A Correction to the Research Article Titled: "Antagonistic Regulation of Actin Dynamics and Cell Motility by TRPC5 and TRPC6 Channels" by D. Tian, S. M. P. Jacobo, D. Billing, A. Rozkalne, S. D. Gage, T. Anagnostou, H. Pavenstaedt, H.-H. Hsu, J. Schlondorff, A. Ramos, A. Greka

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (147) ◽  
pp. er11-er11 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Motility ◽  
Actin Dynamics ◽  
Research Article

scholarly journals Actin-depolymerizing Factor and Cofilin-1 Play Overlapping Roles in Promoting Rapid F-Actin Depolymerization in Mammalian Nonmuscle Cells

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 649-664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pirta Hotulainen ◽  
Eija Paunola ◽  
Maria K. Vartiainen ◽  
Pekka Lappalainen
Keyword(s):  
Cell Motility ◽  
Actin Filament ◽  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Actin Dynamics ◽  
Actin Binding ◽  
Actin Depolymerizing Factor ◽  
Cytoskeletal Dynamics ◽  
Nonmuscle Cells ◽  
In Cells

Actin-depolymerizing factor (ADF)/cofilins are small actin-binding proteins found in all eukaryotes. In vitro, ADF/cofilins promote actin dynamics by depolymerizing and severing actin filaments. However, whether ADF/cofilins contribute to actin dynamics in cells by disassembling “old” actin filaments or by promoting actin filament assembly through their severing activity is a matter of controversy. Analysis of mammalian ADF/cofilins is further complicated by the presence of multiple isoforms, which may contribute to actin dynamics by different mechanisms. We show that two isoforms, ADF and cofilin-1, are expressed in mouse NIH 3T3, B16F1, and Neuro 2A cells. Depleting cofilin-1 and/or ADF by siRNA leads to an accumulation of F-actin and to an increase in cell size. Cofilin-1 and ADF seem to play overlapping roles in cells, because the knockdown phenotype of either protein could be rescued by overexpression of the other one. Cofilin-1 and ADF knockdown cells also had defects in cell motility and cytokinesis, and these defects were most pronounced when both ADF and cofilin-1 were depleted. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching analysis and studies with an actin monomer-sequestering drug, latrunculin-A, demonstrated that these phenotypes arose from diminished actin filament depolymerization rates. These data suggest that mammalian ADF and cofilin-1 promote cytoskeletal dynamics by depolymerizing actin filaments and that this activity is critical for several processes such as cytokinesis and cell motility.

scholarly journals Pak1 regulates focal adhesion strength, myosin IIA distribution, and actin dynamics to optimize cell migration

2011 ◽  
Vol 193 (7) ◽  
pp. 1289-1303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Violaine D. Delorme-Walker ◽  
Jeffrey R. Peterson ◽  
Jonathan Chernoff ◽  
Clare M. Waterman ◽  
Gaudenz Danuser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Cell Motility ◽  
Adhesion Strength ◽  
Focal Adhesion ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Actin Dynamics ◽  
Filamentous Actin ◽  
Downstream Effectors ◽  
Myosin Iia ◽  
And Migration

Cell motility requires the spatial and temporal coordination of forces in the actomyosin cytoskeleton with extracellular adhesion. The biochemical mechanism that coordinates filamentous actin (F-actin) assembly, myosin contractility, adhesion dynamics, and motility to maintain the balance between adhesion and contraction remains unknown. In this paper, we show that p21-activated kinases (Paks), downstream effectors of the small guanosine triphosphatases Rac and Cdc42, biochemically couple leading-edge actin dynamics to focal adhesion (FA) dynamics. Quantitative live cell microscopy assays revealed that the inhibition of Paks abolished F-actin flow in the lamella, displaced myosin IIA from the cell edge, and decreased FA turnover. We show that, by controlling the dynamics of these three systems, Paks regulate the protrusive activity and migration of epithelial cells. Furthermore, we found that expressing Pak1 was sufficient to overcome the inhibitory effects of excess adhesion strength on cell motility. These findings establish Paks as critical molecules coordinating cytoskeletal systems for efficient cell migration.

