scholarly journals The Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome Is Required for Anaphase Progression in Multinucleated Ashbya gossypii Cells

2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 182-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy S. Gladfelter ◽  
Nicoleta Sustreanu ◽  
A. Katrin Hungerbuehler ◽  
Sylvia Voegeli ◽  
Virginie Galati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Nuclear Division ◽  
Eukaryotic Cell ◽  
Ashbya Gossypii ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Filamentous Ascomycete ◽  
Multinucleated Cells ◽  
Mitotic Cyclin

ABSTRACT Regulated protein degradation is essential for eukaryotic cell cycle progression. The anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) is responsible for the protein destruction required for the initiation of anaphase and the exit from mitosis, including the degradation of securin and B-type cyclins. We initiated a study of the APC/C in the multinucleated, filamentous ascomycete Ashbya gossypii to understand the mechanisms underlying the asynchronous mitosis observed in these cells. These experiments were motivated by previous work which demonstrated that the mitotic cyclin AgClb1/2p persists through anaphase, suggesting that the APC/C may not be required for the division cycle in A. gossypii. We have now found that the predicted APC/C components AgCdc23p and AgDoc1p and the targeting factors AgCdc20p and AgCdh1p are essential for growth and nuclear division. Mutants lacking any of these factors arrest as germlings with nuclei blocked in mitosis. A likely substrate of the APC/C is the securin homologue AgPds1p, which is present in all nuclei in hyphae except those in anaphase. The destruction box sequence of AgPds1p is required for this timed disappearance. To investigate how the APC/C may function to degrade AgPds1p in only the subset of anaphase nuclei, we localized components and targeting subunits of the APC/C. Remarkably, AgCdc23p, AgDoc1p, and AgCdc16p were found in all nuclei in all cell cycle stages, as were the APC/C targeting factors AgCdc20p and AgCdh1p. These data suggest that the AgAPC/C may be constitutively active across the cell cycle and that proteolysis in these multinucleated cells may be regulated at the level of substrates rather than by the APC/C itself.

scholarly journals Asynchronous nuclear division cycles in multinucleated cells

2006 ◽  
Vol 172 (3) ◽  
pp. 347-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy S. Gladfelter ◽  
A. Katrin Hungerbuehler ◽  
Peter Philippsen
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Nuclear Division ◽  
Protein Localization ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Pedigree Analysis ◽  
Multinucleated Cells ◽  
Block Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Mitotic Cyclin ◽  
Synchronous Mitosis

Synchronous mitosis is common in multinucleated cells. We analyzed a unique asynchronous nuclear division cycle in a multinucleated filamentous fungus, Ashbya gossypii. Nuclear pedigree analysis and observation of GFP-labeled spindle pole bodies demonstrated that neighboring nuclei in A. gossypii cells are in different cell cycle stages despite close physical proximity. Neighboring nuclei did not differ significantly in their patterns of cyclin protein localization such that both G1 and mitotic cyclins were present regardless of cell cycle stage, suggesting that the complete destruction of cyclins is not occurring in this system. Indeed, the expression of mitotic cyclin lacking NH2-terminal destruction box sequences did not block cell cycle progression. Cells lacking AgSic1p, a predicted cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor, however, showed aberrant multipolar spindles and fragmented nuclei that are indicative of flawed mitoses. We hypothesize that the continuous cytoplasm in these cells promoted the evolution of a nuclear division cycle in which CDK inhibitors primarily control CDK activity rather than oscillating mitotic cyclin proteins.

scholarly journals Budding yeast relies on G1 cyclin specificity to couple cell cycle progression with morphogenetic development

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (23) ◽  
pp. eabg0007
Author(s):  
Deniz Pirincci Ercan ◽  
Florine Chrétien ◽  
Probir Chakravarty ◽  
Helen R. Flynn ◽  
Ambrosius P. Snijders ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Quantitative Model ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Model Cell ◽  
Mitotic Cyclin ◽  
Substrate Phosphorylation ◽  
The Cost

Two models have been put forward for cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) control of the cell cycle. In the qualitative model, cell cycle events are ordered by distinct substrate specificities of successive cyclin waves. Alternatively, in the quantitative model, the gradual rise of Cdk activity from G1 phase to mitosis leads to ordered substrate phosphorylation at sequential thresholds. Here, we study the relative contributions of qualitative and quantitative Cdk control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. All S phase and mitotic cyclins can be replaced by a single mitotic cyclin, albeit at the cost of reduced fitness. A single cyclin can also replace all G1 cyclins to support ordered cell cycle progression, fulfilling key predictions of the quantitative model. However, single-cyclin cells fail to polarize or grow buds and thus cannot survive. Our results suggest that budding yeast has become dependent on G1 cyclin specificity to couple cell cycle progression to essential morphogenetic events.

