scholarly journals Once-Daily Amikacin Dosing in Burn Patients Treated with Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration

2011 ◽  
Vol 55 (10) ◽  
pp. 4639-4642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin S. Akers ◽  
Jason M. Cota ◽  
Christopher R. Frei ◽  
Kevin K. Chung ◽  
Katrin Mende ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTAmikacin clearance can be increased in burn injury, which is often complicated by renal insufficiency. Little is known about the impact of renal replacement therapies, such as continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH), on amikacin pharmacokinetics. We retrospectively examined the clinical pharmacokinetics, bacteriology, and clinical outcomes of 60 burn patients given 15 mg/kg of body weight of amikacin in single daily doses. Twelve were treated with concurrent CVVH therapy, and 48 were not. The pharmacodynamic target of ≥10 for the maximum concentration of drug in serum divided by the MIC (Cmax/MIC) was achieved in only 8.5% of patients, with a small reduction ofCmaxin patients receiving CVVH and no difference in amikacin clearance. Mortality and burn size were greater in patients who received CVVH. Overall, 172 Gram-negative isolates were recovered from the blood cultures of 39 patients, with amikacin MIC data available for 82 isolates from 24 patients. A 10,000-patient Monte Carlo simulation was conducted incorporating pharmacokinetic and MIC data from these patients. The cumulative fraction of response (CFR) was similar in CVVH and non-CVVH patients. The CFR rates were not significantly improved by a theoretical 20 mg/kg amikacin dose. Overall, CVVH did not appear to have a major impact on amikacin serum concentrations. The low pharmacodynamic target attainment appears to be primarily due to higher amikacin MICs rather than more rapid clearance of amikacin related to CVVH therapy.

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S13-S14
Author(s):  
Sarah Zavala ◽  
Kate Pape ◽  
Todd A Walroth ◽  
Melissa A Reger ◽  
Katelyn Garner ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction In burn patients, vitamin D deficiency has been associated with increased incidence of sepsis. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of vitamin D deficiency in adult burn patients on hospital length of stay (LOS). Methods This was a multi-center retrospective study of adult patients at 7 burn centers admitted between January 1, 2016 and July 25, 2019 who had a 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) concentration drawn within the first 7 days of injury. Patients were excluded if admitted for a non-burn injury, total body surface area (TBSA) burn less than 5%, pregnant, incarcerated, or made comfort care or expired within 48 hours of admission. The primary endpoint was to compare hospital LOS between burn patients with vitamin D deficiency (defined as 25OHD < 20 ng/mL) and sufficiency (25OHD ≥ 20 ng/mL). Secondary endpoints include in-hospital mortality, ventilator-free days of the first 28, renal replacement therapy (RRT), length of ICU stay, and days requiring vasopressors. Additional data collected included demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index, injury characteristics, form of vitamin D received (ergocalciferol or cholecalciferol) and dosing during admission, timing of vitamin D initiation, and form of nutrition provided. Dichotomous variables were compared via Chi-square test. Continuous data were compared via student t-test or Mann-Whitney U test. Univariable linear regression was utilized to identify variables associated with LOS (p < 0.05) to analyze further. Cox Proportional Hazard Model was utilized to analyze association with LOS, while censoring for death, and controlling for TBSA, age, presence of inhalation injury, and potential for a center effect. Results Of 1,147 patients screened, 412 were included. Fifty-seven percent were vitamin D deficient. Patients with vitamin D deficiency had longer LOS (18.0 vs 12.0 days, p < 0.001), acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring RRT (7.3 vs 1.7%, p = 0.009), more days requiring vasopressors (mean 1.24 vs 0.58 days, p = 0.008), and fewer ventilator free days of the first 28 days (mean 22.9 vs 25.1, p < 0.001). Univariable analysis identified burn center, AKI, TBSA, inhalation injury, admission concentration, days until concentration drawn, days until initiating supplementation, and dose as significantly associated with LOS. After controlling for center, TBSA, age, and inhalation injury, the best fit model included only deficiency and days until vitamin D initiation. Conclusions Patients with thermal injuries and vitamin D deficiency on admission have increased length of stay and worsened clinical outcomes as compared to patients with sufficient vitamin D concentrations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (A) ◽  
pp. 463-467
Author(s):  
Gede Wara Samsarga ◽  
I Made Suka Adnyana ◽  
Ni Nyoman Sri Budayanti ◽  
I Gusti Putu Hendra Sanjaya ◽  
Agus Roy Rusly Hariantana Hamid ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Research related to the impact of multidrug resistant organisms (MDRO) infection on clinical outcomes in burns is still limited. AIM: This study evaluated the effect of MDRO infection on morbidity and mortality of burn patients. METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted on burn patients admitted to the burn unit of Sanglah General Hospital, Bali, between 2018 and 2020. MDRO patients were described as those who had at least one positive MDRO culture. All other patients were included in the non-MDRO group. Measurement and analysis included mortality and five indicators of morbidity: length of stay, duration of antibiotic therapy, sepsis, pneumonia, and acute kidney injury (AKI). RESULTS: Significant associations of MDRO infection were found for duration of antibiotic therapy (0 vs. 7 days), sepsis (odds ratio [OR] 13.90 [95% Confidence interval (CI) 95% 2.88–67.10]), pneumonia (OR 12,67 [95% CI 3.26–49.23]), and mortality (OR 9.75 [95% CI 2.00–47.50]). No significant association was found for the length of stay and the incidence of AKI. Multivariate analysis found that MDRO infection increased risk of sepsis (OR 36.53 [95% CI 2.05–652.45], pneumonia (OR 10.75 [95% CI 1.87–61.86]) and mortality (OR 57.09 [95% CI 1.41–2318.87]). Multivariate analysis of MDRO infection with duration of antibiotic therapy found no independent variables that were significantly related. CONCLUSION: These research findings suggest that MDRO infections are associated with increasing length of antibiotic treatment, sepsis, pneumonia, and mortality in burn patients.


