scholarly journals Guanine Quadruplex DNA Regulates Gamma Radiation Response of Genome Functions in the Radioresistant Bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans

2019 ◽  
Vol 201 (17) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shruti Mishra ◽  
Reema Chaudhary ◽  
Sudhir Singh ◽  
Swathi Kota ◽  
Hari S. Misra
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Deinococcus Radiodurans ◽  
Dna Structure ◽  
Protein Translation ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
G4 Dna ◽  
Guanine Quadruplex ◽  
Damage Response

ABSTRACT Guanine quadruplex (G4) DNA/RNA are secondary structures that regulate the various cellular processes in both eukaryotes and bacteria. Deinococcus radiodurans, a Gram-positive bacterium known for its extraordinary radioresistance, shows a genomewide occurrence of putative G4 DNA-forming motifs in its GC-rich genome. N-Methyl mesoporphyrin (NMM), a G4 DNA structure-stabilizing drug, did not affect bacterial growth under normal conditions but inhibited the postirradiation recovery of gamma-irradiated cells. Transcriptome sequencing analysis of cells treated with both radiation and NMM showed repression of gamma radiation-responsive gene expression, which was observed in the absence of NMM. Notably, this effect of NMM on the expression of housekeeping genes involved in other cellular processes was not observed. Stabilization of G4 DNA structures mapped at the upstream of recA and in the encoding region of DR_2199 had negatively affected promoter activity in vivo, DNA synthesis in vitro and protein translation in Escherichia coli host. These results suggested that G4 DNA plays an important role in DNA damage response and in the regulation of expression of the DNA repair proteins required for radioresistance in D. radiodurans. IMPORTANCE Deinococcus radiodurans can recover from extensive DNA damage caused by many genotoxic agents. It lacks LexA/RecA-mediated canonical SOS response. Therefore, the molecular mechanisms underlying the regulation of DNA damage response would be worth investigating in this bacterium. D. radiodurans genome is GC-rich and contains numerous islands of putative guanine quadruplex (G4) DNA structure-forming motifs. Here, we showed that in vivo stabilization of G4 DNA structures can impair DNA damage response processes in D. radiodurans. Essential cellular processes such as transcription, DNA synthesis, and protein translation, which are also an integral part of the double-strand DNA break repair pathway, are affected by the arrest of G4 DNA structure dynamics. Thus, the role of DNA secondary structures in DNA damage response and radioresistance is demonstrated.

scholarly journals Crosstalk between the mTOR and DNA Damage Response Pathways in Fission Yeast

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 305
Author(s):  
John-Patrick Alao ◽  
Luc Legon ◽  
Charalampos Rallis
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Cell Biology ◽  
Environmental Changes ◽  
Energy Levels ◽  
Protein Translation ◽  
Mtor Pathway ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Damage Response

Cells have developed response systems to constantly monitor environmental changes and accordingly adjust growth, differentiation, and cellular stress programs. The evolutionarily conserved, nutrient-responsive, mechanistic target of rapamycin signaling (mTOR) pathway coordinates basic anabolic and catabolic cellular processes such as gene transcription, protein translation, autophagy, and metabolism, and is directly implicated in cellular and organismal aging as well as age-related diseases. mTOR mediates these processes in response to a broad range of inputs such as oxygen, amino acids, hormones, and energy levels, as well as stresses, including DNA damage. Here, we briefly summarize data relating to the interplays of the mTOR pathway with DNA damage response pathways in fission yeast, a favorite model in cell biology, and how these interactions shape cell decisions, growth, and cell-cycle progression. We, especially, comment on the roles of caffeine-mediated DNA-damage override. Understanding the biology of nutrient response, DNA damage and related pharmacological treatments can lead to the design of interventions towards improved cellular and organismal fitness, health, and survival.

scholarly journals Nucleotide Excision Repair Protein Rad23 Regulates Cell Virulence Independent of Rad4 in Candida albicans

mSphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia Feng ◽  
Shuangyan Yao ◽  
Yansong Dong ◽  
Jing Hu ◽  
Malcolm Whiteway ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Candida Albicans ◽  
Nucleotide Excision Repair ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Virulence Regulation ◽  
Nucleotide Excision ◽  
Damage Response