Cyclin specificity: how many wheels do you need on a unicycle?

2001 ◽  
Vol 114 (10) ◽  
pp. 1811-1820 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.E. Miller ◽  
F.R. Cross
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Subcellular Localization ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Eukaryotic Cell ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Temporal Expression ◽  
Cycle Progression

Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) activity is essential for eukaryotic cell cycle events. Multiple cyclins activate CDKs in all eukaryotes, but it is unclear whether multiple cyclins are really required for cell cycle progression. It has been argued that cyclins may predominantly act as simple enzymatic activators of CDKs; in opposition to this idea, it has been argued that cyclins might target the activated CDK to particular substrates or inhibitors. Such targeting might occur through a combination of factors, including temporal expression, protein associations, and subcellular localization.

scholarly journals The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Anaphase-Promoting Complex Interacts with Multiple Histone-Modifying Enzymes To Regulate Cell Cycle Progression

2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 1418-1431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma L. Turner ◽  
Mackenzie E. Malo ◽  
Marnie G. Pisclevich ◽  
Megan D. Dash ◽  
Gerald F. Davies ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Chromatin Assembly ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligase Complex ◽  
Genes Encoding ◽  
Dependent Cell ◽  
Histone Modifying Enzymes

ABSTRACT The anaphase-promoting complex (APC), a large evolutionarily conserved ubiquitin ligase complex, regulates cell cycle progression through mitosis and G1. Here, we present data suggesting that APC-dependent cell cycle progression relies on a specific set of posttranslational histone-modifying enzymes. Multiple APC subunit mutants were impaired in total and modified histone H3 protein content. Acetylated H3K56 (H3K56Ac) levels were as reduced as those of total H3, indicating that loading histones with H3K56Ac is unaffected in APC mutants. However, under restrictive conditions, H3K9Ac and dimethylated H3K79 (H3K79me2) levels were more greatly reduced than those of total H3. In a screen for histone acetyltransferase (HAT) and histone deacetylase (HDAC) mutants that genetically interact with the apc5 CA (chromatin assembly) mutant, we found that deletion of GCN5 or ELP3 severely hampered apc5 CA temperature-sensitive (ts) growth. Further analyses showed that (i) the elp3Δ gcn5Δ double mutant ts defect was epistatic to that observed in apc5 CA cells; (ii) gcn5Δ and elp3Δ mutants accumulate in mitosis; and (iii) turnover of the APC substrate Clb2 is not impaired in elp3Δ gcn5Δ cells. Increased expression of ELP3 and GCN5, as well as genes encoding the HAT Rtt109 and the chromatin assembly factors Msi1 and Asf1, suppressed apc5 CA defects, while increased APC5 expression partially suppressed elp3Δ gcn5Δ growth defects. Finally, we demonstrate that Gcn5 is unstable during G1 and following G1 arrest and is stabilized in APC mutants. We present our working model in which Elp3/Gcn5 and the APC work together to facilitate passage through mitosis and G1. To progress into S, we propose that at least Gcn5 must then be targeted for degradation in an APC-dependent fashion.

scholarly journals Regulation of cell cycle drivers by Cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (10) ◽  
pp. 1637-1651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang-Min Jang ◽  
Christophe E. Redon ◽  
Bhushan L. Thakur ◽  
Meriam K. Bahta ◽  
Mirit I. Aladjem
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligases ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Cellular Pathways ◽  
Regulation Of Cell Cycle ◽  
F Box Protein

