scholarly journals Role for Homodimerization in Growth Deregulation by E2a Fusion Proteins

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (16) ◽  
pp. 5789-5796 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Bayly ◽  
David P. LeBrun
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Fusion Proteins ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Chromosomal Translocation ◽  
Early Observation ◽  
Focus Formation ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain

ABSTRACT The oncogenic transcription factor E2a-Pbx1 is expressed in some cases of acute lymphoblastic leukemia as a result of chromosomal translocation 1;19. The early observation that E2a-Pbx1 incorporates transcriptional activation domains from E2a and a DNA-binding homeodomain from Pbx1 inspired a model in which E2a-Pbx1 promotes leukemogenic transformation of lymphoid progenitor cells through transcriptional induction of target genes defined by the Pbx1 portion of the molecule. However, the subsequent demonstration that the only known DNA-binding module on the molecule, the Pbx1 homeodomain, is dispensable for the induction of lymphoblastic lymphoma in transgenic mice called into question the contribution made by the Pbx1 portion. In this study, we have used a domain swap approach coupled with a fibroblast-based focus formation assay to evaluate further the requirement for PBX1-encoded peptide elements in growth deregulation by E2a-Pbx1. No impairment of focus formation was observed when the entire Pbx1 portion was replaced with DNA-binding/dimerization domains derived from yeast transcription factor GAL4 or GCN4. Furthermore, replacement of Pbx1 with tandem FKBP domains that mediate homodimerization in the presence of a synthetic ligand led to striking growth deregulation exclusively in the presence of the dimerizing agent. N-terminal elements encoded by E2A, including the AD1 transcriptional activation domain, were required for dimerization-induced focus formation. We conclude that transcriptional target genes defined by heterologous C-terminal DNA-binding modules are not required in growth deregulation by E2a fusion proteins. We speculate that interactions between N-terminal E2a elements and undefined proteins that could function as components of a transcriptional coactivator complex may be more important.

scholarly journals Histone deacetylase 3 preferentially binds and collaborates with the transcription factor RUNX1 to repress AML1–ETO–dependent transcription in t(8;21) AML

2020 ◽  
Vol 295 (13) ◽  
pp. 4212-4223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun Guo ◽  
Jian Li ◽  
Nickolas Steinauer ◽  
Madeline Wong ◽  
Brent Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Fusion Protein ◽  
Histone Deacetylase ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Chromosomal Translocation ◽  
Histone Deacetylase 3 ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Related Transcription Factor ◽  
Almost All

In up to 15% of acute myeloid leukemias (AMLs), a recurring chromosomal translocation, termed t(8;21), generates the AML1–eight–twenty-one (ETO) leukemia fusion protein, which contains the DNA-binding domain of Runt-related transcription factor 1 (RUNX1) and almost all of ETO. RUNX1 and the AML1–ETO fusion protein are coexpressed in t(8;21) AML cells and antagonize each other's gene-regulatory functions. AML1–ETO represses transcription of RUNX1 target genes by competitively displacing RUNX1 and recruiting corepressors such as histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3). Recent studies have shown that AML1–ETO and RUNX1 co-occupy the binding sites of AML1–ETO–activated genes. How this joined binding allows RUNX1 to antagonize AML1–ETO–mediated transcriptional activation is unclear. Here we show that RUNX1 functions as a bona fide repressor of transcription activated by AML1–ETO. Mechanistically, we show that RUNX1 is a component of the HDAC3 corepressor complex and that HDAC3 preferentially binds to RUNX1 rather than to AML1–ETO in t(8;21) AML cells. Studying the regulation of interleukin-8 (IL8), a newly identified AML1–ETO–activated gene, we demonstrate that RUNX1 and HDAC3 collaboratively repress AML1–ETO–dependent transcription, a finding further supported by results of genome-wide analyses of AML1–ETO–activated genes. These and other results from the genome-wide studies also have important implications for the mechanistic understanding of gene-specific coactivator and corepressor functions across the AML1–ETO/RUNX1 cistrome.

