scholarly journals Analytical Sensitivity of the Abbott BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag Card

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Garrett A. Perchetti ◽  
Meei-Li Huang ◽  
Margaret G. Mills ◽  
Keith R. Jerome ◽  
Alexander L. Greninger
Keyword(s):  
Reverse Transcription ◽  
Limit Of Detection ◽  
Digital Pcr ◽  
Detection Methods ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Analytical Sensitivity ◽  
Qrt Pcr ◽  
Viral Transport Medium ◽  
Antigen Tests ◽  
Antigen Testing

ABSTRACT Multiple rapid antigen (Ag) tests for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have recently received emergency-use authorization (EUA) from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Although less sensitive than molecular detection methods, rapid antigen testing offers the potential for inexpensive, quick, decentralized testing. Robust analytical sensitivity data in comparison to reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) are currently lacking for many rapid antigen tests. Here, we evaluated the analytical sensitivity of the Abbott BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag card using SARS-CoV-2-positive clinical specimens quantified by reverse transcription-droplet digital PCR (RT-ddPCR) and multiple FDA EUA qRT-PCR platforms using RNA standards. Initial and confirmatory limits of detection for the BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag card were determined to be equivalent to 4.04 × 104 to 8.06 × 104 copies/swab. We further confirmed this limit of detection with 72 additional clinical samples positive for SARS-CoV-2 in either phosphate-buffered saline or viral transport medium. One hundred percent of samples with viral loads of >40,000 copies/swab were detected by rapid antigen testing. These data indicate that the BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag card has an analytical sensitivity approximately equivalent to a generic qRT-PCR cycle threshold (CT) value of 29 to 30.

scholarly journals Application of One-Step Reverse Transcription Droplet Digital PCR for Dengue Virus Detection and Quantification in Clinical Specimens

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 639
Author(s):  
Dumrong Mairiang ◽  
Adisak Songjaeng ◽  
Prachya Hansuealueang ◽  
Yuwares Malila ◽  
Paphavee Lertsethtakarn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dengue Virus ◽  
Lower Limit ◽  
Reverse Transcription ◽  
Limit Of Detection ◽  
Digital Pcr ◽  
Droplet Digital Pcr ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Qrt Pcr ◽  
One Step ◽  
Detection And Quantification

Detection and quantification of viruses in laboratory and clinical samples are standard assays in dengue virus (DENV) studies. The quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) is considered to be the standard for DENV detection and quantification due to its high sensitivity. However, qRT-PCR offers only quantification relative to a standard curve and consists of several “in-house” components resulting in interlaboratory variations. We developed and optimized a protocol for applying one-step RT-droplet digital PCR (RT-ddPCR) for DENV detection and quantification. The lower limit of detection (LLOD95) and the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) for RT-ddPCR were estimated to be 1.851 log10-copies/reaction and 2.337 log10-copies/reaction, respectively. The sensitivity of RT-ddPCR was found to be superior to qRT-PCR (94.87% vs. 90.38%, p = 0.039) while no false positives were detected. Quantification of DENV in clinical samples was independently performed in three laboratories showing interlaboratory variations with biases <0.5 log10-copies/mL. The RT-ddPCR protocol presented here could help harmonize DENV quantification results and improve findings in the field such as identifying a DENV titer threshold correlating with disease severity.

scholarly journals Clinical Validation of Automated and Rapid mariPOC SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juha M. Koskinen ◽  
Petri Antikainen ◽  
Kristina Hotakainen ◽  
Anu Haveri ◽  
Niina Ikonen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Limit Of Detection ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
High Capacity ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽  
Analytical Sensitivity ◽  
Clinical Sensitivity ◽  
Qrt Pcr ◽  
Antigen Tests ◽  
Novel Coronavirus