Author(s):  
Cordelie E Witt ◽  
Barclay T Stewart ◽  
Frederick P Rivara ◽  
Samuel P Mandell ◽  
Nicole S Gibran ◽  
...  

Abstract Inhalation injury is associated with high inpatient mortality, but the impact of inhalation injury after discharge and on non-mortality outcomes is poorly characterized. To address this gap, we evaluated the effect of inhalation injury on postdischarge morbidity, mortality, and hospital readmissions among patients who sustained burn injury, as well as on in-hospital outcomes for context. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with cutaneous fire/flame burns admitted to a burn center intensive care unit from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2015, with or without inhalation injury. Records were linked to statewide hospital admission and vital statistics databases to assess postdischarge outcomes. Mixed-effects Poisson regression was used to assess mortality, complications, and readmissions. The overall cohort included 830 patients with cutaneous burns; of these, 201 patients had inhalation injury. In-hospital mortality was 31% among inhalation injury patients vs 6% in patients without inhalation injury (adjusted OR 2.35; 95% CI 1.66–3.31). Inhalation injury was also associated with an increased risk of in-hospital pneumonia and tracheostomy (P < .05 for all). Inhalation injury was not associated with greater postdischarge mortality, all-cause readmission, readmission for pulmonary diagnosis, or readmission requiring intubation. Among the subset of patients with bronchoscopy-confirmed inhalation injury (n = 124; 62% of inhalation injuries), a higher injury grade was not associated with greater inpatient or postdischarge mortality. Inhalation injury was associated with increased early morbidity and mortality, but did not contribute to postdischarge mortality or readmission. These findings have implications for shared decision making with patients and families and for estimating healthcare utilization after initial hospitalization.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S149-S149
Author(s):  
Meredith Moore ◽  
Parizh David ◽  
Elizabeth Dale ◽  
Julia C Slater