scholarly journals Determination of the consensus DNA-binding sequence and a transcriptional activation domain for ESE-2

2006 ◽  
Vol 398 (3) ◽  
pp. 497-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeon Sook Choi ◽  
Satrajit Sinha
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Activation Domain ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain ◽  
Ets Proteins ◽  
Flanking Sequences ◽  
Binding Sequence

The ESE (epithelium-specific Ets) subfamily of Ets transcription factors plays an important role in regulating gene expression in a variety of epithelial cell types. Although ESE proteins have been shown to bind to regulatory elements of some epithelial genes, the optimal DNA-binding sequence has not been experimentally ascertained for any member of the ESE subfamily of transcription factors. This has made the identification and validation of their targets difficult. We are studying ESE-2 (Elf5), which is highly expressed in epithelial cells of many tissues including skin keratinocytes. Here, we identify the preferred DNA-binding site of ESE-2 by performing CASTing (cyclic amplification and selection of targets) experiments. Our analysis shows that the optimal ESE-2 consensus motif consists of a GGA core and an AT-rich 5′- and 3′-flanking sequences. Mutational and competition experiments demonstrate that the flanking sequences that confer high DNA-binding affinity for ESE-2 show considerable differences from the known consensus DNA-binding sites of other Ets proteins, thus reinforcing the idea that the flanking sequences may impart recognition specificity for Ets proteins. In addition, we have identified a novel isoform of murine ESE-2, ESE-2L, that is generated by use of a hitherto unreported new exon and an alternate promoter. Interestingly, transient transfection assays with an optimal ESE-2 responsive reporter show that both ESE-2 and ESE-2L are weak transactivators. However, similar studies utilizing GAL4 chimaeras of ESE-2 demonstrate that while the DNA-binding ETS (E twenty-six) domain functions as a repressor, the PNT (pointed domain) of ESE-2 can act as a potent transcriptional activation domain. This novel transactivating property of PNT is also shared by ESE-3, another ESE family member. Identification of the ESE-2 consensus site and characterization of the transcriptional activation properties of ESE-2 shed new light on its potential as a regulator of target genes.

scholarly journals Stress-induced binding of the transcriptional factor CHOP to a novel DNA control element.

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 1479-1489 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Ubeda ◽  
X Z Wang ◽  
H Zinszner ◽  
I Wu ◽  
J F Habener ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Control Element ◽  
Core Element ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Activity ◽  
Basic Region

CHOP (GADD153) is a mammalian nuclear protein that dimerizes with members of the C/EBP family of transcriptional factors. Absent under normal conditions, CHOP is induced by the stress encountered during nutrient deprivation, the acute-phase response, and treatment of cells with certain toxins. The basic region of CHOP deviates considerably in sequence from that of other C/EBP proteins, and CHOP-C/EBP heterodimers are incapable of binding to a common class of C/EBP sites. With respect to such sites, CHOP serves as an inhibitor of the activity of C/EBP proteins. However, recent studies indicate that certain functions of CHOP, such as the induction of growth arrest by overexpression of the wild-type protein and oncogenic transformation by the TLS-CHOP fusion protein, require an intact basic region, suggesting that DNA binding by CHOP may be implicated in these activities. In this study an in vitro PCR-based selection assay was used to identify sequences bound by CHOP-C/EBP dimers. These sequences were found to contain a unique core element PuPuPuTGCAAT(A/C)CCC. Competition in DNA-binding assays, DNase 1 footprint analysis, and methylation interference demonstrate that the binding is sequence specific. Deletions in the basic region of CHOP lead to a loss of DNA binding, suggesting that CHOP participates in this process. Stress induction in NIH 3T3 cells leads to the appearance of CHOP-containing DNA-binding activity. CHOP is found to contain a transcriptional activation domain which is inducible by cellular stress, lending further support to the notion that the protein can function as a positively acting transcription factor. We conclude that CHOP may serve a dual role both as an inhibitor of the ability of C/EBP proteins to activate some target genes and as a direct activator of others.

