scholarly journals Different resource allocation in a Bacillus subtilis population displaying bimodal motility

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Syvertsson ◽  
Biwen Wang ◽  
Jojet Staal ◽  
Yongqiang Gao ◽  
Remco Kort ◽  
...  

To cope with sudden changes in their environment, bacteria can use a bet-hedging strategy by dividing the population into cells with different properties. This so-called bimodal or bistable cellular differentiation is generally controlled by positive feedback regulation of transcriptional activators. Due to the continuous increase in cell volume, it is difficult for these activators to reach an activation threshold concentration when cells are growing exponentially. This is one reason why bimodal differentiation is primarily observed from the onset of the stationary phase when exponential growth ceases. An exception is the bimodal induction of motility in Bacillus subtilis, which occurs early during exponential growth. Several mechanisms have been put forward to explain this, including double negative-feedback regulation and the stability of the mRNA molecules involved. In this study, we used fluorescence-assisted cell sorting to compare the transcriptome of motile and non-motile cells and noted that expression of ribosomal genes is lower in motile cells. This was confirmed using an unstable GFP reporter fused to the strong ribosomal rpsD promoter. We propose that the reduction in ribosomal gene expression in motile cells is the result of a diversion of cellular resources to the synthesis of the chemotaxis and motility systems. In agreement, single-cell microscopic analysis showed that motile cells are slightly shorter than non-motile cells, an indication of slower growth. We speculate that this growth rate reduction can contribute to the bimodal induction of motility during exponential growth. IMPORTANCE To cope with sudden environmental changes, bacteria can use a bet-hedging strategy and generate different types of cells within a population, so called bimodal differentiation. For example, a Bacillus subtilis culture can contain both motile and non-motile cells. In this study we compared the gene expression between motile and non-motile cells. It appeared that motile cells express less ribosomes. To confirm this, we constructed a ribosomal promoter fusion that enabled us to measure expression of this promoter in individual cells. This reporter fusion confirmed our initial finding. The re-allocation of cellular resources from ribosome synthesis towards synthesis of the motility apparatus results in a reduction in growth. Interestingly, this growth reduction has been shown to stimulate bimodal differentiation.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leendert W. Hamoen ◽  
Biwen Wang ◽  
Jojet Staal ◽  
Yongqiang Gao ◽  
Remco Kort ◽  
...  

To cope with sudden changes in their environment, bacteria can use a bet-hedging strategy by dividing the population into cells with different properties. This so-called bimodal or bistable cellular differentiation is generally controlled by positive feedback regulation of transcriptional activators. Due to the continuous increase in cell volume, it is difficult for these activators to reach an activation threshold concentration when cells are growing exponentially. This is one reason why bimodal differentiation is primarily observed from the onset of the stationary phase when exponential growth ceases. An exception is the bimodal induction of motility in Bacillus subtilis, which occurs early during exponential growth. Several mechanisms have been put forward to explain this, including double negative-feedback regulation and the stability of the mRNA molecules involved. In this study, we used fluorescence-assisted cell sorting to compare the transcriptome of motile and non-motile cells and noted that expression of ribosomal genes is lower in motile cells. This was confirmed using an unstable GFP reporter fused to the strong ribosomal rpsD promoter. We propose that the reduction in ribosomal gene expression in motile cells is the result of a diversion of cellular resources to the synthesis of the chemotaxis and motility systems. In agreement, single-cell microscopic analysis showed that motile cells are slightly shorter than non-motile cells, an indication of slower growth. We speculate that this growth rate reduction can contribute to the bimodal induction of motility during exponential growth.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Ninova ◽  
Baira Godneeva ◽  
Yung-Chia Ariel Chen ◽  
Yicheng Luo ◽  
Sharan J. Prakash ◽  
...  

AbstractChromatin is critical for genome compaction and gene expression. On a coarse scale, the genome is divided into euchromatin, which harbors the majority of genes and is enriched in active chromatin marks, and heterochromatin, which is gene-poor but repeat-rich. The conserved molecular hallmark of heterochromatin is the H3K9me3 modification, which is associated with gene silencing. We found that in Drosophila deposition of most of the H3K9me3 mark depends on SUMO and the SUMO-ligase Su(var)2-10, which recruits the histone methyltransferase complex SetDB1/Wde. In addition to repressing repeats, H3K9me3 also influences expression of both hetero- and euchromatic host genes. High H3K9me3 levels in heterochromatin are required to suppress spurious non-canonical transcription and ensure proper gene expression. In euchromatin, a set of conserved genes is repressed by Su(var)2-10/SetDB1-induced H3K9 trimethylation ensuring tissue-specific gene expression. Several components of heterochromatin are themselves repressed by this pathway providing a negative feedback mechanism to ensure chromatin homeostasis.Highlights-Proper expression of host genes residing in heterochromatin requires Su(var)2-10-dependent installation of the H3K9me3 mark to suppress spurious non-canonical transcription.-A set of euchromatic host genes is repressed by transposon-independent installation of H3K9me3 in a process that depends on Su(var)2-10 and SUMO.-Installation of H3K9me3 via Su(var)2-10 ensures tissue-specific gene expression.-H3K9me3-dependent silencing of genes encoding proteins involved in heterochromatin formation provides negative feedback regulation to maintain heterochromatin homeostasis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 571-585.e4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Ninova ◽  
Baira Godneeva ◽  
Yung-Chia Ariel Chen ◽  
Yicheng Luo ◽  
Sharan J. Prakash ◽  
...  

Thyroid ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 1630-1639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuqian Luo ◽  
Takeshi Akama ◽  
Akiko Okayama ◽  
Aya Yoshihara ◽  
Mariko Sue ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Roman Podolec ◽  
Emilie Demarsy ◽  
Roman Ulm

Ultraviolet-B (UV-B) radiation is an intrinsic fraction of sunlight that plants perceive through the UVR8 photoreceptor. UVR8 is a homodimer in its ground state that monomerizes upon UV-B photon absorption via distinct tryptophan residues. Monomeric UVR8 competitively binds to the substrate binding site of COP1, thus inhibiting its E3 ubiquitin ligase activity against target proteins, which include transcriptional regulators such as HY5. The UVR8–COP1 interaction also leads to the destabilization of PIF bHLH factor family members. Additionally, UVR8 directly interacts with and inhibits the DNA binding of a different set of transcription factors. Each of these UVR8 signaling mechanisms initiates nuclear gene expression changes leading to UV-B-induced photomorphogenesis and acclimation. The two WD40-repeat proteins RUP1 and RUP2 provide negative feedback regulation and inactivate UVR8 by facilitating redimerization. Here, we review the molecular mechanisms of the UVR8 pathway from UV-B perception and signal transduction to gene expression changes and physiological UV-B responses. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Plant Biology, Volume 72 is May 2021. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.


2000 ◽  
Vol 131 (4) ◽  
pp. 795-803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georg Nickenig ◽  
Kerstin Strehlow ◽  
Anselm T Bäumer ◽  
Stefanie Baudler ◽  
Sven Waßmann ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document