Abstract The last decade has revealed new roles for Cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases (CRLs) in a myriad of cellular processes, including cell cycle progression. In addition to CRL1, also named SCF (SKP1-Cullin 1-F box protein), which has been known for decades as an important factor in the regulation of the cell cycle, it is now evident that all eight CRL family members are involved in the intricate cellular pathways driving cell cycle progression. In this review, we summarize the structure of CRLs and their functions in driving the cell cycle. We focus on how CRLs target key proteins for degradation or otherwise alter their functions to control the progression over the various cell cycle phases leading to cell division. We also summarize how CRLs and the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) ligase complex closely cooperate to govern efficient cell cycle progression.

scholarly journals A fission yeast homolog of CDC20/p55CDC/Fizzy is required for recovery from DNA damage and genetically interacts with p34cdc2.

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 742-750 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Matsumoto
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Eukaryotic Cell ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cell Cycle Delay ◽  
Successful Recovery ◽  
Synthetically Lethal

Successful recovery from DNA damage requires coordination of several biological processes. Eukaryotic cell cycle progression is delayed when the cells encounter DNA-damaging agents. This cell cycle delay allows the cells to cope with DNA damage by utilizing DNA repair enzymes. Thus, at least two processes, induction of the cell cycle delay and repair of damaged DNA, are coordinately required for recovery. In this study, a fission yeast rad mutant (slp1-362) was genetically investigated. In response to radiation, slp1 stops cell division; however, it does not restart it. This defect is suppressed when slp1-362 is combined with wee1-50 or cdc2-3w; in these mutants, the onset of mitosis is advanced due to the premature activation of p34cdc2. In contrast, slp1 is synthetically lethal with cdc25, nim1/cdr1, or cdr2, all of which are unable to activate the p34cdc2 kinase correctly. These genetic interactions of slp1 with cdc2 and its modulators imply that slp1 is not defective in either "induction of cell cycle delay" or "DNA repair." slp1+ may be involved in a critical process which restarts cell cycle progression after the completion of DNA repair. Molecular cloning of slp1+ revealed that slp1+ encodes a putative 488-amino-acid polypeptide exhibiting significant homology to WD-domain proteins, namely, CDC20 (budding yeast), p55CDC (human), and Fizzy (fly). A possible role of slp1+ is proposed.

scholarly journals The RASSF1A Tumor Suppressor Restrains Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome Activity during the G1/S Phase Transition To Promote Cell Cycle Progression in Human Epithelial Cells

2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 3190-3197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelique W. Whitehurst ◽  
Rosalyn Ram ◽  
Latha Shivakumar ◽  
Boning Gao ◽  
John D. Minna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Transition ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Tumor Suppressor ◽  
Epithelial Cells ◽  
Cyclin D1 ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Phase Cell ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Cycle Progression

ABSTRACT Multiple molecular lesions in human cancers directly collaborate to deregulate proliferation and suppress apoptosis to promote tumorigenesis. The candidate tumor suppressor RASSF1A is commonly inactivated in a broad spectrum of human tumors and has been implicated as a pivotal gatekeeper of cell cycle progression. However, a mechanistic account of the role of RASSF1A gene inactivation in tumor initiation is lacking. Here we have employed loss-of-function analysis in human epithelial cells for a detailed investigation of the contribution of RASSF1 to cell cycle progression. We found that RASSF1A has dual opposing regulatory connections to G1/S phase cell cycle transit. RASSF1A associates with the Ewing sarcoma breakpoint protein, EWS, to limit accumulation of cyclin D1 and restrict exit from G1. Surprisingly, we found that RASSF1A is also required to restrict SCFβTrCP activity to allow G/S phase transition. This restriction is required for accumulation of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) inhibitor Emi1 and the concomitant block of APC/C-dependent cyclin A turnover. The consequence of this relationship is inhibition of cell cycle progression in normal epithelial cells upon RASSF1A depletion despite elevated cyclin D1 concentrations. Progression to tumorigenicity upon RASSF1A gene inactivation should therefore require collaborating genetic aberrations that bypass the consequences of impaired APC/C regulation at the G1/S phase cell cycle transition.

scholarly journals Control of cell cycle progression by phosphorylation of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) substrates