scholarly journals Cooperative interactions between HOX and PBX proteins mediated by a conserved peptide motif.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 3989-3997 ◽  
Author(s):  
M L Phelan ◽  
I Rambaldi ◽  
M S Featherstone
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Cooperative Interaction ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain ◽  
Conserved Sequence ◽  
Dna Binding Activity ◽  
Group Protein

Homeoprotein products of the Hox/HOM gene family pattern the animal embryo through the transcriptional regulation of target genes. We have previously shown that the labial group protein HOXA-1 has intrinsically weak DNA-binding activity due to residues in the N-terminal arm of its homeodomain (M. L. Phelan, R. Sadoul, and M. S. Featherstone, Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:5066-5075, 1994). This observation, among others, suggests that HOX and HOM proteins require cofactors for stable interactions with DNA. We have demonstrated that a putative HOX cofactor, PBX1A, participates in cooperative DNA binding with HOXA-1 and the Deformed group protein HOXD-4. Three Abdominal-B class HOX proteins failed to cooperate with PBX1A. We mapped the interacting domain of HOXD-4 to the YPWMK pentapeptide motif, a conserved sequence found N terminal to the homeodomain of HOXA-1 and many other homeoproteins but absent from the Abdominal-B class. The naturally occurring fusion of the transcriptional activation domain of E2A with PBX1 creates an oncoprotein implicated in human pre-B-cell leukemias (M. P. Kamps, C. Murre, X.-H. Sun, and D. Baltimore, Cell 60:547-555, 1990; J. Nourse, J. D. Mellentin, N. Galili, J. Wilkinson, E. Starbridge, S. D. Smith, and M. L. Cleary, Cell 60:535-545, 1990). A pentapeptide mutation that abolished cooperative interaction with PBX1A in vitro also abrogated synergistic transcriptional activation with the E2A/PBX oncoprotein. The direct contact of PBX family members by the HOX pentapeptide is likely to play an important role in developmental and oncogenic processes.

scholarly journals Temperature-dependent regulation of a heterologous transcriptional activation domain fused to yeast heat shock transcription factor.

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 1021-1030 ◽  
Author(s):  
J J Bonner ◽  
S Heyward ◽  
D L Fackenthal
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Heat Shock ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Heat Shock Transcription Factor ◽  
Temperature Dependent ◽  
Activation Domain ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain ◽  
Vp16 Fusion

The heat shock transcription factor (HSF) of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is posttranslationally modified. At low growth temperatures, it activates transcription of heat shock genes only poorly; after shift to high temperatures, it activates transcription readily. In an effort to elucidate the mechanism of this regulation, we constructed a series of HSF-VP16 fusions that join the HSF DNA-binding domain to the strong transcriptional activation domain from the VP16 gene of herpes simplex virus. Replacement of the endogenous C-terminal transcriptional activation domain with that of VP16 generates an HSF derivative that exhibits behavior reminiscent of HSF itself: low transcriptional activation activity at normal growth temperature and high activity after heat shock. HSF can thus restrain the activity of the heterologous VP16 transcriptional activation domain. To determine what is required for repression of activity at low temperature, we deleted portions of HSF from this HSF-VP16 fusion to map the regulatory domain. We also isolated point mutations that convert the HSF-VP16 fusion into a constitutive transcriptional activator. We conclude that the central, evolutionarily conserved domain of HSF, encompassing the DNA-binding and multimerization domains, contains a major determinant of temperature-dependent regulation.