ABSTRACT In the pathogenic yeast Candida albicans, the DNA damage response contributes to pathogenicity by regulating cell morphology transitions and maintaining survival in response to DNA damage induced by reactive oxygen species (ROS) in host cells. However, the function of nucleotide excision repair (NER) in C. albicans has not been extensively investigated. To better understand the DNA damage response and its role in virulence, we studied the function of the Rad23 nucleotide excision repair protein in detail. The RAD23 deletion strain and overexpression strain both exhibit UV sensitivity, confirming the critical role of RAD23 in the nucleotide excision repair pathway. Genetic interaction assays revealed that the role of RAD23 in the UV response relies on RAD4 but is independent of RAD53, MMS22, and RAD18. RAD4 and RAD23 have similar roles in regulating cell morphogenesis and biofilm formation; however, only RAD23, but not RAD4, plays a negative role in virulence regulation in a mouse model. We found that the RAD23 deletion strain showed decreased survival in a Candida-macrophage interaction assay. Transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) data further revealed that RAD23, but not RAD4, regulates the transcription of a virulence factor, SUN41, suggesting a unique role of RAD23 in virulence regulation. Taking these observations together, our work reveals that the RAD23-related nucleotide excision pathway plays a critical role in the UV response but may not play a direct role in virulence. The virulence-related role of RAD23 may rely on the regulation of several virulence factors, which may give us further understanding about the linkage between DNA damage repair and virulence regulation in C. albicans. IMPORTANCE Candida albicans remains a significant threat to the lives of immunocompromised people. An understanding of the virulence and infection ability of C. albicans cells in the mammalian host may help with clinical treatment and drug discovery. The DNA damage response pathway is closely related to morphology regulation and virulence, as well as the ability to survive in host cells. In this study, we checked the role of the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway, the key repair system that functions to remove a large variety of DNA lesions such as those caused by UV light, but whose function has not been well studied in C. albicans. We found that Rad23, but not Rad4, plays a role in virulence that appears independent of the function of the NER pathway. Our research revealed that the NER pathway represented by Rad4/Rad23 may not play a direct role in virulence but that Rad23 may play a unique role in regulating the transcription of virulence genes that may contribute to the virulence of C. albicans.

scholarly journals A Double-Strand Break Does Not PromoteNeisseria gonorrhoeaePilin Antigenic Variation

2019 ◽  
Vol 201 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren L. Prister ◽  
Jing Xu ◽  
H Steven Seifert
Keyword(s):  
Neisseria Gonorrhoeae ◽  
Antigenic Variation ◽  
Dna Structure ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break ◽  
Content Type ◽  
G4 Dna ◽  
Recombination System ◽  
Guanine Quadruplex ◽  
Pilin Gene

ABSTRACTThe major subunit of the type IV pilus (T4p) ofNeisseria gonorrhoeaeundergoes antigenic variation (AV) dependent on a guanine quadruplex (G4) DNA structure located upstream of the pilin gene. Since the presence of G4 DNA induces genome instability in both eukaryotic and prokaryotic chromosomes, we tested whether a double-strand break (DSB) at the site of thepilEG4 sequence could substitute for G4-directed pilin AV. The G4 motif was replaced by an I-SceI cut site, and the cut site was also introduced to locations near the origin of replication and the terminus. Expression of the I-SceI endonuclease from an irrelevant chromosomal site confirmed that the endonuclease functions to induce double-strand breaks at all three locations. No antigenic variants were detected when the G4 was replaced with the I-SceI cut site, but there was a growth defect from having a DSB in the chromosome, and suppressor mutations that were mainly deletions of the cut site and/or the entirepilEgene accumulated. Thus, thepilEG4 does not act to promote pilin AV by generating a DSB but requires either a different type of break, a nick, or more complex interactions with other factors to stimulate this programmed recombination system.IMPORTANCENeisseria gonorrhoeae, the causative agent of gonorrhea, possesses a DNA recombination system to change one of its surface-exposed antigens. This recombination system, known as antigenic variation, uses an alternate DNA structure to initiate variation. The guanine quadruplex DNA structure is known to cause nicks or breaks in DNA; however, much remains unknown about how this structure functions in cells. We show that inducing a break by different means does not allow antigenic variation, indicating that the DNA structure may have a more complicated role.