ABSTRACTNovel SARS coronavirus causing COVID-19 was recognized in late 2019. Diagnostics was quickly ramped up worldwide based on the detection of viral RNA. Based on the scientific knowledge for pre-existing coronaviruses, it was expected that the RNA of this novel coronavirus will be detected at significant rates from symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals due to existence of non-infectious RNA. To increase the efficacy of diagnostics, surveillance, screening and pandemic control, rapid methods, such as antigen tests, are needed for decentralized testing and to assess infectiousness. The objectives were to verify analytical sensitivity and specificity, and assess the clinical sensitivity, specificity and usability of a novel automated mariPOC SARS-CoV-2 test based on sophisticated optical laser technology detecting viral structure proteins. Analytical performance was verified using bacterial and viral preparations. Clinical performance of the test was evaluated against qRT-PCR in a retrospective study with nasopharyngeal swab specimens (N=211) collected from symptomatic patients suspected of acute SARS-CoV-2 infections. Sensitivity and specificity of the mariPOC test were 92.3% (12/13) and 100.0% (198/198), respectively. The test’s limit of detection was 22 PFU/test and it had no cross-reactions with the tested respiratory microbes. Our study shows that the mariPOC can detect infectious individuals already in 20 minutes while clinical sensitivity close to qRT-PCR is achieved in two hours or less. The test targets conserved epitopes of SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein, making it robust against strain variations. The new test is a promising and versatile tool for syndromic testing of symptomatic cases and for high capacity infection control screening.

scholarly journals Fast Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA Directly from Respiratory Samples Using a Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) Test

Viruses ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 801
Author(s):  
Olympia E. Anastasiou ◽  
Caroline Holtkamp ◽  
Miriam Schäfer ◽  
Frieda Schön ◽  
Anna Maria Eis-Hübinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Value ◽  
Lamp Assay ◽  
Detection Methods ◽  
Analytical Sensitivity ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Viral Transport Medium ◽  
Rapid Tests ◽  
Sous Vide ◽  
Antigen Tests ◽  
Isothermal Assay

The availability of simple SARS-CoV-2 detection methods is crucial to contain the COVID-19 pandemic. This study examined whether a commercial LAMP assay can reliably detect SARS-CoV-2 genomes directly in respiratory samples without having to extract nucleic acids (NA) beforehand. Nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS, n = 220) were tested by real-time reverse transcription (RT)-PCR and with the LAMP assay. For RT-PCR, NA were investigated. For LAMP, NA from 26 NPS in viral transport medium (VTM) were tested. The other 194 NPS were analyzed directly without prior NA extraction (140 samples in VTM; 54 dry swab samples stirred in phosphate buffered saline). Ten NPS were tested directly by LAMP using a sous-vide cooking unit. The isothermal assay demonstrated excellent specificity (100%) but moderate sensitivity (68.8%), with a positive predictive value of 1 and a negative predictive value of 0.65 for direct testing of NPS in VTM. The use of dry swabs, even without NA extraction, improved the analytical sensitivity; up to 6% of samples showed signs of inhibition. LAMP could be performed successfully with a sous-vide cooking unit. This technique is very fast, requires little laboratory resources, and can replace rapid antigen tests or verify reactive rapid tests on-site.

scholarly journals Building-Level Wastewater Monitoring for COVID-19 Using Tampon Swabs and RT-LAMP for Rapid SARS-Cov-2 RNA Detection

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Bivins ◽  
Megan Lott ◽  
Marlee Shaffer ◽  
Zhenyu Wu ◽  
Devin North ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reverse Transcription ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Limit Of Detection ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Digital Pcr ◽  
Analytical Sensitivity ◽  
Clinical Testing ◽  
Predictive Capacity ◽  
Gene Copies ◽  
Building Level