Temperature-dependent regulation of a heterologous transcriptional activation domain fused to yeast heat shock transcription factor

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 1021-1030
Author(s):  
J J Bonner ◽  
S Heyward ◽  
D L Fackenthal
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Heat Shock ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Heat Shock Transcription Factor ◽  
Temperature Dependent ◽  
Activation Domain ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain ◽  
Vp16 Fusion

The heat shock transcription factor (HSF) of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is posttranslationally modified. At low growth temperatures, it activates transcription of heat shock genes only poorly; after shift to high temperatures, it activates transcription readily. In an effort to elucidate the mechanism of this regulation, we constructed a series of HSF-VP16 fusions that join the HSF DNA-binding domain to the strong transcriptional activation domain from the VP16 gene of herpes simplex virus. Replacement of the endogenous C-terminal transcriptional activation domain with that of VP16 generates an HSF derivative that exhibits behavior reminiscent of HSF itself: low transcriptional activation activity at normal growth temperature and high activity after heat shock. HSF can thus restrain the activity of the heterologous VP16 transcriptional activation domain. To determine what is required for repression of activity at low temperature, we deleted portions of HSF from this HSF-VP16 fusion to map the regulatory domain. We also isolated point mutations that convert the HSF-VP16 fusion into a constitutive transcriptional activator. We conclude that the central, evolutionarily conserved domain of HSF, encompassing the DNA-binding and multimerization domains, contains a major determinant of temperature-dependent regulation.

scholarly journals Assembly of the Hap2p/Hap3p/Hap4p/Hap5p-DNA Complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2005 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. 1829-1839 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. McNabb ◽  
Inés Pinto
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Dna Interactions ◽  
Activation Domain ◽  
Binding Factor ◽  
Protein Dna Interactions ◽  
Dna Complex

ABSTRACT The CCAAT-binding factor (CBF) is an evolutionarily conserved multimeric transcriptional activator in eukaryotes. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the CCAAT-binding factor is composed of four subunits, termed Hap2p, Hap3p, Hap4p, and Hap5p. The Hap2p/Hap3p/Hap5p heterotrimer is the DNA-binding component of the complex that binds to the consensus 5′-CCAAT-3′ sequence in the promoter of target genes. The Hap4p subunit contains the transcriptional activation domain necessary for stimulating transcription after interacting with Hap2p/Hap3p/Hap5p. In this report, we demonstrate that Hap2p, Hap3p, and Hap5p assemble via a one-step pathway requiring all three subunits simultaneously, as opposed to the mammalian CCAAT-binding factor which has been shown to assemble via a two-step pathway with CBF-A (Hap3p homolog) and CBF-C (Hap5p homolog) forming a stable dimer before CBF-B (Hap2p homolog) can interact. We have also found that the interaction of Hap4p with Hap2p/Hap3p/Hap5p requires DNA binding as a prerequisite. To further understand the protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions of this transcription factor, we identified the minimal domain of Hap4p necessary for interaction with the Hap2p/Hap3p/Hap5p-DNA complex, and we demonstrate that this domain is sufficient to complement the respiratory deficiency of a hap4Δ mutant and activate transcription when fused with the VP16 activation domain. These studies provide a further understanding of the assembly of the yeast CCAAT-binding factor at target promoters and raise a number of questions concerning the protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions of this multisubunit transcription factor.

scholarly journals Structural basis of CBP/p300 recruitment in leukemia induction by E2A-PBX1

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (19) ◽  
pp. 3968-3977 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher M. Denis ◽  
Seth Chitayat ◽  
Michael J. Plevin ◽  
Feng Wang ◽  
Patrick Thompson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Chromosomal Translocation ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
E Proteins ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain ◽  
E Protein ◽  
Protein Encoding ◽  
Structural Details ◽  
Kix Domain

Abstract E-proteins are critical transcription factors in B-cell lymphopoiesis. E2A, 1 of 3 E-protein–encoding genes, is implicated in the induction of acute lymphoblastic leukemia through its involvement in the chromosomal translocation 1;19 and consequent expression of the E2A-PBX1 oncoprotein. An interaction involving a region within the N-terminal transcriptional activation domain of E2A-PBX1, termed the PCET motif, which has previously been implicated in E-protein silencing, and the KIX domain of the transcriptional coactivator CBP/p300, critical for leukemogenesis. However, the structural details of this interaction remain unknown. Here we report the structure of a 1:1 complex between PCET motif peptide and the KIX domain. Residues throughout the helical PCET motif that contact the KIX domain are important for both binding KIX and bone marrow immortalization by E2A-PBX1. These results provide molecular insights into E-protein–driven differentiation of B-cells and the mechanism of E-protein silencing, and reveal the PCET/KIX interaction as a therapeutic target for E2A-PBX1–induced leukemia.

