPi therapy.

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. González-Santiago ◽  
◽  
T. Ramón y Cajal ◽  
E. Aguirre ◽  
J. E. Alés-Martínez ◽  
...  

AbstractMutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 high penetrance genes account for most hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, although other new high-moderate penetrance genes included in multigene panels have increased the genetic diagnosis of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families by 50%. Multigene cancer panels provide new challenges related to increased frequency of variants of uncertain significance, new gene-specific cancer risk assessments, and clinical recommendations for carriers of mutations of new genes. Although clinical criteria for genetic testing continue to be largely based on personal and family history with around a 10% detection rate, broader criteria are being applied with a lower threshold for detecting mutations when there are therapeutic implications for patients with breast or ovarian cancer. In this regard, new models of genetic counselling and testing are being implemented following the registration of PARP inhibitors for individuals who display BRCA mutations. Massive sequencing techniques in tumor tissue is also driving a paradigm shift in genetic testing and potential identification of germline mutations. In this paper, we review the current clinical criteria for genetic testing, as well as surveillance recommendations in healthy carriers, risk reduction surgical options, and new treatment strategies in breast cancer gene-mutated carriers.


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 579-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Caruso ◽  
Anselmo Papa ◽  
Silverio Tomao ◽  
Patrizia Vici ◽  
Pierluigi Benedetti Panici ◽  
...  

Ovarian cancer is the first cause of death from gynaecological malignancy. Germline mutation in BRCA1 and 2, two genes involved in the mechanisms of reparation of DNA damage, are showed to be related with the incidence of breast and ovarian cancer, both sporadic and familiar. PARP is a family of enzymes involved in the base excision repair (BER) system. The introduction of inhibitors of PARP in patients with BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer is correlated with the concept of synthetic lethality. Among the PARP inhibitors introduced in clinical practice, niraparib showed interesting results in a phase III trial in the setting of maintenance treatment in ovarian cancer, after platinum-based chemotherapy. Interestingly, was niraparib showed to be efficacious not only in BRCA-mutated patients, but also in patients with other alterations of the homologous recombination (HR) system and in patients with unknown alterations. These results position niraparib as the first PARP-inhibitor with clinically and statistically significant results also in patients with no alterations in BRCA 1/2 and other genes involved in the DNA repair system. Even if the results are potentially practice-changing, the action of niraparib must be further studied and deepened.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (16) ◽  
pp. 8506
Author(s):  
Kristie-Ann Dickson ◽  
Tao Xie ◽  
Christian Evenhuis ◽  
Yue Ma ◽  
Deborah J. Marsh

Several poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are now in clinical use for tumours with defects in BReast CAncer genes BRCA1 or BRCA2 that result in deficient homologous recombination repair (HRR). Use of olaparib, niraparib or rucaparib for the treatment of high-grade serous ovarian cancer, including in the maintenance setting, has extended both progression free and overall survival for women with this malignancy. While different PARP inhibitors (PARPis) are mechanistically similar, differences are apparent in their chemical structures, toxicity profiles, PARP trapping abilities and polypharmacological landscapes. We have treated ovarian cancer cell line models of known BRCA status, including the paired cell lines PEO1 and PEO4, and UWB1.289 and UWB1.289+BRCA1, with five PARPis (olaparib, niraparib, rucaparib, talazoparib and veliparib) and observed differences between PARPis in both cell viability and cell survival. A cell line model of acquired resistance to veliparib showed increased resistance to the other four PARPis tested, suggesting that acquired resistance to one PARPi may not be able to be rescued by another. Lastly, as a proof of principle, HRR proficient ovarian cancer cells were sensitised to PARPis by depletion of BRCA1. In the future, guidelines will need to emerge to assist clinicians in matching specific PARPis to specific patients and tumours.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e23056-e23056
Author(s):  
Kyaw Zin Thein ◽  
Somedeb Ball ◽  
Anita Sultan ◽  
Sriman Swarup ◽  
Myo Zaw ◽  
...  