scholarly journals Baculovirus F-Box Protein LEF-7 Modifies the Host DNA Damage Response To Enhance Virus Multiplication

2013 ◽  
Vol 87 (23) ◽  
pp. 12592-12599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan K. Mitchell ◽  
Nathaniel M. Byers ◽  
Paul D. Friesen
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Viral Gene Expression ◽  
Virus Multiplication ◽  
Site Directed Mutagenesis ◽  
Viral Gene ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Baculovirus Infection ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
F Box Protein

The DNA damage response (DDR) of a host organism represents an effective antiviral defense that is frequently manipulated and exploited by viruses to promote multiplication. We report here that the large DNA baculoviruses, which require host DDR activation for optimal replication, encode a conserved replication factor, LEF-7, that manipulates the DDR via a novel mechanism. LEF-7 suppresses DDR-induced accumulation of phosphorylated host histone variant H2AX (γ-H2AX), a critical regulator of the DDR. LEF-7 was necessary and sufficient to block γ-H2AX accumulation caused by baculovirus infection or DNA damage induced by means of pharmacological agents. Deletion of LEF-7 from the baculovirus genome allowed γ-H2AX accumulation during virus DNA synthesis and impaired both very late viral gene expression and production of infectious progeny. Thus, LEF-7 is essential for efficient baculovirus replication. We determined that LEF-7 is a nuclear F-box protein that interacts with host S-phase kinase-associated protein 1 (SKP1), suggesting that LEF-7 acts as a substrate recognition component of SKP1/Cullin/F-box (SCF) complexes for targeted protein polyubiquitination. Site-directed mutagenesis demonstrated that LEF-7's N-terminal F-box is necessary for γ-H2AX repression andAutographa californicamultiple nucleopolyhedrovirus (AcMNPV) replication events. We concluded that LEF-7 expedites virus replication most likely by selective manipulation of one or more host factors regulating the DDR, including γ-H2AX. Thus, our findings indicate that baculoviruses utilize a unique strategy among viruses for hijacking the host DDR by using a newly recognized F-box protein.

scholarly journals Virus DNA Replication and the Host DNA Damage Response

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew D. Weitzman ◽  
Amélie Fradet-Turcotte
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Life Cycles ◽  
Dynamic Interactions ◽  
Dna Damage And Repair ◽  
Dna Viruses ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Cellular Replication ◽  
Cellular Dna

Viral DNA genomes have limited coding capacity and therefore harness cellular factors to facilitate replication of their genomes and generate progeny virions. Studies of viruses and how they interact with cellular processes have historically provided seminal insights into basic biology and disease mechanisms. The replicative life cycles of many DNA viruses have been shown to engage components of the host DNA damage and repair machinery. Viruses have evolved numerous strategies to navigate the cellular DNA damage response. By hijacking and manipulating cellular replication and repair processes, DNA viruses can selectively harness or abrogate distinct components of the cellular machinery to complete their life cycles. Here, we highlight consequences for viral replication and host genome integrity during the dynamic interactions between virus and host.

scholarly journals Endonuclease G promotes autophagy by suppressing mTOR signaling and activating the DNA damage response

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenjun Wang ◽  
Jianshuang Li ◽  
Junyang Tan ◽  
Miaomiao Wang ◽  
Jing Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Glycogen Synthase ◽  
Endonuclease Activity ◽  
Phosphatidylinositol 3 Kinase ◽  
Endonuclease G ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Type 3

AbstractEndonuclease G (ENDOG), a mitochondrial nuclease, is known to participate in many cellular processes, including apoptosis and paternal mitochondrial elimination, while its role in autophagy remains unclear. Here, we report that ENDOG released from mitochondria promotes autophagy during starvation, which we find to be evolutionally conserved across species by performing experiments in human cell lines, mice, Drosophila and C. elegans. Under starvation, Glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta-mediated phosphorylation of ENDOG at Thr-128 and Ser-288 enhances its interaction with 14-3-3γ, which leads to the release of Tuberin (TSC2) and Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase catalytic subunit type 3 (Vps34) from 14-3-3γ, followed by mTOR pathway suppression and autophagy initiation. Alternatively, ENDOG activates DNA damage response and triggers autophagy through its endonuclease activity. Our results demonstrate that ENDOG is a crucial regulator of autophagy, manifested by phosphorylation-mediated interaction with 14-3-3γ, and its endonuclease activity-mediated DNA damage response.