Abstract Introduction Globally, medical centers have faced unprecedented times with the onset of the Novel Coronavirus pandemic. Emergency departments (ED) and burn units have had to adapt to uncertainty and new challenges. At our institution, we had to alter our daily burn practice, physically moving our burn unit to our surgical intensive care unit to accommodate staff cohorting. While some hospitals have seen patient surges, most have endured dramatic decreases in productivity. A UK burn unit documented lower ED presentations and reduced referrals from other centers, with 50% fewer patients admitted to their burns ward (Farroha). In Israel, a 66% decrease in adult burn patients was noted (Kruchevska et al.). We sought to identify the impact of COVID-19 on burn injury epidemiology in our burn unit based in a large, urban, academic medical center. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of our burn database for ED visits and admissions related to burn injuries between March 1st and June 30th in the years 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020. We looked at the age and sex of patient, type of visit, length of stay (LOS), the mechanism of injury, the setting in which injury occurred, and the details of the injury. We compare annual trends, with emphasis on comparison of 2020 to previous years. Results From admissions and ED data records, 215 patient encounters were reviewed. We saw a yearly rise in total burn patients seen in the ED or admitted to our burn unit 2017–2020 (39, 43, 63, and 70 respectively) with the highest volume of patients in 2020. Mean patient age ranged from 45 (2020) to 51 (2017). More males were burned in all years (male:female ratio 3.9 in 2017, 2.1 in 2018, 2.5 in 2019, 1.9 in 2020). Median LOS in 2020 was 2.5 days, consistent with 2017–2019 values (2, 3, 3, respectively). Between 2017 and 2019, 10%, 2%, and 8% respectively of patients evaluated were treated on an outpatient basis, while in 2020, 20% were outpatient. Rates of flash, scald, flame, chemical, electrical, and contact burns were stable over the period. Of those patients who were admitted, 1.8% sustained work-related burns in 2020 versus 8.9% over 2017–2019. In 2020, 23% of burns were cooking related versus 18% over the prior 3 years. Conclusions Despite documented decreased burn admissions in some units, our unit saw an increase in burn injuries presenting for evaluation in the first 3 months of the COVID-19 pandemic as compared to the analogous period in the three years prior. Burns were less often tied to work-related incidents and more frequently related to cooking injuries. Even with more patients treated and released from the ED, inpatient admission numbers were maintained. These findings support the importance of protecting our staffing and burn unit resources in a pandemic setting in order to appropriately treat regional patients and an increase in home-based injuries.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wayne T. Muraoka ◽  
Jose C. Granados ◽  
Belinda I. Gomez ◽  
Susannah E. Nicholson ◽  
Kevin K. Chung ◽  
...  

Abstract Fluid resuscitation improves clinical outcomes of burn patients; however, its execution in resource-poor environments may have to be amended with limited-volume strategies. Liver dysfunction is common in burn patients and gut dysbiosis is an understudied aspect of burn sequelae. Here, the swine gut microbiota and liver transcripts were investigated to determine the impact of standard-of-care modified Brooke (MB), limited-volume colloid (LV-Co), and limited-volume crystalloid (LV-Cr) resuscitation on the gut microbiota, and to evaluate its' potential relationship with liver dysfunction. Independent of resuscitation strategy, bacterial diversity was reduced 24 h post-injury, and remained perturbed at 48 h. Changes in community structure were most pronounced with LV-Co, and correlated with biomarkers of hepatocellular damage. Hierarchical clustering revealed a group of samples that was suggestive of dysbiosis, and LV-Co increased the risk of association with this group. Compared with MB, LV-Co and LV-Cr significantly altered cellular stress and ATP pathways, and gene expression of these perturbed pathways was correlated with major dysbiosis-associated bacteria. Taken together, LV-Co resuscitation exacerbated the loss of bacterial diversity and increased the risk of dysbiosis. Moreover, we present evidence of a linkage between liver (dys)function and the gut microbiota in the acute setting of burn injury.


Author(s):  
Stefan Janik ◽  
Stefan Grasl ◽  
Erdem Yildiz ◽  
Gerold Besser ◽  
Jonathan Kliman ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the impact of tracheostomy on complications, dysphagia and outcome in second and third degree burned patients. Methods Inpatient mortality, dysphagia, severity of burn injury (ABSI, TBSA) and complications in tracheotomized burn patients were compared to (I) non-tracheotomized burn patients and (II) matched tracheotomized non-burn patients. Results 134 (30.9%) out of 433 patients who underwent tracheostomy, had a significantly higher percentage of inhalation injury (26.1% vs. 7.0%; p < 0.001), higher ABSI (8.9 ± 2.1 vs. 6.0 ± 2.7; p < 0.001) and TBSA score (41.4 ± 19.7% vs. 18.6 ± 18.8%; p < 0.001) compared to 299 non-tracheotomized burn patients. However, complications occurred equally in tracheotomized burn patients and matched controls and tracheostomy was neither linked to dysphagia nor to inpatient mortality at multivariate analysis. In particular, dysphagia occurred in 6.2% of cases and was significantly linked to length of ICU stay (OR 6.2; p = 0.021), preexisting neurocognitive impairments (OR 5.2; p = 0.001) and patients’ age (OR 3.4; p = 0.046). A nomogram was calculated based on age, TBSA and inhalation injury predicting the need for a tracheostomy in severely burned patients. Conclusion Using the new nomogram we were able to predict with significantly higher accuracy the need for tracheostomy in severely burned patients. Moreover, tracheostomy is safe and is not associated with higher incidenc of complications, dysphagia or worse outcome.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
David M. Hill ◽  
Julie A. Rizzo ◽  
James K. Aden ◽  
William L. Hickerson ◽  
Kevin K. Chung ◽  
...  