Community-level wastewater monitoring for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA has demonstrated useful correlation with both coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) case numbers and clinical testing positivity. Wastewater monitoring on college campuses has demonstrated promising predictive capacity for the presence and absence of COVID-19 cases. However, to date, such monitoring has largely relied upon composite or grab samples and reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) techniques, which limits the accessibility and scalability of wastewater monitoring. In this study, we piloted a workflow that uses tampons as passive swabs for collection and reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater. Results for the developed workflow were available same day, with a time to result following tampon swab collection of approximately three hours. The RT-LAMP 95% limit of detection (76 gene copies reaction-1) was greater than RT-droplet digital PCR (ddPCR; 3.3 gene copies reaction-1). Nonetheless, during a building-level wastewater monitoring campaign conducted in the midst of weekly clinical testing of all students, the workflow demonstrated a same-day positive predictive value (PPV) of 33% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 80% for incident COVID-19 cases. The NPV is comparable to that reported by wastewater monitoring using RT-qPCR. These observations suggest that even with lower analytical sensitivity the tampon swab and RT-LAMP workflow offers a cost-effective and rapid approach that could be leveraged for scalable same-day building-level wastewater monitoring for COVID-19.

A prospective nationwide observational study of agreement of antigen tests on oral pharyngeal swabs or less invasive testing with RT-qPCR, for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in adults: Protocol description (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uffe Vest Schneider ◽  
Jenny Dahl Knudsen ◽  
Anders Koch ◽  
Nikolai Søren Kirkby ◽  
Jan Gorm Lisby
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Intervals ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Lateral Flow ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Sampling Location ◽  
Analytical Sensitivity ◽  
Clinical Sensitivity ◽  
Antigen Tests

BACKGROUND The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has resulted in an unprecedented level of world-wide testing for epidemiologic and diagnostic purposes, and due to the extreme need for tests, the gold standard reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) testing capacity has been unable to meet the overall global testing demand. Consequently, although current literature has shown the sensitivity of rapid antigen tests (RATs) to be inferior to RT-qPCR, RATs have been implemented on a large scale without solid data on performance. OBJECTIVE This study will compare analytical and clinical sensitivities and specificities of 50 lateral flow or laboratory based RATs and three Strand Invasion Based Amplification (SIBA)-rt-PCR tests from 30 manufacturers to RT-qPCR on samples obtained from the deep oropharynx. In addition, the study will compare sensitivities and specificities of the included RATs as well as RT-qPCR on clinical samples obtained from the deep oropharynx, anterior nasal cavity, saliva, deep nasopharynx and expired air to RT-qPCR from deep oropharyngeal samples. METHODS In the prospective part of the study, 200 individuals found SARS-CoV-2 positive and 200 individuals found SARS-CoV-2 negative by routine RT-qPCR testing will be re-tested with each RAT applying RT-qPCR as the reference method. In the retrospective part of the study, 304 deep oropharyngeal cavity swabs divided into four groups based on RT-qPCR Cq levels will be tested by each RAT. RESULTS The results will be reported in several manuscripts with different aims. The first manuscript will report retrospective (analytical sensitivity, overall and stratified into different Cq range groups) and prospective (clinical sensitivity) data for RATs with RT-qPCR results as the reference method. The second manuscript will report results for RAT based on anatomical sampling location. The third manuscript will compare different anatomical sampling locations by RT-qPCR testing. The fourth manuscript will focus on RATs that rely on central laboratory testing. Test from four different manufactures will be compared for analytical performance data on retrospective deep oropharyngeal swab samples. The fifth manuscript will report the results of four RATs applied both as professional use and as self-test. The last manuscript will report the results from two breath tests participating in the study. Comparison of sensitivity and specificity between RATs will be done using McNemar for paired samples and chi-squared test for unpaired samples. Comparison of PPV and NPV between RATs will be done by bootstrap test. 95 % confidence intervals for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value are calculated as bootstrap confidence intervals CONCLUSIONS The study will compare the sensitivities of a large number of RATs for SARS-CoV-2 compared to RT-qPCR and will address whether lateral flow based RATs test differ significantly from laboratory based RATS. The anatomical test location for both RAT and RT-qPCR will be compared. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04913116