scholarly journals Cofilin hyperactivation in HIV infection and targeting the cofilin pathway using an anti-α4β7 integrin antibody

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. eaat7911 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sijia He ◽  
Yajing Fu ◽  
Jia Guo ◽  
Mark Spear ◽  
Jiuling Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Cell Migration ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Hiv Infection ◽  
Cell Motility ◽  
Cd4 T Cells ◽  
Immune Reconstitution ◽  
Actin Dynamics ◽  
Lymphoid Tissues ◽  
Cell Recovery

A functional HIV cure requires immune reconstitution for lasting viremia control. A major immune dysfunction persisting in HIV infection is the impairment of T helper cell migration and homing to lymphoid tissues such as GALTs (gut-associated lymphoid tissues). ART (antiretroviral therapy) does not fully restore T cell motility for tissue repopulation. The molecular mechanism dictating this persistent T cell dysfunction is not understood. Cofilin is an actin-depolymerizing factor that regulates actin dynamics for T cell migration. Here, we demonstrate that blood CD4 T cells from HIV-infected patients (n = 193), with or without ART, exhibit significantly lower levels of cofilin phosphorylation (hyperactivation) than those from healthy controls (n = 100; ratio, 1.1:2.3; P < 0.001); cofilin hyperactivation is also associated with poor CD4 T cell recovery following ART. These results suggest an HIV-mediated systemic dysregulation of T cell motility that cannot be repaired solely by ART. We further demonstrate that stimulating blood CD4 T cells with an anti–human α4β7 integrin antibody can trigger signal transduction and modulate the cofilin pathway, partially restoring T cell motility in vitro. However, we also observed that severe T cell motility defect caused by high degrees of cofilin hyperactivation was not repairable by the anti-integrin antibody, demonstrating a mechanistic hindrance to restore immune functions in vivo. Our study suggests that cofilin is a key molecule that may need to be therapeutically targeted early for T cell tissue repopulation, immune reconstitution, and immune control of viremia.

scholarly journals TAMI-04. TUMOR TREATING FIELDS (TTFIELDS) HINDER GLIOMA CELL MOTILITY THROUGH REGULATION OF MICROTUBULE AND ACTIN DYNAMICS

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii213-ii213
Author(s):  
Tali Voloshin ◽  
Rosa Schneiderman ◽  
Alexandra Volodin ◽  
Reuben Shamir ◽  
Noa Kaynan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Motility ◽  
Glioma Cell ◽  
Therapeutic Potential ◽  
Adhesion Formation ◽  
Glioma Cells ◽  
Microtubule Assembly ◽  
Actin Dynamics ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Cellular Polarity ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields

Abstract The ability of glioma cells to invade adjacent brain tissue remains a major obstacle to therapeutic disease management. Therefore, the development of novel treatment modalities that disrupt glioma cell motility could facilitate greater disease control. Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields), encompassing alternating electric fields within the intermediate frequency range, is an anticancer treatment delivered to the tumor region through transducer arrays placed non-invasively on the skin. This novel loco-regional treatment has demonstrated efficacy and safety and is FDA-approved in patients with glioblastoma and malignant pleural mesothelioma. TTFields are currently being investigated in other solid tumors in ongoing trials, including the phase 3 METIS trial (brain metastases from NSCLC; NCT02831959). Although established as an anti-mitotic treatment, the anti-metastatic potential of TTFields and its effects on cytoskeleton rapid dynamics during cellular motility warrant further investigation. Previous studies have demonstrated that TTFields inhibits metastatic properties of cancer cells. Identification of a unifying mechanism connecting the versatile TTFields-induced molecular responses is required to optimize the therapeutic potential of TTFields. In this study, confocal microscopy, computational tools, and biochemical analyses were utilized to show that TTFields disrupt glioma cellular polarity by interfering with microtubule assembly and directionality. Under TTFields application, changes in microtubule organization resulted in activation of GEF-H1, which led to an increase in active RhoA levels and consequent focal adhesion formation with actin cytoskeleton architectural changes. Furthermore, the optimal TTFields frequency for inhibition of invasion in glioma cells was 300 kHz, which differed from the optimal anti-mitotic frequency leading to glioma cell death of 200 kHz. The inhibitory effect of TTFields on migration was observed at fields intensities of 0.6 V/cm RMS (below the threshold of 1 V/cm RMS previously reported for cytotoxic effects). Together, these data identify discrete TTFields effects that disrupt processes crucial for glioma cell motility.