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with high mortality in burn patients. Previously, we reported that timely initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT) with an individualized preference toward continuous modes at relatively higher than recommended doses has become standard practice in critically ill burn patients with AKI and is associated with a historically low mortality. The purpose of this cohort analysis was to determine if modality choice impacted survival in burn patients. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> After Institutional Review Board approval, a subset analysis was performed on de-identified data collected during a multicenter, observational study. All patients (<i>n</i> = 170) were 18 years or older, admitted with severe burn injuries and started on RRT. Comparisons were made utilizing χ<sup>2</sup> or Fisher’s exact test. Kaplan-Meier plots were utilized to assess survival. Sample size determinations to aid future research were calculated utilizing χ<sup>2</sup> test with a Yates Correction Factor. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Demographics and revised Baux were similar between groups. When continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) was compared to all other modalities, there was no statistically significant difference in survival (56 vs. 43%, <i>p</i> = 0.124). However, survival was significantly improved (54 vs. 37%, <i>p</i> = 0.032) in the subset of patients requiring vasopressors (<i>n</i> = 77). There was no statistically significant survival difference in patients with inhalation injury (38 vs. 29%, <i>p</i> = 0.638) or acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (51 vs. 33%, <i>p</i> = 0.11). <b><i>Discussion/Conclusion:</i></b> Survival may be improved if CVVH is chosen as the preferred modality in burn patients with shock and requiring RRT. Differences in other subsets were promising, but analysis was underpowered. Further research should determine if modality choice provides survival benefit in any other subset of burn injury.


2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-14
Author(s):  
Kristin N Grimsrud ◽  
Kelly M Lima ◽  
Nam K Tran ◽  
Tina L Palmieri

Abstract Opioids are essential first line analgesics for pain management after burn injury. Opioid dosing remains challenging in burn patients, particularly in children, due to the immense variability in efficacy between patients. Opioid pharmacokinetics are altered in burned children, increasing variability and obviating dosing regimens extrapolated from adult-data. The present study aimed to characterize variability in fentanyl pharmacokinetics and identify significant contributors to variability in children with ≥10% total body surface area burn requiring fentanyl during routine wound care. We recorded patient demographics and clinical data. Blood samples were collected following fentanyl administration for pharmacokinetics at time 0, 30, 60, 120, and 240 minutes on day of admission and repeated on days 3 and 7. Serum fentanyl concentrations were quantified using tandem liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Population analysis was used to estimate pharmacokinetics parameters. Fourteen patients, 1.2–17 years, with burns from 10–50.5% were included in analysis. A two-compartment model with body weight as a covariate best described fentanyl pharmacokinetics for the overall population. The population clearance and intercompartmental clearance were 7.19 and 2.16 L/hour, respectively, and the volume of distribution for the central and peripheral compartments was 4.01 and 25.1 L, respectively. Individual patient parameter estimates had extensive variability. This study confirmed the high variability in pediatric burn patient fentanyl pharmacokinetics and demonstrates similarities and differences to other populations reported in literature. Further research is needed with a larger number of patients to extensively investigate the impact of burns, genetic polymorphisms, and other factors on fentanyl efficacy and patient outcomes.


Author(s):  
Nupur Aggarwal ◽  
Rakesh Kumar Srivastava

Abstract Background Burn and trauma injuries need emergency care and resuscitation, which required uninterrupted delivery of inpatient care services during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Burn patients are physiologically immunocompromised, increasing the risk of COVID-19 infection in them. This study analyzes the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on patient trends in a burn and plastic unit and assesses the effect of COVID-19 infection in burns. Methods This single-center, retrospective observational case–control study was conducted in the Department of Burns, Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery of a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi, India. Patient data was collected from April 1, 2019 to August 10, 2019 and from April 1, 2020 to August 10, 2020. All data of burns and trauma patients collected was analyzed and compared. Results There were total 350 admissions during COVID time period and 562 admissions during non-COVID time period. The admission rate, type of burn injury, and death rate did not vary significantly during the two time periods. Thermal burn was the most common type of burn injury. There were total 18 cases diagnosed to be COVID-19 positive during the pandemic. There were two deaths among COVID-19 positive burn cases. Conclusion This study finds no difference in patient patterns during COVID and non-COVID time period. Amongst burn patients, no increased risk of COVID-19 infection is seen with larger body surface area of burns. No increase in mortality is seen in burn patients infected with COVID-19.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document