scholarly journals Rapid and Extraction-Free Detection of SARS-CoV-2 from Saliva by Colorimetric Reverse-Transcription Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew A Lalli ◽  
Joshua S Langmade ◽  
Xuhua Chen ◽  
Catrina C Fronick ◽  
Christopher S Sawyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reverse Transcription ◽  
Limit Of Detection ◽  
Colorimetric Assay ◽  
Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Rna Extraction ◽  
Lamp Assay ◽  
Isothermal Amplification ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Viral Detection ◽  
Loop Mediated Isothermal Amplification

Abstract Background Rapid, reliable, and widespread testing is required to curtail the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Current gold-standard nucleic acid tests are hampered by supply shortages in critical reagents including nasal swabs, RNA extraction kits, personal protective equipment, instrumentation, and labor. Methods To overcome these challenges, we developed a rapid colorimetric assay using reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) optimized on human saliva samples without an RNA purification step. We describe the optimization of saliva pretreatment protocols to enable analytically sensitive viral detection by RT-LAMP. We optimized the RT-LAMP reaction conditions and implemented high-throughput unbiased methods for assay interpretation. We tested whether saliva pretreatment could also enable viral detection by conventional reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Finally, we validated these assays on clinical samples. Results The optimized saliva pretreatment protocol enabled analytically sensitive extraction-free detection of SARS-CoV-2 from saliva by colorimetric RT-LAMP or RT-qPCR. In simulated samples, the optimized RT-LAMP assay had a limit of detection of 59 (95% confidence interval: 44–104) particle copies per reaction. We highlighted the flexibility of LAMP assay implementation using 3 readouts: naked-eye colorimetry, spectrophotometry, and real-time fluorescence. In a set of 30 clinical saliva samples, colorimetric RT-LAMP and RT-qPCR assays performed directly on pretreated saliva samples without RNA extraction had accuracies greater than 90%. Conclusions Rapid and extraction-free detection of SARS-CoV-2 from saliva by colorimetric RT-LAMP is a simple, sensitive, and cost-effective approach with broad potential to expand diagnostic testing for the virus causing COVID-19.

A novel duplex ddPCR assay for the diagnosis of schistosomiasis japonica: proof of concept in an experimental mouse model

Parasitology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 144 (8) ◽  
pp. 1005-1015 ◽  
Author(s):  
KOSALA G. WEERAKOON ◽  
CATHERINE A. GORDON ◽  
PENGFEI CAI ◽  
GEOFFREY N. GOBERT ◽  
MARY DUKE ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mouse Model ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Digital Pcr ◽  
Disease Diagnosis ◽  
World Health ◽  
Schistosomiasis Japonica ◽  
Detection Methods ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Additional Tool

SUMMARYThe current World Health Organization strategic plan targets the elimination of schistosomiasis as a public health problem by 2025 and accurate diagnostics will play a pivotal role in achieving this goal. DNA-based detection methods provide a viable alternative to some of the commonly used tests, notably microscopy and serology, for the diagnosis of schistosomiasis. The detection of parasite cell-free DNA in different clinical samples is a recent valuable advance, which provides significant benefits for accurate disease diagnosis. Here we validated a novel duplex droplet digital PCR assay for the diagnosis of Chinese (SjC) and Philippine (SjP) strains of Schistosoma japonicum infection in a mouse model. The assay proved applicable for both SjC and SjP infections and capable of detecting infection at a very early intra-mammalian stage in conveniently obtainable samples (urine and saliva) as well as in serum and feces. The target DNA copy numbers obtained in the assay showed a positive correlation with the infection burden assessed by direct traditional parasitology. The potential to detect parasite DNA in urine and saliva has important practical implications for large-scale epidemiological screening programmes in the future, particularly in terms of logistical convenience, and the assay has the potential to be a valuable additional tool for the diagnosis of schistosomiasis japonica.