Alternative splicing of the mouse profilin II gene generates functionally different profilin isoforms

2000 ◽  
Vol 113 (21) ◽  
pp. 3795-3803 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Di Nardo ◽  
R. Gareus ◽  
D. Kwiatkowski ◽  
W. Witke
Keyword(s):  
Alternative Splicing ◽  
Cell Motility ◽  
Hela Cells ◽  
The Other ◽  
Actin Dynamics ◽  
High Affinity ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
The Brain

Profilins are a conserved family of proteins participating in actin dynamics and cell motility. In the mouse, two profilin genes are known. Profilin I is expressed universally at high levels, while profilin II is expressed mainly in the brain. Here we describe the occurrence of two mouse profilin II isoforms, A and B, which are derived by alternative splicing. They are identical through residue 107 of the protein, but then have distinct C-terminal sequences. Profilin IIA binds to poly-L-proline and actin with high affinity similar to profilin I. Profilin IIB on the other hand does not bind to actin and the affinity for poly-L-proline is greatly diminished. However, tubulin was found to bind to GST-profilin IIB, and in vivo GFP-profilin IIB was recruited to spindles and asters during mitosis in HeLa cells. Our results indicate unexpected diversity in the functions of the profilin family of proteins, and suggest that in mouse profilin IIA is intimately involved in actin dynamics, while profilin IIB associates with other cytoskeletal components.

scholarly journals Critical Roles of Phosphorylation and Actin Binding Motifs, but Not the Central Proline-rich Region, for Ena/Vasodilator-stimulated Phosphoprotein (VASP) Function during Cell Migration

2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 2533-2546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph J. Loureiro ◽  
Douglas A. Rubinson ◽  
James E. Bear ◽  
Gretchen A. Baltus ◽  
Adam V. Kwiatkowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Motility ◽  
Cell Movement ◽  
Protein Family ◽  
Actin Dynamics ◽  
Actin Binding ◽  
Binding Motif ◽  
Conserved Sequence ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Sequence Elements

The Ena/vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) protein family is implicated in the regulation of a number of actin-based cellular processes, including lamellipodial protrusion necessary for whole cell translocation. A growing body of evidence derived largely from in vitro biochemical experiments using purified proteins, cell-free extracts, and pathogen motility has begun to suggest various mechanistic roles for Ena/VASP proteins in the control of actin dynamics. Using complementation of phenotypes in Ena/VASP-deficient cells and overexpression in normal fibroblasts, we have assayed the function of a panel of mutants in one member of this family, Mena, by mutating highly conserved sequence elements found in this protein family. Surprisingly, deletion of sites required for binding of the actin monomer-binding protein profilin, a known ligand of Ena/VASP proteins, has no effect on the ability of Mena to regulate random cell motility. Our analysis revealed two features essential for Ena/VASP function in cell movement, cyclic nucleotide-dependent kinase phosphorylation sites and an F-actin binding motif. Interestingly, expression of the C-terminal EVH2 domain alone is sufficient to complement loss of Ena/VASP function in random cell motility.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document