DNA-binding and transcriptional regulatory properties of hepatic leukemia factor (HLF) and the t(17;19) acute lymphoblastic leukemia chimera E2A-HLF

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 5986-5996
Author(s):  
S P Hunger ◽  
R Brown ◽  
M L Cleary
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Consensus Sequence ◽  
Reporter Genes ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Basic Leucine Zipper

The t(17;19) translocation in acute lymphoblastic leukemias results in creation of E2A-hepatic leukemia factor (HLF) chimeric proteins that contain the DNA-binding and protein dimerization domains of the basic leucine zipper (bZIP) protein HLF fused to a portion of E2A proteins with transcriptional activation properties. An in vitro binding site selection procedure was used to determine DNA sequences preferentially bound by wild-type HLF and chimeric E2A-HLF proteins isolated from various t(17;19)-bearing leukemias. All were found to selectively bind the consensus sequence 5'-GTTACGTAAT-3' with high affinity. Wild-type and chimeric HLF proteins also bound closely related sites identified previously for bZIP proteins of both the proline- and acidic amino acid-rich (PAR) and C/EBP subfamilies; however, E2A-HLF proteins were significantly less tolerant of certain deviations from the HLF consensus binding site. These differences were directly attributable to loss of an HLF ancillary DNA-binding domain in all E2A-HLF chimeras and were further exacerbated by a zipper mutation in one isolate. Both wild-type and chimeric HLF proteins displayed transcriptional activator properties in lymphoid and nonlymphoid cells on reporter genes containing HLF or C/EBP consensus binding sites. But on reporter genes with nonoptimal binding sites, their transcriptional properties diverged and E2A-HLF competitively inhibited activation by wild-type PAR proteins. These findings establish a spectrum of binding site-specific transcriptional properties for E2A-HLF which may preferentially activate expression of select subordinate genes as a homodimer and potentially antagonize expression of others through heteromeric interactions.

Reconstitution of transcriptional activation domains by reiteration of short peptide segments reveals the modular organization of a glutamine-rich activation domain

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 6056-6067
Author(s):  
M Tanaka ◽  
W Herr
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Activation Domain ◽  
Activation Domains ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain ◽  
Pou Domain

The POU domain activator Oct-2 contains an N-terminal glutamine-rich transcriptional activation domain. An 18-amino-acid segment (Q18III) from this region reconstituted a fully functional activation domain when tandemly reiterated and fused to either the Oct-2 or GAL4 DNA-binding domain. A minimal transcriptional activation domain likely requires three tandem Q18III segments, because one or two tandem Q18III segments displayed little activity, whereas three to five tandem segments were active and displayed increasing activity with increasing copy number. As with natural Oct-2 activation domains, in our assay a reiterated activation domain required a second homologous or heterologous activation domain to stimulate transcription effectively when fused to the Oct-2 POU domain. These results suggest that there are different levels of synergy within and among activation domains. Analysis of reiterated activation domains containing mutated Q18III segments revealed that leucines and glutamines, but not serines or threonines, are critical for activity in vivo. Curiously, several reiterated activation domains that were inactive in vivo were active in vitro, suggesting that there are significant functional differences in our in vivo and in vitro assays. Reiteration of a second 18-amino-acid segment from the Oct-2 glutamine-rich activation domain (Q18II) was also active, but its activity was DNA-binding domain specific, because it was active when fused to the GAL4 than to the Oct-2 DNA-binding domain. The ability of separate short peptide segments derived from a single transcriptional activation domain to activate transcription after tandem reiteration emphasizes the flexible and modular nature of a transcriptional activation domain.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document