scholarly journals Rapid isothermal amplification and portable detection system for SARS-CoV-2

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (37) ◽  
pp. 22727-22735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anurup Ganguli ◽  
Ariana Mostafa ◽  
Jacob Berger ◽  
Mehmet Y. Aydin ◽  
Fu Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Limit Of Detection ◽  
Detection System ◽  
Alternative Pathway ◽  
Rna Extraction ◽  
Lamp Assay ◽  
Isothermal Amplification ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Complete Agreement ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Viral Transport Medium

The COVID-19 pandemic provides an urgent example where a gap exists between availability of state-of-the-art diagnostics and current needs. As assay protocols and primer sequences become widely known, many laboratories perform diagnostic tests using methods such as RT-PCR or reverse transcription loop mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP). Here, we report an RT-LAMP isothermal assay for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus and demonstrate the assay on clinical samples using a simple and accessible point-of-care (POC) instrument. We characterized the assay by dipping swabs into synthetic nasal fluid spiked with the virus, moving the swab to viral transport medium (VTM), and sampling a volume of the VTM to perform the RT-LAMP assay without an RNA extraction kit. The assay has a limit of detection (LOD) of 50 RNA copies per μL in the VTM solution within 30 min. We further demonstrate our assay by detecting SARS-CoV-2 viruses from 20 clinical samples. Finally, we demonstrate a portable and real-time POC device to detect SARS-CoV-2 from VTM samples using an additively manufactured three-dimensional cartridge and a smartphone-based reader. The POC system was tested using 10 clinical samples, and was able to detect SARS-CoV-2 from these clinical samples by distinguishing positive samples from negative samples after 30 min. The POC tests are in complete agreement with RT-PCR controls. This work demonstrates an alternative pathway for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics that does not require conventional laboratory infrastructure, in settings where diagnosis is required at the point of sample collection.

scholarly journals RT-qPCR and RT-Digital PCR: A Comparison of Different Platforms for the Evaluation of Residual Disease in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 525-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Alikian ◽  
Alexandra S Whale ◽  
Susanna Akiki ◽  
Kim Piechocki ◽  
Celia Torrado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Reverse Transcription ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Fusion Transcript ◽  
Digital Pcr ◽  
Analytical Sensitivity

Abstract BACKGROUND Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the cornerstone of successful clinical management of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Quantitative monitoring of the percentage of the fusion transcript BCR-ABL1 (breakpoint cluster region–c-abl oncogene 1, non-receptor tyrosine kinase) BCR-ABL1IS (%BCR-ABL1IS) by reverse transcription–quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) is the gold standard strategy for evaluating patient response to TKIs and classification into prognostic subgroups. However, this approach can be challenging to perform in a reproducible manner. Reverse-transcription digital PCR (RT-dPCR) is an adaptation of this method that could provide the robust and standardized workflow needed for truly standardized patient stratification. METHODS BCR-ABL1 and ABL1 transcript copy numbers were quantified in a total of 102 samples; 70 CML patients undergoing TKI therapy and 32 non-CML individuals. 3 commercially available digital PCR platforms (QS3D, QX200 and Raindrop) were compared with the platform routinely used in the clinic for RT-qPCR using the EAC (Europe Against Cancer) assay. RESULTS Measurements on all instruments correlated well when the %BCR-ABL1IS was ≥0.1%. In patients with residual disease below this level, greater variations were measured both within and between instruments limiting comparable performance to a 4 log dynamic range. CONCLUSIONS RT-dPCR was able to quantify low-level BCR-ABL1 transcript copies but was unable to improve sensitivity below the level of detection achieved by RT-qPCR. However, RT-dPCR was able to perform these sensitive measurements without use of a calibration curve. Adaptions to the protocol to increase the amount of RNA measured are likely to be necessary to improve the analytical sensitivity of BCR-ABL testing on a dPCR platform.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document