e23056 Background: Poly adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have shown to improve survival in ovarian cancer (OC) through synthetic lethality with potentiation of double-strand breaks in tumor cells. Yet, there are concerns of secondary hematologic malignancies (SHM) and notable adverse events (AE) leading to treatment discontinuation (TD), interruption (TI), or dose reduction (DR). Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE databases and meeting abstracts from inception through January 2019 were queried. Phase 3 RCTs utilizing PARP inhibitors maintenance in OC were eligible. Mantel-Haenszel (MH) method was used to calculate the estimated pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Random effects model was applied. Results: A total of 1792 patients from four phase III RCTs were included. The study arm used olaparib or niraparib or rucaparib while the control arm utilized placebo. Almost all patients in the SOLO-2 & -1 trials had a gBRCA mutation, while there were patients with and without the said mutation in the other two studies. The SHM incidence was 1.25% in PARP inhibitors group vs 0.83% in control group (RR, 1.15; 95% CI: 0.41–3.22, p = 0.79). TI due to AE was 59.71% in study group versus 11.39% in control arm (RR, 4.94; 95% CI: 2.44 – 9.96, P < 0.001). DR was reported in 47.73% in PARP inhibitors arm versus 6.86% in control group (RR, 7.73; 95% CI: 4.17 – 14.31, P < 0.001). TD rate was 10.97% higher in study group compared to control arm (RR, 6.63; 95% CI: 3.55 – 11.31, P < 0.001). Conclusions: The risk of SHM was not significantly increased in PARP inhibitors group. However, patients on PAPR inhibitors arm experienced significant drop outs due to AE, despite showing significant improvement in PFS in studies. Proper supportive care may enhance compliance.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han Yu Huang ◽  
Chen Liu ◽  
Xin Li You ◽  
Xi Li ◽  
Yang chao Sun ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Ovarian cancer has the highest fatality rate among patients with gynaecological tumours. Current therapies including poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have limitations due to the frequent recurrence of ovarian cancer after treatment and resistance to therapy.Methods: In this study, we used multiple models with different genetic backgrounds to investigate the potential synergism effect and mechanism between the bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4) inhibitor AZD5153 and the PARP inhibitor Olaparib. The models were two-dimensional (2D) and 3D cell lines, patient-derived organoids (PDO) and patient-derived xenografts (PDX). Results: Cotreatment with Olaparib and AZD5153 exhibited marked synergistic effects, and significantly attenuated cell viability, whereas it increased DNA replication fork instability, chromosomal breakage and apoptosis compared to treatment with either drug alone. Mechanistically, the tumor upregulates PTEN after Olaparib treatment to make its DNA and chromosome more stable and therefore induces Olaparib resistance. AZD5153 can downregulate PTEN to reverse Olaparib resistance and thus increase joint lethal effect with Olaparib.Conclusion: This study reveals that AZD5153 can downregulate PTEN to reverse Olaparib resistance and thus increase joint lethal effect on DNA replication fork instability, chromosomal breakage, and apoptosis with Olaparib.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva M. Galan-Moya ◽  
Ana Alcaraz-Sanabria ◽  
Cristina Nieto-Jimenez ◽  
Veronica Corrales-Sanchez ◽  
Miriam Nuncia-Cantarero ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. T19-T37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoko Katsuki ◽  
Minoru Takata

Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome and a rare childhood disorder Fanconi anemia (FA) are caused by homologous recombination (HR) defects, and some of the causative genes overlap. Recent studies in this field have led to the exciting development of PARP inhibitors as novel cancer therapeutics and have clarified important mechanisms underlying genome instability and tumor suppression in HR-defective disorders. In this review, we provide an overview of the basic molecular mechanisms governing HR and DNA crosslink repair, highlightingBRCA2, and the intriguing relationship between HBOC and FA.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margherita Turinetto ◽  
Giulia Scotto ◽  
Valentina Tuninetti ◽  
Gaia Giannone ◽  
Giorgio Valabrega

PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have shown promising clinical results and have revolutionized the landscape of ovarian cancer management in the last few years. While the core mechanism of action of these drugs has been largely analyzed, the interaction between PARP inhibitors and the microenvironment has been scarcely researched so far. Recent data shows a variety of mechanism through which PARPi might influence the tumor microenvironment and especially the immune system response, that might even partly be the reason behind PARPi efficacy. One of many pathways that are affected is the cGAS-cGAMP-STING; the upregulation of STING (stimulator of interferon genes), produces more Interferon ϒ and pro inflammatory cytokines, thus increasing intratumoral CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Upregulation of immune checkpoints such as PD1-PDL1 has also been observed. Another interesting mechanism of interaction between PARPi and microenvironment is the ability of PARPi to kill hypoxic cells, as these cells show an intrinsic reduction in the expression and function of the proteins involved in HR. This process has been defined “contextual synthetic lethality”. Despite ovarian cancer having always been considered a poor responder to immune therapy, data is now shedding a new light on the matter. First, OC is much more heterogenous than previously thought, therefore it is fundamental to select predictive biomarkers for target therapies. While single agent therapies have not yielded significant results on the long term, influencing the immune system and the tumor microenvironment via the concomitant use of PARPi and other target therapies might be a more successful approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document