2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 243-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randy Suryadinata ◽  
Martin Sadowski ◽  
Boris Sarcevic
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Genetic Material ◽  
Eukaryotic Cell ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
M Phase ◽  
Unicellular Organisms ◽  
Multicellular Organisms

The eukaryotic cell cycle is a fundamental evolutionarily conserved process that regulates cell division from simple unicellular organisms, such as yeast, through to higher multicellular organisms, such as humans. The cell cycle comprises several phases, including the S-phase (DNA synthesis phase) and M-phase (mitotic phase). During S-phase, the genetic material is replicated, and is then segregated into two identical daughter cells following mitotic M-phase and cytokinesis. The S- and M-phases are separated by two gap phases (G1 and G2) that govern the readiness of cells to enter S- or M-phase. Genetic and biochemical studies demonstrate that cell division in eukaryotes is mediated by CDKs (cyclin-dependent kinases). Active CDKs comprise a protein kinase subunit whose catalytic activity is dependent on association with a regulatory cyclin subunit. Cell-cycle-stage-dependent accumulation and proteolytic degradation of different cyclin subunits regulates their association with CDKs to control different stages of cell division. CDKs promote cell cycle progression by phosphorylating critical downstream substrates to alter their activity. Here, we will review some of the well-characterized CDK substrates to provide mechanistic insights into how these kinases control different stages of cell division.

scholarly journals A Cds1-Mediated Checkpoint Protects the MBF Activator Rep2 from Ubiquitination by Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome-Ste9 at S-Phase Arrest in Fission Yeast

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (18) ◽  
pp. 4959-4970 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhaoqing Chu ◽  
Majid Eshaghi ◽  
Suk Yean Poon ◽  
Jianhua Liu
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Transcriptional Activity ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Cell Recovery ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Phase Arrest ◽  
S Phase Arrest

ABSTRACT Transcription of the MluI cell cycle box (MCB) motif-containing genes at G1 phase is regulated by the MCB-binding factors (MBF) (also called DSC1) in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Upon S-phase arrest, the MBF transcriptional activity is induced through the accumulation of the MBF activator Rep2. In this study, we show that the turnover of Rep2 is attributable to ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis. Levels of Rep2 oscillate during the cell cycle, with a peak at G1 phase, coincident with the MBF activity. Furthermore, we show that Rep2 ubiquitination requires the function of the E3 ligase anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C). Ste9 can be phosphorylated by the checkpoint kinase Cds1 in vitro, and its inhibition/phosphorylation at S-phase arrest is dependent on the function of Cds1. Our data indicate that the Cds1-dependent stabilization of Rep2 is achieved through the inhibition/phosphorylation of APC/C-Ste9 at the onset of S-phase arrest. Stabilization of Rep2 is important for stimulating transcription of the MBF-dependent genes to ensure a sufficient supply of proteins essential for cell recovery from S-phase arrest. We propose that oscillation of Rep2 plays a role in regulation of periodic transcription of the MBF-dependent genes during cell cycle progression.

scholarly journals Activity of the APCCdh1 form of the anaphase-promoting complex persists until S phase and prevents the premature expression of Cdc20p

2001 ◽  
Vol 154 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
James N. Huang ◽  
Iha Park ◽  
Eric Ellingson ◽  
Laurie E. Littlepage ◽  
David Pellman
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Essential Step ◽  
Complete Inactivation ◽  
Regulatory Loop ◽  
Normal Cell Cycle

Cell cycle progression is driven by waves of cyclin expression coupled with regulated protein degradation. An essential step for initiating mitosis is the inactivation of proteolysis mediated by the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) bound to its regulator Cdh1p/Hct1p. Yeast APCCdh1 was proposed previously to be inactivated at Start by G1 cyclin/cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK). Here, we demonstrate that in a normal cell cycle APCCdh1 is inactivated in a graded manner and is not extinguished until S phase. Complete inactivation of APCCdh1 requires S phase cyclins. Further, persistent APCCdh1 activity throughout G1 helps to ensure the proper timing of Cdc20p expression. This suggests that S phase cyclins have an important role in allowing the accumulation of mitotic cyclins and further suggests a regulatory loop among S phase cyclins, APCCdh1, and APCCdc20.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document