Recent Advances in Therapeutic Application of DNA Damage Response Inhibitors against Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stina George Fernandes ◽  
Prachi Shah ◽  
Ekta Khattar
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Dna Integrity ◽  
Normal Cells ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Environmental Agents ◽  
Genomic Damage ◽  
Sensor Proteins

: DNA integrity is continuously challenged by intrinsic cellular processes and environmental agents. To overcome this genomic damage, cells have developed multiple signaling pathways collectively named as DNA damage response (DDR) and composed of three components: (i) sensor proteins, which detect DNA damage, (ii) mediators that relay the signal downstream and recruit the repair machinery, and (iii) the repair proteins, which restore the damaged DNA. A flawed DDR and failure to repair the damage lead to the accumulation of genetic lesions and increased genomic instability, which is recognized as a hallmark of cancer. Cancer cells tend to harbor increased mutations in DDR genes and often have fewer DDR pathways than normal cells. This makes cancer cells more dependent on particular DDR pathways and thus become more susceptible to compounds inhibiting those pathways compared to normal cells, which have all the DDR pathways intact. Understanding the roles of different DDR proteins in the DNA damage response and repair pathways and identification of their structures have paved the way for the development of their inhibitors as targeted cancer therapy. In this review, we describe the major participants of various DDR pathways, their significance in carcinogenesis, and focus on the inhibitors developed against several key DDR proteins.

A cohesin–RAD21 interactome

2012 ◽  
Vol 442 (3) ◽  
pp. 661-670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anil K. Panigrahi ◽  
Nenggang Zhang ◽  
Subhendu K. Otta ◽  
Debananda Pati
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Protein Modification ◽  
Cohesin Complex ◽  
Cellular Functions ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Nuclear Extracts ◽  
Protein Interactome ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Induced Apoptosis

The cohesin complex holds the sister chromatids together from S-phase until the metaphase-to-anaphase transition, and ensures both their proper cohesion and timely separation. In addition to its canonical function in chromosomal segregation, cohesin has been suggested by several lines of investigation in recent years to play additional roles in apoptosis, DNA-damage response, transcriptional regulation and haematopoiesis. To better understand the basis of the disparate cellular functions of cohesin in these various processes, we have characterized a comprehensive protein interactome of cohesin–RAD21 by using three independent approaches: Y2H (yeast two-hybrid) screening, immunoprecipitation-coupled-MS of cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts from MOLT-4 T-lymphocytes in the presence and absence of etoposide-induced apoptosis, and affinity pull-down assays of chromatographically purified nuclear extracts from pro-apoptotic MOLT-4 cells. Our analyses revealed 112 novel protein interactors of cohesin–RAD21 that function in different cellular processes, including mitosis, regulation of apoptosis, chromosome dynamics, replication, transcription regulation, RNA processing, DNA-damage response, protein modification and degradation, and cytoskeleton and cell motility. Identification of cohesin interactors provides a framework for explaining the various non-canonical functions of the cohesin complex.

scholarly journals ATM: Main Features, Signaling Pathways, and Its Diverse Roles in DNA Damage Response, Tumor Suppression, and Cancer Development

Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 845
Author(s):  
Liem Minh Phan ◽  
Abdol-Hossein Rezaeian
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Signaling Pathways ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Cancer Development ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Cancer Cell Survival

ATM is among of the most critical initiators and coordinators of the DNA-damage response. ATM canonical and non-canonical signaling pathways involve hundreds of downstream targets that control many important cellular processes such as DNA damage repair, apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, metabolism, proliferation, oxidative sensing, among others. Of note, ATM is often considered a major tumor suppressor because of its ability to induce apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. However, in some advanced stage tumor cells, ATM signaling is increased and confers remarkable advantages for cancer cell survival, resistance to radiation and chemotherapy, biosynthesis, proliferation, and metastasis. This review focuses on addressing major characteristics, signaling pathways and especially the diverse roles of ATM in cellular homeostasis and cancer development.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document